Clinton flat out denied ever being on pedophile island but the flight logs says 26 times....
What did actually Epstein do for a living?? I know he stole over 40 million from the owner of the limited clothing store... ponzi scheme??? Blackmail???
Clinton flat out denied ever being on pedophile island but the flight logs says 26 times....
What did actually Epstein do for a living?? I know he stole over 40 million from the owner of the limited clothing store... ponzi scheme??? Blackmail???
Clinton flat out denied ever being on pedophile island but the flight logs says 26 times....
What did actually Epstein do for a living?? I know he stole over 40 million from the owner of the limited clothing store... ponzi scheme??? Blackmail???
Nobody can prove what someone knows in their own mind. That said, Clinton was on perv island. The unsealed travel logs prove it and photos prove it. Trump was involved in real estate deals. Not a single photo, nor witness, nor travel log places Trump on the island. Trump's photos are at fund raisers and other assorted events for the rich....not on perv island.
That's a big distinction that you are overlooking Stu.
Nobody can prove what someone knows in their own mind. That said, Clinton was on perv island. The unsealed travel logs prove it and photos prove it. Trump was involved in real estate deals. Not a single photo, nor witness, nor travel log places Trump on the island. Trump's photos are at fund raisers and other assorted events for the rich....not on perv island.
That's a big distinction that you are overlooking Stu.
It's not about proving in court it is knowing the information to leverage in future negotiations.
Seldom anything is heard in court plea deals and gag orders prevent this type of thing.
It's not about proving in court it is knowing the information to leverage in future negotiations.
Seldom anything is heard in court plea deals and gag orders prevent this type of thing.
What am I overlooking? I wasn't really making any specific point or attempting to denigrate the President.
What am I overlooking? I wasn't really making any specific point or attempting to denigrate the President.
You insinuate things all of the time Stu. Then when you are called out, you have a very tricky way of saying that you did not exactly say what you insinuated. Why do you play this game?
You insinuate things all of the time Stu. Then when you are called out, you have a very tricky way of saying that you did not exactly say what you insinuated. Why do you play this game?
What was I insinuating? I don't "insinuate" much. I pretty much come out and say what's on my mind. And I don't involve myself in this Trump love/hate fest that has very little to do with politics. I stand on ten toes behind everything I say on this site. No trickery or back peddling needed. If you're gonna call me out for some b.s. you better back it up with facts. Let's speak to what's really going on. You thought I was slamming Trump. I was defending him but you though I was slamming him and his little stubby unit is shoved so far up you arse and/or down your throat that you felt you had to defend him. How's that for insinuating? You people are insane. Even if someone comes in here and says the makes the most benign comment, someone will twist it and turn it into a debate. It's maddening. I've been trying to be very diplomatic as of late and yet I simply make a comment that Trump had his wife with him in all of the pictures i've seen and that she doesn't strike me as a Ghislaine Maxwell type that would be complicit in him diddling young girls. I didn'y insinuate anything. You took what you wanted to from that and used it as fodder for a debate that didn't exist.
"Clinton was on perv island! Trump wasn't!" So freakin' what. It has no bearing on what I was saying. I wasn't defending Clinton, who I detest. I wasn't "insinuating" that Trump is guilty of anything. Geez. Get off that man's tip.
What was I insinuating? I don't "insinuate" much. I pretty much come out and say what's on my mind. And I don't involve myself in this Trump love/hate fest that has very little to do with politics. I stand on ten toes behind everything I say on this site. No trickery or back peddling needed. If you're gonna call me out for some b.s. you better back it up with facts. Let's speak to what's really going on. You thought I was slamming Trump. I was defending him but you though I was slamming him and his little stubby unit is shoved so far up you arse and/or down your throat that you felt you had to defend him. How's that for insinuating? You people are insane. Even if someone comes in here and says the makes the most benign comment, someone will twist it and turn it into a debate. It's maddening. I've been trying to be very diplomatic as of late and yet I simply make a comment that Trump had his wife with him in all of the pictures i've seen and that she doesn't strike me as a Ghislaine Maxwell type that would be complicit in him diddling young girls. I didn'y insinuate anything. You took what you wanted to from that and used it as fodder for a debate that didn't exist.
"Clinton was on perv island! Trump wasn't!" So freakin' what. It has no bearing on what I was saying. I wasn't defending Clinton, who I detest. I wasn't "insinuating" that Trump is guilty of anything. Geez. Get off that man's tip.
Ha....man cry me a river, you need to be on the Jim Bakker tv show with the sob story you love to tell. Connect the dots old guy, you are smart enough to know that Trump was seen with the guy multiple times, Trump has a life long history of taking advantage and using women..so lets not play lawyer ball and claim that he was above such things...he is above nothing when it comes to taking advantage of females.
So you didnt like the lobotomy remark, it fits if you continue to look the other way with regards to Trump and his history. Maybe it will come out, maybe not and I agree with others about Clinton...of course it fits his MO totally...in the same way it fits Trump's even more.
Ha....man cry me a river, you need to be on the Jim Bakker tv show with the sob story you love to tell. Connect the dots old guy, you are smart enough to know that Trump was seen with the guy multiple times, Trump has a life long history of taking advantage and using women..so lets not play lawyer ball and claim that he was above such things...he is above nothing when it comes to taking advantage of females.
So you didnt like the lobotomy remark, it fits if you continue to look the other way with regards to Trump and his history. Maybe it will come out, maybe not and I agree with others about Clinton...of course it fits his MO totally...in the same way it fits Trump's even more.
Why not? Maybe she likes underage girls herself. If the Clinton's can be convicted on suspicion, no good reason to exempt Melania.
Why not? Maybe she likes underage girls herself. If the Clinton's can be convicted on suspicion, no good reason to exempt Melania.
Stu...I now can see the point that you were mocking the people pointing their respective fingers at Trump by bringing the 1st Lady into the discussion. I certainly didn't mean to offend you so let's leave it at that. I took what you said the wrong way. Period.
I watched the Netflix documentary on this topic and Trump is on record as visiting Epstein at his home to discuss real estate deals. Trump commented on the fact that the girls in his pool looked very young. That is the extent of his involvement, but that doesn't make him complicit. Clinton on the other hand???
All of the goofs here will use that as evidence against Trump because they are so filled with hate for the guy. They will all be voting across the board for the Desperatecrats in November with their squeaky clean Biden leading the way. They are hypocrites pure and simple.
Stu...I now can see the point that you were mocking the people pointing their respective fingers at Trump by bringing the 1st Lady into the discussion. I certainly didn't mean to offend you so let's leave it at that. I took what you said the wrong way. Period.
I watched the Netflix documentary on this topic and Trump is on record as visiting Epstein at his home to discuss real estate deals. Trump commented on the fact that the girls in his pool looked very young. That is the extent of his involvement, but that doesn't make him complicit. Clinton on the other hand???
All of the goofs here will use that as evidence against Trump because they are so filled with hate for the guy. They will all be voting across the board for the Desperatecrats in November with their squeaky clean Biden leading the way. They are hypocrites pure and simple.
She just doesn't strike me as the type, Key. Completely arbitrary, as obviously i've know nothing about her, but she just doesn't strike me as the type. It's not a defense of Trump or an indictment on Clinton. Was just more so saying how anybody with an old lady knows there are some that kowtow and some that will slit your throat. She seems like the latter. Sure, there was the Stormy Daniels thing but I believe even in that, she cut him slack because of him entering politics. I think she would've divorced him if not for that. I bet privately she has her foot on his balls. My comments were as a man talking man shop. Crazy wife shop. Not political shop. My wife isn't that crazy but she wouldn't go for the okie doke either. If we went to party with the Epsteins, we wouldn't be closing the place down, if you know what I mean? And I wouldn't at any point be flying solo. I have a lot of freedom but I can't just walk all over her. And she has an eye for creeps.
She just doesn't strike me as the type, Key. Completely arbitrary, as obviously i've know nothing about her, but she just doesn't strike me as the type. It's not a defense of Trump or an indictment on Clinton. Was just more so saying how anybody with an old lady knows there are some that kowtow and some that will slit your throat. She seems like the latter. Sure, there was the Stormy Daniels thing but I believe even in that, she cut him slack because of him entering politics. I think she would've divorced him if not for that. I bet privately she has her foot on his balls. My comments were as a man talking man shop. Crazy wife shop. Not political shop. My wife isn't that crazy but she wouldn't go for the okie doke either. If we went to party with the Epsteins, we wouldn't be closing the place down, if you know what I mean? And I wouldn't at any point be flying solo. I have a lot of freedom but I can't just walk all over her. And she has an eye for creeps.
Dude, it's all good. I don't get offended by anything on this site, or the internet in general. Scal is the only one that ever came close to offending me. He's the only one to ever get under my skin.
Dude, it's all good. I don't get offended by anything on this site, or the internet in general. Scal is the only one that ever came close to offending me. He's the only one to ever get under my skin.
A while ago, you mentioned in a thread that you & your wife took a break from each & you weren't exactly celibate during that period. Did you ever share that with her?
A while ago, you mentioned in a thread that you & your wife took a break from each & you weren't exactly celibate during that period. Did you ever share that with her?
Geez, you are a weirdo stalker but I stick to my guns and my beliefs. And while we've busted each other's balls, I believe that more than likely you are a good and righteous person.
The break was before we were married. I slept with several women during this time. She knows me so she can figure as much but i've only ever referred to one of them. I still bring her up every now and then when a situation warrants.
Geez, you are a weirdo stalker but I stick to my guns and my beliefs. And while we've busted each other's balls, I believe that more than likely you are a good and righteous person.
The break was before we were married. I slept with several women during this time. She knows me so she can figure as much but i've only ever referred to one of them. I still bring her up every now and then when a situation warrants.
Doing it before you are married is a huge difference IMO.
I asked the question because you seem to have a dynamite relationship with your wife & you speak highly of her. That's why I thought it was farked up fooling around on her during the break thinking you were married at the time.
Glad you didn't act like a scumbag swinging dick.
A good women is hard to find/keep for gambling degenerates like us.
Doing it before you are married is a huge difference IMO.
I asked the question because you seem to have a dynamite relationship with your wife & you speak highly of her. That's why I thought it was farked up fooling around on her during the break thinking you were married at the time.
Glad you didn't act like a scumbag swinging dick.
A good women is hard to find/keep for gambling degenerates like us.
I'm no saint. I've kept drug use from her. I have always taken care of business. I've always been a breadwinner. I've always been good to her. Loving, respectful. We have a good thing so she's never had to question me but I know at times she has had her suspicians. I socially partook. It's not like I was a druggy laying around. Never brought it around her. When we moved, I only ever got down here when a bunch of buddies were up for a bachelor party but when I would go back to California for business... It's a secret i've struggled with breaking to her. It's a non-issue now but i'll still have to come clean.
I'm no saint. I've kept drug use from her. I have always taken care of business. I've always been a breadwinner. I've always been good to her. Loving, respectful. We have a good thing so she's never had to question me but I know at times she has had her suspicians. I socially partook. It's not like I was a druggy laying around. Never brought it around her. When we moved, I only ever got down here when a bunch of buddies were up for a bachelor party but when I would go back to California for business... It's a secret i've struggled with breaking to her. It's a non-issue now but i'll still have to come clean.
I wouldn't poke the bear. Some things are better left unsaid. If you share it, what good comes of it? If you want to get it off your chest, write down what you would say & then burn it.
We've been married 30 years & there's one thing I've never told my wife. I don't plan on screwing up at this point in my life.
I wouldn't poke the bear. Some things are better left unsaid. If you share it, what good comes of it? If you want to get it off your chest, write down what you would say & then burn it.
We've been married 30 years & there's one thing I've never told my wife. I don't plan on screwing up at this point in my life.
Reports state Maxwell is under the heaviest guard every recorded at the place she is being held....... it's also being reported she has sex tapes of many famous people and politicians, hidden away for safe keeping. Many people are worried what comes of this, and Barr seems intent on going after her, considering he had to fire people just to get a case to move forward. This will end up being bigger than O.J.'s court case, considering who's involved. Contrary to what most believe, she will live to tell her story ( in exchange for some leniency).
Reports state Maxwell is under the heaviest guard every recorded at the place she is being held....... it's also being reported she has sex tapes of many famous people and politicians, hidden away for safe keeping. Many people are worried what comes of this, and Barr seems intent on going after her, considering he had to fire people just to get a case to move forward. This will end up being bigger than O.J.'s court case, considering who's involved. Contrary to what most believe, she will live to tell her story ( in exchange for some leniency).
I believe she has the get out of jail free card, if not minimal time served. She has the golden ticket. All of they places are extremely secure. A lot of powerful ,well known people caught with their "hands" in the "cookie " jar...question is how bad do people want to know and at what price.
I believe she has the get out of jail free card, if not minimal time served. She has the golden ticket. All of they places are extremely secure. A lot of powerful ,well known people caught with their "hands" in the "cookie " jar...question is how bad do people want to know and at what price.
She may have not eaten the cookies, but she served the cookies so I don't see how she gets out of this completely. If she does indeed have the tapes, this will get very, very interesting.
I am all for justice, but unfortunately we live in a world where money speaks louder than justice. Epstein evaded justice for decades because of his wealth. The almighty US dollar will be used to attempt control over yet another injustice, although I would love to see everyone exposed that took part.
Hopefully the tapes are protected and part of her instructions upon death in legal form. Then all of the shit will hit the fan regardless.
She may have not eaten the cookies, but she served the cookies so I don't see how she gets out of this completely. If she does indeed have the tapes, this will get very, very interesting.
I am all for justice, but unfortunately we live in a world where money speaks louder than justice. Epstein evaded justice for decades because of his wealth. The almighty US dollar will be used to attempt control over yet another injustice, although I would love to see everyone exposed that took part.
Hopefully the tapes are protected and part of her instructions upon death in legal form. Then all of the shit will hit the fan regardless.
An unsubstantiated false slur on our President ..shame.
An unsubstantiated false slur on our President ..shame.
Not at all. Don't you remember his comment about how Epstein like them young? Your memory is getting more & more selective Slim.
They are still waiting for his DNA on his rape case. Why the delay? An innocent man doesn't act like he has something to hide.
Not at all. Don't you remember his comment about how Epstein like them young? Your memory is getting more & more selective Slim.
They are still waiting for his DNA on his rape case. Why the delay? An innocent man doesn't act like he has something to hide.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.