come on bowslit... you spend so much time trying to talk about me that you avoid the issue/topic of the thread... mainly because you lack the ability to engage in a conversation...
Plus once you have sarasotaSpin coming in right behind you again it is obvious what you are...
"just another one"
Covers knows
0
here comes my two stalkers
come on bowslit... you spend so much time trying to talk about me that you avoid the issue/topic of the thread... mainly because you lack the ability to engage in a conversation...
Plus once you have sarasotaSpin coming in right behind you again it is obvious what you are...
Perhaps you are missing the point... I will not be insulting and say that it is going over your head, so I am going to attempt to articulate my point/s
The initial GOP strategy with obamacare was to bring up the point of illegals being covered by obamacare and that if obama refuted this then he was lying as the obama rhetoric had been preaching before he took office... that he was a liar and could not be trusted...
but linking obamacare with a need for an increased need to identify illegal immigrants to avoid from giving them coverage under obama care it actually increases the over all cost of obama and increases the size of government and utilization of government funds and resource towards the issue of illegal immigrants...
and then complain about spending...
But the end effect is that it turns off populations like the latino voters who are sensitive to that issue... But perhaps that is the whole point in that if it appealed the majority it would matter if the latino minority of voters were turned off...
any time you want to comment on the points I make concerning the topic of the thread, I would be happy to engage in a discussion...
But Im guessing it will be more of rambling on about your obsession with me...
0
Quote Originally Posted by dl36:
Perhaps you are missing the point... I will not be insulting and say that it is going over your head, so I am going to attempt to articulate my point/s
The initial GOP strategy with obamacare was to bring up the point of illegals being covered by obamacare and that if obama refuted this then he was lying as the obama rhetoric had been preaching before he took office... that he was a liar and could not be trusted...
but linking obamacare with a need for an increased need to identify illegal immigrants to avoid from giving them coverage under obama care it actually increases the over all cost of obama and increases the size of government and utilization of government funds and resource towards the issue of illegal immigrants...
and then complain about spending...
But the end effect is that it turns off populations like the latino voters who are sensitive to that issue... But perhaps that is the whole point in that if it appealed the majority it would matter if the latino minority of voters were turned off...
any time you want to comment on the points I make concerning the topic of the thread, I would be happy to engage in a discussion...
But Im guessing it will be more of rambling on about your obsession with me...
come on bowslit... you spend so much time trying to talk about me that you avoid the issue/topic of the thread... mainly because you lack the ability to engage in a conversation...
Plus once you have sarasotaSpin coming in right behind you again it is obvious what you are...
"just another one"
Covers knows
Fuck dl36. is it that fricken hard for you to admit you were wrong?
I frickin did address your stupid pidly little lame ass points in post # 30 and others.
I ask again...is it that fuckin hard for you to admit you were wrong?
0
Quote Originally Posted by dl36:
here comes my two stalkers
come on bowslit... you spend so much time trying to talk about me that you avoid the issue/topic of the thread... mainly because you lack the ability to engage in a conversation...
Plus once you have sarasotaSpin coming in right behind you again it is obvious what you are...
"just another one"
Covers knows
Fuck dl36. is it that fricken hard for you to admit you were wrong?
I frickin did address your stupid pidly little lame ass points in post # 30 and others.
I ask again...is it that fuckin hard for you to admit you were wrong?
Perhaps you are missing the point... I will not be insulting and say that it is going over your head, so I am going to attempt to articulate my point/s
The initial GOP strategy with obamacare was to bring up the point of illegals being covered by obamacare and that if obama refuted this then he was lying as the obama rhetoric had been preaching before he took office... that he was a liar and could not be trusted...
but linking obamacare with a need for an increased need to identify illegal immigrants to avoid from giving them coverage under obama care it actually increases the over all cost of obama and increases the size of government and utilization of government funds and resource towards the issue of illegal immigrants...
and then complain about spending...
But the end effect is that it turns off populations like the latino voters who are sensitive to that issue... But perhaps that is the whole point in that if it appealed the majority it would matter if the latino minority of voters were turned off...
any time you want to discuss the topic of the thread
rather then ya ya ya and then talking more of your BS...
0
Quote Originally Posted by dl36:
Perhaps you are missing the point... I will not be insulting and say that it is going over your head, so I am going to attempt to articulate my point/s
The initial GOP strategy with obamacare was to bring up the point of illegals being covered by obamacare and that if obama refuted this then he was lying as the obama rhetoric had been preaching before he took office... that he was a liar and could not be trusted...
but linking obamacare with a need for an increased need to identify illegal immigrants to avoid from giving them coverage under obama care it actually increases the over all cost of obama and increases the size of government and utilization of government funds and resource towards the issue of illegal immigrants...
and then complain about spending...
But the end effect is that it turns off populations like the latino voters who are sensitive to that issue... But perhaps that is the whole point in that if it appealed the majority it would matter if the latino minority of voters were turned off...
any time you want to discuss the topic of the thread
rather then ya ya ya and then talking more of your BS...
you are typing in caps trying to convince everyone that you are not racist, when NO ONE had played the race card until you laid it down...
I think it is time to stop before you make this worse for yourself
Thats how you were wrong.
My point is that republicans concede most of the latino vote. They know that most of the latino's will vote for the party that gives them the most handouts. What republicans did 2 or 3 years ago will not be remembered.
0
Quote Originally Posted by dl36:
OMG!
The bowlist meltdown begins...
The lady doth protest too much me thinks
you are typing in caps trying to convince everyone that you are not racist, when NO ONE had played the race card until you laid it down...
I think it is time to stop before you make this worse for yourself
Thats how you were wrong.
My point is that republicans concede most of the latino vote. They know that most of the latino's will vote for the party that gives them the most handouts. What republicans did 2 or 3 years ago will not be remembered.
My point is that republicans concede most of the latino vote. They know that most of the latino's will vote for the party that gives them the most handouts. What republicans did 2 or 3 years ago will not be remembered.
Exactly. Just like the 1% who also vote for the party that will give them the most handouts... and coincidentally, are the only segment of society the GOP is willing to represent.
0
Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:
Thats how you were wrong.
My point is that republicans concede most of the latino vote. They know that most of the latino's will vote for the party that gives them the most handouts. What republicans did 2 or 3 years ago will not be remembered.
Exactly. Just like the 1% who also vote for the party that will give them the most handouts... and coincidentally, are the only segment of society the GOP is willing to represent.
Exactly. Just like the 1% who also vote for the party that will give them the most handouts... and coincidentally, are the only segment of society the GOP is willing to represent.
Think about that for a minute. If the GOP only got the 1% and conceded the latinos wouldnt that set them up to be defeated by a landslide every election? There are more than the 1% ers that vote GOP.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DiscoD69:
Exactly. Just like the 1% who also vote for the party that will give them the most handouts... and coincidentally, are the only segment of society the GOP is willing to represent.
Think about that for a minute. If the GOP only got the 1% and conceded the latinos wouldnt that set them up to be defeated by a landslide every election? There are more than the 1% ers that vote GOP.
Think about that for a minute. If the GOP only got the 1% and conceded the latinos wouldnt that set them up to be defeated by a landslide every election? There are more than the 1% ers that vote GOP.
You're missing the point in many ways... Who the GOP represent, and who votes for the GOP, are not necessarily the same thing.
In this case, there is a huge gap.
0
Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:
Think about that for a minute. If the GOP only got the 1% and conceded the latinos wouldnt that set them up to be defeated by a landslide every election? There are more than the 1% ers that vote GOP.
You're missing the point in many ways... Who the GOP represent, and who votes for the GOP, are not necessarily the same thing.
Back to the post that said, "Are you supposed to promise goodies to get voters, play Santa Claus?"
Don't candidated do that anyways? And MOST Amreicans STILL aren't tuned into this election yet. A guestimate: A very high percentage of Americans are being so turned off by the political system that they will tune OUT until the very last minute. Most of them don't even know a few things about Romney or Santorum, of course Obama's been in office, so they know him. I've been out there talking with people and very few of them even watched one Republican debate. Their attitude is: They're all the same, crooks! Which ironically is what those of us who DO pay attention to feel. I really feel that those who hold office actually depend on the vast majority tuning out, it's better for their image.
0
Back to the post that said, "Are you supposed to promise goodies to get voters, play Santa Claus?"
Don't candidated do that anyways? And MOST Amreicans STILL aren't tuned into this election yet. A guestimate: A very high percentage of Americans are being so turned off by the political system that they will tune OUT until the very last minute. Most of them don't even know a few things about Romney or Santorum, of course Obama's been in office, so they know him. I've been out there talking with people and very few of them even watched one Republican debate. Their attitude is: They're all the same, crooks! Which ironically is what those of us who DO pay attention to feel. I really feel that those who hold office actually depend on the vast majority tuning out, it's better for their image.
You're missing the point in many ways... Who the GOP represent, and who votes for the GOP, are not necessarily the same thing.
In this case, there is a huge gap.
The only changing demographic is the swing or independant voters.
If you are for small government, pro life, government only doing what we can't do for ourselves then you vote for the GOP.
If you believe in the right of a woman to snuff out a fetus, unlimited government handouts, entitlements, teachers unions, high pensions for government employees, affirmative action. Then you vote for the libs.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DiscoD69:
You're missing the point in many ways... Who the GOP represent, and who votes for the GOP, are not necessarily the same thing.
In this case, there is a huge gap.
The only changing demographic is the swing or independant voters.
If you are for small government, pro life, government only doing what we can't do for ourselves then you vote for the GOP.
If you believe in the right of a woman to snuff out a fetus, unlimited government handouts, entitlements, teachers unions, high pensions for government employees, affirmative action. Then you vote for the libs.
You're missing the point in many ways... Who the GOP represent, and who votes for the GOP, are not necessarily the same thing.
In this case, there is a huge gap.
The only changing demographic is the swing or independant voters.
If you are for small government, pro life, government only doing what we can't do for ourselves then you vote for the GOP.
If you believe in the right of a woman to snuff out a fetus, unlimited government handouts, entitlements, teachers unions, high pensions for government employees, affirmative action. Then you vote for the libs.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DiscoD69:
You're missing the point in many ways... Who the GOP represent, and who votes for the GOP, are not necessarily the same thing.
In this case, there is a huge gap.
The only changing demographic is the swing or independant voters.
If you are for small government, pro life, government only doing what we can't do for ourselves then you vote for the GOP.
If you believe in the right of a woman to snuff out a fetus, unlimited government handouts, entitlements, teachers unions, high pensions for government employees, affirmative action. Then you vote for the libs.
"Unlimited Government Handouts", You mean this is an exclusive action done only by Democrats? Have you heard of: Bailouts? Tax Breaks? No-bid Contracts? Subsidies for Filfthy Rich Oil Companies? Subsidies for Millionaire Race Horse Owners?
Where have you been?
0
"Unlimited Government Handouts", You mean this is an exclusive action done only by Democrats? Have you heard of: Bailouts? Tax Breaks? No-bid Contracts? Subsidies for Filfthy Rich Oil Companies? Subsidies for Millionaire Race Horse Owners?
"Unlimited Government Handouts", You mean this is an exclusive action done only by Democrats? Have you heard of: Bailouts? Tax Breaks? No-bid Contracts? Subsidies for Filfthy Rich Oil Companies? Subsidies for Millionaire Race Horse Owners?
Where have you been?
0
"Unlimited Government Handouts", You mean this is an exclusive action done only by Democrats? Have you heard of: Bailouts? Tax Breaks? No-bid Contracts? Subsidies for Filfthy Rich Oil Companies? Subsidies for Millionaire Race Horse Owners?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.