The media's war against Trump has been old for a long time now...They should start doing there jobs and focus on real news rather than work on trying to get Trump impeached everyday.
Democrat politicians need to start to govern and focus on real issues, things that really matter.
Did Russia want Trump to win the election? Absolutely they did but nothing illegal was done....Lets say it could be proved that Russia leaked the Clinton E-mail scandal - its not illegal. And its not like it wasn't true.
Was it immoral for Trump JR to hope to get damaging INFO from Russia on Clinton? It sure was but it was not illegal and not even close to treason which some democrats claim. The fact that this claim could be made directly shows the desperation that the media and democratic party will do or say anything for a Trump impeachment.
What the DNC did to Bernie Sanders to try to get Hillary in was more deplorable.
Was Trump a horrible candidate? He sure was. Both were lousy candidates but someone had to win.
It would be more productive for DEMS to do some effective governing to help assure a 2020 victory and for the media to focus in on that work in order to get Trump out in 4.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
The media's war against Trump has been old for a long time now...They should start doing there jobs and focus on real news rather than work on trying to get Trump impeached everyday.
Democrat politicians need to start to govern and focus on real issues, things that really matter.
Did Russia want Trump to win the election? Absolutely they did but nothing illegal was done....Lets say it could be proved that Russia leaked the Clinton E-mail scandal - its not illegal. And its not like it wasn't true.
Was it immoral for Trump JR to hope to get damaging INFO from Russia on Clinton? It sure was but it was not illegal and not even close to treason which some democrats claim. The fact that this claim could be made directly shows the desperation that the media and democratic party will do or say anything for a Trump impeachment.
What the DNC did to Bernie Sanders to try to get Hillary in was more deplorable.
Was Trump a horrible candidate? He sure was. Both were lousy candidates but someone had to win.
It would be more productive for DEMS to do some effective governing to help assure a 2020 victory and for the media to focus in on that work in order to get Trump out in 4.
The fact is a lot of people have been making a fortune in Washington. The lobbyist will do anything to keep the cash cow.
It is extremely difficult to drain the swamp
Yea the only way out for those there is to vote them out! Next election I can see the "Dump Trump" signs now..... IF HRC was in his seat we would all be driving to Canada
0
Quote Originally Posted by LRM704:
The fact is a lot of people have been making a fortune in Washington. The lobbyist will do anything to keep the cash cow.
It is extremely difficult to drain the swamp
Yea the only way out for those there is to vote them out! Next election I can see the "Dump Trump" signs now..... IF HRC was in his seat we would all be driving to Canada
The whole Russian Tie Investigation is nothing more than of a "witch hunt" by the liberals and media, according to Donald J. Trump. This has to come down to what Mueller's finding in the end of the day, stay tuned.
0
The whole Russian Tie Investigation is nothing more than of a "witch hunt" by the liberals and media, according to Donald J. Trump. This has to come down to what Mueller's finding in the end of the day, stay tuned.
The media's war against Trump has been old for a long time now...They should start doing there jobs and focus on real news rather than work on trying to get Trump impeached everyday.
Democrat politicians need to start to govern and focus on real issues, things that really matter.
Did Russia want Trump to win the election? Absolutely they did but nothing illegal was done....Lets say it could be proved that Russia leaked the Clinton E-mail scandal - its not illegal. And its not like it wasn't true.
Was it immoral for Trump JR to hope to get damaging INFO from Russia on Clinton? It sure was but it was not illegal and not even close to treason which some democrats claim. The fact that this claim could be made directly shows the desperation that the media and democratic party will do or say anything for a Trump impeachment.
What the DNC did to Bernie Sanders to try to get Hillary in was more deplorable.
Was Trump a horrible candidate? He sure was. Both were lousy candidates but someone had to win.
It would be more productive for DEMS to do some effective governing to help assure a 2020 victory and for the media to focus in on that work in order to get Trump out in 4.
The right controls the house ,senate and WH. They are the only team in town and they are still losing.
0
Quote Originally Posted by MikeMed:
The media's war against Trump has been old for a long time now...They should start doing there jobs and focus on real news rather than work on trying to get Trump impeached everyday.
Democrat politicians need to start to govern and focus on real issues, things that really matter.
Did Russia want Trump to win the election? Absolutely they did but nothing illegal was done....Lets say it could be proved that Russia leaked the Clinton E-mail scandal - its not illegal. And its not like it wasn't true.
Was it immoral for Trump JR to hope to get damaging INFO from Russia on Clinton? It sure was but it was not illegal and not even close to treason which some democrats claim. The fact that this claim could be made directly shows the desperation that the media and democratic party will do or say anything for a Trump impeachment.
What the DNC did to Bernie Sanders to try to get Hillary in was more deplorable.
Was Trump a horrible candidate? He sure was. Both were lousy candidates but someone had to win.
It would be more productive for DEMS to do some effective governing to help assure a 2020 victory and for the media to focus in on that work in order to get Trump out in 4.
The right controls the house ,senate and WH. They are the only team in town and they are still losing.
I think they are 5 -0, since nov. I might be wrong.
trump and fox said republicans are 5-0 and remember they are always wrong all of the time no matter the issue, or just plain lying. i haven't followed these elections other than georgia but ballotpedia says republicans are 4-1. democrats won an election in california. doesn't even look like a republican ran in that one.
0
Quote Originally Posted by HockeyTeeth:
I think they are 5 -0, since nov. I might be wrong.
trump and fox said republicans are 5-0 and remember they are always wrong all of the time no matter the issue, or just plain lying. i haven't followed these elections other than georgia but ballotpedia says republicans are 4-1. democrats won an election in california. doesn't even look like a republican ran in that one.
Republicans are 5-0 in special elections...One over looked win was Republicans prevented a loss in Ga. 6th by stopping Ossoff from getting 50% he needed to win outright in April. (he only received 48.1% of the vote ) thus the need for the June runoff in which Handel won..
Counting the all-Democratic Special Election in California it makes it 5-1...those Democrats have a knack for winning those uncontested all Democrat elections..
0
Republicans are 5-0 in special elections...One over looked win was Republicans prevented a loss in Ga. 6th by stopping Ossoff from getting 50% he needed to win outright in April. (he only received 48.1% of the vote ) thus the need for the June runoff in which Handel won..
Counting the all-Democratic Special Election in California it makes it 5-1...those Democrats have a knack for winning those uncontested all Democrat elections..
regardless, it was a special election for the house that they did not win, which makes it hard to be 5-0. it was in a district democrats generally win big, just as the others were primarily in districts republicans win big.
0
regardless, it was a special election for the house that they did not win, which makes it hard to be 5-0. it was in a district democrats generally win big, just as the others were primarily in districts republicans win big.
The secretive D.C.-based company that commissioned the sensational anti-Trump campaign research dossier also got paid work advising corrupt Venezuelan officials conducting a lucrative money laundering schemes, told a respected international human rights group probing the Russian election-meddling illusion / collusion concocted scandal.
Thor Halvorssen, head of the New York-based Human Rights Foundation, told the Senate Judiciary Committee in written testimony that the secretive Washington-based political intelligence and dirty-deeds-done-dirt-cheap firm, now calling itself '' Fusion GPS '' operated a campaign against journalists who threatened to expose the multibillion-dollar fraud involving faulty South American electric power plants, and a multi-billion dollar fraud scheme laundering proceeds in U.S. banks, and the kickback schemes to pay off Venezuelan officials.
“Corrupt government officials in dictatorships would be powerless if they didn’t have cronies in the business world, and these cronies, in turn, would be useless allies without enablers like Fusion GPS, who are eager to whitewash and profit from their crimes,” Mr. Halvorssen wrote.
0
The secretive D.C.-based company that commissioned the sensational anti-Trump campaign research dossier also got paid work advising corrupt Venezuelan officials conducting a lucrative money laundering schemes, told a respected international human rights group probing the Russian election-meddling illusion / collusion concocted scandal.
Thor Halvorssen, head of the New York-based Human Rights Foundation, told the Senate Judiciary Committee in written testimony that the secretive Washington-based political intelligence and dirty-deeds-done-dirt-cheap firm, now calling itself '' Fusion GPS '' operated a campaign against journalists who threatened to expose the multibillion-dollar fraud involving faulty South American electric power plants, and a multi-billion dollar fraud scheme laundering proceeds in U.S. banks, and the kickback schemes to pay off Venezuelan officials.
“Corrupt government officials in dictatorships would be powerless if they didn’t have cronies in the business world, and these cronies, in turn, would be useless allies without enablers like Fusion GPS, who are eager to whitewash and profit from their crimes,” Mr. Halvorssen wrote.
person Morris and Eileen McGann show how former FBI Director James Comey started the Intelligence War on Donald Trump! It was Comey who brought the phony dossier to the public and created the Russian illusion / collusion scandal:
• COMEY insisted that a 2-page summary of the unverified, fabricated, highly inflammatory anti-Trump dossier get to the Pres. & Congress.
• COMEY testified that he knew in advance that providing confidential info to Congress virtually assured that it would appear in the press — He said he learned how to work it in Washington.
• COMEY did it: BUZZFEED immediately published the entire dossier — millions of folks read the phony claims, and many still believe it.
• But tho' FBI knew there were problems with the dossier, they still lied to everyone by not telling the truth. In October '16, right before the election, the FBI offered $50,000 to Christopher Steele, who compiled the dossier. FBI wanted him to verify the claims in his "own" dossier.
• Steele never verified the dossier; Comey was informed by Jms. Clapper, National Intelligence Agency's head, that the charges in the dossier could not be verified and that there were problems with some of the “sources.”
• Despite all the warnings about the dossier's dire lack of reliability, Comey never alerted the public to the phony material in the dossier.
• The dossier's fake info was easily proven to be false.
• The FBI refused to admit or deny that it paid any money to Steele, let alone 50 Grand.
• Steele had done special jobs for the FBI in the past.
• Steele later told a London Court that much of the material in the dossier was provided to him by “unsolicited sources” and needed to be verified.
After Trump fired him, Comey directly signed a huge multi-million dollar book deal.
Apparently he was saving the truth about the dossier for his memoirs. Comey will tell the truth, but only for some big bucks.
Directing the FBI turned out to be very lucrative. But all the Comey's money, all his big bucks banked may not be enough to save his brain from a bullet.
person Morris and Eileen McGann explain why Obama is pleased that his 2 terms of office led to a doubling of the number of unemployed people; Obama knew that making more people poor means that they're much more inclined to vote Democrat and approve of ever enlarging the government and its dishing out of handouts.
0
person Morris and Eileen McGann show how former FBI Director James Comey started the Intelligence War on Donald Trump! It was Comey who brought the phony dossier to the public and created the Russian illusion / collusion scandal:
• COMEY insisted that a 2-page summary of the unverified, fabricated, highly inflammatory anti-Trump dossier get to the Pres. & Congress.
• COMEY testified that he knew in advance that providing confidential info to Congress virtually assured that it would appear in the press — He said he learned how to work it in Washington.
• COMEY did it: BUZZFEED immediately published the entire dossier — millions of folks read the phony claims, and many still believe it.
• But tho' FBI knew there were problems with the dossier, they still lied to everyone by not telling the truth. In October '16, right before the election, the FBI offered $50,000 to Christopher Steele, who compiled the dossier. FBI wanted him to verify the claims in his "own" dossier.
• Steele never verified the dossier; Comey was informed by Jms. Clapper, National Intelligence Agency's head, that the charges in the dossier could not be verified and that there were problems with some of the “sources.”
• Despite all the warnings about the dossier's dire lack of reliability, Comey never alerted the public to the phony material in the dossier.
• The dossier's fake info was easily proven to be false.
• The FBI refused to admit or deny that it paid any money to Steele, let alone 50 Grand.
• Steele had done special jobs for the FBI in the past.
• Steele later told a London Court that much of the material in the dossier was provided to him by “unsolicited sources” and needed to be verified.
After Trump fired him, Comey directly signed a huge multi-million dollar book deal.
Apparently he was saving the truth about the dossier for his memoirs. Comey will tell the truth, but only for some big bucks.
Directing the FBI turned out to be very lucrative. But all the Comey's money, all his big bucks banked may not be enough to save his brain from a bullet.
person Morris and Eileen McGann explain why Obama is pleased that his 2 terms of office led to a doubling of the number of unemployed people; Obama knew that making more people poor means that they're much more inclined to vote Democrat and approve of ever enlarging the government and its dishing out of handouts.
it's been proven false. there was no russian collusion. russia paid hillary like 130 million to secure the uranium deal. that's who russia wanted.
it's proven now, guys. next road block to think of, oh how about another race war...
Thank God you resolved this issue for me. I was really nervous that there was some Russian involvement in the election but you have used your sleuth skills to put my mind at ease.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Hawky:
it's been proven false. there was no russian collusion. russia paid hillary like 130 million to secure the uranium deal. that's who russia wanted.
it's proven now, guys. next road block to think of, oh how about another race war...
Thank God you resolved this issue for me. I was really nervous that there was some Russian involvement in the election but you have used your sleuth skills to put my mind at ease.
i just assumed mueller was briefing hawky on a regular basis. the mueller team has been pretty quiet about their investigation, but maybe mueller is confiding in his closest friends. like hawky.
0
i just assumed mueller was briefing hawky on a regular basis. the mueller team has been pretty quiet about their investigation, but maybe mueller is confiding in his closest friends. like hawky.
Thank God you resolved this issue for me. I was really nervous that there was some Russian involvement in the election but you have used your sleuth skills to put my mind at ease.
whoa covers linesman with some sarcasm ladies and gentlemen. why the anger bud? why'd you feel the need to say that? is my post not valid in this forum? why the handshake? is that supposed to make me ignore the uncalled for sarcasm in front of it?
if you tried to shake my hand after saying something like that in real life I would laugh and walk away. nice unbiased linesman, Covers
0
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:
Thank God you resolved this issue for me. I was really nervous that there was some Russian involvement in the election but you have used your sleuth skills to put my mind at ease.
whoa covers linesman with some sarcasm ladies and gentlemen. why the anger bud? why'd you feel the need to say that? is my post not valid in this forum? why the handshake? is that supposed to make me ignore the uncalled for sarcasm in front of it?
if you tried to shake my hand after saying something like that in real life I would laugh and walk away. nice unbiased linesman, Covers
whoa covers linesman with some sarcasm ladies and gentlemen. why the anger bud? why'd you feel the need to say that? is my post not valid in this forum? why the handshake? is that supposed to make me ignore the uncalled for sarcasm in front of it?
if you tried to shake my hand after saying something like that in real life I would laugh and walk away. nice unbiased linesman, Covers
Bias? I congratulated you for your statement of fact without any support.
See, when you are playing with the big boys, you support statement like this with fact and documents.
I'm sure in real life, you walk into a bar, make a bold statement, and everyone accepts it as fact.
At least people liked the poster above do.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Hawky:
whoa covers linesman with some sarcasm ladies and gentlemen. why the anger bud? why'd you feel the need to say that? is my post not valid in this forum? why the handshake? is that supposed to make me ignore the uncalled for sarcasm in front of it?
if you tried to shake my hand after saying something like that in real life I would laugh and walk away. nice unbiased linesman, Covers
Bias? I congratulated you for your statement of fact without any support.
See, when you are playing with the big boys, you support statement like this with fact and documents.
I'm sure in real life, you walk into a bar, make a bold statement, and everyone accepts it as fact.
Bias? I congratulated you for your statement of fact without any support.
See, when you are playing with the big boys, you support statement like this with fact and documents.
I'm sure in real life, you walk into a bar, make a bold statement, and everyone accepts it as fact.
At least people liked the poster above do.
ok mr.support. show me the 'facts and documents' that it's true. OH YA, THEY ARE PROVEN FALSE! i need no backup when the original story was bs in the first place.
In real life I don't go to the bar because losers like YOU are there dying for social acceptance, getting diseases, fighting over nothing for 15 bucks a drink. good try though. it's a public forum people can say whatever they want. you want to attack me because you think you are right, that's fine. have fun at the bar tonight with ur russia scandal talk and all of your friends that believe it still for some dumb reason
0
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:
Bias? I congratulated you for your statement of fact without any support.
See, when you are playing with the big boys, you support statement like this with fact and documents.
I'm sure in real life, you walk into a bar, make a bold statement, and everyone accepts it as fact.
At least people liked the poster above do.
ok mr.support. show me the 'facts and documents' that it's true. OH YA, THEY ARE PROVEN FALSE! i need no backup when the original story was bs in the first place.
In real life I don't go to the bar because losers like YOU are there dying for social acceptance, getting diseases, fighting over nothing for 15 bucks a drink. good try though. it's a public forum people can say whatever they want. you want to attack me because you think you are right, that's fine. have fun at the bar tonight with ur russia scandal talk and all of your friends that believe it still for some dumb reason
it was a lie to hide the seth rich murder, he was the leaker, now msn trying to say assange is in bad health when he's not, aaaaaaaand muellers DONE. it's all coming down now, man. your hillary bet lost, and the bs you spew to justify it for over half a year is just making you look stupid
0
it was a lie to hide the seth rich murder, he was the leaker, now msn trying to say assange is in bad health when he's not, aaaaaaaand muellers DONE. it's all coming down now, man. your hillary bet lost, and the bs you spew to justify it for over half a year is just making you look stupid
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
