Now this Fubah/Kelly idiot is happy Biden and the Democrats are doing such a bad job because he’s going to be betting on Republicans in the midterms.
Now this Fubah/Kelly idiot is happy Biden and the Democrats are doing such a bad job because he’s going to be betting on Republicans in the midterms.
Now this Fubah/Kelly idiot is happy Biden and the Democrats are doing such a bad job because he’s going to be betting on Republicans in the midterms.
and i will win at least $15,000 betting on republicans to win the house and senate next year!!!
ABSOLUTELY, Kelly! I am all over that one too, my friend!
Mid-terms!
As I have stated repeatedly on this forum, I expect the republicans to take back BOTH the House and Senate in the mid-terms and I plan on profitting off that reality BIGLY!!!
"...the party of the current WH usually loses either the House, the Senate or both, in the first mid-term. Modern FACT! I expect this trends will recur and will be betting HUGE $$$$ that it will. It matters not to me who wins as a) I am an Independent and, b) it won't make any difference in Washington as we will STILL have the same Congress gridlock as we do today (Biden would veto everything) -- but I expect to profit BIG TIME off the republican win!!!! And the odds are favorable right now. I won HUGE betting against trump last year ($54,000 profit!) and the odds were Biden -200. But for the mid-terms next year the early line looks to be in the pick'em range or Dems favored. I will be going all in on republicans to regain both the House and the Senate."
I need to see more convincing evidence than just a 'trend' before putting any bucks down next year. Plenty can change over the next 11 months.
and i will win at least $15,000 betting on republicans to win the house and senate next year!!!
ABSOLUTELY, Kelly! I am all over that one too, my friend!
Mid-terms!
As I have stated repeatedly on this forum, I expect the republicans to take back BOTH the House and Senate in the mid-terms and I plan on profitting off that reality BIGLY!!!
"...the party of the current WH usually loses either the House, the Senate or both, in the first mid-term. Modern FACT! I expect this trends will recur and will be betting HUGE $$$$ that it will. It matters not to me who wins as a) I am an Independent and, b) it won't make any difference in Washington as we will STILL have the same Congress gridlock as we do today (Biden would veto everything) -- but I expect to profit BIG TIME off the republican win!!!! And the odds are favorable right now. I won HUGE betting against trump last year ($54,000 profit!) and the odds were Biden -200. But for the mid-terms next year the early line looks to be in the pick'em range or Dems favored. I will be going all in on republicans to regain both the House and the Senate."
I need to see more convincing evidence than just a 'trend' before putting any bucks down next year. Plenty can change over the next 11 months.
ABSOLUTELY, Kelly! I am all over that one too, my friend!
Mid-terms!
As I have stated repeatedly on this forum, I expect the republicans to take back BOTH the House and Senate in the mid-terms and I plan on profitting off that reality BIGLY!!!
"...the party of the current WH usually loses either the House, the Senate or both, in the first mid-term. Modern FACT! I expect this trends will recur and will be betting HUGE $$$$ that it will. It matters not to me who wins as a) I am an Independent and, b) it won't make any difference in Washington as we will STILL have the same Congress gridlock as we do today (Biden would veto everything) -- but I expect to profit BIG TIME off the republican win!!!! And the odds are favorable right now. I won HUGE betting against trump last year ($54,000 profit!) and the odds were Biden -200. But for the mid-terms next year the early line looks to be in the pick'em range or Dems favored. I will be going all in on republicans to regain both the House and the Senate."
I need to see more convincing evidence than just a 'trend' before putting any bucks down next year. Plenty can change over the next 11 months.
yep ,makes sense baish , which is why i am waiting until next october see what the lines r like then and how the political winds r blowing but it is a strong trend might as well make money off it ! good luck to u whatever u eventually decide
ABSOLUTELY, Kelly! I am all over that one too, my friend!
Mid-terms!
As I have stated repeatedly on this forum, I expect the republicans to take back BOTH the House and Senate in the mid-terms and I plan on profitting off that reality BIGLY!!!
"...the party of the current WH usually loses either the House, the Senate or both, in the first mid-term. Modern FACT! I expect this trends will recur and will be betting HUGE $$$$ that it will. It matters not to me who wins as a) I am an Independent and, b) it won't make any difference in Washington as we will STILL have the same Congress gridlock as we do today (Biden would veto everything) -- but I expect to profit BIG TIME off the republican win!!!! And the odds are favorable right now. I won HUGE betting against trump last year ($54,000 profit!) and the odds were Biden -200. But for the mid-terms next year the early line looks to be in the pick'em range or Dems favored. I will be going all in on republicans to regain both the House and the Senate."
I need to see more convincing evidence than just a 'trend' before putting any bucks down next year. Plenty can change over the next 11 months.
yep ,makes sense baish , which is why i am waiting until next october see what the lines r like then and how the political winds r blowing but it is a strong trend might as well make money off it ! good luck to u whatever u eventually decide
Mike Pence vows to back incumbent GOP governors
battling Trump-approved challengers, report says
...
Trump has regularly lashed out at members of the GOP establishment
who he feels have not been supportive enough OF HIM.
He has vowed to oust "disloyal" Republican lawmakers who voted against him
in his second impeachment trial, and he has reportedly sought to depose
Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell.
Mike Pence vows to back incumbent GOP governors
battling Trump-approved challengers, report says
...
Trump has regularly lashed out at members of the GOP establishment
who he feels have not been supportive enough OF HIM.
He has vowed to oust "disloyal" Republican lawmakers who voted against him
in his second impeachment trial, and he has reportedly sought to depose
Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell.
Trump has regularly lashed out at members of the GOP establishment
who he feels have not been supportive enough OF HIM.
He has vowed to oust "disloyal" Republican lawmakers who voted against him
in his second impeachment trial, and he has reportedly sought to depose
Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell.
reading that a person might begin to believe donald chump is a vindictive prick
nahhhh cant possibly b true
Trump has regularly lashed out at members of the GOP establishment
who he feels have not been supportive enough OF HIM.
He has vowed to oust "disloyal" Republican lawmakers who voted against him
in his second impeachment trial, and he has reportedly sought to depose
Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell.
reading that a person might begin to believe donald chump is a vindictive prick
nahhhh cant possibly b true
reading that a person might begin to believe donald chump is a vindictive prick nahhhh cant possibly b true
It would seem very counter-productive
reading that a person might begin to believe donald chump is a vindictive prick nahhhh cant possibly b true
It would seem very counter-productive
While the GOP is a solid favorite to recapture the House in 2022, the future price is pretty damn expensive at Heritage:
GOP: -525
DEM: +400
I certainly would not want to risk $5,250 to win $1,000. Good luck to those who do.
While the GOP is a solid favorite to recapture the House in 2022, the future price is pretty damn expensive at Heritage:
GOP: -525
DEM: +400
I certainly would not want to risk $5,250 to win $1,000. Good luck to those who do.
Trump said people who believe
his election-fraud theories are STUPID
BUSINESS INSIDER -
Disgraced former President Donald Trump published a statement
Saturday in a bid to push his unfounded election-fraud claims.
"Anybody that doesn't think there wasn't massive election fraud
in the 2020 presidential election is either very stupid, or very corrupt!"
- trump said in a Saturday Dec 4 statement.
Critics pounced on the error. They said the [dumbass] former president
used a double negative and wound up insulting those who espoused
his FALSIFIED claim that the 2020 election was stolen from him.
Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell tweeted,
"I agree with the former President!"
Trump said people who believe
his election-fraud theories are STUPID
BUSINESS INSIDER -
Disgraced former President Donald Trump published a statement
Saturday in a bid to push his unfounded election-fraud claims.
"Anybody that doesn't think there wasn't massive election fraud
in the 2020 presidential election is either very stupid, or very corrupt!"
- trump said in a Saturday Dec 4 statement.
Critics pounced on the error. They said the [dumbass] former president
used a double negative and wound up insulting those who espoused
his FALSIFIED claim that the 2020 election was stolen from him.
Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell tweeted,
"I agree with the former President!"
Those odds seem about right compared to the probability.
It seems routine that the party of the new president is swept out of congress in the first mid-terms. I expect this.
The only modern day exception is understandably different, when America was still reeling from the September 11 attacks with patriotic fervor.
Other than that 5 to 1 odds looks about right as it stands today. Conditions could change but unlikely to be significant.
Those odds seem about right compared to the probability.
It seems routine that the party of the new president is swept out of congress in the first mid-terms. I expect this.
The only modern day exception is understandably different, when America was still reeling from the September 11 attacks with patriotic fervor.
Other than that 5 to 1 odds looks about right as it stands today. Conditions could change but unlikely to be significant.
I have been saying this repeatedly for well over a year.
The president's party almost automatically loses in the first mid terms. I see nothing to change that trend and I have stated many times I am going to cash in BIGLY on that anticipation by betting heavily on the GOP to regain both the house and the senate.
With A democrat in office and republicans controlling Congress, **NOTHING** helpful to Americans will get passed the final two years and not in 2022 either. Three years of governmental gridlock due to on party not having full control. As a result of that gridlock -- which the Democrats will have no control over -- 2024 will likely see a Republican voted in if he or she is half-decent, and I will cash in big time on betting that result as well!
I have been saying this repeatedly for well over a year.
The president's party almost automatically loses in the first mid terms. I see nothing to change that trend and I have stated many times I am going to cash in BIGLY on that anticipation by betting heavily on the GOP to regain both the house and the senate.
With A democrat in office and republicans controlling Congress, **NOTHING** helpful to Americans will get passed the final two years and not in 2022 either. Three years of governmental gridlock due to on party not having full control. As a result of that gridlock -- which the Democrats will have no control over -- 2024 will likely see a Republican voted in if he or she is half-decent, and I will cash in big time on betting that result as well!
I have been saying this repeatedly for well over a year. The president's party almost automatically loses in the first mid terms. I see nothing to change that trend and I have stated many times I am going to cash in BIGLY on that anticipation by betting heavily on the GOP to regain both the house and the senate.
With A democrat in office and republicans controlling Congress, **NOTHING** helpful to Americans will get passed the final two years and not in 2022 either. Three years of governmental gridlock due to on party not having full control. As a result of that gridlock -- which the Democrats will have no control over -- 2024 will likely see a Republican voted in if he or she is half-decent, and I will cash in big time on betting that result as well!
i agree and have so far set aside 30k for that lucrative event but hope to add more to my investment
but i wont place the bets until late october
I have been saying this repeatedly for well over a year. The president's party almost automatically loses in the first mid terms. I see nothing to change that trend and I have stated many times I am going to cash in BIGLY on that anticipation by betting heavily on the GOP to regain both the house and the senate.
With A democrat in office and republicans controlling Congress, **NOTHING** helpful to Americans will get passed the final two years and not in 2022 either. Three years of governmental gridlock due to on party not having full control. As a result of that gridlock -- which the Democrats will have no control over -- 2024 will likely see a Republican voted in if he or she is half-decent, and I will cash in big time on betting that result as well!
i agree and have so far set aside 30k for that lucrative event but hope to add more to my investment
but i wont place the bets until late october
@KellyM_1964
Probably want to save that cash, you're gonna need it when the collapse occurs.... that straight line upwards that is the SPY trend isn't going to last forever....but hey, you do you buddy....BOL and Happy New Year to you and the 3Amigos
@KellyM_1964
Probably want to save that cash, you're gonna need it when the collapse occurs.... that straight line upwards that is the SPY trend isn't going to last forever....but hey, you do you buddy....BOL and Happy New Year to you and the 3Amigos
This is a very good point. I doubt anything will advance in congress the next three years
This is a very good point. I doubt anything will advance in congress the next three years
Yet another reason why trump ranks so low among Presidents....THE BIG LIE
Romney defends Biden's 2020 victory
after Trump attacks GOP senator Rounds
Sen Mitt Romney defended fellow Republican Sen. Mike Rounds of South Dakota on Monday for accurately stating that the 2020 election was fair and that Trump “did not win.”
"Mike Rounds speaks truth knowing that our Republic
depends upon it. Republicans like Govs Hutchinson,
Baker & Hogan; Sens McConnell, Thune & Johnson;
Bush & Cheney; plus 60+ courts and even the
right-leaning Wall Street Journal editorial page agree:
Joe Biden *WON* the election," Romney tweeted.
Yet another reason why trump ranks so low among Presidents....THE BIG LIE
Romney defends Biden's 2020 victory
after Trump attacks GOP senator Rounds
Sen Mitt Romney defended fellow Republican Sen. Mike Rounds of South Dakota on Monday for accurately stating that the 2020 election was fair and that Trump “did not win.”
"Mike Rounds speaks truth knowing that our Republic
depends upon it. Republicans like Govs Hutchinson,
Baker & Hogan; Sens McConnell, Thune & Johnson;
Bush & Cheney; plus 60+ courts and even the
right-leaning Wall Street Journal editorial page agree:
Joe Biden *WON* the election," Romney tweeted.
Romney defends Biden's 2020 victory
after Trump attacks GOP senator Rounds
Sen Mitt Romney defended fellow Republican Sen. Mike Rounds of South Dakota on Monday for accurately stating that the 2020 election was fair and that Trump “did not win.”
"Mike Rounds speaks truth knowing that our Republic
depends upon it. Republicans like Govs Hutchinson,
Baker & Hogan; Sens McConnell, Thune & Johnson;
Bush & Cheney; plus 60+ courts and even the
right-leaning Wall Street Journal editorial page agree:
Joe Biden *WON* the election," Romney tweeted.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell,
who has tried to shift the GOP's focus toward future elections,
defended Rounds' remarks on CNN:
"I believe Senator Rounds told the truth about what
happened in the 2020 election. And I agree with him."
Romney defends Biden's 2020 victory
after Trump attacks GOP senator Rounds
Sen Mitt Romney defended fellow Republican Sen. Mike Rounds of South Dakota on Monday for accurately stating that the 2020 election was fair and that Trump “did not win.”
"Mike Rounds speaks truth knowing that our Republic
depends upon it. Republicans like Govs Hutchinson,
Baker & Hogan; Sens McConnell, Thune & Johnson;
Bush & Cheney; plus 60+ courts and even the
right-leaning Wall Street Journal editorial page agree:
Joe Biden *WON* the election," Romney tweeted.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell,
who has tried to shift the GOP's focus toward future elections,
defended Rounds' remarks on CNN:
"I believe Senator Rounds told the truth about what
happened in the 2020 election. And I agree with him."
More reasons why trump is ranked at the bottom f the list...
According to New York Attorney General Letitia James,
her office has so far uncovered "significant evidence" that the Trump Organization
used fraudulent and misleading asset valuations on multiple properties.
More reasons why trump is ranked at the bottom f the list...
According to New York Attorney General Letitia James,
her office has so far uncovered "significant evidence" that the Trump Organization
used fraudulent and misleading asset valuations on multiple properties.
The Economist/YouGov Poll
January 22-25
Q101G: Favorability of —
MODERATES said:
+22 pts ... Barack Obama (58% vs 36%)
-10 pts ...... President Joe Biden (43% vs 53%)
-20 pts ...... Nancy Pelosi (35% vs 55%)
The Economist/YouGov Poll
January 22-25
Q101G: Favorability of —
MODERATES said:
+22 pts ... Barack Obama (58% vs 36%)
-10 pts ...... President Joe Biden (43% vs 53%)
-20 pts ...... Nancy Pelosi (35% vs 55%)
He most certainly is and it hurts him sometimes. But he's also not a RINO and is not a part of the establishment. Which is why almost every Democrat and many Republicans hate him. He's upsetting the applecart of business as usual in DC.
He most certainly is and it hurts him sometimes. But he's also not a RINO and is not a part of the establishment. Which is why almost every Democrat and many Republicans hate him. He's upsetting the applecart of business as usual in DC.
what does that even remotely have to do with his presidency?
what does that even remotely have to do with his presidency?
The Economist/YouGov Poll
January 22-25
Q101G: Favorability of —
MODERATES said:
+22 pts ... Barack Obama (58% vs 36%)
-10 pts ...... President Joe Biden (43% vs 53%)
-20 pts ...... Nancy Pelosi (35% vs 55%)
-30 pts .... donald trump (32% vs 62%)
-42 pts .... Mitch McConnell (20% vs 62%)
The Economist/YouGov Poll
January 22-25
Q101G: Favorability of —
MODERATES said:
+22 pts ... Barack Obama (58% vs 36%)
-10 pts ...... President Joe Biden (43% vs 53%)
-20 pts ...... Nancy Pelosi (35% vs 55%)
-30 pts .... donald trump (32% vs 62%)
-42 pts .... Mitch McConnell (20% vs 62%)
The Economist/YouGov Poll
January 22-25
Q101G: Favorability of —
MODERATES said:
+22 pts ... Barack Obama (58% vs 36%)
-10 pts ...... President Joe Biden (43% vs 53%)
-20 pts ...... Nancy Pelosi (35% vs 55%)
-30 pts .... donald trump (32% vs 62%)
-42 pts .... Mitch McConnell (20% vs 62%)
I don't think we will find members of either party very popular nationally these days, with perhaps the exception of Barack Obama.
The Economist/YouGov Poll
January 22-25
Q101G: Favorability of —
MODERATES said:
+22 pts ... Barack Obama (58% vs 36%)
-10 pts ...... President Joe Biden (43% vs 53%)
-20 pts ...... Nancy Pelosi (35% vs 55%)
-30 pts .... donald trump (32% vs 62%)
-42 pts .... Mitch McConnell (20% vs 62%)
I don't think we will find members of either party very popular nationally these days, with perhaps the exception of Barack Obama.
[Quote: Originally Posted by baish2012]Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: The Economist/YouGov PollJanuary 22-25 Q101G: Favorability of — MODERATES said: +22 pts ... Barack Obama (58% vs 36%) -10 pts ...... President Joe Biden (43% vs 53%) -20 pts ...... Nancy Pelosi (35% vs 55%) -30 pts .... donald trump (32% vs 62%) -42 pts .... Mitch McConnell (20% vs 62%) I don't think we will find members of either party very popular nationally these days, with perhaps the exception of Barack Obama.[/Quote]
You are stepping out of Fupa and Kelly's line....
How can you post such rational thought that goes against the very principals those two shills have established in this sub forum
[Quote: Originally Posted by baish2012]Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: The Economist/YouGov PollJanuary 22-25 Q101G: Favorability of — MODERATES said: +22 pts ... Barack Obama (58% vs 36%) -10 pts ...... President Joe Biden (43% vs 53%) -20 pts ...... Nancy Pelosi (35% vs 55%) -30 pts .... donald trump (32% vs 62%) -42 pts .... Mitch McConnell (20% vs 62%) I don't think we will find members of either party very popular nationally these days, with perhaps the exception of Barack Obama.[/Quote]
You are stepping out of Fupa and Kelly's line....
How can you post such rational thought that goes against the very principals those two shills have established in this sub forum
The Economist/YouGov Poll
January 22-25
Q101G: Favorability of —
MODERATES said:
+22 pts ... Barack Obama (58% vs 36%)
-10 pts ...... President Joe Biden (43% vs 53%)
-20 pts ...... Nancy Pelosi (35% vs 55%)
-30 pts .... donald trump (32% vs 62%)
-42 pts .... Mitch McConnell (20% vs 62%)
I don't think we will find members of either party very popular nationally these days, with perhaps the exception of Barack Obama.
While that is true, there is nevertheless a striking difference between key figures in blue and red that can't be overlooked.
The Economist/YouGov Poll
January 22-25
Q101G: Favorability of —
MODERATES said:
+22 pts ... Barack Obama (58% vs 36%)
-10 pts ...... President Joe Biden (43% vs 53%)
-20 pts ...... Nancy Pelosi (35% vs 55%)
-30 pts .... donald trump (32% vs 62%)
-42 pts .... Mitch McConnell (20% vs 62%)
I don't think we will find members of either party very popular nationally these days, with perhaps the exception of Barack Obama.
While that is true, there is nevertheless a striking difference between key figures in blue and red that can't be overlooked.
Good Forbes article on people who insist on writing and talking in thirdperson...
https://www.forbes.com/sites/stephaniesarkis/2019/04/26/gaslighters-use-the-third-person-for-dramatic-effect/?sh=4829983175d7
Gaslighters Use The Third Person for Dramatic Effect
Recently, Anderson Cooper had a segment pointing out President Trump's use of third person. The third person is where someone refers to themselves by their own name. For example, Trump has spoken in the third person for years. He even gives himself nicknames.
First, speaking in the third person distances you from your actions. Posting in the third person on social media may be more common if you have post-traumatic stress disorder because it helps you to emotionally distance yourself from trauma. However, if you are a world leader, using the third person takes on an ominous tone.
When a gaslighter/narcissist speaks in the third person, his statement is said as if it is coming from a supporter. When his quote is published in the media, readers scanning the news may see just the quote and assume it is attributable to someone else. This then gives the quote more credibility. It then becomes apocryphal. It is a form of spreading propaganda. Gaslighters/narcissists speak with the intention that a lie will be heard so many times that it will become the truth and that their use of the third person gives their quotes more clout.
If gaslighters/narcissists feel that not enough people are praising them (they commonly and unrealistically feel this way), they praise themselves. It can be a form of self-soothing, a reassurance to the gaslighter/narcissist that he is worthy of adoration.
The gaslighter/narcissist, who is notorious for lying, may tell you that he never talked about himself in the third person—he will tell you that you must be mistaken, that was a quote from someone else. Gaslighters/narcissists will stick with this story even when you have video proof of their use of the third person.
Good Forbes article on people who insist on writing and talking in thirdperson...
https://www.forbes.com/sites/stephaniesarkis/2019/04/26/gaslighters-use-the-third-person-for-dramatic-effect/?sh=4829983175d7
Gaslighters Use The Third Person for Dramatic Effect
Recently, Anderson Cooper had a segment pointing out President Trump's use of third person. The third person is where someone refers to themselves by their own name. For example, Trump has spoken in the third person for years. He even gives himself nicknames.
First, speaking in the third person distances you from your actions. Posting in the third person on social media may be more common if you have post-traumatic stress disorder because it helps you to emotionally distance yourself from trauma. However, if you are a world leader, using the third person takes on an ominous tone.
When a gaslighter/narcissist speaks in the third person, his statement is said as if it is coming from a supporter. When his quote is published in the media, readers scanning the news may see just the quote and assume it is attributable to someone else. This then gives the quote more credibility. It then becomes apocryphal. It is a form of spreading propaganda. Gaslighters/narcissists speak with the intention that a lie will be heard so many times that it will become the truth and that their use of the third person gives their quotes more clout.
If gaslighters/narcissists feel that not enough people are praising them (they commonly and unrealistically feel this way), they praise themselves. It can be a form of self-soothing, a reassurance to the gaslighter/narcissist that he is worthy of adoration.
The gaslighter/narcissist, who is notorious for lying, may tell you that he never talked about himself in the third person—he will tell you that you must be mistaken, that was a quote from someone else. Gaslighters/narcissists will stick with this story even when you have video proof of their use of the third person.
The Economist/YouGov Poll
January 22-25
Q101G: Favorability of —
MODERATES said:
+22 pts ... Barack Obama (58% vs 36%)
-10 pts ...... President Joe Biden (43% vs 53%)
-20 pts ...... Nancy Pelosi (35% vs 55%)
-30 pts .... donald trump (32% vs 62%)
-42 pts .... Mitch McConnell (20% vs 62%)
I don't think we will find members of either party very popular nationally these days, with perhaps the exception of Barack Obama.
The Economist/YouGov Poll
January 22-25
Q102. Favorability of Political Parties —
MODERATES said:
-8 pts .... DEMOCRATS (43% vs 51%)
-36 pts .... Republicans (28% vs 64%)
The Economist/YouGov Poll
January 22-25
Q101G: Favorability of —
MODERATES said:
+22 pts ... Barack Obama (58% vs 36%)
-10 pts ...... President Joe Biden (43% vs 53%)
-20 pts ...... Nancy Pelosi (35% vs 55%)
-30 pts .... donald trump (32% vs 62%)
-42 pts .... Mitch McConnell (20% vs 62%)
I don't think we will find members of either party very popular nationally these days, with perhaps the exception of Barack Obama.
The Economist/YouGov Poll
January 22-25
Q102. Favorability of Political Parties —
MODERATES said:
-8 pts .... DEMOCRATS (43% vs 51%)
-36 pts .... Republicans (28% vs 64%)
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.