All Forums | Politics

Rubio thinks the earth is a couple hundred years old

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 1790
Posts: 41
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 2089
Posted: #26
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:

It's called bait and switch ..Club loves to trick members into opening his threads that way ....


albeit stupid, IMO.....that's fine....it's funny almost

I just feel like if it was a 180, mods would've taken action
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2003
Posts: 27850
Posted: #27
Quote Originally Posted by kaponofor3:

The effing GOP just needs to kick the religious wing of the party out. That's the only chance they have to remain relevant and to steal some of the support from members of the traditionally Democratic base. Actually, you don't need to kick the religious wing out, you just need them to STFU and not be in positions of power.

But the merging of church and state is the goal because it allows a prescribed view point for every issue and every issue to come...
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 5751
Posted: #28
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:

It's called bait and switch ..Club loves to trick members into opening his threads that way ....


I remember a while back Club had a thread titled "Cheap Mail Order Brides from the Ukraine". I clicked on it and damnit if he wasn't bashing religion.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2003
Posts: 28196
Posted: #29
Quote Originally Posted by canovsp:


I remember a while back Club had a thread titled "Cheap Mail Order Brides from the Ukraine". I clicked on it and damnit if he wasn't bashing religion.


decent number of muslims in the ukraine, they aren't as promiscuous as the advertisements would have you believe.  if it's unbridled promiscuity you are looking for, it's the hardcore family values rightwing christian chicks you want.  try to get one who is mute.  you'll pay extra though. 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 33768
Posted: #30
Quote Originally Posted by canovsp:


I remember a while back Club had a thread titled "Cheap Mail Order Brides from the Ukraine". I clicked on it and damnit if he wasn't bashing religion.

Yeah,he likes to do that ..lol       I believe.. it gives him a tingle up his leg.  

Hey now,I might try wording my thread titles like that ..

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 5751
Posted: #31
Ya'll know I was joking.

I just wanted to plug Ukraine Mail Order Brides.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2003
Posts: 27850
Posted: #32
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:

Yeah,he likes to do that ..lol       I believe.. it gives him a tingle up his leg.  

Hey now,I might try wording my thread titles like that ..


 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2005
Posts: 9261
Posted: #33

Q: Senator, if one of your daughters asked you—and maybe they already have—“Daddy, did god really create the world in 6 days?,” what would you say?

A: What I’ve said to them is that I believe that God created the universe and that the six days in the Bible may not be six days as we understand it … it may not be 24-hour days, and that’s what I believe. I know there’s always a debate between those who read the Bible literally and those who don’t, and I think it’s a legitimate debate within the Christian community of which I’m a part. My belief is that the story that the Bible tells about God creating this magnificent Earth on which we live—that is essentially true, that is fundamentally true. Now, whether it happened exactly as we might understand it reading the text of the Bible: That, I don’t presume to know.

-----then-Sen. Obama, D-Ill., speaking at the Compassion Forum at Messiah College in Grantham, Pa. on April 13, 2008

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2003
Posts: 28196
Posted: #34
Quote Originally Posted by 14daroad:

Q: Senator, if one of your daughters asked you—and maybe they already have—“Daddy, did god really create the world in 6 days?,” what would you say?

A: What I’ve said to them is that I believe that God created the universe and that the six days in the Bible may not be six days as we understand it … it may not be 24-hour days, and that’s what I believe. I know there’s always a debate between those who read the Bible literally and those who don’t, and I think it’s a legitimate debate within the Christian community of which I’m a part. My belief is that the story that the Bible tells about God creating this magnificent Earth on which we live—that is essentially true, that is fundamentally true. Now, whether it happened exactly as we might understand it reading the text of the Bible: That, I don’t presume to know.

-----then-Sen. Obama, D-Ill., speaking at the Compassion Forum at Messiah College in Grantham, Pa. on April 13, 2008



yes, equally crazy and stupid. 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 25165
Posted: #35

https://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/nab/does-c14-disprove-the-bible

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2003
Posts: 28196
Posted: #36
Quote Originally Posted by Getty3:

https://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/nab/does-c14-disprove-the-bible



as i understand it, and i'm far from a science expert, there are many types of scientific dating methods and carbon dating is limited because it can only be used to date rocks that are a million or so years old.  other radio-something methods must be used for other rocks. 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2003
Posts: 27850
Posted: #37
Its like saying that because I was not alive for the civil war then therefore it must not have existed and all artifacts from the civil war are fakes to try to prove the theory that the civil war happened... 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 25165
Posted: #38
Quote Originally Posted by dl36:

Its like saying that because I was not alive for the civil war then therefore it must not have existed and all artifacts from the civil war are fakes to try to prove the theory that the civil war happened... 
That's fine, but the artifacts exist along with numerous eyewitness accounts. They corroborate eachother. Much like Jesus in the New Testament.
 Believing we have the knowledge to accurately calculate the age of the Earth within a few million years (give or take a few million) is as ludicrous as believing it's only 6,000 years old (which Rubio never said) Rubio was simply and in my mind truthfully admitting that we don't really know the answer and never will. 
This is probably my least favorite CD thread. But he has taught us how it feels to be a victim of inaccurate, condensed, sensationalistic journalism. 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2003
Posts: 28196
Posted: #39
Quote Originally Posted by Getty3:

That's fine, but the artifacts exist along with numerous eyewitness accounts. They corroborate eachother. Much like Jesus in the New Testament.
 Believing we have the knowledge to accurately calculate the age of the Earth within a few million years (give or take a few million) is as ludicrous as believing it's only 6,000 years old (which Rubio never said) Rubio was simply and in my mind truthfully admitting that we don't really know the answer and never will. 
This is probably my least favorite CD thread. But he has taught us how it feels to be a victim of inaccurate, condensed, sensationalistic journalism. 


i try to include something for everyone. 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2003
Posts: 27850
Posted: #40
Quote Originally Posted by Getty3:

That's fine, but the artifacts exist along with numerous eyewitness accounts. They corroborate eachother. Much like Jesus in the New Testament.
 Believing we have the knowledge to accurately calculate the age of the Earth within a few million years (give or take a few million) is as ludicrous as believing it's only 6,000 years old (which Rubio never said) Rubio was simply and in my mind truthfully admitting that we don't really know the answer and never will. 
This is probably my least favorite CD thread. But he has taught us how it feels to be a victim of inaccurate, condensed, sensationalistic journalism. 

Science is based on theories and evidence that supports the theory... in fact true scientific methodology is disprove the theory with the null hypothesis... carbon dating is the current theory based on current science... 500 years from now I would hope that we are not using the same theory based on the same science...

religion however has a history of doing exactly that...

There is a difference between insisting that science is correct and being weary of those that seek to merge church and state in their governing and policy like to making creationism and christian science as public school curriculum....  

its not necessarily what a person thinks, but how they think

 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2003
Posts: 27850
Posted: #41
Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:



i try to include something for everyone. 

Although we dont always agree, I like that your views come from you personal perspective rather then from a propaganda machine that prescribes all beliefs and views...

Seems more american to me
All Forums | Politics
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.