Posted:
#26
it has nothing to do with innocence and quilt, but instead, to do with riots in every city or not, so he was not quilty
Yeah
Who really thinks OJ killed Ron & Nicole?
Posted:
#29
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
Giant,
I dont agree.
There was mistakes made when they processed the evidence, the prosecution was terrible..
They let small time locals prosecute the biggest case in the history of the department.
You cannot be serious if you think there were goof ups from the LAPD.
Giant,
I dont agree.
There was mistakes made when they processed the evidence, the prosecution was terrible..
They let small time locals prosecute the biggest case in the history of the department.
You cannot be serious if you think there were goof ups from the LAPD.
Chris Darden blew the case with the "glove fitting" presentation
Darden was warned that the gloves would have shrunk after a year in a plastic bag, and dampness.
Only one reason Darden was part of the prosecution 
Posted:
#31
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
Giant,
I dont agree.
There was mistakes made when they processed the evidence, the prosecution was terrible..
They let small time locals prosecute the biggest case in the history of the department.
You cannot be serious if you think there werent goof ups from the LAPD.
Giant,
I dont agree.
There was mistakes made when they processed the evidence, the prosecution was terrible..
They let small time locals prosecute the biggest case in the history of the department.
You cannot be serious if you think there werent goof ups from the LAPD.
They spent four hours deliberating. It was a year-long trial, and they spent four hours deliberating. Four hours!
They had their minds made up before even entering the jury box.
Vincent Bugliosi couldn't have gotten a conviction with that jury. I'm convinced of that. By the way, the LAPD wasn't on trial, Johnnie Cochran just lead you to believe they were.
Posted:
#35
Quote Originally Posted by smac38:
of course he did
the thing that makes me sick is what a joke its become. i mean, think about it. how many times is something said about him being a murderer and how he got off for it, and its funny
that just tells you what a joke the legal system is
the system worked.
The police fumbled the ball numerous times ( Fung allowing helper to collect evidence
...Van Nader (sic?) bringing home evidence )
Fuhrman using the word "person"
The difference between OJ and us , is OJ could afford the best attorneys, forensics experts, DNA experts etc...we would be stuck with public defenders 
Posted:
#36
i dont ever ever agree with that character called the giant but in this case he is 100 %corret .NO MATTER what the jury viewed for evidence it was obvious that when they came back after only a few hours that they were not going to convict him
johnny c stated in closing arguments to the jury that they should actually aquit this monster for all the past injustices that the black man has encountered thru time AND THATS WHAT THEY DID
lance ito (judge) was a big jerkoff who had no control of the courtroom
up untill that time marsha clark was one of the best prosecuting att in murder cases but the police handled the evidence like a bunch of keystone cops alot of mistakes made but that fuckin jury wasnt gonna convict that pos 
Posted:
#40
Actually I really didnt need to know what Covers thinks about OJ and whether they think hes guilty.
Ya know why:
Racism - You ladies can talk until your pussies are blue that you arent racist against OJ but its clear with the ridiculous comments that people make. This guy went through the exact same judicial system that you swear by but because the outcome isnt to you liking you say it was the jury.
Its funny that no one ever brings up any other trials like Rodney Kind or James Byrd. Funny no mention of the injustice in those trials because they didnt involved white people and a black male.
OJ was found NOT GUILTY! You ladies can spin this try for the next 30 years however you choose but guess what, THEY WILL NEVER RETRY THIS CASE! Get over it and move on with your lives.
I see comments regarding OJ, Vick, Kobe, Bonds, etc and these are all men who have more athletic ability in one finger than you guys have in your entire body. This pisses you off that they are running things and do things you only wish you could do. Meanwhile, you guys have to spend time staying bitter because you cant do shit about it.
When OJ is found NOT GUILTY once again you guys can spend another 15 years talking about this trial, how the jury was biased, judge wanted his autograph and he bought the best legal team money can buy.
Im sure the juice will really care as he drops a load in another hot white woman that you guys can only jerk off to on the internet.
And as Chilly Chill would say:
Posted:
#49
Quote Originally Posted by 69_Amazin_Mets:
Hey Dummy,
John King, Lawrence Russell Brewer, and Shawn Allen Berry were all convicted
ONCE AGAIN, YOUR RACIST VIEWS ARE WRONG!!!!
If you clearly read what I wrote, instead of playing with your clit, I stated that "its funny that people never bring up trials like Rodney King and James Byrd." Oh I know EXACTLY the verdict in the trial but I can guarantee you less than 1% of Covers knows. I can also guarantee that there was NEVER a thread made about this trial on Covers.
Again, we all know the reason why
Hot Forum Topics
){kind=link}