That's not why he got fired. It's because he got his feelings hurt when Trump wanted to rip troops out of the middle east, to Bolton's dismay. Has nothing to do w a "yes" man as you categorize, so pay attention to the facts will ya ?!
Also, if independent voters truly want more evidence, witnesses , it just goes to show they have fallen for " the Schiff Show" played out in the House. It's the Senate's job to review the findings brought forward already by the House, not to bring forward new material. The house had every opportunity to do that...Riiiiiiight ?!
That's not why he got fired. It's because he got his feelings hurt when Trump wanted to rip troops out of the middle east, to Bolton's dismay. Has nothing to do w a "yes" man as you categorize, so pay attention to the facts will ya ?!
Also, if independent voters truly want more evidence, witnesses , it just goes to show they have fallen for " the Schiff Show" played out in the House. It's the Senate's job to review the findings brought forward already by the House, not to bring forward new material. The house had every opportunity to do that...Riiiiiiight ?!
An honest man ? .. seems as though he has an axe to grind due to his firing by Trump, and oh, he's got some book he's trying to sell, too. An honest, credible,man... I would have said that years ago about him, but times sure have changed. Same applies to John Kelly, too.
John kelly is a man of integrity which is a enigma in the Trump administration & corporation ...you may have it before entering his lair but is quickly removed and not needed when serving your sentence on my tax dollars...
Dark- Your definitely out of line when decide people that don't agree with you and joe-pockets are bootlickin, ignorant and
non-critical thinkers. Aren't you simply putting it back on you with statements like that. Grow up dude and restate
who is spreading their ignorance.
Dark- Your definitely out of line when decide people that don't agree with you and joe-pockets are bootlickin, ignorant and
non-critical thinkers. Aren't you simply putting it back on you with statements like that. Grow up dude and restate
who is spreading their ignorance.
dark - you insist on blaming the right that don't support your views- Your opinion is not based on facts. Which witnesses did you
call that was on the phone call - Sondland, who said assumed and presumed 66 times, NOONE ELSE! Theres your facts. Your
congressional clowns rushed to impeach (Then held articles for 33 days). Your side did not do their job in YOUR secret inquiry.
FACT- 17 so-called witnesses who simply gave their opinion. FACT Why didn't we get the 18th witness deposition? I wanted more
witnesses. However, YOUR side could have had the witnesses. Why should the Senate do your job? You wanted a fair trial. You
don't even see the irony in that. That is the Democratic hypocritical way. I stand by my statement but there is no way in hell
your goin to admit your wrong. Another Democratic oath!
I know you don't like to read much but check out the 111 page brief which outlines all the evidence for you.
Don't be so farking lazy. All you Repugs ask for others to do your research. Didn't you see the emails, texts etc during the trial? Do you want me to draw you a picture like the POS you support needs? They have to draw him pictures for cripes sakes to get critical news conveyed.
dark - you insist on blaming the right that don't support your views- Your opinion is not based on facts. Which witnesses did you
call that was on the phone call - Sondland, who said assumed and presumed 66 times, NOONE ELSE! Theres your facts. Your
congressional clowns rushed to impeach (Then held articles for 33 days). Your side did not do their job in YOUR secret inquiry.
FACT- 17 so-called witnesses who simply gave their opinion. FACT Why didn't we get the 18th witness deposition? I wanted more
witnesses. However, YOUR side could have had the witnesses. Why should the Senate do your job? You wanted a fair trial. You
don't even see the irony in that. That is the Democratic hypocritical way. I stand by my statement but there is no way in hell
your goin to admit your wrong. Another Democratic oath!
I know you don't like to read much but check out the 111 page brief which outlines all the evidence for you.
Don't be so farking lazy. All you Repugs ask for others to do your research. Didn't you see the emails, texts etc during the trial? Do you want me to draw you a picture like the POS you support needs? They have to draw him pictures for cripes sakes to get critical news conveyed.
Most people recognize the partisan "Schiff Show " for what it really is. A partisan effort to remove a sitting president at all costs. Never before in our country's brief history has it become so partisan. What's to stop this nonsense from occurring again ?
Future impeachment hearings in the House , that have votes drawn strictly on party lines , should be rejected... and not go to the Senate. Could have saved a lot of taxpayers money
Good Lord...don't be talking about saving taxpayer money.
Have you seen what Trump has done to the national debt?
To get back to the thread....Bolton has never been concerned about sending our men & women to war anywhere in the world. And this coward wouldn't come forward to speak the truth. He's right out of the Cheney & Rummy mold.
midnite-dark - 1st I hope you had a blast with ur kids in miami (we will always agree on family first if nothing else). First half was shorter than the
the halftime show. 2nd half got alot more interesting. As for this 111 page brief you suggest I should have read to educate myself.
My gosh man, can you give me one other person on the planet that would read that. Wasn't the repetiveness of the trial enuf!!!!!!
If that makes me an illiterate, so be it. Let me ask you and dark a very simple question you guys always avoid. Why didn't your
party call the witnesses? Remember, i wanted witnesses also. One thing for sure, you can bet your ass that us lazy-ass, bootlickin
apple-polishing, sycophant, lackey, non-critical thinkin, ignorant Republicans would have. Do you agree the Dems fk d up there?
Anyway, Impeachment #2 has run its course. Seeya all for #3 which has to be soon, right!!! Trump 2 Dems 0
Democrats sent subpoenas to a number of Trump's inner circle (Mulvaney, Blair, Duffy, McGahn) but Trump prevented them from responding to the lawful order.
In McGahn's situation, they have been in the courts for over 8 months arguing whether he should be forced to appear. Based on that case, the Democrats were not willing to fight other subpoenas for witnesses knowing that it could take years to get an ruling which would have most likely been appealed again & again.
Once the trial moved to the Senate, the Democrats provided the available data showing Trump's obstructed witnesses and attempted to extort Ukraine. Unfortunately, the GOP did not want to question any witnesses.
The Democrats interviewed the patriots willing to do so as they responded to the lawful subpoenas to appear.
Ok... how about if I said we could have all saved ourselves 4 months of this nonsense. Including a 30 day or so spell when Nancy was sitting on her impeachment results in the House. What a dope. She and Schiffty Schiff's Schiff Show were a complete partisan disaster from the start.
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
