I've watched it, I've listened to it, and I've read about it, and I still can't find any evidence that the POTUS stated there was a terror attack in Sweden.
President Trump's explanation (via twitter) makes perfect sense as to what he was referring to, mostly because he is Trump, and he will never be mistaken for a great orator.
The President is somewhat lacking in linguistic skills, and is at times verbally clumsy, but to believe for a nano second that he was referencing a terror attack that didn't exist is just wishful thinking on the part of the left.
This event just reinforces what many have known for 100's of years, and that is that people are predisposed to believe certain things they are told, regardless of merit.
bigreds daddy
0
I've watched it, I've listened to it, and I've read about it, and I still can't find any evidence that the POTUS stated there was a terror attack in Sweden.
President Trump's explanation (via twitter) makes perfect sense as to what he was referring to, mostly because he is Trump, and he will never be mistaken for a great orator.
The President is somewhat lacking in linguistic skills, and is at times verbally clumsy, but to believe for a nano second that he was referencing a terror attack that didn't exist is just wishful thinking on the part of the left.
This event just reinforces what many have known for 100's of years, and that is that people are predisposed to believe certain things they are told, regardless of merit.
I've watched it, I've listened to it, and I've read about it, and I still can't find any evidence that the POTUS stated there was a terror attack in Sweden.
President Trump's explanation (via twitter) makes perfect sense as to what he was referring to, mostly because he is Trump, and he will never be mistaken for a great orator.
The President is somewhat lacking in linguistic skills, and is at times verbally clumsy, but to believe for a nano second that he was referencing a terror attack that didn't exist is just wishful thinking on the part of the left.
This event just reinforces what many have known for 100's of years, and that is that people are predisposed to believe certain things they are told, regardless of merit.
I am guessing that the role of king of the Trump sheep means being the chief apologist. You are performing that role splendidly albeit you kind of become that which follow you.
Just that you are higher up on the food chain.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:
I've watched it, I've listened to it, and I've read about it, and I still can't find any evidence that the POTUS stated there was a terror attack in Sweden.
President Trump's explanation (via twitter) makes perfect sense as to what he was referring to, mostly because he is Trump, and he will never be mistaken for a great orator.
The President is somewhat lacking in linguistic skills, and is at times verbally clumsy, but to believe for a nano second that he was referencing a terror attack that didn't exist is just wishful thinking on the part of the left.
This event just reinforces what many have known for 100's of years, and that is that people are predisposed to believe certain things they are told, regardless of merit.
I am guessing that the role of king of the Trump sheep means being the chief apologist. You are performing that role splendidly albeit you kind of become that which follow you.
I've watched it, I've listened to it, and I've read about it, and I still can't find any evidence that the POTUS stated there was a terror attack in Sweden.
President Trump's explanation (via twitter) makes perfect sense as to what he was referring to, mostly because he is Trump, and he will never be mistaken for a great orator.
The President is somewhat lacking in linguistic skills, and is at times verbally clumsy, but to believe for a nano second that he was referencing a terror attack that didn't exist is just wishful thinking on the part of the left.
This event just reinforces what many have known for 100's of years, and that is that people are predisposed to believe certain things they are told, regardless of merit.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hh5DAOeqkMU
0
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:
I've watched it, I've listened to it, and I've read about it, and I still can't find any evidence that the POTUS stated there was a terror attack in Sweden.
President Trump's explanation (via twitter) makes perfect sense as to what he was referring to, mostly because he is Trump, and he will never be mistaken for a great orator.
The President is somewhat lacking in linguistic skills, and is at times verbally clumsy, but to believe for a nano second that he was referencing a terror attack that didn't exist is just wishful thinking on the part of the left.
This event just reinforces what many have known for 100's of years, and that is that people are predisposed to believe certain things they are told, regardless of merit.
A billionaire's genes or a corrupt/lying hag married to a serial adulterer... I'll take Baron's genes any day...
You mean "and" don't you? Melania lying about her education and visa and that "loofa faced shltgibbon who cheated on his first wife with his second and cheated on his second wife with his third wife.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Killer_B:
A billionaire's genes or a corrupt/lying hag married to a serial adulterer... I'll take Baron's genes any day...
You mean "and" don't you? Melania lying about her education and visa and that "loofa faced shltgibbon who cheated on his first wife with his second and cheated on his second wife with his third wife.
Juanita Broaddick destroys Chelsea on twitter. Makes Chelsea cry'''''
Chelsea Clinton tweeted out: “I need a thesaurus. What’s another word
for horrifying? Sick? Awful? Running out of adjectives these days that
mean unconscionably terrible.”
...Juanita Broaddrick replied,
“Well [Chelsea], since you asked. Here’s my definition of horrifying,
sick & awful. Answer: Your father, Bill Clinton."
Chelsea deleted
the tweet shortly thereafter.
0
Juanita Broaddick destroys Chelsea on twitter. Makes Chelsea cry'''''
Chelsea Clinton tweeted out: “I need a thesaurus. What’s another word
for horrifying? Sick? Awful? Running out of adjectives these days that
mean unconscionably terrible.”
...Juanita Broaddrick replied,
“Well [Chelsea], since you asked. Here’s my definition of horrifying,
sick & awful. Answer: Your father, Bill Clinton."
Sure Man don't you think you should've figured out how dependable the polls were election night, bet you believed those too - Nyet?
All the sudden since The Boss hit the scene all my customers want products I sell... It really sucks, I know one person that doesn't like him and I think eventually he'll come around. Media doing a nice job as usual except he's got a medium to talk directly to the people. Think about the media before this, they controlled everything you heard. The POTUS could say whatever he wanted, and they control when and how often it's played, if at all. That's just for starters of the power they had.
Lets' see he speaks his mind instead of the previous babbling, affirmative-action absentee fool that would never answer a question. He said something to that Russian diplomat though. Of course after 8 years the only people that really got anywhere were the happy's and the Iranians (they ran into a lot of cash at the end of BO's reign - Why isn't this a major story? wtf
Stop the tv screen during the protests today and look at these people. I'm Speechless... Not really... They look like the stupidest people I've ever seen in my life and here's why. There was an election, Trump won. The losing side stfu and doesn't take the country closer to a civil war that would actually last about 2 hours over a fair election. Not to mention the corrupt/dishonest candidate the other side ran, it's as if she's Ms. Popularity and was up 80-20 in the polls. This is currently unprecedented in modern times that the losing side refuses to even give the other party's guy, I mean this is how it works - up until now. Let's flip this. What if the white racist (that are supposedly so racist he got elected twice) was picketing over BO winning. They just come out of the woodwork like the morons we currently have doing the "he's not my president" b.s. Wouldn't that of been the equivalent to this (that was no where near happening)?
Actually, the media is covering it to make it bigger and more effective than this is, another gift from them. A Happy was on Tucker Carlson tonight and the dud said "As a happy man, we're concerned about some of the legislation that "could be" coming. Of course when he got flustered he had no comeback on what exactly are you and your friends so worried about Trump doing. He got pressed 3x and could not answer (because they're the least of Trump's problems and he's not going to do anything anyway.
0
Sure Man don't you think you should've figured out how dependable the polls were election night, bet you believed those too - Nyet?
All the sudden since The Boss hit the scene all my customers want products I sell... It really sucks, I know one person that doesn't like him and I think eventually he'll come around. Media doing a nice job as usual except he's got a medium to talk directly to the people. Think about the media before this, they controlled everything you heard. The POTUS could say whatever he wanted, and they control when and how often it's played, if at all. That's just for starters of the power they had.
Lets' see he speaks his mind instead of the previous babbling, affirmative-action absentee fool that would never answer a question. He said something to that Russian diplomat though. Of course after 8 years the only people that really got anywhere were the happy's and the Iranians (they ran into a lot of cash at the end of BO's reign - Why isn't this a major story? wtf
Stop the tv screen during the protests today and look at these people. I'm Speechless... Not really... They look like the stupidest people I've ever seen in my life and here's why. There was an election, Trump won. The losing side stfu and doesn't take the country closer to a civil war that would actually last about 2 hours over a fair election. Not to mention the corrupt/dishonest candidate the other side ran, it's as if she's Ms. Popularity and was up 80-20 in the polls. This is currently unprecedented in modern times that the losing side refuses to even give the other party's guy, I mean this is how it works - up until now. Let's flip this. What if the white racist (that are supposedly so racist he got elected twice) was picketing over BO winning. They just come out of the woodwork like the morons we currently have doing the "he's not my president" b.s. Wouldn't that of been the equivalent to this (that was no where near happening)?
Actually, the media is covering it to make it bigger and more effective than this is, another gift from them. A Happy was on Tucker Carlson tonight and the dud said "As a happy man, we're concerned about some of the legislation that "could be" coming. Of course when he got flustered he had no comeback on what exactly are you and your friends so worried about Trump doing. He got pressed 3x and could not answer (because they're the least of Trump's problems and he's not going to do anything anyway.
right.... and u are the ____ who believes there's actually a commander in chief that has never had an alcoholic beverage? maybe baron is not his child and he is a virgin too? what kind of person has never had a drink? i mean hes politicfact check has come wrong on 90% of the statements he has said. keep believing everything he says like the sheep u are.
0
right.... and u are the ____ who believes there's actually a commander in chief that has never had an alcoholic beverage? maybe baron is not his child and he is a virgin too? what kind of person has never had a drink? i mean hes politicfact check has come wrong on 90% of the statements he has said. keep believing everything he says like the sheep u are.
right.... and u are the ____ who believes there's actually a commander in chief that has never had an alcoholic beverage? maybe baron is not his child and he is a virgin too? what kind of person has never had a drink? i mean hes politicfact check has come wrong on 90% of the statements he has said. keep believing everything he says like the sheep u are.
His brother was an alcoholic that died from it... The Boss was aware that he may carry the same gene so he never drank. Look it up. He's not the only person to never have a drink. Ted Nugent has never done a drug or a drink - which is way harder to believe than The Boss - Nyet?
0
Quote Originally Posted by mainman11111:
right.... and u are the ____ who believes there's actually a commander in chief that has never had an alcoholic beverage? maybe baron is not his child and he is a virgin too? what kind of person has never had a drink? i mean hes politicfact check has come wrong on 90% of the statements he has said. keep believing everything he says like the sheep u are.
His brother was an alcoholic that died from it... The Boss was aware that he may carry the same gene so he never drank. Look it up. He's not the only person to never have a drink. Ted Nugent has never done a drug or a drink - which is way harder to believe than The Boss - Nyet?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.