Coming to NYC soon.
Look you are welcome to post threads and have discussion but this crap you are pulling is neither. It is obvious your intention is to retaliate against the other threads and that is not allowed on this site. So if you post any further useless combative threads then it will not work out well for you going forward.
Look you are welcome to post threads and have discussion but this crap you are pulling is neither. It is obvious your intention is to retaliate against the other threads and that is not allowed on this site. So if you post any further useless combative threads then it will not work out well for you going forward.
You do have to wonder when all these questionable people coming across the boarder will show their true intentions. Not everyone is seeking asylum. They've caught some of the people, but all the gotaways are likely the ones we needed to know who they were.
You do have to wonder when all these questionable people coming across the boarder will show their true intentions. Not everyone is seeking asylum. They've caught some of the people, but all the gotaways are likely the ones we needed to know who they were.
Good post.
Good post.
but this crap you are pulling is neither.
It is obvious your intention is to retaliate against the other threads
and that is not allowed on this site.
So if you post any further useless combative threads then it will not work out well for you going forward.
He posted 2 more after WSC posted the warning, after his first nine (9) SPAM threads!
11 deliberate SPAM threads in 4 days....
but this crap you are pulling is neither.
It is obvious your intention is to retaliate against the other threads
and that is not allowed on this site.
So if you post any further useless combative threads then it will not work out well for you going forward.
He posted 2 more after WSC posted the warning, after his first nine (9) SPAM threads!
11 deliberate SPAM threads in 4 days....
"One group seems unable to contain their emotions and go off the rails because the other group bugs them..the other group while annoying is able to control themselves and thus get in trouble less.
The reality is I cannot make people engage I cant make them interact or debate and I cant and wont box people for agreeing with each other and posting boring unimportant content."
"Again I suggest that the one group who drives you nuts, just avoid those messages and stop yourself from replying and engaging. Its ok to ask questions and to try to interact but if they are not responding or wanting the interaction, you cant hound them and antagonize because that IS against the rules."
"One group seems unable to contain their emotions and go off the rails because the other group bugs them..the other group while annoying is able to control themselves and thus get in trouble less.
The reality is I cannot make people engage I cant make them interact or debate and I cant and wont box people for agreeing with each other and posting boring unimportant content."
"Again I suggest that the one group who drives you nuts, just avoid those messages and stop yourself from replying and engaging. Its ok to ask questions and to try to interact but if they are not responding or wanting the interaction, you cant hound them and antagonize because that IS against the rules."
So if you post any further useless combative threads then it will not work out well for you going forward.
So if you post any further useless combative threads then it will not work out well for you going forward.
If you see a title or an author that you know you disagree with -- Just skip that thread.
If you do not plan to engage and discuss that topic -- just avoid that thread altogether.
That is what has been recommended.
If you see a title or an author that you know you disagree with -- Just skip that thread.
If you do not plan to engage and discuss that topic -- just avoid that thread altogether.
That is what has been recommended.
I do not see it as retaliation. Which thread is this one retaliating against in particular?
It might seem annoying or frustrating simply because now the Leftist's threads are not the only thing on the most recent page.
I am sure it will settle down soon.
Either people will engage or they will not engage.
I do not see it as retaliation. Which thread is this one retaliating against in particular?
It might seem annoying or frustrating simply because now the Leftist's threads are not the only thing on the most recent page.
I am sure it will settle down soon.
Either people will engage or they will not engage.
He did! Two (2) more after the warning from the ref.......
He did! Two (2) more after the warning from the ref.......
@cdog8043
Not a big deal to me.
But it would be easier and maybe make for better discussion if you only had one or two threads and tied things in.
It might also help if you had content in the thread and not just a title.
But it is good to at least see some other 'names' in the politics forum.
@cdog8043
Not a big deal to me.
But it would be easier and maybe make for better discussion if you only had one or two threads and tied things in.
It might also help if you had content in the thread and not just a title.
But it is good to at least see some other 'names' in the politics forum.
He did! Two (2) more after the warning from the ref.......
He did! Two (2) more after the warning from the ref.......
@fubah2
That is simply your opinion. They are NOT useless and not necessarily combative. No more so than any others on here. It is just a lot of them all at once.
He could make one or two threads instead of so many. That would be better.
Why does it matter to you anyway? You are not going to counter any of his points anyway.
@fubah2
That is simply your opinion. They are NOT useless and not necessarily combative. No more so than any others on here. It is just a lot of them all at once.
He could make one or two threads instead of so many. That would be better.
Why does it matter to you anyway? You are not going to counter any of his points anyway.
And the guy made threads that have the potential to create discussion no matter what is said
any arguing of that point is just semantics .
There was just no copy/pasting or requoting of anything with emojis holding trophies or clapping so it looks different to your eyeballs and feels different to your brains
but the potential for discussion is there even though the thread titles were like flashing whorehouse signs in the red light district much like many of the other thread titles that are loitering in this seedy part of town are
And the guy made threads that have the potential to create discussion no matter what is said
any arguing of that point is just semantics .
There was just no copy/pasting or requoting of anything with emojis holding trophies or clapping so it looks different to your eyeballs and feels different to your brains
but the potential for discussion is there even though the thread titles were like flashing whorehouse signs in the red light district much like many of the other thread titles that are loitering in this seedy part of town are
that was real as hell
but unfortunately it will be met with silence because “ discussion “ in it’s true form is not a top priority to many people here
that was real as hell
but unfortunately it will be met with silence because “ discussion “ in it’s true form is not a top priority to many people here
Look you are welcome to post threads and have discussion but this crap you are pulling is neither. It is obvious your intention is to retaliate against the other threads and that is not allowed on this site. So if you post any further useless combative threads then it will not work out well for you going forward.
@wallstreetcappers
Look you are welcome to post threads and have discussion but this crap you are pulling is neither. It is obvious your intention is to retaliate against the other threads and that is not allowed on this site. So if you post any further useless combative threads then it will not work out well for you going forward.
@wallstreetcappers
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.