He never committed to challenging the results of the election. He made the point to say "let's see how it goes"... With all the games the Administration/Democratic Party/Media played together is that not a valid position to take?
Trump will select the best people for the positions. Diversity isn't going to be the number 1 goal like the 0 Administration... THE BEST PEOPLE WILL GET THE POSITIONS REGARDLESS OF GENDER, RACE, RELIGION, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, etc...
Why don't you give the man a chance? He beat everybody because he's a winner.
And besides not having the justice department go after Clinton what's he flip-flopping about. I believe by the summer a whole lot of people in this country illegally that are breaking laws will be removed. Is that ok with you Wall or are you happy with the scum of the earth here illegally wreaking havoc?
Wall, did you really want HRC to be president? Seriously?
0
He never committed to challenging the results of the election. He made the point to say "let's see how it goes"... With all the games the Administration/Democratic Party/Media played together is that not a valid position to take?
Trump will select the best people for the positions. Diversity isn't going to be the number 1 goal like the 0 Administration... THE BEST PEOPLE WILL GET THE POSITIONS REGARDLESS OF GENDER, RACE, RELIGION, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, etc...
Why don't you give the man a chance? He beat everybody because he's a winner.
And besides not having the justice department go after Clinton what's he flip-flopping about. I believe by the summer a whole lot of people in this country illegally that are breaking laws will be removed. Is that ok with you Wall or are you happy with the scum of the earth here illegally wreaking havoc?
Wall, did you really want HRC to be president? Seriously?
Well my take is how can we support a system where a candidate wins in the electoral college but loses by TWO MILLION votes?
How does this not enrage you guys?
I seem to recall Trump warning that he would likely not concede if he lost, meaning he would do exactly what is happening now but in reverse to his win.
So hurrah that Trump "won" the electoral college but I dont see how we can continue to support a system that trashes the popular vote like this..
Over two million votes he is losing yet he still wins...makes you wonder.
HERE is THE CRUSHER'S PREDICTION:
If HRC is stupid enough to contest this election....Trump will order his new AG to prosecute Crooked HILLARY to the FULLEST EXTENT under the law...Remember How TEMPERMENTAL the DONALD "is"..
I ASSURE you crooked HILLARY doesn't want to be wearing a striped FEDERAL INMATE attire anytime in the near future...so she best "GOVERN HER ACTIONS ACCORDINGLY"
Even she is not STUPID ENOUGH to go there....but we will soon see...
Let the election rest..time to move on...NO WAY CROOKED HILLARY HAS ANY CHANCE OF WINNING EITHER WAY
0
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
Well my take is how can we support a system where a candidate wins in the electoral college but loses by TWO MILLION votes?
How does this not enrage you guys?
I seem to recall Trump warning that he would likely not concede if he lost, meaning he would do exactly what is happening now but in reverse to his win.
So hurrah that Trump "won" the electoral college but I dont see how we can continue to support a system that trashes the popular vote like this..
Over two million votes he is losing yet he still wins...makes you wonder.
HERE is THE CRUSHER'S PREDICTION:
If HRC is stupid enough to contest this election....Trump will order his new AG to prosecute Crooked HILLARY to the FULLEST EXTENT under the law...Remember How TEMPERMENTAL the DONALD "is"..
I ASSURE you crooked HILLARY doesn't want to be wearing a striped FEDERAL INMATE attire anytime in the near future...so she best "GOVERN HER ACTIONS ACCORDINGLY"
Even she is not STUPID ENOUGH to go there....but we will soon see...
Let the election rest..time to move on...NO WAY CROOKED HILLARY HAS ANY CHANCE OF WINNING EITHER WAY
So in your opinion then a person that votes and lives in a state with high population should count less than a persons vote in state with less population? Interesting.
It is about the united states.
0
Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:
So in your opinion then a person that votes and lives in a state with high population should count less than a persons vote in state with less population? Interesting.
And the evidence the Russians hacked the Democratic Party? Oh the Obama Intelligence Community makes the claim... Yeah right...
In a country where you don't have to show id to vote and have millions of illegal alien$ (I'm sorry undocumented immigrants), I'm sure none of them are voting... 20% of California is probably illegals...
0
And the evidence the Russians hacked the Democratic Party? Oh the Obama Intelligence Community makes the claim... Yeah right...
In a country where you don't have to show id to vote and have millions of illegal alien$ (I'm sorry undocumented immigrants), I'm sure none of them are voting... 20% of California is probably illegals...
And the evidence the Russians hacked the Democratic Party? Oh the Obama Intelligence Community makes the claim... Yeah right...
In a country where you don't have to show id to vote and have millions of illegal alien$ (I'm sorry undocumented immigrants), I'm sure none of them are voting... 20% of California is probably illegals...
And the evidence the Russians hacked the Democratic Party? Oh the Obama Intelligence Community makes the claim... Yeah right...
In a country where you don't have to show id to vote and have millions of illegal alien$ (I'm sorry undocumented immigrants), I'm sure none of them are voting... 20% of California is probably illegals...
And the evidence the Russians hacked the Democratic Party? Oh the Obama Intelligence Community makes the claim... Yeah right...
In a country where you don't have to show id to vote and have millions of illegal alien$ (I'm sorry undocumented immigrants), I'm sure none of them are voting... 20% of California is probably illegals...
two cybersecurity firms, Fidelis Cybersecurity and Mandiant, independently corroboratedCrowdstrike’s assessment that Russian hackers infiltrated DNC networks, having found that the two groups that hacked into the DNC used malware and methods identical to those used in other attacks attributed to the same Russian hacking groups.
2) What does this have to do with "Obama Intelligence Community" ?
Obama does not own NSA, nor does he own the CIA ..etc
Yes Bush and Cheney falsely presented WMD intelligence to
DNC was hacked by Russian hackers
0
Quote Originally Posted by Killer_B:
And the evidence the Russians hacked the Democratic Party? Oh the Obama Intelligence Community makes the claim... Yeah right...
In a country where you don't have to show id to vote and have millions of illegal alien$ (I'm sorry undocumented immigrants), I'm sure none of them are voting... 20% of California is probably illegals...
two cybersecurity firms, Fidelis Cybersecurity and Mandiant, independently corroboratedCrowdstrike’s assessment that Russian hackers infiltrated DNC networks, having found that the two groups that hacked into the DNC used malware and methods identical to those used in other attacks attributed to the same Russian hacking groups.
2) What does this have to do with "Obama Intelligence Community" ?
Obama does not own NSA, nor does he own the CIA ..etc
Yes Bush and Cheney falsely presented WMD intelligence to
But, but, but it was the Russians... Go buy a new excuse why the corrupt c&nt didn't win. The truth has a certain ring to it and she's the farthest thing I've ever heard from it.
0
But, but, but it was the Russians... Go buy a new excuse why the corrupt c&nt didn't win. The truth has a certain ring to it and she's the farthest thing I've ever heard from it.
Oh how the tables have turned yet the players and the game are still the same.
Now instead of b!tching about Obama and the horrible liberal democrats you guys are busy on a new project of gloating and belittling, it is so refreshing to see such a positive change come about in the forum.
0
Oh how the tables have turned yet the players and the game are still the same.
Now instead of b!tching about Obama and the horrible liberal democrats you guys are busy on a new project of gloating and belittling, it is so refreshing to see such a positive change come about in the forum.
Just wondering if any of those "intelligence" agencies had information about the Clinton Campaign causing violence at Trump rallies?
Since you seem to have all the answers why didn't you call your congressman and give him all the facts? Actually why don't you link all your facts here .
0
Quote Originally Posted by Killer_B:
Just wondering if any of those "intelligence" agencies had information about the Clinton Campaign causing violence at Trump rallies?
Since you seem to have all the answers why didn't you call your congressman and give him all the facts? Actually why don't you link all your facts here .
3) A capacity to admit you're a naive fool who laps up everything he can find to cement his desired view of the world
Looks like you guys are TERMINAL
enjoy the next 8 years
Another deflection ...
For the past 8 years you and the other usual suspects have been sore losers on this site, insulting people who disagreed with you, bitching ,deflecting, birther-ism ..etc
I have never seen so many "sore winners"
after 8-November-2016
Samuel Johnson once said
Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.
On Covers Defection is the last refuge of a scoundrel
0
Quote Originally Posted by TILTOLOGIC:
Trump Delusion Syndrome...
The only known cure so far is:
1) Self Awareness
2) The ability to filter emotion from reason
3) A capacity to admit you're a naive fool who laps up everything he can find to cement his desired view of the world
Looks like you guys are TERMINAL
enjoy the next 8 years
Another deflection ...
For the past 8 years you and the other usual suspects have been sore losers on this site, insulting people who disagreed with you, bitching ,deflecting, birther-ism ..etc
I have never seen so many "sore winners"
after 8-November-2016
Samuel Johnson once said
Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.
On Covers Defection is the last refuge of a scoundrel
Since you seem to have all the answers why didn't you call your congressman and give him all the facts? Actually why don't you link all your facts here .
Ask and you shall receive... The media was right there "reporting" the violence was all motivated by Trump when it was really the hag and her campaign behind it.
Since you seem to have all the answers why didn't you call your congressman and give him all the facts? Actually why don't you link all your facts here .
Ask and you shall receive... The media was right there "reporting" the violence was all motivated by Trump when it was really the hag and her campaign behind it.
and by the way the picture they are refering to has been there since she was 1st lady. https://www.whitehouse.gov/photos-and-video/photogallery/portraits-us-first-ladies
Jeesuuus for news is more truthful than that site!!! And that doesn't say much. No wonder you are like that.
and by the way the picture they are refering to has been there since she was 1st lady. https://www.whitehouse.gov/photos-and-video/photogallery/portraits-us-first-ladies
Jeesuuus for news is more truthful than that site!!! And that doesn't say much. No wonder you are like that.
Political insider is more fiction than fact. Their news aren't based on fact based journalism but on unsourced claims and wild rumors that feed conspiracy fantasies. According to politifact, political insider has spread fake news.
0
Political insider is more fiction than fact. Their news aren't based on fact based journalism but on unsourced claims and wild rumors that feed conspiracy fantasies. According to politifact, political insider has spread fake news.
Pretty funny watching the Hillary supporters blame the electoral college for her loss.
Everybody thought that the election was a lock because the democrats had rigged the electoral college in their favor.....remember...Trump had to draw an "inside straight" to win.....and now that the cards fell, the game is somehow "unfair" against HRC. What a joke.
The electoral college is in the constitution....until you amend the constitution to get rid of the electoral college BEFORE the election, then this entire argument is not only hypocritical, but dishonest.
Anyone whom excepts these new vote counts as being accurate is actively undermining the US electoral process. How can we vouch for the legitimacy of the recount results???? WHAT MAKES THE RECOUNT MORE ACCURATE THAN THE FIRST COUNT????
How will the election ultimately be decided...best of 3, 5, or 7? Is it not the least bit alarming that large blocks of votes are being "found" and deemed uncounted? What a joke.
Trump beat the establishment at their own game. Tip you cap and move on. If you do not, then you are nothing but a whining, crybaby, punk. Go home losers.
Never Make A Winner A Loser. Never.
0
Pretty funny watching the Hillary supporters blame the electoral college for her loss.
Everybody thought that the election was a lock because the democrats had rigged the electoral college in their favor.....remember...Trump had to draw an "inside straight" to win.....and now that the cards fell, the game is somehow "unfair" against HRC. What a joke.
The electoral college is in the constitution....until you amend the constitution to get rid of the electoral college BEFORE the election, then this entire argument is not only hypocritical, but dishonest.
Anyone whom excepts these new vote counts as being accurate is actively undermining the US electoral process. How can we vouch for the legitimacy of the recount results???? WHAT MAKES THE RECOUNT MORE ACCURATE THAN THE FIRST COUNT????
How will the election ultimately be decided...best of 3, 5, or 7? Is it not the least bit alarming that large blocks of votes are being "found" and deemed uncounted? What a joke.
Trump beat the establishment at their own game. Tip you cap and move on. If you do not, then you are nothing but a whining, crybaby, punk. Go home losers.
Trump did say that and the press and hrc fried him for it. So instead of frying hrc for this recount nonsense they r again frying the clown for making off the cuff comments of millions of illegal votes. Just illustrates how clueless and out of touch the lame stream media is
On the electoral college, this is a sports betting forum and some don't understand the logic of the system. To use a sports analogy, that would be like in the music city miracle the refs saying well we can't determine whether the pass was a lateral so we r just going to, after the fact,award the game to the team who had the most yards
I live in Austin Texas. They haven't voted Democrat in a presidential race since I've been voting. All state wide races go unopposed red. All county offices go unopposed blue. On the individual congressional races 1 0f 35 was even contested. Bottom line u would have to be an idiot to vote in Texas. Contrast that w a state like New Hampshire, which had a contested pres, senate, and governor race. Thus, unless u do some type of detailed statistical analysis of voter patterns turnout etc, it is nothing more than misinformed sour grapes to continue harping on this popular vote nonsense (and ironically as recently as today The lamestream media putting out an article about a rapper who was whining how we don't have a democracy because HRC won the popular vote).
0
Trump did say that and the press and hrc fried him for it. So instead of frying hrc for this recount nonsense they r again frying the clown for making off the cuff comments of millions of illegal votes. Just illustrates how clueless and out of touch the lame stream media is
On the electoral college, this is a sports betting forum and some don't understand the logic of the system. To use a sports analogy, that would be like in the music city miracle the refs saying well we can't determine whether the pass was a lateral so we r just going to, after the fact,award the game to the team who had the most yards
I live in Austin Texas. They haven't voted Democrat in a presidential race since I've been voting. All state wide races go unopposed red. All county offices go unopposed blue. On the individual congressional races 1 0f 35 was even contested. Bottom line u would have to be an idiot to vote in Texas. Contrast that w a state like New Hampshire, which had a contested pres, senate, and governor race. Thus, unless u do some type of detailed statistical analysis of voter patterns turnout etc, it is nothing more than misinformed sour grapes to continue harping on this popular vote nonsense (and ironically as recently as today The lamestream media putting out an article about a rapper who was whining how we don't have a democracy because HRC won the popular vote).
Trump did say that and the press and hrc fried him for it. So instead of frying hrc for this recount nonsense they r again frying the clown for making off the cuff comments of millions of illegal votes. Just illustrates how clueless and out of touch the lame stream media is
On the electoral college, this is a sports betting forum and some don't understand the logic of the system. To use a sports analogy, that would be like in the music city miracle the refs saying well we can't determine whether the pass was a lateral so we r just going to, after the fact,award the game to the team who had the most yards
I live in Austin Texas. They haven't voted Democrat in a presidential race since I've been voting. All state wide races go unopposed red. All county offices go unopposed blue. On the individual congressional races 1 0f 35 was even contested. Bottom line u would have to be an idiot to vote in Texas. Contrast that w a state like New Hampshire, which had a contested pres, senate, and governor race. Thus, unless u do some type of detailed statistical analysis of voter patterns turnout etc, it is nothing more than misinformed sour grapes to continue harping on this popular vote nonsense (and ironically as recently as today The lamestream media putting out an article about a rapper who was whining how we don't have a democracy because HRC won the popular vote).
We are not a true democracy, we are a representative democracy.Majority does not rule here. And until we are not everyones vote carries the same weight.
0
Quote Originally Posted by shiek:
Trump did say that and the press and hrc fried him for it. So instead of frying hrc for this recount nonsense they r again frying the clown for making off the cuff comments of millions of illegal votes. Just illustrates how clueless and out of touch the lame stream media is
On the electoral college, this is a sports betting forum and some don't understand the logic of the system. To use a sports analogy, that would be like in the music city miracle the refs saying well we can't determine whether the pass was a lateral so we r just going to, after the fact,award the game to the team who had the most yards
I live in Austin Texas. They haven't voted Democrat in a presidential race since I've been voting. All state wide races go unopposed red. All county offices go unopposed blue. On the individual congressional races 1 0f 35 was even contested. Bottom line u would have to be an idiot to vote in Texas. Contrast that w a state like New Hampshire, which had a contested pres, senate, and governor race. Thus, unless u do some type of detailed statistical analysis of voter patterns turnout etc, it is nothing more than misinformed sour grapes to continue harping on this popular vote nonsense (and ironically as recently as today The lamestream media putting out an article about a rapper who was whining how we don't have a democracy because HRC won the popular vote).
We are not a true democracy, we are a representative democracy.Majority does not rule here. And until we are not everyones vote carries the same weight.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
