• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 4
      NFL Week 4
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • Steelers-Browns Picks
      • Week 4 Survivor Picks
      • NFL Week 4 Odds
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Politics

    Joe Bidens term

    12 Next Last»
    BigGame90
    Raiders22
    thirdperson
    kcblitzkrieg
    ABooksNightmare
    ...
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 215
    Posts: 32
    12 Next Last»
     
    BigGame90
    BigGame90
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2006
    Posts: 5069
    Posted: Aug. 21, 2024 - 11:09 AM ET #1

    Biggest fraud of an administration. 

    Revised employment just lowered by over 800k jobs as of March 2024. Final revised numbers are expected to be released early 2025. 

    The report, released Wednesday morning, showed the largest downward revisions to the professional and business services industry, where employment was revised down by 358,000 during the period. Leisure & hospitality saw the second-largest downward revision of 150,000. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/us-employment-falls-by-818000-in-latest-government-revision-144414848.html

    So it seems like the majority of jobs actually created were government jobs, which shouldn't be hard to cReAtE. 

     

    What a joke of an administration. I would be embarrassed had I voted for sleepy. 

     

    July's rise in the unemployment rate also triggered a commonly followed recession indicator, the Sahm Rule, which shows the recent rate of the rise in unemployment consistent with that which typically precedes a recession.

    "wErE nOt In A rEcEsSiOn" is what we've been hearing non stop. "lOoK aT tHe JoBs RpOrTs" is all we kept hearing. The media and this sleep administration gas lit the public to no end. The left accused the right of gas lighting when it was them all along. The left really needs to take a look in the mirror. Whatever they claim the right is, they are. What a joke of an administration. If you've believed anything they've told you over the last 3.5 years, you are the sheep. 

    If they are this far off with the jobs report (one of the largest declines in history) I couldn't even imagine the true state of the US fiscal deficit. I'd imagine this is one of the worst presidential runs in history. Everyone that's been posting pOlLs about US President rankings, was just trying to distract from sleeping being THE WORST. 

    Reply
    To remove first post, remove entire topic.

    Biggest fraud of an administration. 

    Revised employment just lowered by over 800k jobs as of March 2024. Final revised numbers are expected to be released early 2025. 

    The report, released Wednesday morning, showed the largest downward revisions to the professional and business services industry, where employment was revised down by 358,000 during the period. Leisure & hospitality saw the second-largest downward revision of 150,000. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/us-employment-falls-by-818000-in-latest-government-revision-144414848.html

    So it seems like the majority of jobs actually created were government jobs, which shouldn't be hard to cReAtE. 

     

    What a joke of an administration. I would be embarrassed had I voted for sleepy. 

     

    July's rise in the unemployment rate also triggered a commonly followed recession indicator, the Sahm Rule, which shows the recent rate of the rise in unemployment consistent with that which typically precedes a recession.

    "wErE nOt In A rEcEsSiOn" is what we've been hearing non stop. "lOoK aT tHe JoBs RpOrTs" is all we kept hearing. The media and this sleep administration gas lit the public to no end. The left accused the right of gas lighting when it was them all along. The left really needs to take a look in the mirror. Whatever they claim the right is, they are. What a joke of an administration. If you've believed anything they've told you over the last 3.5 years, you are the sheep. 

    If they are this far off with the jobs report (one of the largest declines in history) I couldn't even imagine the true state of the US fiscal deficit. I'd imagine this is one of the worst presidential runs in history. Everyone that's been posting pOlLs about US President rankings, was just trying to distract from sleeping being THE WORST. 

     
    BigGame90
    BigGame90
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2006
    Posts: 5069
    Posted: Aug. 21, 2024 - 11:12 AM ET #2

    Yahoo has no mention of this on their front page. If this was done during Trumps term, this would be the headline, and every window would have an article about the revised massive drop. What a sham of an admin. Embarrassed for everyone that believed the bold faced lies from this admin. Gas lighting the public and telling them everything is ok because jObS aRe Up and UnEmPlOyMeNt Is DoWn. LIES. 

    Reply

    Yahoo has no mention of this on their front page. If this was done during Trumps term, this would be the headline, and every window would have an article about the revised massive drop. What a sham of an admin. Embarrassed for everyone that believed the bold faced lies from this admin. Gas lighting the public and telling them everything is ok because jObS aRe Up and UnEmPlOyMeNt Is DoWn. LIES. 

     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 34273
    Posted: Aug. 21, 2024 - 11:36 AM ET #3

    Yes sir.  It is even worse than folks think.  They have been doing a very deceptive job with the employment numbers for a while.  

    When a quarter of your 'created' jobs are government jobs and when foreign-born new hires are out-numbering American-born new hires by over 3 to 1, then you have some additional problems baked in as well.  Not even considering the issue with multiple part-time jobs needed in the mix.

    It will also be somewhat interesting what Powell has to say at Jackson Hole and what the anticipation of rate cuts, and how much and how often, will do.

    They are doing what they can to keep saying we are not in a recession and still saying a 'soft landing' is more likely.

    They have done an excellent job on spinning the inflation numbers as well.

    It is looking like they will be able to maintain this through the election, which is a very key part of the plan.

    peace_5

    Reply

    Yes sir.  It is even worse than folks think.  They have been doing a very deceptive job with the employment numbers for a while.  

    When a quarter of your 'created' jobs are government jobs and when foreign-born new hires are out-numbering American-born new hires by over 3 to 1, then you have some additional problems baked in as well.  Not even considering the issue with multiple part-time jobs needed in the mix.

    It will also be somewhat interesting what Powell has to say at Jackson Hole and what the anticipation of rate cuts, and how much and how often, will do.

    They are doing what they can to keep saying we are not in a recession and still saying a 'soft landing' is more likely.

    They have done an excellent job on spinning the inflation numbers as well.

    It is looking like they will be able to maintain this through the election, which is a very key part of the plan.

    peace_5

     
    thirdperson
    thirdperson
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2005
    Posts: 9436
    Posted: Aug. 21, 2024 - 11:40 AM ET #4

    818,000 is almost 0.5% of total jobs.  Even with preliminary revision by Bureau of labor statistics, job growth has been strong by historical norms.

    Reply

    818,000 is almost 0.5% of total jobs.  Even with preliminary revision by Bureau of labor statistics, job growth has been strong by historical norms.

     
    kcblitzkrieg
    kcblitzkrieg
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2008
    Posts: 7997
    Posted: Aug. 21, 2024 - 1:00 PM ET #5

    We all addressed this back in MARCH.... pats on the back all around..... 

    https://www.covers.com/forum/politics-87/jobs---record-unemployment-103834305

    You will not survive here. You are not a wolf, and this is the land of wolves now...
    Reply

    We all addressed this back in MARCH.... pats on the back all around..... 

    https://www.covers.com/forum/politics-87/jobs---record-unemployment-103834305

     
    ABooksNightmare
    ABooksNightmare
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2004
    Posts: 26633
    Posted: Aug. 21, 2024 - 1:12 PM ET #6

    You really can fluff numbers either direction...plus you have to consider the source of how the numbers of figures are derived...for example, if you are relying or ensuring that employers are providing accurate numbers you will have inconsistencies...employers just want to get through the demand that these censuses ask for...employers are not interested in accuracy of the data, but rather completing the requirement and moving on...I for one, get hounded by a census team each month for reports...it's quite ridiculous really,...there is zero advantage to an employer for reporting these figures so you have to take the data with a grain of salt...yes, we have reports that can be ran to populate the data, but it is not checked for accuracy...every minute spent on populating some ridiculous census data or information for the government agencies is time taken away from running ones business...I don't put a lot of faith in those census figures sometimes given I know how they are derived and I know the pain that businesses have to go through to obtain the data...without checks and balances in place, which there are not, the data is not reliable...and that Bureau of Labor and Statistics is exactly who I am referring to here...they suck

    COVERS allows u to tell someone they are sexually frustrated so long as ur hands are clean
    Reply

    You really can fluff numbers either direction...plus you have to consider the source of how the numbers of figures are derived...for example, if you are relying or ensuring that employers are providing accurate numbers you will have inconsistencies...employers just want to get through the demand that these censuses ask for...employers are not interested in accuracy of the data, but rather completing the requirement and moving on...I for one, get hounded by a census team each month for reports...it's quite ridiculous really,...there is zero advantage to an employer for reporting these figures so you have to take the data with a grain of salt...yes, we have reports that can be ran to populate the data, but it is not checked for accuracy...every minute spent on populating some ridiculous census data or information for the government agencies is time taken away from running ones business...I don't put a lot of faith in those census figures sometimes given I know how they are derived and I know the pain that businesses have to go through to obtain the data...without checks and balances in place, which there are not, the data is not reliable...and that Bureau of Labor and Statistics is exactly who I am referring to here...they suck

     
    Raiders22
    Raiders22
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 34273
    Posted: Aug. 21, 2024 - 1:39 PM ET #7

    @ABooksNightmare

     Certainly a lot of that is true.  But the statistical model for this accounts for the sampling error(s) and that sort of thing.  The employer's is not nearly as error-prone as the household one's, for example.  

    But when the revision and the UI records are looked at -- they do the re-achoring and this comes out in the wash, so to speak.

    But, overall, this is not an area where economists are inclined to 'fluff' one way or the other for a particular 'purpose'.

    Now, certain non-economic group(s) may 'interpret' them how they like, or 'spin' them; but, mostly, the numbers are what they are and fairly accurate.

    peace_5

    Reply

    @ABooksNightmare

     Certainly a lot of that is true.  But the statistical model for this accounts for the sampling error(s) and that sort of thing.  The employer's is not nearly as error-prone as the household one's, for example.  

    But when the revision and the UI records are looked at -- they do the re-achoring and this comes out in the wash, so to speak.

    But, overall, this is not an area where economists are inclined to 'fluff' one way or the other for a particular 'purpose'.

    Now, certain non-economic group(s) may 'interpret' them how they like, or 'spin' them; but, mostly, the numbers are what they are and fairly accurate.

    peace_5

     
    BigGame90
    BigGame90
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2006
    Posts: 5069
    Posted: Aug. 21, 2024 - 1:47 PM ET #8

    @ABooksNightmare

     The problem is, the markets are partially based on these numbers. So an over exaggerated estimate is really harmful to markets. 

    @thirdperson

     Way to try to skew numbers like the left only knows how to do. The problem is, the average per month revised was ~64k loss. So when the average reporting was ~242k added per month, the real number was closer to 174k added per month (you can do the % to figure out gov't related jobs, and part time to see how bad this really is). THAT'S ALMOST a 30% revision LOSS.  If I estimated 30% loss on every job, my business would be closed. This is complete irresponsibility on the part of Democrats. This was clearly done with intention to mislead and to gas light the public and markets. 

    Reply

    @ABooksNightmare

     The problem is, the markets are partially based on these numbers. So an over exaggerated estimate is really harmful to markets. 

    @thirdperson

     Way to try to skew numbers like the left only knows how to do. The problem is, the average per month revised was ~64k loss. So when the average reporting was ~242k added per month, the real number was closer to 174k added per month (you can do the % to figure out gov't related jobs, and part time to see how bad this really is). THAT'S ALMOST a 30% revision LOSS.  If I estimated 30% loss on every job, my business would be closed. This is complete irresponsibility on the part of Democrats. This was clearly done with intention to mislead and to gas light the public and markets. 

     
    scooby-doos
    scooby-doos
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2010
    Posts: 3194
    Posted: Aug. 21, 2024 - 2:17 PM ET #9

    This administration has been lying to us their whole time.  

    Reply

    This administration has been lying to us their whole time.  

     
    BigGame90
    BigGame90
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2006
    Posts: 5069
    Posted: Aug. 21, 2024 - 2:34 PM ET #10

    Last nights DNC disgrace of a speaking event...

     

    Mentions:

    Trump 147 times

    Economy 27 times

    Border 8 times

    Crime 6 times

    Prices 5 times

    Inflation 3 times

     

    What do the dems really care about?  TRUMP an_roll_laugh

     

    The real importance starts at the bottom of that list and works up. The lazy and gas lighting dems adverted those mentions at all costs! bahhhahhhh 

     

    Trump working for America. Dems working against Trump.  If the dems actually put in work, the Country and economy might be better off. Instead, they work on trying to defeat Trump and they sacrifice their own voters to do so. 

     

    Reply

    Last nights DNC disgrace of a speaking event...

     

    Mentions:

    Trump 147 times

    Economy 27 times

    Border 8 times

    Crime 6 times

    Prices 5 times

    Inflation 3 times

     

    What do the dems really care about?  TRUMP an_roll_laugh

     

    The real importance starts at the bottom of that list and works up. The lazy and gas lighting dems adverted those mentions at all costs! bahhhahhhh 

     

    Trump working for America. Dems working against Trump.  If the dems actually put in work, the Country and economy might be better off. Instead, they work on trying to defeat Trump and they sacrifice their own voters to do so. 

     

     
    wallstreetcappers
    wallstreetcappers
    Covers Linesmen
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2003
    Posts: 58425
    Posted: Aug. 21, 2024 - 2:39 PM ET #11

    @scooby-doos

    This for sure is not a partisan topic, the fact that all of the participants in here are favoring the TNC makes it a partisan thread but you have to be kidding to suggest that the RNC (proper time frame reference) has not pulled the slight of hand that you are claiming the DNC is in this case, with regards to social impacts of governmental topics.

    I seem to recall lots of narrative in many RNC presidencies that stunk much worse than this....much much worse. The truth of topics and conclusions like these is never in the outlier and extremes. ALL political parties and politicians craft narratives to serve their partisan agendas. I could say one of hundreds of outright lies Trump spews regularly as false, generalizing and deliberate. Trump said that more than 100% of jobs created were for illegals...those were his words and he does this crap all the time and it is misleading, it is fake it is a lie and it has an agenda.

    What good is it to try and play partisan patty cake like this and follow the mind games that your own partisan participants are feeding you?

    Reply

    @scooby-doos

    This for sure is not a partisan topic, the fact that all of the participants in here are favoring the TNC makes it a partisan thread but you have to be kidding to suggest that the RNC (proper time frame reference) has not pulled the slight of hand that you are claiming the DNC is in this case, with regards to social impacts of governmental topics.

    I seem to recall lots of narrative in many RNC presidencies that stunk much worse than this....much much worse. The truth of topics and conclusions like these is never in the outlier and extremes. ALL political parties and politicians craft narratives to serve their partisan agendas. I could say one of hundreds of outright lies Trump spews regularly as false, generalizing and deliberate. Trump said that more than 100% of jobs created were for illegals...those were his words and he does this crap all the time and it is misleading, it is fake it is a lie and it has an agenda.

    What good is it to try and play partisan patty cake like this and follow the mind games that your own partisan participants are feeding you?

     
    ABooksNightmare
    ABooksNightmare
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2004
    Posts: 26633
    Posted: Aug. 21, 2024 - 2:49 PM ET #12

    an_roll_laughboth sides are ridiculed with lies, agendas and generalizations it's not even funny anymore...

     

    The presidency has become who can decipher between the biggest bullshitter...throw shit out there and see what sticks...I believe they know that the average citizen/voter will not fact check or dig into their comments and therefore that is the impression that is left...they are doing this intentionally for that purpose because it is happening on both sides...doesn't matter who does it more, it only matters that it is happening and has been happening for all of our voting life...it's just easier to discredit now with social media and the internet...

     

    Biggest bullshitter wins and who can capture the heart of those voters by what they can remember versus what they deem as credible....what a shit show...

    COVERS allows u to tell someone they are sexually frustrated so long as ur hands are clean
    Reply

    an_roll_laughboth sides are ridiculed with lies, agendas and generalizations it's not even funny anymore...

     

    The presidency has become who can decipher between the biggest bullshitter...throw shit out there and see what sticks...I believe they know that the average citizen/voter will not fact check or dig into their comments and therefore that is the impression that is left...they are doing this intentionally for that purpose because it is happening on both sides...doesn't matter who does it more, it only matters that it is happening and has been happening for all of our voting life...it's just easier to discredit now with social media and the internet...

     

    Biggest bullshitter wins and who can capture the heart of those voters by what they can remember versus what they deem as credible....what a shit show...

     
    kcblitzkrieg
    kcblitzkrieg
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2008
    Posts: 7997
    Posted: Aug. 21, 2024 - 3:01 PM ET #13

    @wallstreetcappers

     https://www.covers.com/forum/politics-87/jobs---record-unemployment-103834305

     

    I will give you the benefit of the doubt that you were not speaking about me when you said "all participants" as I merely shared the original thread when we discussed the "record unemployment" numbers nearly 6 months ago.... 

    You will not survive here. You are not a wolf, and this is the land of wolves now...
    Reply

    @wallstreetcappers

     https://www.covers.com/forum/politics-87/jobs---record-unemployment-103834305

     

    I will give you the benefit of the doubt that you were not speaking about me when you said "all participants" as I merely shared the original thread when we discussed the "record unemployment" numbers nearly 6 months ago.... 

     
    wallstreetcappers
    wallstreetcappers
    Covers Linesmen
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2003
    Posts: 58425
    Posted: Aug. 21, 2024 - 3:08 PM ET #14

    @kcblitzkrieg

     I dont need to click on a link to read a thread where I know someone said this someone else said that. My position never changes with regard to data presented and that can be CPI it can be employment rate it can be GDP it can be whatever and that is from ALL governments, China is well known for their crafting of narrative with data so the issue is that ANY government data is crap even if they are reporting it accurately. The way data is collected is lame it is a slice of the economy usually surveys or selected segments of the economy it is not comprehensive and it is not accurate and never has been.

    The fact that revisions are being reported is a waste of time trying to craft that it is just the DNC and they are trying to force a narrative, well narratives are the best game in town and all sides do it. I just dislike the way both groups here try to take punches at the other and actually convince themselves that one group is better and one is worse and then convince themselves that their party is better and their candidate is better because of narrative generation.

     

    Reply

    @kcblitzkrieg

     I dont need to click on a link to read a thread where I know someone said this someone else said that. My position never changes with regard to data presented and that can be CPI it can be employment rate it can be GDP it can be whatever and that is from ALL governments, China is well known for their crafting of narrative with data so the issue is that ANY government data is crap even if they are reporting it accurately. The way data is collected is lame it is a slice of the economy usually surveys or selected segments of the economy it is not comprehensive and it is not accurate and never has been.

    The fact that revisions are being reported is a waste of time trying to craft that it is just the DNC and they are trying to force a narrative, well narratives are the best game in town and all sides do it. I just dislike the way both groups here try to take punches at the other and actually convince themselves that one group is better and one is worse and then convince themselves that their party is better and their candidate is better because of narrative generation.

     

     
    ABooksNightmare
    ABooksNightmare
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2004
    Posts: 26633
    Posted: Aug. 21, 2024 - 3:18 PM ET #15

    I'm surprised this thread is allowed BigGame...good for youpeace_5

     

    Usually any thread countering Biden is disintegrated....way to break through...this is encouraging...peace_5

    COVERS allows u to tell someone they are sexually frustrated so long as ur hands are clean
    Reply

    I'm surprised this thread is allowed BigGame...good for youpeace_5

     

    Usually any thread countering Biden is disintegrated....way to break through...this is encouraging...peace_5

     
    wallstreetcappers
    wallstreetcappers
    Covers Linesmen
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2003
    Posts: 58425
    Posted: Aug. 21, 2024 - 3:38 PM ET #16

    @ABooksNightmare

    Sheesh you are smarter than to keep making nonsense replies like that.

    Reply

    @ABooksNightmare

    Sheesh you are smarter than to keep making nonsense replies like that.

     
    thirdperson
    thirdperson
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2005
    Posts: 9436
    Posted: Aug. 21, 2024 - 7:44 PM ET #17

    Trump baseless attacks on integrity of Bureau of labor statistics are irresponsible and inaccurate according to American enterprise institute.  Routine revisions occur every year and there is nothing scandalous here.  BLS relies on multiple surveys  for estimating employment levels and revisions are part of that process.  In 2019 during Trump administration, BLS revised down its estimate by over 500,000 jobs.

    Reply

    Trump baseless attacks on integrity of Bureau of labor statistics are irresponsible and inaccurate according to American enterprise institute.  Routine revisions occur every year and there is nothing scandalous here.  BLS relies on multiple surveys  for estimating employment levels and revisions are part of that process.  In 2019 during Trump administration, BLS revised down its estimate by over 500,000 jobs.

     
    ABooksNightmare
    ABooksNightmare
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2004
    Posts: 26633
    Posted: Aug. 21, 2024 - 8:00 PM ET #18

    I report to the BLS on a regular basis so what multiple surveys are you referring to than gives you the impression that what you are stating is factual?

     

    I will tell you what is reported....monthly I report to the BLS number of employees broken out by male and female...total wages and hours worked including overtime...that's federal

     

    For the state, I report new hire registery, which is mainly used for child support and wage garnishment orders...the states may also use the quarterly state wage reporting information supplied by each business....

     

    So what exactly do you feel are multiple resources being used to configure this data because I can tell you as a business that has employees nationally, we are not supplying this information...the EEOC or census report is remitted annually which breaks down by type of classification...the monthly BLS report asks for this classification (Job Title) data as well but I tell them to pound sand and they say ok...

     

    I think there may be a false understanding of how this data is configured, but take it from someone who reports this...this all they receive....there may be some additional state requirements in certain states but that's it...curious to know what multiple sources are used because I would call your bluff on this and day that there is not...generally, government facilities are barely equipped to handle one source of raw data let alone verify with multiple...they don't have the resources or man power to do this...

    COVERS allows u to tell someone they are sexually frustrated so long as ur hands are clean
    Reply

    I report to the BLS on a regular basis so what multiple surveys are you referring to than gives you the impression that what you are stating is factual?

     

    I will tell you what is reported....monthly I report to the BLS number of employees broken out by male and female...total wages and hours worked including overtime...that's federal

     

    For the state, I report new hire registery, which is mainly used for child support and wage garnishment orders...the states may also use the quarterly state wage reporting information supplied by each business....

     

    So what exactly do you feel are multiple resources being used to configure this data because I can tell you as a business that has employees nationally, we are not supplying this information...the EEOC or census report is remitted annually which breaks down by type of classification...the monthly BLS report asks for this classification (Job Title) data as well but I tell them to pound sand and they say ok...

     

    I think there may be a false understanding of how this data is configured, but take it from someone who reports this...this all they receive....there may be some additional state requirements in certain states but that's it...curious to know what multiple sources are used because I would call your bluff on this and day that there is not...generally, government facilities are barely equipped to handle one source of raw data let alone verify with multiple...they don't have the resources or man power to do this...

     
    wallstreetcappers
    wallstreetcappers
    Covers Linesmen
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2003
    Posts: 58425
    Posted: Aug. 21, 2024 - 8:34 PM ET #19

    I am saying it is based on surveys of a percentage of the economy, a small percentage and it is extrapolated from the surveys and sample size. It has wide standard of deviation because the data is not comprehensive. I understand how all the data points are collected and none of the reported figures are accurate. It is impossible to get a full comprehensive data set with a super low standard deviation (variance) thus the wide ranges, wide corrections and strange month to month results. 

    I dont fault the government because how could we expect thousands of private companies and self employed individuals to correctly and in a timely fashion report accurate and fresh data that has a high degree of confidence? Its impossible. Then you have to rely on the accuracy of those providing the data and there is no real true way of verifying the surveys people submit, again not the fault of the business owner but just a reality of data collection and the complete lack of accuracy and the need for updates and trailing corrections. 

     

    Reply

    I am saying it is based on surveys of a percentage of the economy, a small percentage and it is extrapolated from the surveys and sample size. It has wide standard of deviation because the data is not comprehensive. I understand how all the data points are collected and none of the reported figures are accurate. It is impossible to get a full comprehensive data set with a super low standard deviation (variance) thus the wide ranges, wide corrections and strange month to month results. 

    I dont fault the government because how could we expect thousands of private companies and self employed individuals to correctly and in a timely fashion report accurate and fresh data that has a high degree of confidence? Its impossible. Then you have to rely on the accuracy of those providing the data and there is no real true way of verifying the surveys people submit, again not the fault of the business owner but just a reality of data collection and the complete lack of accuracy and the need for updates and trailing corrections. 

     

     
    dubz4dummyz
    dubz4dummyz
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2021
    Posts: 14194
    Posted: Aug. 21, 2024 - 9:06 PM ET #20

    Quote Originally Posted by ABooksNightmare:

    both sides are ridiculed with lies, agendas and generalizations it's not even funny anymore... 

    ....what a shit show...

     

    Holy shit someone is finally getting it

     

    All politicians do is make a bunch of bullshit promises to attract voters...then they do about 5% of the shit they promised...all while lining their pockets and their friends/families pockets with tax money/corp money

     

    Its impossible to trust any politician...they are just feeding you bullshit to attract your vote

     

    Funny how all these threads are basically one group thinking it is righteous over the other....imagine arguing about who's the more clean-cut crook

     

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by ABooksNightmare:

    both sides are ridiculed with lies, agendas and generalizations it's not even funny anymore... 

    ....what a shit show...

     

    Holy shit someone is finally getting it

     

    All politicians do is make a bunch of bullshit promises to attract voters...then they do about 5% of the shit they promised...all while lining their pockets and their friends/families pockets with tax money/corp money

     

    Its impossible to trust any politician...they are just feeding you bullshit to attract your vote

     

    Funny how all these threads are basically one group thinking it is righteous over the other....imagine arguing about who's the more clean-cut crook

     

     
    UNIMAN
    UNIMAN
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2014
    Posts: 10454
    Posted: Aug. 21, 2024 - 10:48 PM ET #21

    The numbers were as real as the patrons Kamala greeted in Philly.

    Reply

    The numbers were as real as the patrons Kamala greeted in Philly.

     
    THEMUGG
    THEMUGG
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2003
    Posts: 38234
    Posted: Aug. 21, 2024 - 10:52 PM ET #22

     I can't wait to see the books that come out in the next 3-4 years about the Biden admin. an_lightening

    Reply

     I can't wait to see the books that come out in the next 3-4 years about the Biden admin. an_lightening

     
    Barbarossa
    Barbarossa
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2009
    Posts: 278472
    Posted: Aug. 22, 2024 - 5:15 AM ET #23

    Kamala will fix it "once she is in office" , oh wait , what has she been doing the last THREE 1/2 years ?? 

    The Pastor of Disaster
    Reply

    Kamala will fix it "once she is in office" , oh wait , what has she been doing the last THREE 1/2 years ?? 

     
    joe pockets
    joe pockets
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2000
    Posts: 5501
    Posted: Aug. 22, 2024 - 9:54 AM ET #24

    @THEMUGG

     If Trump loses this time that fractured party will be showing him out the back door, and maybe just than the American public will find out how devious and misleading the MAGA episode has been! Because the books that his clinging enablers write about the private backdrop of this era will sit on shelves for years and years!…..Enjoy the every man for himself show an_popcorn 

    Reply

    @THEMUGG

     If Trump loses this time that fractured party will be showing him out the back door, and maybe just than the American public will find out how devious and misleading the MAGA episode has been! Because the books that his clinging enablers write about the private backdrop of this era will sit on shelves for years and years!…..Enjoy the every man for himself show an_popcorn 

     
     
    jesron1269
    jesron1269
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2008
    Posts: 37796
    Posted: Aug. 22, 2024 - 12:05 PM ET #25

    Quote Originally Posted by joe pockets:

    @THEMUGG  If Trump loses this time that fractured party will be showing him out the back door, and maybe just than the American public will find out how devious and misleading the MAGA episode has been! Because the books that his clinging enablers write about the private backdrop of this era will sit on shelves for years and years!…..Enjoy the every man for himself show

    Any real Republican knows it has been a shit show. But to say that it was devious and misleading without including the Joe Biden/Kamala Harris episode who produced the same hit records is blind and stupid. Call a spade a spade. Don't drink your shit stained Kool Aide and tell me it is delicious. I assure you that is a drink I want nothing to do with either.

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by joe pockets:

    @THEMUGG  If Trump loses this time that fractured party will be showing him out the back door, and maybe just than the American public will find out how devious and misleading the MAGA episode has been! Because the books that his clinging enablers write about the private backdrop of this era will sit on shelves for years and years!…..Enjoy the every man for himself show

    Any real Republican knows it has been a shit show. But to say that it was devious and misleading without including the Joe Biden/Kamala Harris episode who produced the same hit records is blind and stupid. Call a spade a spade. Don't drink your shit stained Kool Aide and tell me it is delicious. I assure you that is a drink I want nothing to do with either.

    All Forums | Politics
    12 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 452,680
    • Tuesday 09/29/2026 636
    • Serious Streak Survivor Strategies 1,918,213
    • The MLB Playoffs are here. 6,358
    • PART DEUX 251
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 102,507
    • You asked for more winners- here you go 1,500
    • NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 28,827
    • That’s the game! This will end 3-2 Phillies win. No more runs. Take In Game Live UNDER 5.5 runs (+261) and Phillies to win by EXACTLY 1 runs (+280) 619
    • ?? KBO Plays 🥎 15,649

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.