21 Republican stAtes have sued our president in his authority to block Chinese from receiving oil from Canada.
The keystone pipeline was granted by executive action it was undone by executive action. China will have to build a pipeline in canada for their tar sand oil ,From Alberta canada.
See too much so back to simple stupid. Republican states have sued our president for Chinese interests
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
21 Republican stAtes have sued our president in his authority to block Chinese from receiving oil from Canada.
The keystone pipeline was granted by executive action it was undone by executive action. China will have to build a pipeline in canada for their tar sand oil ,From Alberta canada.
See too much so back to simple stupid. Republican states have sued our president for Chinese interests
This oil will STILL be removed from the ground by Canada. Without the pipeline it will now be trucked and railed to refineries in the U.S. Those trains and trucks will belch vast amounts of diesel exhaust transporting this oil. A pipeline pushing oil by electric pumps powered by renewable energy would seem a BIT more LOGICAL!!
But we no longer have logical people in charge. Obviously!!
And we sure as hell don't want to be exporting anything to China!!!! Oh no, we must only IMPORT from China, make them stronger!!! How dare we make THEM DEPENDENT ON US!!
This oil will STILL be removed from the ground by Canada. Without the pipeline it will now be trucked and railed to refineries in the U.S. Those trains and trucks will belch vast amounts of diesel exhaust transporting this oil. A pipeline pushing oil by electric pumps powered by renewable energy would seem a BIT more LOGICAL!!
But we no longer have logical people in charge. Obviously!!
And we sure as hell don't want to be exporting anything to China!!!! Oh no, we must only IMPORT from China, make them stronger!!! How dare we make THEM DEPENDENT ON US!!
Another nice Democrat LIE. This oil will STILL be removed from the ground by Canada. Without the pipeline it will now be trucked and railed to refineries in the U.S. Those trains and trucks will belch vast amounts of diesel exhaust transporting this oil. A pipeline pushing oil by electric pumps powered by renewable energy would seem a BIT more LOGICAL!! But we no longer have logical people in charge. Obviously!! And we sure as hell don't want to be exporting anything to China!!!! Oh no, we must only IMPORT from China, make them stronger!!! How dare we make THEM DEPENDENT ON US!! Just plain stupid!!!! https://www.galioninquirer.com/opinion/61114/canceling-keystone-xl-pipeline-gift-to-china-and-russia
We wouldn't be exporting anything, bro. We'd be middle-men, which to anyone who understands drug culture, it almost is never worth it. You're right, i'll just be shipped by rail car, which isn't any better but still, nature is right. We're just making it harder for a Canadien company with Chinese interest to get oil to it's Chinese customers.
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
0
Quote Originally Posted by UNIMAN:
Another nice Democrat LIE. This oil will STILL be removed from the ground by Canada. Without the pipeline it will now be trucked and railed to refineries in the U.S. Those trains and trucks will belch vast amounts of diesel exhaust transporting this oil. A pipeline pushing oil by electric pumps powered by renewable energy would seem a BIT more LOGICAL!! But we no longer have logical people in charge. Obviously!! And we sure as hell don't want to be exporting anything to China!!!! Oh no, we must only IMPORT from China, make them stronger!!! How dare we make THEM DEPENDENT ON US!! Just plain stupid!!!! https://www.galioninquirer.com/opinion/61114/canceling-keystone-xl-pipeline-gift-to-china-and-russia
We wouldn't be exporting anything, bro. We'd be middle-men, which to anyone who understands drug culture, it almost is never worth it. You're right, i'll just be shipped by rail car, which isn't any better but still, nature is right. We're just making it harder for a Canadien company with Chinese interest to get oil to it's Chinese customers.
Ship it through Canada oh yah they have environmental lead which make far more costly . To export their oil over the Rockies or out through Irving ports at the end of the st Lawrence hands going through the bread belt is far more cost effective.
We should preserve the land that give a the world grain. And let other areas ship their oil.
0
Ship it through Canada oh yah they have environmental lead which make far more costly . To export their oil over the Rockies or out through Irving ports at the end of the st Lawrence hands going through the bread belt is far more cost effective.
We should preserve the land that give a the world grain. And let other areas ship their oil.
Then analyst the term may in context of structures sentence. In terms of legal definition.
An expression of possibility, a permissive choice to act or not, as distinguished from "shall," which is an imperative or often mandatory course of action.
This may is different qualifier than shall.
If shipped safely over rail is different then taking a toxic bio hazard mix it with sand and blowing down a steel pipe at 1000 pounds per square in.
If not if the system leaks it does like a sieve and it hasn't even been completed. Keystones pipeline needs a more durable substance lining the pipes than steel. And the material Inokal 7/16 strength is expensive.
By rail then Buffet has the monopoly on railroad Trains and bulk transportations. An American last time I checked. And this project can co to us to ship the tar sand to China via rail distribution as it does.
Keystones is an added feature to supply China with Canada in oil. China already buys the product via mail
If keystone to operate it SHALL leak toxic sludge on to a bio sphere not able to digest sour crude.
0
@uniman.
-may-go-to-china-
Then analyst the term may in context of structures sentence. In terms of legal definition.
An expression of possibility, a permissive choice to act or not, as distinguished from "shall," which is an imperative or often mandatory course of action.
This may is different qualifier than shall.
If shipped safely over rail is different then taking a toxic bio hazard mix it with sand and blowing down a steel pipe at 1000 pounds per square in.
If not if the system leaks it does like a sieve and it hasn't even been completed. Keystones pipeline needs a more durable substance lining the pipes than steel. And the material Inokal 7/16 strength is expensive.
By rail then Buffet has the monopoly on railroad Trains and bulk transportations. An American last time I checked. And this project can co to us to ship the tar sand to China via rail distribution as it does.
Keystones is an added feature to supply China with Canada in oil. China already buys the product via mail
If keystone to operate it SHALL leak toxic sludge on to a bio sphere not able to digest sour crude.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.