Let the forum know when you actually decide to provide some real hard evidence reinforcing your faulty claims..
While the unemployment rate actually has come down from the 10 percent readings it showed in 2009, the amount of participants for the SNAP program has soared.
There were fewer than 31 million people on food stamps as recently as November 2008, but an aggressive effort from President Obama's administration has helped build participation, with the total increasing by 44 percent since the president took office in January 2009.
https://www.cnbc.com/id/48898378
Now if those dummies at CNBC only knew there was no evidence for their claims!
While the unemployment rate actually has come down from the 10 percent readings it showed in 2009, the amount of participants for the SNAP program has soared.
There were fewer than 31 million people on food stamps as recently as November 2008, but an aggressive effort from President Obama's administration has helped build participation, with the total increasing by 44 percent since the president took office in January 2009.
https://www.cnbc.com/id/48898378
Now if those dummies at CNBC only knew there was no evidence for their claims!
I didn't even address you (post #7). I just went right into my point which you conveniently avoided. seems like that's you MO.
-the post regarding o Riley's segment on race, you didn't even address the content of the thread. you argued he has speech writers etc. and didn't argue the content. you avoided the issue
-you tell lords you're not affiliated with either party and that supporting a party is dumb. yet I asked you in another thread (which you also avoided) why every thread you make is anti-republican. If you were truly neutral, we would at least see some threads out of you that are in some kind of disagreement to democratic policies. yet in your 26 thread a day average, we haven't seen any criticizing democrats.
-I simply pointed out you made two threads in complete contradiction to each other on post #7. my reply was to dl36 on post 11.
and then you're going demand I address you in a certain way?
you got... just problems in general
I didn't even address you (post #7). I just went right into my point which you conveniently avoided. seems like that's you MO.
-the post regarding o Riley's segment on race, you didn't even address the content of the thread. you argued he has speech writers etc. and didn't argue the content. you avoided the issue
-you tell lords you're not affiliated with either party and that supporting a party is dumb. yet I asked you in another thread (which you also avoided) why every thread you make is anti-republican. If you were truly neutral, we would at least see some threads out of you that are in some kind of disagreement to democratic policies. yet in your 26 thread a day average, we haven't seen any criticizing democrats.
-I simply pointed out you made two threads in complete contradiction to each other on post #7. my reply was to dl36 on post 11.
and then you're going demand I address you in a certain way?
you got... just problems in general
More than 76,000 workers went on the federal government's disability program in July, according to the latest data from the Social Security administration, bringing the total number of new enrollees this year to 534,038.
Although that is down somewhat from the same month last year, enrollment in the Social Security Disability Insurance program remains sharply higher than it has been historically. Since 2009, an average of about 1 million workers have gone on SSDI annually — a 31% increase from the average enrollment over the previous 10 years.
As a result, a record 8.9 million workers are now collecting disability benefits, which is up 15% since the recovery officially started in mid-2009.
More than 76,000 workers went on the federal government's disability program in July, according to the latest data from the Social Security administration, bringing the total number of new enrollees this year to 534,038.
Although that is down somewhat from the same month last year, enrollment in the Social Security Disability Insurance program remains sharply higher than it has been historically. Since 2009, an average of about 1 million workers have gone on SSDI annually — a 31% increase from the average enrollment over the previous 10 years.
As a result, a record 8.9 million workers are now collecting disability benefits, which is up 15% since the recovery officially started in mid-2009.
More than 76,000 workers went on the federal government's disability program in July, according to the latest data from the Social Security administration, bringing the total number of new enrollees this year to 534,038.
Although that is down somewhat from the same month last year, enrollment in the Social Security Disability Insurance program remains sharply higher than it has been historically. Since 2009, an average of about 1 million workers have gone on SSDI annually — a 31% increase from the average enrollment over the previous 10 years.
As a result, a record 8.9 million workers are now collecting disability benefits, which is up 15% since the recovery officially started in mid-2009.
More than 76,000 workers went on the federal government's disability program in July, according to the latest data from the Social Security administration, bringing the total number of new enrollees this year to 534,038.
Although that is down somewhat from the same month last year, enrollment in the Social Security Disability Insurance program remains sharply higher than it has been historically. Since 2009, an average of about 1 million workers have gone on SSDI annually — a 31% increase from the average enrollment over the previous 10 years.
As a result, a record 8.9 million workers are now collecting disability benefits, which is up 15% since the recovery officially started in mid-2009.
chkn dinner
chkn dinner
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.