They are going to boycott the presidential debates on CNN and NBC if the networks go forward and air a program about Hillary Clinton !
They are supposedly for the " free market ", so why don't they air their own program about one of the 27 candidates that might run., like Rand Curly Paul, or Crispy Christie, or Rick Sanitarium. ? Such flip flopper are they.
And listen to this....they are going to use technology to connect with a wider range of voters. LMGO. Why ?.....They really don't want to reach a wider range of voters because they will lose by a wider margin. I mean they are already trying to discourage voting , that's why we had longer voting lines last go around.
Those people are nutty as a fruit cake. and two faced.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
They are going to boycott the presidential debates on CNN and NBC if the networks go forward and air a program about Hillary Clinton !
They are supposedly for the " free market ", so why don't they air their own program about one of the 27 candidates that might run., like Rand Curly Paul, or Crispy Christie, or Rick Sanitarium. ? Such flip flopper are they.
And listen to this....they are going to use technology to connect with a wider range of voters. LMGO. Why ?.....They really don't want to reach a wider range of voters because they will lose by a wider margin. I mean they are already trying to discourage voting , that's why we had longer voting lines last go around.
Those people are nutty as a fruit cake. and two faced.
Why would they allow debates to be facilitated on networks that are not friendly to Conservative ideas?
The fact of the matter is that there are not going to be as many debates. After the RNC got caught fixing primaries, and essentially paving the way for Mittens they can't afford any more exposure. They will be cutting the debates, mostly to networks they can control. Fox news comes to mind.
0
Why would they allow debates to be facilitated on networks that are not friendly to Conservative ideas?
The fact of the matter is that there are not going to be as many debates. After the RNC got caught fixing primaries, and essentially paving the way for Mittens they can't afford any more exposure. They will be cutting the debates, mostly to networks they can control. Fox news comes to mind.
NBC, which is a completely different outlet than MSNBC has a little bit of plausible deniability, but not cnn. They are attempting outright cheerleading and propaganda for HIllary.
I wonder if they will still run the special if Hillary is in jail for perjury, or standing trial?
0
NBC, which is a completely different outlet than MSNBC has a little bit of plausible deniability, but not cnn. They are attempting outright cheerleading and propaganda for HIllary.
I wonder if they will still run the special if Hillary is in jail for perjury, or standing trial?
Please, rid the thread topic of the word "Repulsicans" because obviously the OP is just looking to stir the political pot again..and tick off a differing political party..
Thanks,, in advance..
0
Political Forum moderator,
Please, rid the thread topic of the word "Repulsicans" because obviously the OP is just looking to stir the political pot again..and tick off a differing political party..
Please, rid the thread topic of the word "Repulsicans" because obviously the OP is just looking to stir the political pot again..and tick off a differing political party..
Thanks,, in advance..
if wall were here he would call Ronnie McDonnie out on this right here in this thread as he does others
But back on topic....what difference does it make???
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
Political Forum moderator,
Please, rid the thread topic of the word "Repulsicans" because obviously the OP is just looking to stir the political pot again..and tick off a differing political party..
Thanks,, in advance..
if wall were here he would call Ronnie McDonnie out on this right here in this thread as he does others
But back on topic....what difference does it make???
I will say that there might be an opportunity during the Dem/Republican debates of having a real moderator. Names like Levin, Savage, Hannity, Coulter, Dr Ben Carson, Limbaugh, Kelly etc
0
I will say that there might be an opportunity during the Dem/Republican debates of having a real moderator. Names like Levin, Savage, Hannity, Coulter, Dr Ben Carson, Limbaugh, Kelly etc
Lord of the Flies... You are always trying to make a mountain out of a mole hill.
Sly...wasn't it YOU that posted the word" Halfrican " ? Now you're asking Wally about my post ? such hypocrites.
Let me help you out here ,,Was it in a topic title............... Don...? By using the word "Repulsican" for "Republican" National Committee you are intentionally starting a combative thread and word should be edited out of the title or the whole thread can be moved .
0
Quote Originally Posted by don juan:
Lord of the Flies... You are always trying to make a mountain out of a mole hill.
Sly...wasn't it YOU that posted the word" Halfrican " ? Now you're asking Wally about my post ? such hypocrites.
Let me help you out here ,,Was it in a topic title............... Don...? By using the word "Repulsican" for "Republican" National Committee you are intentionally starting a combative thread and word should be edited out of the title or the whole thread can be moved .
I will say that there might be an opportunity during the Dem/Republican debates of having a real moderator. Names like Levin, Savage, Hannity, Coulter, Dr Ben Carson, Limbaugh, Kelly etc
And you think that these people can be moderate ? lol
In order for the debates to be fair....
I'd suggest that... Just have someone read questions only, no moderator.
Each State gets 2 questions only, to the final two candidates.
Each State can decide the on the one question they can ask each candidate. Maybe 1.5 or 2 minutes per answer. Two or three debates should be enough to have all the questions answered.
25 states the first night, the other 25 states on debate # 2 an so on.
State questions should be in no particular order. Maybe Just drawn out of a hat.
0
Quote Originally Posted by sundance:
I will say that there might be an opportunity during the Dem/Republican debates of having a real moderator. Names like Levin, Savage, Hannity, Coulter, Dr Ben Carson, Limbaugh, Kelly etc
And you think that these people can be moderate ? lol
In order for the debates to be fair....
I'd suggest that... Just have someone read questions only, no moderator.
Each State gets 2 questions only, to the final two candidates.
Each State can decide the on the one question they can ask each candidate. Maybe 1.5 or 2 minutes per answer. Two or three debates should be enough to have all the questions answered.
25 states the first night, the other 25 states on debate # 2 an so on.
State questions should be in no particular order. Maybe Just drawn out of a hat.
Let me help you out here ,,Was it in a topic title............... Don...? By using the word "Repulsican" for "Republican" National Committee you are intentionally starting a combative thread and word should be edited out of the title or the whole thread can be moved .
Sly, are you saying it's combative because you are a republican ?
Ah ha
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
Let me help you out here ,,Was it in a topic title............... Don...? By using the word "Repulsican" for "Republican" National Committee you are intentionally starting a combative thread and word should be edited out of the title or the whole thread can be moved .
Sly, are you saying it's combative because you are a republican ?
I'd suggest that... Just have someone read questions only, no moderator.
Don juan, like in this Forum..without a moderator someone reading the question might get away with intentionally interject the word "Repuliscan"..into the debate .
0
Quote Originally Posted by don juan:
I'd suggest that... Just have someone read questions only, no moderator.
Don juan, like in this Forum..without a moderator someone reading the question might get away with intentionally interject the word "Repuliscan"..into the debate .
RJSmith ,the long political process to elect a President in America is necessary. We are not only electing a person who will be the leader of the free word ,but one that will preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of a nation of 310 million people not 10 million people ..I hope this helps..
0
RJSmith ,the long political process to elect a President in America is necessary. We are not only electing a person who will be the leader of the free word ,but one that will preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of a nation of 310 million people not 10 million people ..I hope this helps..
Please, rid the thread topic of the word "Repulsicans" because obviously the OP is just looking to stir the political pot again..and tick off a differing political party..
Thanks,, in advance..
Sarasota, you seem like a reasonable individual but I think this is an unreasonable request.
politics by its nature is adversarial.
You can't censor thread titles to eliminate words like Republicans, Democrats, conservative, liberal.
What would be the purpose in doing that ?
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
Political Forum moderator,
Please, rid the thread topic of the word "Repulsicans" because obviously the OP is just looking to stir the political pot again..and tick off a differing political party..
Thanks,, in advance..
Sarasota, you seem like a reasonable individual but I think this is an unreasonable request.
politics by its nature is adversarial.
You can't censor thread titles to eliminate words like Republicans, Democrats, conservative, liberal.
Sarasota, you seem like a reasonable individual but I think this is an unreasonable request.
politics by its nature is adversarial.
You can't censor thread titles to eliminate words like Republicans, Democrats, conservative, liberal.
What would be the purpose in doing that ?
You're missing the point. Don has made a habit of adding his little play on words by changing Republican to Repulsican and Fox News to Faux news, Romney to Robney (or is it Robme?). You wouldn't think he is a mature adult but rather a immature little adolesent. He is incapable of having a mature adult conversation about issues.
And Don's insult on me will come in 3-2-1....
Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
0
Quote Originally Posted by Villemure30:
Sarasota, you seem like a reasonable individual but I think this is an unreasonable request.
politics by its nature is adversarial.
You can't censor thread titles to eliminate words like Republicans, Democrats, conservative, liberal.
What would be the purpose in doing that ?
You're missing the point. Don has made a habit of adding his little play on words by changing Republican to Repulsican and Fox News to Faux news, Romney to Robney (or is it Robme?). You wouldn't think he is a mature adult but rather a immature little adolesent. He is incapable of having a mature adult conversation about issues.
I never insulted you Danny boy,. but everyone has a different sense of the common good. It is true that some people think of themselves first, and screw everyone else. This is evidenced by the fact that murder happens hundreds of times a day is this country.
The philosophy of the repulsican party is let everyone pull themselves up by their boot straps. Well, many young people cannot make it in a greed driven capitalistic system, without assistance programs.
0
I never insulted you Danny boy,. but everyone has a different sense of the common good. It is true that some people think of themselves first, and screw everyone else. This is evidenced by the fact that murder happens hundreds of times a day is this country.
The philosophy of the repulsican party is let everyone pull themselves up by their boot straps. Well, many young people cannot make it in a greed driven capitalistic system, without assistance programs.
You're missing the point. Don has made a habit of adding his little play on words by changing Republican to Repulsican and Fox News to Faux news, Romney to Robney (or is it Robme?). You wouldn't think he is a mature adult but rather a immature little adolesent. He is incapable of having a mature adult conversation about issues.
And Don's insult on me will come in 3-2-1....
I can see where you are coming from but as long as the moderator of the forum lays out the rules and and enforces the rules equally then everybody knows the guidelines.
This is no different than knowing the officials of a hockey game or baseball game.
Some umpires have a small strike zone others large ....
Some referees call clutch & grabs and others let the boys play.
As long as everything is enforced equally guidelines are there to follow
0
Quote Originally Posted by Danrules24:
You're missing the point. Don has made a habit of adding his little play on words by changing Republican to Repulsican and Fox News to Faux news, Romney to Robney (or is it Robme?). You wouldn't think he is a mature adult but rather a immature little adolesent. He is incapable of having a mature adult conversation about issues.
And Don's insult on me will come in 3-2-1....
I can see where you are coming from but as long as the moderator of the forum lays out the rules and and enforces the rules equally then everybody knows the guidelines.
This is no different than knowing the officials of a hockey game or baseball game.
Some umpires have a small strike zone others large ....
Some referees call clutch & grabs and others let the boys play.
As long as everything is enforced equally guidelines are there to follow
Donny, Some people think of themselves?? Talk about hypocrisy coming from your generation. A generation that completely fucked this country up and left a mess for the next generation. Take your hypocrisy and stuff it Mr. Kettle
0
Donny, Some people think of themselves?? Talk about hypocrisy coming from your generation. A generation that completely fucked this country up and left a mess for the next generation. Take your hypocrisy and stuff it Mr. Kettle
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.