All Forums | Politics

Americans Really Don't Like Trump and HRC

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 981
Posts: 38
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2015
Posts: 5868
Posted: #1
Many Covers posters, including me, have expressed dismay at the horrible choices primary votes have shoved down the throats of the general public.  We are not alone.

https://politicalwire.com/2016/05/05/americans-really-dont-like-trump-and-clinton/
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2015
Posts: 20652
Posted: #2
Media doesn't like either but voters seem to love me Hillary Clinton needs Sanders as a running mate trump needs a women who can soften his mag
Let the games begin.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 35347
Posted: #3
Quote Originally Posted by nature1970:

Media doesn't like either but voters seem to love me Hillary Clinton needs Sanders as a running mate trump needs a women who can soften his mag
Let the games begin.

Trump/Palin....    there wouldn't be enough hours in the day to try and make sense of the idiocy that came out of their mouths.   

It would make for a hell of trainwreck reality show though...   
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 14749
Posted: #4
I like Mr. Trump but I don't particularly like hillary.

So you are half right here.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 5575
Posted: #5
Quote Originally Posted by SirJohnDrake:

I like Mr. Trump but I don't particularly like hillary.

So you are half right here.


I will second this statement
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2003
Posts: 27850
Posted: #6
It's funny how partisan lemmings will put down one and not the other.  

It's even funnier that the lemmings need group think to support their delusions
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 6580
Posted: #7
I'm not a fan or Sanders, Cruz, or Huckabee if that makes any difference. A lot of other names you can add to the list as well. 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2015
Posts: 20652
Posted: #8
So they are neck and neck. People do not understand yet what difference it makes

St8ll Obama had a border adgent shot to push a non weapons allowed weapons Union as part of a clandestinwee special action program.


Guess he was caught in a fast and furious house example of over reaching the npreeidential authority.


Did I get echo a false hood.....
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2014
Posts: 4717
Posted: #9
Who cares what Americans think? They're stupid, most of them, White culture has degenerated, and are lost and disconnected. Latinos meanwhile are taking over, representing 60% of HUD homebuyers, majority population of Califotnia, with 39%. of elementary school children being illegal aliens from Mexico. Trump saw in 2003 the invasion of Iraq would lead to uprisings everywhere with Muslim rxtremism taking hold without strongmen. That foresight is all I know to see he is overqualified to be President.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2003
Posts: 27850
Posted: #10
It's hilarious to hear how mindless trump followers think
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 35347
Posted: #11
Quote Originally Posted by Relax_Dude:

Who cares what Americans think? They're stupid, most of them, White culture has degenerated, and are lost and disconnected. Latinos meanwhile are taking over, representing 60% of HUD homebuyers, majority population of Califotnia, with 39%. of elementary school children being illegal aliens from Mexico. Trump saw in 2003 the invasion of Iraq would lead to uprisings everywhere with Muslim rxtremism taking hold without strongmen. That foresight is all I know to see he is overqualified to be President.

And you're allegedly in Japan so why do you care at all?
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 34007
Posted: #12
If White culture has degeneraded and is lost and disconnected ..than why to most people of color want to lighten their skin to look white by using creams and stuff like “Whitenicious” ?

e.i. Sammy Soas,Michael and Latoya Jackson , Tempestt Bledsoe,Lil Kim,Iman( of late David Bowie wife) Halle Berry, Diana Ross,Beyonce,Nicki Minaj and Rihana etc...
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2003
Posts: 27850
Posted: #13
Wow that was a weird bail out. I get the playing race card and everything but you just look confused.

Confusing times I guess
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2014
Posts: 4717
Posted: #14
Culture is different than race. There is only one human race. But there are lines that separate us culturally. Islam is a culture based on a book uniting behind a medieval warlord with mythical connections to Allah, the Creator. Japan has the most refined culture in the world. Some Japanese find their culture so intricate that it becomes almost useless outside of Japan. A counter culture is s minority group which identifies with itself in opposition to the perceived dominant culture --in the US the white culture (a mixture of Anglo Saxon, Germanic and Scandinavian) has a small majority in population, and a larger % of wealth. Whenever you talk about protecting your culture, you will be attacked as being xenophobic, RACIST, bigoted , usually by counter culturalists (la RAZA or unwitting and dim witted globalists, usually liberals, who out of LAZINESS ANS MENTAL MEDIOCRITY, resort to name calling and labeling to shut up your argument. They over GENERALIZE because WEAK MINDS tend to do just that. Other over used terms are fascists and dropping references to Adolf Hitler. That way they can continue to subvert the white culture and take over. First you have to shut them up. Then you divert their funds to people of color and immigrants. The process is slow but effective.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 5575
Posted: #15
No clue how this thread was changed to talking about race.... HRC and Trump both lilly white.

I will attempt to put this thread back on topic.

Trump is going to win - most of you liberals that like t

o live every moment on this politics forum know this, but are stubborn to too scared to admit it.  I don't think you are stupid.

Trump will win, and his approval ratings out of the gate will the very lowest of his term (8 years).  He will almost instantly rise in popularity and approval, while a very firm 25% will remain in "very disappointed" category - that being the hardcore left communist new world order crowd.  Fine by me... to hell with the idiocy

This election in November will be a HUGE LANDSLIDE - larger than any of you can imagine, maybe the biggest in the last 60+ years.  The pundits are just now coming around to "realizing it will be a tight race:"  They are so behind the curve.

Landslide - nothing short of a complete repudiation of BO and HRC and the rest of them.  Senate and House gains for GOP - and the real hope and change commences.  

I have been saying for about a year now, and have been right about all of this.  Time wo wise up.  I still say I think HRC might not make it out of the DNC convention, and that is still a very high likelihood... but I acknowledge the corruptness of the media and the DNC just might try to squeak her by, which will be disastrous for the general election - but what are the alternatives?  Sanders the socialist?  lol  or maybe the Manchurian candidate of Biden?  also laughable.

I just love this - by far the most entertaining and REAL reality show any of us have ever imagined... and it is going down NOW

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2015
Posts: 5868
Posted: #16
Likely Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson is polling at 10%:

https://politicalwire.com/2016/05/24/time-to-pay-attention-to-gary-johnson/

That may narrow as the general election approaches, but much of the credit for GJ's relative strength compared to most other minor-party candidates in the past is the historic unpopularity of HRC and Trump.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 34007
Posted: #17
Quote Originally Posted by dl36:

Wow that was a weird bail out. I get the playing race card and everything but you just look confused.

Confusing times I guess



 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2003
Posts: 27850
Posted: #18
[
Quote: Originally Posted by SportsFan9698] No clue how this thread was changed to talking about race.... HRC and Trump both lilly white.

[/Quote

It's weird how that happened
It's even weirder how some people steap dependent on playing the race card even when it's not there.

I didn't think a bail out was needed.  Maybe he got confused.  He certainly continues to look confused.

Confusing times 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 34007
Posted: #19
Speaking of the race card...........the Dems are beyond desperate..they are now trotting out 91 year old Jimmuh Carter ( 2nd worst President ever)...to play the race card..

Jimmy Carter said Monday that presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump had tapped into "inherent racism" to bolster his candidacy.

Carter also said Trump violated "basic human rights" by labeling Mexican and Muslim immigrants as criminals and terrorists.

"When you single out any particular group of people for secondary citizenship status, that's a violation of basic human rights," Carter said...


Jimmuh,,someone needs to point out to you that the Muslims Trump wants to ban from America are not citizens. ''They have no citizenship status. Plus the Mexicans he's talking about are illegal aliens from Mexico, are also not citizens. ....

The biggest anti-semite of them all talking about someone else being racist ,.......lmao ...only proves there's not fool like an old liberal fool.....lol

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 6580
Posted: #20
Sportsfan,

When you say "Liberals" which posters are you speaking to specifically? Try being more specific in who you're addressing, it will create better dialogue. 

You come across as the old, crazy man shaking his fist at the sun and blaming kids for everything. 

What ends up happening is you (Slim and Bowl also have a tendency to do this) say "what do all you Liberals say or think....."and then you think your opinion or statement is validated because no one responds. Mostly no one responds because other posters have no idea who you're addressing your statement at. 

Being more specific would make these threads a lot more interesting. 


 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 25541
Posted: #21
Maybe; maybe not.  When you do that then apparently you get boxed for name calling.  Might be better to generalize. Besides, by now we all know who the liberals and conservatives are on here. 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 6679
Posted: #22
Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:

Sportsfan,

When you say "Liberals" which posters are you speaking to specifically? Try being more specific in who you're addressing, it will create better dialogue. 

You come across as the old, crazy man shaking his fist at the sun and blaming kids for everything. 

What ends up happening is you (Slim and Bowl also have a tendency to do this) say "what do all you Liberals say or think....."and then you think your opinion or statement is validated because no one responds. Mostly no one responds because other posters have no idea who you're addressing your statement at. 

Being more specific would make these threads a lot more interesting. 


I will answer it. If the person doesn't agree with their positions on every single issue, then that person is a "liberal".

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 5575
Posted: #23
Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:

Sportsfan,

When you say "Liberals" which posters are you speaking to specifically? Try being more specific in who you're addressing, it will create better dialogue. 

You come across as the old, crazy man shaking his fist at the sun and blaming kids for everything. 

What ends up happening is you (Slim and Bowl also have a tendency to do this) say "what do all you Liberals say or think....."and then you think your opinion or statement is validated because no one responds. Mostly no one responds because other posters have no idea who you're addressing your statement at. 

Being more specific would make these threads a lot more interesting. 



KTrain

So sorry you are confused... this is the Politics forum.  Most here identify as being "Liberal" or Conservative" and some claim to be independent.

These are basic terms that are widely understood.  If that confuses you, I cannot help you.  Read a book or watch news... I have no answer for your confusion.

If you are trying to bait me to incite arguments with specific people here, I will not take the bait.  When I cite "Liberals" I mean just that... a group of people here.

You cannot fix stupid....
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 34007
Posted: #24
Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:

Sportsfan,

When you say "Liberals" which posters are you speaking to specifically?

What ends up happening is you (Slim and Bowl also have a tendency to do this) say "what do all you Liberals say or think.....



I'm not speaking for  Bowlslit here  ,,but as for me ..I can spot one a mile away.....that's why .......so if the shoe fits..
 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 6580
Posted: #25
Quote Originally Posted by bunny651:

I will answer it. If the person doesn't agree with their positions on every single issue, then that person is a "liberal".


Pretty much sums it all up. 
All Forums | Politics
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.