All Forums | Politics

In light of recent events, how does everyone feel about Trumps ban on Muslim countries now?

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 1584
Posts: 56
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 6288
Posted: #26
Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:

Gun violence is responsible for more death in the US than Islamic terrorism. So I guess you would be for banning guns first,correct? 


The only gun control I would support is that every Federal Housing project in the country be searched and seize every illegal gun and charge them all to the fullest extent of the law. That would likely save thousands of lives...

No thanks on banning guns - see Venezuela if you need the reason why... The lefties just love Socialistic countries. The government is shooting at the citizenry because they can't shoot back, because guns have been banned...

When I asked to keep the country safe, my intention is to keep the people that believe in 7th century concepts in their country of origin.
England imported a lot of problems, good luck trying to solve them now, the Muslim is out of the bottle... Too many more people are going to have to die before the citizenry rises up and holds the moronic politicians that are so in love with importing these throwbacks to account. Extreme measures are in order. Two recent polls of Muslims find that 50% & 66% of them won't inform on people they know that are involved with ISIS or terrorism. Ain't that just grand?
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2004
Posts: 10739
Posted: #27
Quote Originally Posted by Killer_B:



The only gun control I would support is that every Federal Housing project in the country be searched and seize every illegal gun and charge them all to the fullest extent of the law. That would likely save thousands of lives...

No thanks on banning guns - see Venezuela if you need the reason why... The lefties just love Socialistic countries. The government is shooting at the citizenry because they can't shoot back, because guns have been banned...

When I asked to keep the country safe, my intention is to keep the people that believe in 7th century concepts in their country of origin.
England imported a lot of problems, good luck trying to solve them now, the Muslim is out of the bottle... Too many more people are going to have to die before the citizenry rises up and holds the moronic politicians that are so in love with importing these throwbacks to account. Extreme measures are in order. Two recent polls of Muslims find that 50% & 66% of them won't inform on people they know that are involved with ISIS or terrorism. Ain't that just grand?
24 people have been killed by terrorists in the US in the last decade. 280,024 were killed by guns in the US.Who is the bigger threat to you? Put your bigotry aside and dwell on the facts.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 8840
Posted: #28

darkhose, let's stick to the topic.  You're  a typical loon on the left that likes to get these discussions on tangent.  Go start your own thread about gun control.

Can you dispute 'Killer's assertion that Trump has sound reasoning in putting forth a travel ban for dangerous Muslim nations  ?

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 6288
Posted: #29
50 were killed in Orlando a year ago... My bigotry? Facts can not be bigoted... Have you seen the murder totals in the major cities since 2009? I'm a realist... I have a gun, and I'd hate to be put in a position to have to decide to use it, but its better than needing one with no option if it's my civil right Is that not common sense? Are you willing to sweep the entire country to grab every gun and make them illegal to manufacture or only in the governments hands or what? Now you may say no, but this is only where it starts and that's the end game. Slavery to Government could be the name of the Act.
Example: Abortion. It didn't start here, but somehow it got to be done at 8.95 months and some baby parts are harvested and sold.
If those 2 "normalities" in the lefts sick mind would've been called this then, I wonder if abortion would be legal at all. Considering the number of birth controls options available, would making this harder to have done be a benefit to mankind and terminating millions in that same decade of the 280K murders?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2014
Posts: 2042
Posted: #30
Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:

24 people have been killed by terrorists in the US in the last decade. 280,024 were killed by guns in the US.Who is the bigger threat to you? Put your bigotry aside and dwell on the facts.

Where did the 24 come from?  Source?
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 8840
Posted: #31

Logic escapes these buffoons on the left like 'darkhose...  They are emotional creatures , and this clouds their judgment. 


How else could you dispute a travel ban when you see madness in Europe ?

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2017
Posts: 334
Posted: #32
Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:

24 people have been killed by terrorists in the US in the last decade. 280,024 were killed by guns in the US.Who is the bigger threat to you? Put your bigotry aside and dwell on the facts.

Full of red herrings today aren't we?

However you need to twist the facts and manipulate false comparisons to make a false point.

We had 50 in FL and 24 in San Bernardino alone. 

Comparing murders from a percentage of 300 million to a population of less than 1% of that is not an honest comparison and may actually work against the point you were trying to make. Simple Minds
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 8840
Posted: #33
Hey 'darkhose' , we are waiting... 
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 35487
Posted: #34
....................
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2002
Posts: 22961
Posted: #35
Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:

24 people have been killed by terrorists in the US in the last decade. 280,024 were killed by guns in the US.Who is the bigger threat to you? Put your bigotry aside and dwell on the facts.


Darkhorse, you are an intelligent person, so I imagine you fully understand why your argument is flawed. As such, I will only add 2 words ... 'preventative measures'

For the record, I do not support a "ban" on muslims, but I do support some additional vetting measures. I'm pretty sure that the majority of those in France, an exceptionally liberal country, now have similar feelings.
bigreds daddy
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2003
Posts: 28196
Posted: #36
apparently there was an anti-Sharia law protest yesterday in a place where there is neither sharia law nor the threat of sharia law, a place you and i know as america.

anyway, the trick here is to figure out which of these folks is sabanesque.


https://twitter.com/evan7257/status/873565225869598720
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2016
Posts: 22234
Posted: #37
Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:

apparently there was an anti-Sharia law protest yesterday in a place where there is neither sharia law nor the threat of sharia law, a place you and i know as america.

anyway, the trick here is to figure out which of these folks is sabanesque.


https://twitter.com/evan7257/status/873565225869598720
There were several in several cities.
R.I.P. #94 MARSHAWN KNEELAND - DC4L
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2004
Posts: 10739
Posted: #38
Quote Originally Posted by Rush51:

darkhose, let's stick to the topic.  You're  a typical loon on the left that likes to get these discussions on tangent.  Go start your own thread about gun control.

Can you dispute 'Killer's assertion that Trump has sound reasoning in putting forth a travel ban for dangerous Muslim nations  ?


his topic was about safety,no?How many "muslim" terrorists that kb cited would have been affected by a travel ban?
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2004
Posts: 10739
Posted: #39
Quote Originally Posted by bettingforfun:


Where did the 24 come from?  Source?

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/oct/05/viral-image/fact-checking-comparison-gun-deaths-and-terrorism-/
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2004
Posts: 10739
Posted: #40
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:



Darkhorse, you are an intelligent person, so I imagine you fully understand why your argument is flawed. As such, I will only add 2 words ... 'preventative measures'

For the record, I do not support a "ban" on muslims, but I do support some additional vetting measures. I'm pretty sure that the majority of those in France, an exceptionally liberal country, now have similar feelings.

such as backround checks ,registration and mandatory waiting period?
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2004
Posts: 10739
Posted: #41
Quote Originally Posted by Rush51:

Hey 'darkhose' , we are waiting... 

subliminal message ? Don't, slim gets excited.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2004
Posts: 10739
Posted: #42
Quote Originally Posted by bettingforfun:


Where did the 24 come from?  Source?

If you want a link just on homicides . 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2015/10/02/u-s-deaths-from-gun-violence-and-terrorism-in-comparison-infograpic/#28afc593133b
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 35487
Posted: #43
Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:


subliminal message ? Don't, slim gets excited.



Another racist comment from a far left Hillary supporter..you people have a one track mind..
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2004
Posts: 10739
Posted: #44
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:




Another racist comment from a far left Hillary supporter..you people have a one track mind..

What race would that be slim, Charlotte or human?
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 35487
Posted: #45
Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:


What race would that be slim, Charlotte or human?


You tell me ..what race is it that has the "darkhose's " you say would excite me ?
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2004
Posts: 10739
Posted: #46
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:



You tell me ..what race is it that has the "darkhose's " you say would excite me ?

You get excited everytime someone uses a variation of "darkhorse" .You made it racial ,not me.

 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 35487
Posted: #47
Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:


You get excited everytime someone uses a variation of "darkhorse" .You made it racial ,not me.



So, now you are saying it's not racial,...you meant it as sexual .
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2004
Posts: 10739
Posted: #48
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:



So, now you are saying it's not racial,...you meant it as sexual .

Whatever slim.GFY.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2004
Posts: 10739
Posted: #49
Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:


Whatever slim.GFY.

And before you try to twist it slim, it means Good For You.. 
 
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 35487
Posted: #50
Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:


And before you try to twist it slim, it means Good For You.. 


That's the way I took it to mean,,the other way is not the darkhorse I know...........
All Forums | Politics
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.