Time for an expose' (not intended for the 280 character, narrow attention span Twitter types.)
So, who's lying, the multiple different posters who have given his real, losing record, or the guy who said he'd never charge for picks and, as predicted, is?
How much of a simp do you have to be to not realize you're being called "stupid" to your face?
"The few who messaged me privately, congrats on your win! WE CRUSHED TODAY!! WE HAVE ANOTHER COMING SHORTLY!!!"
This sub-human garbage thinks you're too stupid to see that this was a ploy to get people to contact it privately without openly soliciting and getting banned by the mods again, in its latest attempt to start a tout business.
Same with his bot boys. The lying weasel thinks you're too stupid to realize it's posting behind aliases to suck you in.
And why solicit now? Why not last week or the week before? Because over the last few days multiple posters have done the research and shared what they found - it DOES have a losing record. So it has to act quickly before more people catch on.
How new to sportsbetting do you have to be to not recognize the old "Throw some sh*t at the wall and see if it sticks" scam? OF COURSE it will have some winning days, that's the law of averages when you give picks everyday, but it's not handicapping skill as his overall record proves.
For the past two weeks every time someone pointed out that it cheated on its' record, it said, "They're just jealous because they're fading." Now all of a sudden, Saturday, AFTER it started soliciting for PM's, it changed its story to "I know they're betting on me."
Why the flip flop from "They're fading me" to "They're betting on me and I don't want them to have my picks"? It HAD to make the change to cover for the lie/excuse for taking plays off the forum. Yeah, sure, as if the people who have been steadily warning others not to bet the losing plays are suddenly betting on them.
It's the same con the scamdicapper-wannabe pulled last season under one of its other names.
Caveat emptor