"Facebook announced Friday that former President Donald Trump would be suspended from its platform until at least January 7th, 2023 -- two years from when he was initially suspended.
Facebook (FB) said it will then assess the circumstances to see if he should be allowed back on.
The move guarantees Trump won't be able to post from his Facebook account, which had tens of millions of followers, prior to the 2022 midterm elections."
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
breaking news from cnn
"Facebook announced Friday that former President Donald Trump would be suspended from its platform until at least January 7th, 2023 -- two years from when he was initially suspended.
Facebook (FB) said it will then assess the circumstances to see if he should be allowed back on.
The move guarantees Trump won't be able to post from his Facebook account, which had tens of millions of followers, prior to the 2022 midterm elections."
breaking news from cnn "Facebook announced Friday that former President Donald Trump would be suspended from its platform until at least January 7th, 2023 -- two years from when he was initially suspended. Facebook (FB) said it will then assess the circumstances to see if he should be allowed back on. The move guarantees Trump won't be able to post from his Facebook account, which had tens of millions of followers, prior to the 2022 midterm elections."
I wonder how trump feels about that? LOL
0
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:
breaking news from cnn "Facebook announced Friday that former President Donald Trump would be suspended from its platform until at least January 7th, 2023 -- two years from when he was initially suspended. Facebook (FB) said it will then assess the circumstances to see if he should be allowed back on. The move guarantees Trump won't be able to post from his Facebook account, which had tens of millions of followers, prior to the 2022 midterm elections."
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: breaking news from cnn "Facebook announced Friday that former President Donald Trump would be suspended from its platform until at least January 7th, 2023 -- two years from when he was initially suspended. Facebook (FB) said it will then assess the circumstances to see if he should be allowed back on. The move guarantees Trump won't be able to post from his Facebook account, which had tens of millions of followers, prior to the 2022 midterm elections."
I wonder how trump feels about that? LOL
not happy
next is to see what twitter does
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: breaking news from cnn "Facebook announced Friday that former President Donald Trump would be suspended from its platform until at least January 7th, 2023 -- two years from when he was initially suspended. Facebook (FB) said it will then assess the circumstances to see if he should be allowed back on. The move guarantees Trump won't be able to post from his Facebook account, which had tens of millions of followers, prior to the 2022 midterm elections."
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: breaking news from cnn "Facebook announced Friday that former President Donald Trump would be suspended from its platform until at least January 7th, 2023 -- two years from when he was initially suspended. Facebook (FB) said it will then assess the circumstances to see if he should be allowed back on. The move guarantees Trump won't be able to post from his Facebook account, which had tens of millions of followers, prior to the 2022 midterm elections." I wonder how trump feels about that? LOL not happy
next is to see what twitter does
Will look forward to that!
1
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: breaking news from cnn "Facebook announced Friday that former President Donald Trump would be suspended from its platform until at least January 7th, 2023 -- two years from when he was initially suspended. Facebook (FB) said it will then assess the circumstances to see if he should be allowed back on. The move guarantees Trump won't be able to post from his Facebook account, which had tens of millions of followers, prior to the 2022 midterm elections." I wonder how trump feels about that? LOL not happy
all those - red or blue - who post LIES which r significant to the population in terms of incitement, promoting hatred, promoting distrust in our venerable institutions including the constituition, as well as promoting unsubstantiated conspiracy theories - should be banned permanently
that is what i wish for
and i hope it comes true
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
0
all those - red or blue - who post LIES which r significant to the population in terms of incitement, promoting hatred, promoting distrust in our venerable institutions including the constituition, as well as promoting unsubstantiated conspiracy theories - should be banned permanently
all those - red or blue - who post LIES which r significant to the population in terms of incitement, promoting hatred, promoting distrust in our venerable institutions including the constituition, as well as promoting unsubstantiated conspiracy theories - should be banned permanently that is what i wish for and i hope it comes true
Have to agree with that.
trump made LYING popular on the right, and to many ignorant people, acceptable.
It isn't.
0
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:
all those - red or blue - who post LIES which r significant to the population in terms of incitement, promoting hatred, promoting distrust in our venerable institutions including the constituition, as well as promoting unsubstantiated conspiracy theories - should be banned permanently that is what i wish for and i hope it comes true
Have to agree with that.
trump made LYING popular on the right, and to many ignorant people, acceptable.
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: all those - red or blue - who post LIES which r significant to the population in terms of incitement, promoting hatred, promoting distrust in our venerable institutions including the constituition, as well as promoting unsubstantiated conspiracy theories - should be banned permanently that is what i wish for and i hope it comes true I agree, and let's follow those rules completely, until we see how ludicrous these rules are: The Russian Collusion fairy tale was proven a hoax. Anyone who continues to peddle it should be banned from social media, as it is dangerous to incite hatred and distrust. Yet blue check liberals continue to dabble with it. Same with the "Fine people" hoax, which fomented fear and hatred, and was simply an omission of a full statement.
That only holds true if the premise is true.
This premise is FALSE:
"The Russian Collusion fairy tale was proven a hoax"
There wasn't enough evidence to to convict a sitting president, yes, but that does NOT PROVE it was a hoax.
Quite the contrary. Recently released documents *PROVING* Paul Manafort gave republican's internal polling data on key swing states to RUSSIAN inteligence, coupled with the REPUBLICAN-led Senate sub-committee's CONFIRMATION of the previous claims by multiple US intelligence agencies that the Russians DID IN FACT interfere in the 2016 election (as well as 2018 and 2020) in itself counters any false claim that collusion was ****PROVEN**** a HOAX.
So anyone who continues to peddle that "it was PROVEN a HOAX" should be banned from social media (including here), as it is dangerous to incite hatred and distrust.
3
Quote Originally Posted by Circus_Bettor:
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: all those - red or blue - who post LIES which r significant to the population in terms of incitement, promoting hatred, promoting distrust in our venerable institutions including the constituition, as well as promoting unsubstantiated conspiracy theories - should be banned permanently that is what i wish for and i hope it comes true I agree, and let's follow those rules completely, until we see how ludicrous these rules are: The Russian Collusion fairy tale was proven a hoax. Anyone who continues to peddle it should be banned from social media, as it is dangerous to incite hatred and distrust. Yet blue check liberals continue to dabble with it. Same with the "Fine people" hoax, which fomented fear and hatred, and was simply an omission of a full statement.
That only holds true if the premise is true.
This premise is FALSE:
"The Russian Collusion fairy tale was proven a hoax"
There wasn't enough evidence to to convict a sitting president, yes, but that does NOT PROVE it was a hoax.
Quite the contrary. Recently released documents *PROVING* Paul Manafort gave republican's internal polling data on key swing states to RUSSIAN inteligence, coupled with the REPUBLICAN-led Senate sub-committee's CONFIRMATION of the previous claims by multiple US intelligence agencies that the Russians DID IN FACT interfere in the 2016 election (as well as 2018 and 2020) in itself counters any false claim that collusion was ****PROVEN**** a HOAX.
So anyone who continues to peddle that "it was PROVEN a HOAX" should be banned from social media (including here), as it is dangerous to incite hatred and distrust.
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: all those - red or blue - who post LIES which r significant to the population in terms of incitement, promoting hatred, promoting distrust in our venerable institutions including the constituition, as well as promoting unsubstantiated conspiracy theories - should be banned permanently that is what i wish for and i hope it comes true I agree, and let's follow those rules completely, until we see how ludicrous these rules are: The Russian Collusion fairy tale was proven a hoax. Anyone who continues to peddle it should be banned from social media, as it is dangerous to incite hatred and distrust. Yet blue check liberals continue to dabble with it. Same with the "Fine people" hoax, which fomented fear and hatred, and was simply an omission of a full statement.
That only holds true if the premise is true.
This premise is FALSE:
"The Russian Collusion fairy tale was proven a hoax"
There wasn't enough evidence to to convict a sitting president, yes, but that does NOT PROVE it was a hoax.
Quite the contrary. Recently released documents *PROVING* Paul Manafort gave republican's internal polling data on key swing states to RUSSIAN inteligence, coupled with the REPUBLICAN-led Senate sub-committee's CONFIRMATION of the previous claims by multiple US intelligence agencies that the Russians DID IN FACT interfere in the 2016 election (as well as 2018 and 2020) in itself counters any false claim that collusion was ****PROVEN**** a HOAX.
So anyone who continues to peddle that "it was PROVEN a HOAX" should be banned from social media (including here), as it is dangerous to incite hatred and distrust.
very good point fubah
now had he stated something like " russian collusion was never proven beyond a reasonable doubt " then that statement would be accurate and true . no argument there .
but i agree that saying it was " proven a hoax " is clearly a false statement
wording and syntax matters
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
2
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by Circus_Bettor:
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: all those - red or blue - who post LIES which r significant to the population in terms of incitement, promoting hatred, promoting distrust in our venerable institutions including the constituition, as well as promoting unsubstantiated conspiracy theories - should be banned permanently that is what i wish for and i hope it comes true I agree, and let's follow those rules completely, until we see how ludicrous these rules are: The Russian Collusion fairy tale was proven a hoax. Anyone who continues to peddle it should be banned from social media, as it is dangerous to incite hatred and distrust. Yet blue check liberals continue to dabble with it. Same with the "Fine people" hoax, which fomented fear and hatred, and was simply an omission of a full statement.
That only holds true if the premise is true.
This premise is FALSE:
"The Russian Collusion fairy tale was proven a hoax"
There wasn't enough evidence to to convict a sitting president, yes, but that does NOT PROVE it was a hoax.
Quite the contrary. Recently released documents *PROVING* Paul Manafort gave republican's internal polling data on key swing states to RUSSIAN inteligence, coupled with the REPUBLICAN-led Senate sub-committee's CONFIRMATION of the previous claims by multiple US intelligence agencies that the Russians DID IN FACT interfere in the 2016 election (as well as 2018 and 2020) in itself counters any false claim that collusion was ****PROVEN**** a HOAX.
So anyone who continues to peddle that "it was PROVEN a HOAX" should be banned from social media (including here), as it is dangerous to incite hatred and distrust.
very good point fubah
now had he stated something like " russian collusion was never proven beyond a reasonable doubt " then that statement would be accurate and true . no argument there .
but i agree that saying it was " proven a hoax " is clearly a false statement
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: all those - red or blue - who post LIES which r significant to the population in terms of incitement, promoting hatred, promoting distrust in our venerable institutions including the constituition, as well as promoting unsubstantiated conspiracy theories - should be banned permanently that is what i wish for and i hope it comes true I agree, and let's follow those rules completely, until we see how ludicrous these rules are: The Russian Collusion fairy tale was proven a hoax. Anyone who continues to peddle it should be banned from social media, as it is dangerous to incite hatred and distrust. Yet blue check liberals continue to dabble with it. Same with the "Fine people" hoax, which fomented fear and hatred, and was simply an omission of a full statement.
That only holds true if the premise is true.
This premise is FALSE:
"The Russian Collusion fairy tale was proven a hoax"
There wasn't enough evidence to to convict a sitting president, yes, but that does NOT PROVE it was a hoax.
Quite the contrary. Recently released documents *PROVING* Paul Manafort gave republican's internal polling data on key swing states to RUSSIAN inteligence, coupled with the REPUBLICAN-led Senate sub-committee's CONFIRMATION of the previous claims by multiple US intelligence agencies that the Russians DID IN FACT interfere in the 2016 election (as well as 2018 and 2020) in itself counters any false claim that collusion was ****PROVEN**** a HOAX.
So anyone who continues to peddle that "it was PROVEN a HOAX" should be bannedfrom social media (including here), as it is dangerous to incite hatred and distrust.
very good point fubah
now had he stated something like " russian collusion was never proven beyond a reasonable doubt " then that statement would be accurate and true . no argument there .
but i agree that saying it was " proven a hoax " is clearly a false statement
wording and syntax matters
Yeah, I'll go along with that.
And proof is somtimes nebulous. For example the weirdos of the infamous "FLAT EARTH SOCIETY" (all republicans, I believe) are convinced that the statement the Earth is spherical and rotates around the Sun, has never been *PROVEN* (to them)
I mean, one can cast doubt on ANYTHING.............though that doesn't make the doubters correct.
0
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by Circus_Bettor:
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: all those - red or blue - who post LIES which r significant to the population in terms of incitement, promoting hatred, promoting distrust in our venerable institutions including the constituition, as well as promoting unsubstantiated conspiracy theories - should be banned permanently that is what i wish for and i hope it comes true I agree, and let's follow those rules completely, until we see how ludicrous these rules are: The Russian Collusion fairy tale was proven a hoax. Anyone who continues to peddle it should be banned from social media, as it is dangerous to incite hatred and distrust. Yet blue check liberals continue to dabble with it. Same with the "Fine people" hoax, which fomented fear and hatred, and was simply an omission of a full statement.
That only holds true if the premise is true.
This premise is FALSE:
"The Russian Collusion fairy tale was proven a hoax"
There wasn't enough evidence to to convict a sitting president, yes, but that does NOT PROVE it was a hoax.
Quite the contrary. Recently released documents *PROVING* Paul Manafort gave republican's internal polling data on key swing states to RUSSIAN inteligence, coupled with the REPUBLICAN-led Senate sub-committee's CONFIRMATION of the previous claims by multiple US intelligence agencies that the Russians DID IN FACT interfere in the 2016 election (as well as 2018 and 2020) in itself counters any false claim that collusion was ****PROVEN**** a HOAX.
So anyone who continues to peddle that "it was PROVEN a HOAX" should be bannedfrom social media (including here), as it is dangerous to incite hatred and distrust.
very good point fubah
now had he stated something like " russian collusion was never proven beyond a reasonable doubt " then that statement would be accurate and true . no argument there .
but i agree that saying it was " proven a hoax " is clearly a false statement
wording and syntax matters
Yeah, I'll go along with that.
And proof is somtimes nebulous. For example the weirdos of the infamous "FLAT EARTH SOCIETY" (all republicans, I believe) are convinced that the statement the Earth is spherical and rotates around the Sun, has never been *PROVEN* (to them)
I mean, one can cast doubt on ANYTHING.............though that doesn't make the doubters correct.
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by Circus_Bettor: Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: all those - red or blue - who post LIES which r significant to the population in terms of incitement, promoting hatred, promoting distrust in our venerable institutions including the constituition, as well as promoting unsubstantiated conspiracy theories - should be banned permanently that is what i wish for and i hope it comes true I agree, and let's follow those rules completely, until we see how ludicrous these rules are: The Russian Collusion fairy tale was proven a hoax. Anyone who continues to peddle it should be banned from social media, as it is dangerous to incite hatred and distrust. Yet blue check liberals continue to dabble with it. Same with the "Fine people" hoax, which fomented fear and hatred, and was simply an omission of a full statement. That only holds true if the premise is true. This premise is FALSE: "The Russian Collusion fairy tale was proven a hoax" There wasn't enough evidence to to convict a sitting president, yes, but that does NOT PROVE it was a hoax. Quite the contrary. Recently released documents *PROVING* Paul Manafort gave republican's internal polling data on key swing states to RUSSIAN inteligence, coupled with the REPUBLICAN-led Senate sub-committee's CONFIRMATION of the previous claims by multiple US intelligence agencies that the Russians DID IN FACT interfere in the 2016 election (as well as 2018 and 2020) in itself counters any false claim that collusion was ****PROVEN**** a HOAX. So anyone who continues to peddle that "it was PROVEN a HOAX" should be banned from social media (including here), as it is dangerous to incite hatred and distrust. very good point fubah now had he stated something like " russian collusion was never proven beyond a reasonable doubt " then that statement would be accurate and true . no argument there . but i agree that saying it was " proven a hoax " is clearly a false statement wording and syntax matters Yeah, I'll go along with that. And proof is somtimes nebulous. For example the weirdos of the infamous "FLAT EARTH SOCIETY" (all republicans, I believe) are convinced that the statement the Earth is spherical and rotates around the Sun, has never been *PROVEN* (to them) I mean, one can cast doubt on ANYTHING.............though that doesn't make the doubters correct.
good point
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: Quote Originally Posted by Circus_Bettor: Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: all those - red or blue - who post LIES which r significant to the population in terms of incitement, promoting hatred, promoting distrust in our venerable institutions including the constituition, as well as promoting unsubstantiated conspiracy theories - should be banned permanently that is what i wish for and i hope it comes true I agree, and let's follow those rules completely, until we see how ludicrous these rules are: The Russian Collusion fairy tale was proven a hoax. Anyone who continues to peddle it should be banned from social media, as it is dangerous to incite hatred and distrust. Yet blue check liberals continue to dabble with it. Same with the "Fine people" hoax, which fomented fear and hatred, and was simply an omission of a full statement. That only holds true if the premise is true. This premise is FALSE: "The Russian Collusion fairy tale was proven a hoax" There wasn't enough evidence to to convict a sitting president, yes, but that does NOT PROVE it was a hoax. Quite the contrary. Recently released documents *PROVING* Paul Manafort gave republican's internal polling data on key swing states to RUSSIAN inteligence, coupled with the REPUBLICAN-led Senate sub-committee's CONFIRMATION of the previous claims by multiple US intelligence agencies that the Russians DID IN FACT interfere in the 2016 election (as well as 2018 and 2020) in itself counters any false claim that collusion was ****PROVEN**** a HOAX. So anyone who continues to peddle that "it was PROVEN a HOAX" should be banned from social media (including here), as it is dangerous to incite hatred and distrust. very good point fubah now had he stated something like " russian collusion was never proven beyond a reasonable doubt " then that statement would be accurate and true . no argument there . but i agree that saying it was " proven a hoax " is clearly a false statement wording and syntax matters Yeah, I'll go along with that. And proof is somtimes nebulous. For example the weirdos of the infamous "FLAT EARTH SOCIETY" (all republicans, I believe) are convinced that the statement the Earth is spherical and rotates around the Sun, has never been *PROVEN* (to them) I mean, one can cast doubt on ANYTHING.............though that doesn't make the doubters correct.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
