I completely disagree, those are considered good writers. Like Jordan once said, "million dollar move, but 10 cent shot." You can contiue to have the best write up and analysis time and time again, but if your plays don't hit your not a good capper. If a person is able to provide winners consistently with no write up they are considered a good capper because it is not a coincidence they continue to win. They obviously have a formula that works, but either don't have the time or even care to explain their pick in a write up.
I completely disagree, those are considered good writers. Like Jordan once said, "million dollar move, but 10 cent shot." You can contiue to have the best write up and analysis time and time again, but if your plays don't hit your not a good capper. If a person is able to provide winners consistently with no write up they are considered a good capper because it is not a coincidence they continue to win. They obviously have a formula that works, but either don't have the time or even care to explain their pick in a write up.
I'm not saying you follow their plays, in fact, I don't follow others' plays either, but my point is a good write up doesn't make someone a good capper. This just means a person is a good writer/researcher. IMO a good capper is determined by consistently providing winners.
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
