The same trends of repression, censorship and ideological homogeneity plaguing the national press generally have engulfed the media outlet I co-founded, culminating in censorship of my own articles.
The same trends of repression, censorship and ideological homogeneity plaguing the national press generally have engulfed the media outlet I co-founded, culminating in censorship of my own articles.
"The final, precipitating cause is that The Intercept’s editors censored an article I wrote this week, refusing to publish it unless I remove all sections critical of Joe Biden, the candidate vehemently supported by all Intercept editors involved in this effort at suppression."
"But the pathologies, illiberalism, and repressive mentality that led to the bizarre spectacle of my being censored by my own media outlet are ones that are not unique to The Intercept."
I won't do a tit-for-tat with The Intercept. I get that need to defend themselves. But just note:
1) Ask Betsy Reed why they won't publish an accounting of what happened with Reality Winner & who that cover-up is protecting.
2) "Great journalism" that nobody reads isn't great.
3) Given their claims, I'm going to publish -- along with the censored article -- the emails about it so people can decide for themselves if it was censored.
4) I understand TI's editors will slam my journalism as "changed"; I wish they had had the courage to do it before today.
5) Like I said in my statement, The Intercept does still have some great journalists and publishes good things. I hope they can figure out how to induce some people to read it.
6) This is the CIA-mimicking paragraph I referenced that I was shocked to see at The Intercept:
2
"The final, precipitating cause is that The Intercept’s editors censored an article I wrote this week, refusing to publish it unless I remove all sections critical of Joe Biden, the candidate vehemently supported by all Intercept editors involved in this effort at suppression."
"But the pathologies, illiberalism, and repressive mentality that led to the bizarre spectacle of my being censored by my own media outlet are ones that are not unique to The Intercept."
I won't do a tit-for-tat with The Intercept. I get that need to defend themselves. But just note:
1) Ask Betsy Reed why they won't publish an accounting of what happened with Reality Winner & who that cover-up is protecting.
2) "Great journalism" that nobody reads isn't great.
3) Given their claims, I'm going to publish -- along with the censored article -- the emails about it so people can decide for themselves if it was censored.
4) I understand TI's editors will slam my journalism as "changed"; I wish they had had the courage to do it before today.
5) Like I said in my statement, The Intercept does still have some great journalists and publishes good things. I hope they can figure out how to induce some people to read it.
6) This is the CIA-mimicking paragraph I referenced that I was shocked to see at The Intercept:
“Here's the article that I wrote about Joe Biden's conduct in Ukraine & China, based on Hunter's emails and other witness testimony, along with a critique of media lies designed to protect the Democratic candidate, which The Intercept refused to publish:”
“Here's the article that I wrote about Joe Biden's conduct in Ukraine & China, based on Hunter's emails and other witness testimony, along with a critique of media lies designed to protect the Democratic candidate, which The Intercept refused to publish:”
“On Friday, the New York Times reported that “no concrete evidence has emerged that the laptop contains Russian disinformation” and the paper said even the FBI has “acknowledged that it had not found any Russian disinformation on the laptop.””
3
“On Friday, the New York Times reported that “no concrete evidence has emerged that the laptop contains Russian disinformation” and the paper said even the FBI has “acknowledged that it had not found any Russian disinformation on the laptop.””
Read Matt Taibbi’s new article, with lots of new facts, about the Intercept and the repression taking place at unprecedented levels in numerous major newsrooms right now.
Read Matt Taibbi’s new article, with lots of new facts, about the Intercept and the repression taking place at unprecedented levels in numerous major newsrooms right now.
The morning after he launched his Substack, Greenwald’s newsletter is already in the top ten paid newsletters with “thousands of subscribers” at $5 month
0
The morning after he launched his Substack, Greenwald’s newsletter is already in the top ten paid newsletters with “thousands of subscribers” at $5 month
"The final, precipitating cause is that The Intercept’s editors censored an article I wrote this week, refusing to publish it unless I remove all sections critical of Joe Biden, the candidate vehemently supported by all Intercept editors involved in this effort at suppression." "But the pathologies, illiberalism, and repressive mentality that led to the bizarre spectacle of my being censored by my own media outlet are ones that are not unique to The Intercept." I won't do a tit-for-tat with The Intercept. I get that need to defend themselves. But just note: 1) Ask Betsy Reed why they won't publish an accounting of what happened with Reality Winner & who that cover-up is protecting. 2) "Great journalism" that nobody reads isn't great. 3) Given their claims, I'm going to publish -- along with the censored article -- the emails about it so people can decide for themselves if it was censored. 4) I understand TI's editors will slam my journalism as "changed"; I wish they had had the courage to do it before today. 5) Like I said in my statement, The Intercept does still have some great journalists and publishes good things. I hope they can figure out how to induce some people to read it. 6) This is the CIA-mimicking paragraph I referenced that I was shocked to see at The Intercept:
If our country allows for the censorship of our news to continue, we will be no better than any other communist nation that does the same.
Make America Great Again.......AGAIN.
Gamble for entertainment, invest for wealth!
0
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox:
"The final, precipitating cause is that The Intercept’s editors censored an article I wrote this week, refusing to publish it unless I remove all sections critical of Joe Biden, the candidate vehemently supported by all Intercept editors involved in this effort at suppression." "But the pathologies, illiberalism, and repressive mentality that led to the bizarre spectacle of my being censored by my own media outlet are ones that are not unique to The Intercept." I won't do a tit-for-tat with The Intercept. I get that need to defend themselves. But just note: 1) Ask Betsy Reed why they won't publish an accounting of what happened with Reality Winner & who that cover-up is protecting. 2) "Great journalism" that nobody reads isn't great. 3) Given their claims, I'm going to publish -- along with the censored article -- the emails about it so people can decide for themselves if it was censored. 4) I understand TI's editors will slam my journalism as "changed"; I wish they had had the courage to do it before today. 5) Like I said in my statement, The Intercept does still have some great journalists and publishes good things. I hope they can figure out how to induce some people to read it. 6) This is the CIA-mimicking paragraph I referenced that I was shocked to see at The Intercept:
If our country allows for the censorship of our news to continue, we will be no better than any other communist nation that does the same.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.