Well then, you "believe" wrong
Just saying these girls new the deal and were willing participants.
I get that is what YOU are alleging.
But you have nothing other than conjecture to support your contention as it applies SPECIFICALLY to each and every one of those women allegedly "KNOWING the deal" and each and every one of them allegedly being "willing participants"
You can't state that like it's a fact nor even a probability....not in any VALID way you can't.
But if you can support it as FACT then feel free to post your links to the FACTS proving your case as it applies to each and every one of those vicitimized women and I am willing to change my view based on FACTS, not conjecture.
That said, sure, we've all heard stories and watched in the movies how *some* women can be "golddiggers" and willing to do ANYTHING to get what they want. Some, yes. It's plausible in this case too!
But painting EVERY one of the subsequent accusers with that same brush stroke is WRONGFUL.
For all we really do know, all (or most) of the Harvey Weinstein accusers ARE unwilling victims while the "golddiggers" who knew "the deal" and were willing in this quid-pro-quo with Weinstein we don't even know about because THEY are keeping silent or are supportive of him.
Now, had you stated something like: "it's my OPINION, that *some* of those women now accusing Wienstein could very well have known "the deal" and may have been fully complicit at the time" ....THAT type of "opinion" statement contans caveats that make sense and seem reasonable at face value
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
