Let's see here ... what is worse ... a man who verbally insults, or a woman who illegally profits from her political position, even if it is at the detriment of the country.
HRC is a known liar, a known thief, and a known b!tch.
Trump's words offend people.
America will make their decision in November, not based upon the facts, but based upon what the liberal media tells them to do
Let's see here ... what is worse ... a man who verbally insults, or a woman who illegally profits from her political position, even if it is at the detriment of the country.
HRC is a known liar, a known thief, and a known b!tch.
Trump's words offend people.
America will make their decision in November, not based upon the facts, but based upon what the liberal media tells them to do
The highest rated network by far is right wing and so devoid of any reasonable content for viewers to make informed political decisions, it's laughable.
That network has spent the past 8 years catering to birthers, defaming the president, fear-mongering, dehumanizing Muslims and Blacls, and promoting all out war all over the world where it believes ISIS to be in every nook and cranny, innocent citizens be damned.
And you think, that America, with what is now a razor thin margin between Trump and Clinton, are being 'told what to do' at the ballot box, so you can come back with an "I told ya so!" when Hillary wins?
What if the choice is, "I don't want to elect a dangerous incoherent megalomaniac who bragged continuously about his admiration and ties to a dictator in Putin, so I'll take the other one?"
The guy has now insulted a POW, the parents of a deceased war vet, and mocked a disabled reporter with exaggerated gesticulations (and the insults against women are more than I can count). I could only think children are next in line for insult and you and his supporters would excuse that too.
I love the words 'liberal media'.
The highest rated network by far is right wing and so devoid of any reasonable content for viewers to make informed political decisions, it's laughable.
That network has spent the past 8 years catering to birthers, defaming the president, fear-mongering, dehumanizing Muslims and Blacls, and promoting all out war all over the world where it believes ISIS to be in every nook and cranny, innocent citizens be damned.
And you think, that America, with what is now a razor thin margin between Trump and Clinton, are being 'told what to do' at the ballot box, so you can come back with an "I told ya so!" when Hillary wins?
What if the choice is, "I don't want to elect a dangerous incoherent megalomaniac who bragged continuously about his admiration and ties to a dictator in Putin, so I'll take the other one?"
The guy has now insulted a POW, the parents of a deceased war vet, and mocked a disabled reporter with exaggerated gesticulations (and the insults against women are more than I can count). I could only think children are next in line for insult and you and his supporters would excuse that too.
A guy who has multiple rape claims against him and a man who has filed for bankruptcy so many times should be nowhere near the White house.
So before any of you bed wetters respond by saying those rape allegations against him are all bs, Isn't that what people said in the early stages when Bill Cosby was accused?
Hillary Clinton a known liar, thief and girl sounds like Mother Teresa compared to Trump.
A guy who has multiple rape claims against him and a man who has filed for bankruptcy so many times should be nowhere near the White house.
So before any of you bed wetters respond by saying those rape allegations against him are all bs, Isn't that what people said in the early stages when Bill Cosby was accused?
Hillary Clinton a known liar, thief and girl sounds like Mother Teresa compared to Trump.
A guy who has multiple rape claims against him and a man who has filed for bankruptcy so many times should be nowhere near the White house.
So before any of you bed wetters respond by saying those rape allegations against him are all bs, Isn't that what people said in the early stages when Bill Cosby was accused?
Hillary Clinton a known liar, thief and girl sounds like Mother Teresa compared to Trump.
The rape allegations are to be taken seriously, until that is, you dig deeper.
Let me ask you this ... just recently a 13 year old girl accused Trump of rape. If there was any merit whatsoever to this claim, wouldn't it be blasted all over the news? Wouldn't MSNBC and CNN put hours and hours of their air time into discussing it? (rhetorical questions)
Next ...
You say he has filed for bankruptcy "so many times" ... now you sound like a Democratic politician.
How many times is "so many"?
4.
How many businesses has Trump owned/run?
4 bankruptcies is not the staggering number some make it out to be.
If any person invests in a business, and that business fails, they are allowed to file for bankruptcy. Trump did nothing wrong. He did what over 1 million people do each and every year. OVER 1 MILLION PEOPLE EACH YEAR FILE FOR BANKRUPTCY.
Do not make it out to be such a red flag. Trump made use of the rules that this country has, just as anyone else would have if in the same circumstances.
If your argument for HRC is that she is a better person than Trump, you will need more fodder than that
bigreds daddy
Quote Originally Posted by SwishSwish1234:
A guy who has multiple rape claims against him and a man who has filed for bankruptcy so many times should be nowhere near the White house.
So before any of you bed wetters respond by saying those rape allegations against him are all bs, Isn't that what people said in the early stages when Bill Cosby was accused?
Hillary Clinton a known liar, thief and girl sounds like Mother Teresa compared to Trump.
The rape allegations are to be taken seriously, until that is, you dig deeper.
Let me ask you this ... just recently a 13 year old girl accused Trump of rape. If there was any merit whatsoever to this claim, wouldn't it be blasted all over the news? Wouldn't MSNBC and CNN put hours and hours of their air time into discussing it? (rhetorical questions)
Next ...
You say he has filed for bankruptcy "so many times" ... now you sound like a Democratic politician.
How many times is "so many"?
4.
How many businesses has Trump owned/run?
4 bankruptcies is not the staggering number some make it out to be.
If any person invests in a business, and that business fails, they are allowed to file for bankruptcy. Trump did nothing wrong. He did what over 1 million people do each and every year. OVER 1 MILLION PEOPLE EACH YEAR FILE FOR BANKRUPTCY.
Do not make it out to be such a red flag. Trump made use of the rules that this country has, just as anyone else would have if in the same circumstances.
If your argument for HRC is that she is a better person than Trump, you will need more fodder than that
It is unfortunate that I need to waste my time to explain this to you, but I will do so for the sake of showing how stupid you are ...
Yes, FOX News is the highest rated network. Well done Scal, you finally got something right.
Now I will point out that which is obvious to anyone who is objective (this does not include you, Scal)
With so many liberally biased news sources, their ratings are spread out amongst them all. Whereas FOX, and it's conservative take on the news, does not have nearly as much competition. Thus, their viewers (conservatives) have fewer options, which in turn raises the viewership of FOX.
Is that simple enough for you, Scal?
I can write in crayon next time if need be
bigreds daddy
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
I love the words 'liberal media'.
The highest rated network by far is right wing
It is unfortunate that I need to waste my time to explain this to you, but I will do so for the sake of showing how stupid you are ...
Yes, FOX News is the highest rated network. Well done Scal, you finally got something right.
Now I will point out that which is obvious to anyone who is objective (this does not include you, Scal)
With so many liberally biased news sources, their ratings are spread out amongst them all. Whereas FOX, and it's conservative take on the news, does not have nearly as much competition. Thus, their viewers (conservatives) have fewer options, which in turn raises the viewership of FOX.
And you think, that America, with what is now a razor thin margin between Trump and Clinton, are being 'told what to do' at the ballot box, so you can come back with an "I told ya so!" when Hillary wins?
No, my little inconsequential friend, I believe that America is being "told what to do" by the vast majority of the media.
FOX News clearly tells the news with a spin.
MSNBC, CNN, 60 Minutes, et al, do the exact same, simply from the opposite perspective.
There is more liberalism in the media than conservatism.
Most objective people would acknowledge that ... you, the resident racist, will not agree with this because it does not fit your biased narrative.
I fully expect HRC to win ... as much as a result of the media's bias as anything else
bigreds daddy
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
And you think, that America, with what is now a razor thin margin between Trump and Clinton, are being 'told what to do' at the ballot box, so you can come back with an "I told ya so!" when Hillary wins?
No, my little inconsequential friend, I believe that America is being "told what to do" by the vast majority of the media.
FOX News clearly tells the news with a spin.
MSNBC, CNN, 60 Minutes, et al, do the exact same, simply from the opposite perspective.
There is more liberalism in the media than conservatism.
Most objective people would acknowledge that ... you, the resident racist, will not agree with this because it does not fit your biased narrative.
I fully expect HRC to win ... as much as a result of the media's bias as anything else
What if the choice is, "I don't want to elect a dangerous incoherent megalomaniac who bragged continuously about his admiration and ties to a dictator in Putin, so I'll take the other one?"
If that is your argument for HRC, then I can accept that.
I have not, and will not make any argument for Trump, other than to say that he is less vile, less corrupt, and less of a liar than she is.
Trump is not fit to be POTUS.
HRC is not fit to be POTUS.
So now the people must vote on who is less disturbing of an option ... just don't try to say that HRC is a good candidate, much less a good person
bigreds daddy
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
What if the choice is, "I don't want to elect a dangerous incoherent megalomaniac who bragged continuously about his admiration and ties to a dictator in Putin, so I'll take the other one?"
If that is your argument for HRC, then I can accept that.
I have not, and will not make any argument for Trump, other than to say that he is less vile, less corrupt, and less of a liar than she is.
Trump is not fit to be POTUS.
HRC is not fit to be POTUS.
So now the people must vote on who is less disturbing of an option ... just don't try to say that HRC is a good candidate, much less a good person
If that is your argument for HRC, then I can accept that.
I have not, and will not make any argument for Trump, other than to say that he is less vile, less corrupt, and less of a liar than she is.
Trump is not fit to be POTUS.
HRC is not fit to be POTUS.
So now the people must vote on who is less disturbing of an option ... just don't try to say that HRC is a good candidate, much less a good person
Who in the world here, even the most hard core liberal, has ever said Hillary is a 'good person' or even insinuated such a thing???
You'd be an idiot to do so. Here hands are disturbingly dirty, so much so I have to look away at times.
The left KNOWS Hillary is in cahoots with Wall Street. We simply value long-standing Democrat platforms that she will embrace (to a degree) and that is more than enough for all of us to vote for her.
Any reasonable Liberal was salivating for Bernie because he truly was a Liberal and because of his age, he had a devil may care attitude that would have gotten a progressive agenda moved forward (however distasteful that is to the right, THAT is why we would have elected him).
None of this makes Hillary a good candidate or a good person. Not sure why you are bringing either up. But we'll still elect her because we value the the issues she purports to support and because her party will force her to do so (to a degree). And because Trump is the weakest substantive presidential candidate in modern history.
The only thing I find attractive is that he continually rebukes Saudi Arabi for their barbarism and corrupt ties to our economy. That is to be applauded.
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:
If that is your argument for HRC, then I can accept that.
I have not, and will not make any argument for Trump, other than to say that he is less vile, less corrupt, and less of a liar than she is.
Trump is not fit to be POTUS.
HRC is not fit to be POTUS.
So now the people must vote on who is less disturbing of an option ... just don't try to say that HRC is a good candidate, much less a good person
Who in the world here, even the most hard core liberal, has ever said Hillary is a 'good person' or even insinuated such a thing???
You'd be an idiot to do so. Here hands are disturbingly dirty, so much so I have to look away at times.
The left KNOWS Hillary is in cahoots with Wall Street. We simply value long-standing Democrat platforms that she will embrace (to a degree) and that is more than enough for all of us to vote for her.
Any reasonable Liberal was salivating for Bernie because he truly was a Liberal and because of his age, he had a devil may care attitude that would have gotten a progressive agenda moved forward (however distasteful that is to the right, THAT is why we would have elected him).
None of this makes Hillary a good candidate or a good person. Not sure why you are bringing either up. But we'll still elect her because we value the the issues she purports to support and because her party will force her to do so (to a degree). And because Trump is the weakest substantive presidential candidate in modern history.
The only thing I find attractive is that he continually rebukes Saudi Arabi for their barbarism and corrupt ties to our economy. That is to be applauded.
And because Trump is the weakest substantive presidential candidate in modern history.
Barry Goldwater? George McGovern?
Trump is not my idea of a great candidate either, but I do believe he has a true love and passion for this country, whereas Ms. Clinton would sell it for the right price in the name of world equality.
And because Trump is the weakest substantive presidential candidate in modern history.
Barry Goldwater? George McGovern?
Trump is not my idea of a great candidate either, but I do believe he has a true love and passion for this country, whereas Ms. Clinton would sell it for the right price in the name of world equality.
After the IRS knifed Spiro Agnew to clear the way for a Nixon Impeachment, Tricky person nominated Jerry Ford for his VP as insurance (poison pill) againest Impeachment. Congress showed their hand that they would Impeach person even if the VP was Kruischev.I nominate Jerry Ford on record as the weakest substantive presidential office-holder in modern history.
After the IRS knifed Spiro Agnew to clear the way for a Nixon Impeachment, Tricky person nominated Jerry Ford for his VP as insurance (poison pill) againest Impeachment. Congress showed their hand that they would Impeach person even if the VP was Kruischev.I nominate Jerry Ford on record as the weakest substantive presidential office-holder in modern history.
It's not Trump's insults that I find revolting, it's the fact that he has no idea what he is talking about most of the time. Bush's White House got hijacked by Cheney, and we all know how well that worked out (multiple wars based on bad intelligence, a cavalier disregard for a plummeting economy, massive bailouts, biggest corrupt lobbying scandal of all time, Sheldon Adelson making all online gambling illegal, etc). So there's that.
It's not Trump's insults that I find revolting, it's the fact that he has no idea what he is talking about most of the time. Bush's White House got hijacked by Cheney, and we all know how well that worked out (multiple wars based on bad intelligence, a cavalier disregard for a plummeting economy, massive bailouts, biggest corrupt lobbying scandal of all time, Sheldon Adelson making all online gambling illegal, etc). So there's that.
Your political commentary is as deep, and well thought out, as that of Scal's
You're one to judge
Side
McGovern and Ford? Sorry Trump trumps them all in my opinion.
Although I will credit Goldwater for being the first domino that fell to start the fall of the GOP in its current discombobulated and fractured state. He did enormous damage to the party and that reverberates until today.
So in that regard I concede he IS worse than Trump.
Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:
Thank you for sharing your insight.
Your political commentary is as deep, and well thought out, as that of Scal's
You're one to judge
Side
McGovern and Ford? Sorry Trump trumps them all in my opinion.
Although I will credit Goldwater for being the first domino that fell to start the fall of the GOP in its current discombobulated and fractured state. He did enormous damage to the party and that reverberates until today.
So in that regard I concede he IS worse than Trump.
Hot Forum Topics
