He won a game on 3/3/08 and then didn't pick a game until 3/16----13 DAYS, but the streak continues????? thew rules say 7 days. Hasn't anyone noticed this? He should have a 10 game win strak only. What's up?||confused.gif' border=0>||an_shake.gif' border=0>
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
He won a game on 3/3/08 and then didn't pick a game until 3/16----13 DAYS, but the streak continues????? thew rules say 7 days. Hasn't anyone noticed this? He should have a 10 game win strak only. What's up?||confused.gif' border=0>||an_shake.gif' border=0>
I am not trying to be an ass, but I agree with espnzoneboy..... The rules are the rules and his streak should be at 10 rather than 13.... It makes you wonder if the wagerline-team even pays attention to anything on here. Even calls into question the legitimacy of the site if they aren't even able to follow their own rules lol..... Come on W-L team : p
0
I am not trying to be an ass, but I agree with espnzoneboy..... The rules are the rules and his streak should be at 10 rather than 13.... It makes you wonder if the wagerline-team even pays attention to anything on here. Even calls into question the legitimacy of the site if they aren't even able to follow their own rules lol..... Come on W-L team : p
Hey, Chadnail, not to change the topic, but You think the X-men can beat UCLA outright? I love the points. I hate UCLA.. I think they bought the refs... the worst #1 in my opinion. They got lucky against Cal and Stanford at end of reg. (should have lost both)season. They got calls against Tex A&M... First 2 games in Anaheim..They have been lucky and gotten all the breaks. Makes me sick. I thought the refs in their games have been the worst in history, awful, homers!!! paid off etc.. I think its a disgrace to give a #1 seed 4 games nearly at home like N.C. does. Raleigh, then Charlotte. Come one, they don't need help and why do they need an advantage? I hope they get upset by Louisville also, but they might roll until Final 4. Go Davidson, love the Cinderella Team!!!! On topic, I didn't question them, I just wanted to give a heads-up, but I appreciate the backing. I'm am really surprised no one noticed from them???? ||confused.gif' border=0>||an_cry.gif' border=0>||thumbs_down.gif' border=0>
0
Hey, Chadnail, not to change the topic, but You think the X-men can beat UCLA outright? I love the points. I hate UCLA.. I think they bought the refs... the worst #1 in my opinion. They got lucky against Cal and Stanford at end of reg. (should have lost both)season. They got calls against Tex A&M... First 2 games in Anaheim..They have been lucky and gotten all the breaks. Makes me sick. I thought the refs in their games have been the worst in history, awful, homers!!! paid off etc.. I think its a disgrace to give a #1 seed 4 games nearly at home like N.C. does. Raleigh, then Charlotte. Come one, they don't need help and why do they need an advantage? I hope they get upset by Louisville also, but they might roll until Final 4. Go Davidson, love the Cinderella Team!!!! On topic, I didn't question them, I just wanted to give a heads-up, but I appreciate the backing. I'm am really surprised no one noticed from them???? ||confused.gif' border=0>||an_cry.gif' border=0>||thumbs_down.gif' border=0>
In regards to Xavier, you have to love the +6 they are getting. My brother-in-law discussed UCLA and we both agree they are an overrated 1 seed. I don't want to say that the refs have been bought, but it damn sure looks that way. It seems like UCLA is getting all the right calls at all the right times. If Xavier can hit some three's and get the score in the high 70s to low 80s, they roll UCLA. As for UNC, unfortunately the sites for the stadium are picked seasons in advance, so while it seems unfair that UNC got to play 5 straight games in Raleigh then Charlotte, it's kind of a luck of the draw type thing I guess. And i regards to Tuppy's comment, I always just thought they would reset it to zero after that 7 day window lapsed, but I appreciate the explanation. Thanks guys!
0
In regards to Xavier, you have to love the +6 they are getting. My brother-in-law discussed UCLA and we both agree they are an overrated 1 seed. I don't want to say that the refs have been bought, but it damn sure looks that way. It seems like UCLA is getting all the right calls at all the right times. If Xavier can hit some three's and get the score in the high 70s to low 80s, they roll UCLA. As for UNC, unfortunately the sites for the stadium are picked seasons in advance, so while it seems unfair that UNC got to play 5 straight games in Raleigh then Charlotte, it's kind of a luck of the draw type thing I guess. And i regards to Tuppy's comment, I always just thought they would reset it to zero after that 7 day window lapsed, but I appreciate the explanation. Thanks guys!
ya wagerline why do you cheat is the funds so low you had to lay off some refs and linesman, or is wadero one of you guys and you want to show people that 10 grand can be won then you get more customers back hmm if this proves to be true(where you dont reset his streak)there could be a class action lawsuit against you, why u ask, because its in the RULES. Now i dont understand why you wouldnt stop any kind of problems before they exist ||an_drunksick.gif' border=0>
0
ya wagerline why do you cheat is the funds so low you had to lay off some refs and linesman, or is wadero one of you guys and you want to show people that 10 grand can be won then you get more customers back hmm if this proves to be true(where you dont reset his streak)there could be a class action lawsuit against you, why u ask, because its in the RULES. Now i dont understand why you wouldnt stop any kind of problems before they exist ||an_drunksick.gif' border=0>
SEnd them an e-mail...posting in here generally does not get you a reply
i would suggest the help section*
https://www.wagerline.com/postingforum/showmain.aspx?spt=14
0
SEnd them an e-mail...posting in here generally does not get you a reply
i would suggest the help section*
https://www.wagerline.com/postingforum/showmain.aspx?spt=14
Thanks Tuppy and Chevy, I got it. Looks like W-T fixed the problem and didthe correct thing. I knew once they were told, they'd take care of it.. Thanks Wagerline Referees! Wader will makethis moot if he keeps winning like he has been. take care...||an_clap.gif' border=0>||clover.gif' border=0>||cool.gif' border=0>||an_cheers.gif' border=0>||thumbs_up.gif' border=0>||peace.gif' border=0>
0
Thanks Tuppy and Chevy, I got it. Looks like W-T fixed the problem and didthe correct thing. I knew once they were told, they'd take care of it.. Thanks Wagerline Referees! Wader will makethis moot if he keeps winning like he has been. take care...||an_clap.gif' border=0>||clover.gif' border=0>||cool.gif' border=0>||an_cheers.gif' border=0>||thumbs_up.gif' border=0>||peace.gif' border=0>
Why are you all player hating rats? Wader's streak does not effect you or your picks in the least, yet you have to squeal to the wagerline team to have his streak reset. Quit being bitches and stop complaining that it is unfair. You will not win the 10 grand if wader get's reset, so shut the f%*# up.
0
Why are you all player hating rats? Wader's streak does not effect you or your picks in the least, yet you have to squeal to the wagerline team to have his streak reset. Quit being bitches and stop complaining that it is unfair. You will not win the 10 grand if wader get's reset, so shut the f%*# up.
even if he got to 21 with the 12 day gap or whatever it was, don't you think wagerline would have audited his run prior to paying 10k....either catch it now or later it doesn't matter.
Peace. Word. Late.
||an_violin.gif' border=0>
i'm trying to post my picture from myspace page but can't figure out how
0
even if he got to 21 with the 12 day gap or whatever it was, don't you think wagerline would have audited his run prior to paying 10k....either catch it now or later it doesn't matter.
Peace. Word. Late.
||an_violin.gif' border=0>
i'm trying to post my picture from myspace page but can't figure out how
Why are you all player hating rats? Wader's streak does not effect you or your picks in the least, yet you have to squeal to the wagerline team to have his streak reset. Quit being bitches and stop complaining that it is unfair. You will not win the 10 grand if wader get's reset, so shut the f%*# up.
HEAR,HEAR
0
Why are you all player hating rats? Wader's streak does not effect you or your picks in the least, yet you have to squeal to the wagerline team to have his streak reset. Quit being bitches and stop complaining that it is unfair. You will not win the 10 grand if wader get's reset, so shut the f%*# up.
HEAR,HEAR
player hating rats? He lost anyway, its moot, but you simpletons---RULES ARE RULES PERIOD RESPECT people lack it these days. End of story ||an_shake.gif' border=0>||thumbs_down.gif' border=0>
0
player hating rats? He lost anyway, its moot, but you simpletons---RULES ARE RULES PERIOD RESPECT people lack it these days. End of story ||an_shake.gif' border=0>||thumbs_down.gif' border=0>
the true player haters are the ones who actually look these streaks up and then make a post about na fuk that im a player hater thats right its all about me just like it sounds like its all about you (1manparty) so u shut the fuk up.
0
the true player haters are the ones who actually look these streaks up and then make a post about na fuk that im a player hater thats right its all about me just like it sounds like its all about you (1manparty) so u shut the fuk up.
wader speaks...Did I really think wagerline would cut me a check for 10g without checking my past picks? No. But for people to audit my past picks is a bit strange.. Maybe get a life? Or put more research into your own picks and you may get more than 3 in a row. Did I think I would really hit 21 in a row? with the added three wins or without I thought I had next to no chance of pulling it off. It is like hitting the lottery. But to audit my pick history is a bit sad and pathetic...
0
wader speaks...Did I really think wagerline would cut me a check for 10g without checking my past picks? No. But for people to audit my past picks is a bit strange.. Maybe get a life? Or put more research into your own picks and you may get more than 3 in a row. Did I think I would really hit 21 in a row? with the added three wins or without I thought I had next to no chance of pulling it off. It is like hitting the lottery. But to audit my pick history is a bit sad and pathetic...
Well said wader I noticed that you had not made a pick in time and I was like cool they did not pick up on that.To be honest with you it reminded me of a little sister telling on her older brother about something he had done.It just goes to show that when you are having success there are alot of people out there that get jealous fast.Can you imagine what it is like for someone famous or rich like bill gates.
0
Well said wader I noticed that you had not made a pick in time and I was like cool they did not pick up on that.To be honest with you it reminded me of a little sister telling on her older brother about something he had done.It just goes to show that when you are having success there are alot of people out there that get jealous fast.Can you imagine what it is like for someone famous or rich like bill gates.
Very true Iceman..I could see if this was a competition against one another..But it is not. It is like rooting against someone to win the state lottery. It is sponsered by an online casino that rakes in mllions each year. waaaaaaaah! he took 13 days to make a pick wahhhh!!!
0
Very true Iceman..I could see if this was a competition against one another..But it is not. It is like rooting against someone to win the state lottery. It is sponsered by an online casino that rakes in mllions each year. waaaaaaaah! he took 13 days to make a pick wahhhh!!!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.