i wonder if dj will see the comparison between him saying the DA had won and me saying berg had won his case vs obama. as i said in the initial thread, i was incorrect, and had just recalled an article that happened after obama and the dnc had failed to respond in the allotted time and technically obama admitted he wasnt born in america, but before the case was eventually thrown out.
here, dj presumably read an article at a time when the condescending talker had a 204 vote lead, but before the 7500 votes were 'found' for prosser. thus at that moment in time, he was correct, but afterwards he was incorrect.
the question is should i stoop to djs douchebag level and respond in many of his threads how hes so full of shit bc he once though the condescending woman had won the election?
I didn't claim she won. I don't care if she did or not. I think it is hysterical how you far right wingers get so worked up over the election of a Judge in state where your right wing hero governor is engaging in cronyism on a level usually not seen.
It is ironic on so many levels.
And I can't help that you make more misstatements than most people on this board combined. I guess when one uses libertarianism to hide behind extremism, their colors can't help but to show.
0
Quote Originally Posted by steveshane67:
i wonder if dj will see the comparison between him saying the DA had won and me saying berg had won his case vs obama. as i said in the initial thread, i was incorrect, and had just recalled an article that happened after obama and the dnc had failed to respond in the allotted time and technically obama admitted he wasnt born in america, but before the case was eventually thrown out.
here, dj presumably read an article at a time when the condescending talker had a 204 vote lead, but before the 7500 votes were 'found' for prosser. thus at that moment in time, he was correct, but afterwards he was incorrect.
the question is should i stoop to djs douchebag level and respond in many of his threads how hes so full of shit bc he once though the condescending woman had won the election?
I didn't claim she won. I don't care if she did or not. I think it is hysterical how you far right wingers get so worked up over the election of a Judge in state where your right wing hero governor is engaging in cronyism on a level usually not seen.
It is ironic on so many levels.
And I can't help that you make more misstatements than most people on this board combined. I guess when one uses libertarianism to hide behind extremism, their colors can't help but to show.
I didn't claim she won. I don't care if she did or not. I think it is hysterical how you far right wingers get so worked up over the election of a Judge in state where your right wing hero governor is engaging in cronyism on a level usually not seen.
It is ironic on so many levels.
And I can't help that you make more misstatements than most people on this board combined. I guess when one uses libertarianism to hide behind extremism, their colors can't help but to show.
silly me, for interpretting this
Judge Kloppenberg
Another victory for American Democracy.
as you thinking she won
what politician doesnt engage in cronyism?
how am i getting worked up over this election?
the only misstatements i make are when you have 0 ability to correctly interpret them. just like you think a 'qualified attendant' for a special medical needs child is not a nurse but just a teachers aide.
0
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:
I didn't claim she won. I don't care if she did or not. I think it is hysterical how you far right wingers get so worked up over the election of a Judge in state where your right wing hero governor is engaging in cronyism on a level usually not seen.
It is ironic on so many levels.
And I can't help that you make more misstatements than most people on this board combined. I guess when one uses libertarianism to hide behind extremism, their colors can't help but to show.
silly me, for interpretting this
Judge Kloppenberg
Another victory for American Democracy.
as you thinking she won
what politician doesnt engage in cronyism?
how am i getting worked up over this election?
the only misstatements i make are when you have 0 ability to correctly interpret them. just like you think a 'qualified attendant' for a special medical needs child is not a nurse but just a teachers aide.
I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!
-BG
(aka another right wing extremist)
0
I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!
I refuse to be labeled as a Republican, and don't think I have ever referred to myself as a Libertarian, not sure, may have to illustrate that I am not a Republican. Truth is that I am a registered Independent.
0
Sure DJ,
I am not much of a joiner.
I refuse to be labeled as a Republican, and don't think I have ever referred to myself as a Libertarian, not sure, may have to illustrate that I am not a Republican. Truth is that I am a registered Independent.
MILWAUKEE -- Congresswoman Tammy
Baldwin is asking for a federal investigation into the surprise
discovery of 14,000 votes in Waukesha County for the Wisconsin Supreme
Court race.
The Wisconsin Democrat sent a letter to U.S. Attorney General Eric
Holder Friday night asking him to assign the Justice Department Public
Integrity Section. It oversees the federal prosecution of election
crimes.
A message left by The Associated Press at Holder's office today wasn't immediately returned.
Waukesha County Clerk Kathy Nickolaus said "human error" resulted in
the miscount there. The change gave incumbent Justice David Prosser a
7,500-vote edge over challenger JoAnne Kloppenburg.
In the letter, Baldwin says the mishap raises serious doubts as to the integrity of the state's electoral process.
..........................................
I think the Libs are mad because the GOP had guards stationed at all the cemeteries around Milwaukee and Madison
Have no fear..Eric & Barry will come to the rescue and try and save the election!
This might be settled by Xmas!
0
SURPRISE SURPRISE
MILWAUKEE -- Congresswoman Tammy
Baldwin is asking for a federal investigation into the surprise
discovery of 14,000 votes in Waukesha County for the Wisconsin Supreme
Court race.
The Wisconsin Democrat sent a letter to U.S. Attorney General Eric
Holder Friday night asking him to assign the Justice Department Public
Integrity Section. It oversees the federal prosecution of election
crimes.
A message left by The Associated Press at Holder's office today wasn't immediately returned.
Waukesha County Clerk Kathy Nickolaus said "human error" resulted in
the miscount there. The change gave incumbent Justice David Prosser a
7,500-vote edge over challenger JoAnne Kloppenburg.
In the letter, Baldwin says the mishap raises serious doubts as to the integrity of the state's electoral process.
..........................................
I think the Libs are mad because the GOP had guards stationed at all the cemeteries around Milwaukee and Madison
Have no fear..Eric & Barry will come to the rescue and try and save the election!
With the Holder Justice Department anything can happen except fairness. How they will screw the incumbent out of 7000 votes will be interesting to watch.
0
With the Holder Justice Department anything can happen except fairness. How they will screw the incumbent out of 7000 votes will be interesting to watch.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.