All Forums | Poker

poker...

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 1367
Posts: 38
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 60
Posted: #26
there is quite a lot of theories about bots, and i would have to say it is very possible.. i mean, you gotta admit there is some seriously amazing software writers out there.
 
but what i want to now is why you are playing 70k hands and 1000/500 blinds if you consider yourself an average player at best.
 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 677
Posted: #27
My favorite part of the story is that this guy is blaming the dude who called with aces.  Anyone in their right mind would call with aces when the board is 8 10 10.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 459
Posted: #28
My motivation to lie about this?
 
Because I'm a douch bag. Wow, great reason. Thx for the insight.
 
...And why does the amount that I lost have anything to do with anything else. You have no clue what 70K is to me. It could be a years pay, it could be a month's, it could be a week's. So stop putting it on your own little scale like it's the craziest thing you've ever heard.
 
There's stories all over covers that exemplify very unrealistic or unlikely scenarios. You can probably spend all day trying to convince the majority of covers users that online poker is legit.
 
...And if it's not, I would conclude that it is very common parctice for players to communicate with eachother while playing at a table to increase their odds and take down another player.
 
If you can't tell I'm switching subjects a bit, because I realize that you don't know anything about this one specific beat I experienced and you're comments regarding it are for the most part irrelevant.
 
Thx for the wonderful commentary above though!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 459
Posted: #29
Spoon,
 
Thx for one of the only intelligent responses on this subject. I admit that playing in this game was not the best of ideas, but like I said earlier, I was just gunna play a few flops to see if I could catch a killer hand and clean-up on it. I observed the table for a bit and people were rarely rasing pre-flop and I felt comfortable sitting down.
 
When I flopped quads, I went-all in becasue I just wanted to collect and leave. there was a ton of cah in there and I didn't want to take any chances knowing for sure that I was about 99.25% to win at this point
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 1279
Posted: #30
you are a blatant liar. why do you need such attention?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 459
Posted: #31
Liar? please prove.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2004
Posts: 3736
Posted: #32
Quote Originally Posted by bchadwick:

Liar? please prove.

 

just reading your posts are proof enough. One more thing, your reasoning for pushing with QUADS for christs sake (guy keeps acting like he flopped top pair, top kicker and his hand was soooo vulnerable) just shows how fuckin clueless of a player you are. Thenyou lie and say there was 5 aces in the deck then you backpeddle and say oh maybe there wasnt. This story has more holes in it than a-rod and Barry talkin about roids. Just take your lies and HORRIBLE poker plays somewhere else

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 1947
Posted: #33
Quote Originally Posted by bchadwick:

Liar? please prove.

Just go away, nobody believes you, nobody respects you, and nobody gives a shit about your BS story.  So just leave douche bag.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 459
Posted: #34
 I'm pertty sure some people belive and respect me. I'm done talking about this one poker hand and how it's likely that I got scammed. I probably willjust lay off the online poker form now on. Although I'm new to covers and spend 1/100th of the time guys do on thid site, I'm here for capping (to give and take advice).
 
Think I have nothing to offer? Well, let's just take last REAL sports play for example. I won myselfand many other tons of cash:
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 459
Posted: #35
btw... I'm sure one one u will chime in and comment on me changing subjects or something. The point is that I'm ending this (one hand) poker discussion as the debate could last forever. The primary function of covers is a place to share caping info, so I thought I'd share with u my last football play:
 
...Or wait, will this be a lie also?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 459
Posted: #36
[Pro Football] Topic: PITT COVERING 7
bchadwick  View Space | Friends | Playbook

Prospect
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 57
Location: Hawaii
#1
Posted: 1/30/2009 1:50:37 PM
Steelers have only covered a -7  7/18 times this season. They've pushed 7 twice.
 
Cards have covered +7 12/18 times and pushed 7 once.
 
I think the Steelers win this game, but it may be a close one. Is -7 a god bet??? I'm thinking the -3.5 (-160) is the best wager out there!
 
*** Yes, I know the Steelers schedule is a bit more difficult, but you gotta wonder if Pitt's offense has a high probablitly of putting up the pts to cover by a full TD. AZ will score 17+ for sure
 
I predict 27-23 Pitt
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 459
Posted: #37
There's one minor error in that write-up that I correct later in my post. Perhaps you catch it, maybe not.
 
The point is that I provided the covers community with an exact score to the biggest sporting (and betting) event of the year.
 
RESPECT THAT
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 1947
Posted: #38
I had Ravens over Miami 27-10, who gives a shit since I am a losing sports bettor.
 
Like I said, just go away.
All Forums | Poker
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.