• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
    • NFL Week 2
      NFL Week 2
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • Lions-Bills Early Leans
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Politics

    Economically, Could Obama Be America's Best President?

    «First Previous 123
    14daroad
    Stiln
    Peraski
    dl36
    TRAIN69
    ...
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 1770
    Posts: 67
    «First Previous 123
     
    14daroad
    14daroad
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2005
    Posts: 9261
    Posted: Jul. 30, 2013 - 6:45 PM ET #51

    Quote Originally Posted by Stiln:

    Let the forum know when you actually decide to provide some real hard evidence reinforcing your faulty claims..


    You may want to stop pretending you can refute a single thing I said.

    You can't, because they're true. 

    Of course when someone says "There were more people working in America at the height of the 1982 recession than there are today" then provides a reference saying explicitly: 'U.S. Labor Force Participation Rate Lowest Since 1979' You may want to stop pretending no "evidence" was provided for the claim.

    Because when you pretend, people start drawing negative conclusions about you.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Stiln:

    Let the forum know when you actually decide to provide some real hard evidence reinforcing your faulty claims..


    You may want to stop pretending you can refute a single thing I said.

    You can't, because they're true. 

    Of course when someone says "There were more people working in America at the height of the 1982 recession than there are today" then provides a reference saying explicitly: 'U.S. Labor Force Participation Rate Lowest Since 1979' You may want to stop pretending no "evidence" was provided for the claim.

    Because when you pretend, people start drawing negative conclusions about you.

     
    14daroad
    14daroad
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2005
    Posts: 9261
    Posted: Jul. 30, 2013 - 6:50 PM ET #52

    Good times:

    Recession Officially Over, U.S. Incomes Kept Falling


    https://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/10/us/recession-officially-over-us-incomes-kept-falling.html?_r=1

    Again, great to see the NY Times in on the "no evidence" gag.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Good times:

    Recession Officially Over, U.S. Incomes Kept Falling


    https://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/10/us/recession-officially-over-us-incomes-kept-falling.html?_r=1

    Again, great to see the NY Times in on the "no evidence" gag.

     
    Stiln
    Stiln
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 6431
    Posted: Jul. 30, 2013 - 6:53 PM ET #53

    Well since I'm not longer interested in hearing you waste my time with faulty evidence and garbage that is not true,

    I gotta run and enjoy life.

    But you stay here and keep defending your internet honor that you so vehemently argue to the death with the last word..

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Well since I'm not longer interested in hearing you waste my time with faulty evidence and garbage that is not true,

    I gotta run and enjoy life.

    But you stay here and keep defending your internet honor that you so vehemently argue to the death with the last word..

     
    14daroad
    14daroad
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2005
    Posts: 9261
    Posted: Jul. 30, 2013 - 6:55 PM ET #54

    More Americans than ever using food stamps

    A record 47.8 million people are enrolled in the program despite the recession's end and a stronger economy.


    https://money.msn.com/now/post.aspx?post=e9caf453-75ca-4ad6-ae9d-9b991cd6702f

    Even these guys get it:

    While the unemployment rate actually has come down from the 10 percent readings it showed in 2009, the amount of participants for the SNAP program has soared.

    There were fewer than 31 million people on food stamps as recently as November 2008, but an aggressive effort from President Obama's administration has helped build participation, with the total increasing by 44 percent since the president took office in January 2009.

    https://www.cnbc.com/id/48898378

    Now if those dummies at CNBC only knew there was no evidence for their claims!


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    More Americans than ever using food stamps

    A record 47.8 million people are enrolled in the program despite the recession's end and a stronger economy.


    https://money.msn.com/now/post.aspx?post=e9caf453-75ca-4ad6-ae9d-9b991cd6702f

    Even these guys get it:

    While the unemployment rate actually has come down from the 10 percent readings it showed in 2009, the amount of participants for the SNAP program has soared.

    There were fewer than 31 million people on food stamps as recently as November 2008, but an aggressive effort from President Obama's administration has helped build participation, with the total increasing by 44 percent since the president took office in January 2009.

    https://www.cnbc.com/id/48898378

    Now if those dummies at CNBC only knew there was no evidence for their claims!


     
    14daroad
    14daroad
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2005
    Posts: 9261
    Posted: Jul. 30, 2013 - 6:56 PM ET #55

    Quote Originally Posted by Stiln:

    Well since I'm not longer interested in hearing you waste my time with faulty evidence and garbage that is not true,


    Everything I said is fact.

    Which is why you spent 20 posts trying to obfuscate those facts.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Stiln:

    Well since I'm not longer interested in hearing you waste my time with faulty evidence and garbage that is not true,


    Everything I said is fact.

    Which is why you spent 20 posts trying to obfuscate those facts.

     
    14daroad
    14daroad
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2005
    Posts: 9261
    Posted: Jul. 30, 2013 - 7:05 PM ET #56

    Record number on SSDI. Disabled worker, spouse of disabled worker, child of disabled worker: 10,914,232 - July 2013
     
    Which is 144,080 more than July 2012.

    Feb 2009: 9,334,369

    https://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/currentpay.cgi

    Now if only those dummies at the Social Security Administration knew they had no evidence for these claims!
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Record number on SSDI. Disabled worker, spouse of disabled worker, child of disabled worker: 10,914,232 - July 2013
     
    Which is 144,080 more than July 2012.

    Feb 2009: 9,334,369

    https://www.socialsecurity.gov/cgi-bin/currentpay.cgi

    Now if only those dummies at the Social Security Administration knew they had no evidence for these claims!
     
    Peraski
    Peraski
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2010
    Posts: 300
    Posted: Jul. 30, 2013 - 8:09 PM ET #57

    Quote Originally Posted by Stiln:



    You have an attitude problem, don't ever address me the way you did.

    I didn't even address you (post #7).  I just went right into my point which you conveniently avoided.  seems like that's you MO. 

    -the post regarding o Riley's segment on race, you didn't even address the content of the thread.   you argued he has speech writers etc. and didn't argue the content.  you avoided the issue

    -you tell lords you're not affiliated with either party and that supporting a party is dumb.  yet I asked you in another thread (which you also avoided) why every thread you make is anti-republican.   If you were truly neutral, we would at least see some threads out of you that are in some kind of disagreement to democratic policies.   yet in your 26 thread a day average, we haven't seen any criticizing democrats.  

    -I simply pointed out you made two threads in complete contradiction to each other on post #7.  my reply was to dl36 on post 11.

    and then you're going demand I address you in a certain way?  

    you got... just problems in general

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by Stiln:



    You have an attitude problem, don't ever address me the way you did.

    I didn't even address you (post #7).  I just went right into my point which you conveniently avoided.  seems like that's you MO. 

    -the post regarding o Riley's segment on race, you didn't even address the content of the thread.   you argued he has speech writers etc. and didn't argue the content.  you avoided the issue

    -you tell lords you're not affiliated with either party and that supporting a party is dumb.  yet I asked you in another thread (which you also avoided) why every thread you make is anti-republican.   If you were truly neutral, we would at least see some threads out of you that are in some kind of disagreement to democratic policies.   yet in your 26 thread a day average, we haven't seen any criticizing democrats.  

    -I simply pointed out you made two threads in complete contradiction to each other on post #7.  my reply was to dl36 on post 11.

    and then you're going demand I address you in a certain way?  

    you got... just problems in general

     
    dl36
    dl36
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2003
    Posts: 27850
    Posted: Jul. 30, 2013 - 8:36 PM ET #58

    didnt I say that the rich doing well and the economy doing well together only proves the trickle down theory?

    So I guess you are saying that the people who talk trickle down are lying or just too stupid to know they are incorrect...  I dont know if I agree with your point... but I do respect your right to make it...


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    didnt I say that the rich doing well and the economy doing well together only proves the trickle down theory?

    So I guess you are saying that the people who talk trickle down are lying or just too stupid to know they are incorrect...  I dont know if I agree with your point... but I do respect your right to make it...


     
    TRAIN69
    TRAIN69
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2002
    Posts: 55592
    Posted: Jul. 30, 2013 - 9:57 PM ET #59

     

    Somehow the laughing head seemed too easy......

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

     

    Somehow the laughing head seemed too easy......

     
    14daroad
    14daroad
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2005
    Posts: 9261
    Posted: Jul. 31, 2013 - 11:15 AM ET #60

    More than 76,000 workers went on the federal government's disability program in July, according to the latest data from the Social Security administration, bringing the total number of new enrollees this year to 534,038.

    Although that is down somewhat from the same month last year, enrollment in the Social Security Disability Insurance program remains sharply higher than it has been historically. Since 2009, an average of about 1 million workers have gone on SSDI annually — a 31% increase from the average enrollment over the previous 10 years.

    As a result, a record 8.9 million workers are now collecting disability benefits, which is up 15% since the recovery officially started in mid-2009.

    https://news.investors.com/073013-665681-nearly-9-million-workers-now-on-disability.htm
     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    More than 76,000 workers went on the federal government's disability program in July, according to the latest data from the Social Security administration, bringing the total number of new enrollees this year to 534,038.

    Although that is down somewhat from the same month last year, enrollment in the Social Security Disability Insurance program remains sharply higher than it has been historically. Since 2009, an average of about 1 million workers have gone on SSDI annually — a 31% increase from the average enrollment over the previous 10 years.

    As a result, a record 8.9 million workers are now collecting disability benefits, which is up 15% since the recovery officially started in mid-2009.

    https://news.investors.com/073013-665681-nearly-9-million-workers-now-on-disability.htm
     

     
    Stiln
    Stiln
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 6431
    Posted: Jul. 31, 2013 - 11:28 AM ET #61

    Quote Originally Posted by 14daroad:

    More than 76,000 workers went on the federal government's disability program in July, according to the latest data from the Social Security administration, bringing the total number of new enrollees this year to 534,038.

    Although that is down somewhat from the same month last year, enrollment in the Social Security Disability Insurance program remains sharply higher than it has been historically. Since 2009, an average of about 1 million workers have gone on SSDI annually — a 31% increase from the average enrollment over the previous 10 years.

    As a result, a record 8.9 million workers are now collecting disability benefits, which is up 15% since the recovery officially started in mid-2009.

    https://news.investors.com/073013-665681-nearly-9-million-workers-now-on-disability.htm
     



    You have issues the way you take to the internet, politics.

    Like you think somehow you're accomplishing something here, changing peoples minds, which you're not..

    You defending your anonymous internet honor little buddy?
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by 14daroad:

    More than 76,000 workers went on the federal government's disability program in July, according to the latest data from the Social Security administration, bringing the total number of new enrollees this year to 534,038.

    Although that is down somewhat from the same month last year, enrollment in the Social Security Disability Insurance program remains sharply higher than it has been historically. Since 2009, an average of about 1 million workers have gone on SSDI annually — a 31% increase from the average enrollment over the previous 10 years.

    As a result, a record 8.9 million workers are now collecting disability benefits, which is up 15% since the recovery officially started in mid-2009.

    https://news.investors.com/073013-665681-nearly-9-million-workers-now-on-disability.htm
     



    You have issues the way you take to the internet, politics.

    Like you think somehow you're accomplishing something here, changing peoples minds, which you're not..

    You defending your anonymous internet honor little buddy?
     
    Peraski
    Peraski
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2010
    Posts: 300
    Posted: Jul. 31, 2013 - 11:39 AM ET #62

    da road- stiln asks for evidence, completely ignores the content of the argument, and goes on personal attacks.  like the links provided by stiln are better evidence than the sources/links you provide?  on the post above, you provide statistics and link, and stiln's reply is to demean you personally.   then the follow up post by stiln is going to be: 'the little posters coming to your rescue...'.  again, completely ignoring the content of the argument and getting personal.  stiln- you are fooling no one, and are only exposing yourself as a gigantic tool.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    da road- stiln asks for evidence, completely ignores the content of the argument, and goes on personal attacks.  like the links provided by stiln are better evidence than the sources/links you provide?  on the post above, you provide statistics and link, and stiln's reply is to demean you personally.   then the follow up post by stiln is going to be: 'the little posters coming to your rescue...'.  again, completely ignoring the content of the argument and getting personal.  stiln- you are fooling no one, and are only exposing yourself as a gigantic tool.
     
    Stiln
    Stiln
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 6431
    Posted: Jul. 31, 2013 - 11:40 AM ET #63

    Quote Originally Posted by Peraski:

    da road- stiln asks for evidence, completely ignores the content of the argument, and goes on personal attacks.  like the links provided by stiln are better evidence than the sources/links you provide?  on the post above, you provide statistics and link, and stiln's reply is to demean you personally.   then the follow up post by stiln is going to be: 'the little posters coming to your rescue...'.  again, completely ignoring the content of the argument and getting personal.  stiln- you are fooling no one, and are only exposing yourself as a gigantic tool.


    Huh?

    You're an alias..... Wanna guess why that is?
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Peraski:

    da road- stiln asks for evidence, completely ignores the content of the argument, and goes on personal attacks.  like the links provided by stiln are better evidence than the sources/links you provide?  on the post above, you provide statistics and link, and stiln's reply is to demean you personally.   then the follow up post by stiln is going to be: 'the little posters coming to your rescue...'.  again, completely ignoring the content of the argument and getting personal.  stiln- you are fooling no one, and are only exposing yourself as a gigantic tool.


    Huh?

    You're an alias..... Wanna guess why that is?
     
    captjohn67
    captjohn67
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2008
    Posts: 12821
    Posted: Jul. 31, 2013 - 11:47 AM ET #64

    Quote Originally Posted by Peraski:

    da road- stiln asks for evidence, completely ignores the content of the argument, and goes on personal attacks.  like the links provided by stiln are better evidence than the sources/links you provide?  on the post above, you provide statistics and link, and stiln's reply is to demean you personally.   then the follow up post by stiln is going to be: 'the little posters coming to your rescue...'.  again, completely ignoring the content of the argument and getting personal.  stiln- you are fooling no one, and are only exposing yourself as a gigantic tool.

    chkn dinner

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Quote Originally Posted by Peraski:

    da road- stiln asks for evidence, completely ignores the content of the argument, and goes on personal attacks.  like the links provided by stiln are better evidence than the sources/links you provide?  on the post above, you provide statistics and link, and stiln's reply is to demean you personally.   then the follow up post by stiln is going to be: 'the little posters coming to your rescue...'.  again, completely ignoring the content of the argument and getting personal.  stiln- you are fooling no one, and are only exposing yourself as a gigantic tool.

    chkn dinner

     
    Peraski
    Peraski
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2010
    Posts: 300
    Posted: Jul. 31, 2013 - 12:08 PM ET #65

    you should make an alias that creates threads that are in opposition to democratic views, since you 'don't support either party' and are 'neutral'.  stiln can be the anti gop poster and (here's a suggestion for your alias: 'takn') can make the threads that are anti democratic.  or you can just be 'neutral' like you say you are, and find something worth posting that is anti left wing.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    you should make an alias that creates threads that are in opposition to democratic views, since you 'don't support either party' and are 'neutral'.  stiln can be the anti gop poster and (here's a suggestion for your alias: 'takn') can make the threads that are anti democratic.  or you can just be 'neutral' like you say you are, and find something worth posting that is anti left wing.
     
    14daroad
    14daroad
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2005
    Posts: 9261
    Posted: Jul. 31, 2013 - 4:33 PM ET #66

    Quote Originally Posted by Peraski:

    da road- stiln asks for evidence, completely ignores the content of the argument, and goes on personal attacks.  like the links provided by stiln are better evidence than the sources/links you provide?  on the post above, you provide statistics and link, and stiln's reply is to demean you personally.    

    Of course it is.

    Why do you think he reposed an article from May that he already created a thread on?

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Peraski:

    da road- stiln asks for evidence, completely ignores the content of the argument, and goes on personal attacks.  like the links provided by stiln are better evidence than the sources/links you provide?  on the post above, you provide statistics and link, and stiln's reply is to demean you personally.    

    Of course it is.

    Why do you think he reposed an article from May that he already created a thread on?

     
     
    14daroad
    14daroad
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2005
    Posts: 9261
    Posted: Jul. 31, 2013 - 4:35 PM ET #67

    Quote Originally Posted by Stiln:




    Like you think somehow you're accomplishing something here, changing peoples minds, which you're not..



    Since there is not even the most basic attempt to actually think about what is being offered as fact regarding the Obama Presidency, we can see that this, like many, many other posts of yours, is pure projection.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Stiln:




    Like you think somehow you're accomplishing something here, changing peoples minds, which you're not..



    Since there is not even the most basic attempt to actually think about what is being offered as fact regarding the Obama Presidency, we can see that this, like many, many other posts of yours, is pure projection.
    All Forums | Politics
    «First Previous 123

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 448,439 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 “To BEt, or not to BEt, that is the question” ...Fubah2's risky bets 302,119 Covers arrow
    • PART DEUX 274 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 257,521 Covers arrow
    • I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters 58,272 Covers arrow
    • Couple Beers 4,423 Covers arrow
    • Thursday 09/17/2026 525 Covers arrow
    • Trump lies so much. 20,718 Covers arrow
    • Wednesday 09/16/2026 711 Covers arrow
    • We have picked a terrible time to have the stupidest president ever 28,958 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.