what the darn did trump do last night? try to grab hillary's box? or just confirm that he has no clue about anything related to the job? hillary is all the way up to -476.
you could have gotten this at -160 not long ago.
Yes the truth is in the numbers. It's easy to stand by truth and reality rather than trying to fabricate a story to explain why the truth is incorrect.
0
Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:
what the darn did trump do last night? try to grab hillary's box? or just confirm that he has no clue about anything related to the job? hillary is all the way up to -476.
you could have gotten this at -160 not long ago.
Yes the truth is in the numbers. It's easy to stand by truth and reality rather than trying to fabricate a story to explain why the truth is incorrect.
CNN coaching their so called independent panel now that's "deplorable” ..
Is it any wonder that with CNN's thumb on the scale,Hillary won the debate 57% to 34% according to CNN/ORC's post-debate poll?
CNN did a similar stunt after the Vice Presidential Debate, CNN hosted a 28-person focus group of
self-identified "undecided voters" at the University of Richmond (Va.).
One of the participants in this group—Justin Smith—later complained that CNN's Pamela Brown
had asked the group if they now intended to vote for Donald Trump,
Hillary Clinton, or an unnamed third party candidate. In Smith's
telling, two supported Trump, five supported Clinton, and 12 indicated
they would vote for a third party candidate.
But, Smith tells Reason, the producers then told the focus
group they were going to "reshoot" the segment, only this time they
replaced "third party candidate" as an option with "undecided."
This made the panel decided between the two..Hillary or Trump..this helped perpetuate a narrative that third party supporters are just
undecideds who haven't yet come around to the correct line of thinking.
Ever wonder how they were able to dig up so many undecided voters ? Now we know ..
0
CNN coaching their so called independent panel now that's "deplorable” ..
Is it any wonder that with CNN's thumb on the scale,Hillary won the debate 57% to 34% according to CNN/ORC's post-debate poll?
CNN did a similar stunt after the Vice Presidential Debate, CNN hosted a 28-person focus group of
self-identified "undecided voters" at the University of Richmond (Va.).
One of the participants in this group—Justin Smith—later complained that CNN's Pamela Brown
had asked the group if they now intended to vote for Donald Trump,
Hillary Clinton, or an unnamed third party candidate. In Smith's
telling, two supported Trump, five supported Clinton, and 12 indicated
they would vote for a third party candidate.
But, Smith tells Reason, the producers then told the focus
group they were going to "reshoot" the segment, only this time they
replaced "third party candidate" as an option with "undecided."
This made the panel decided between the two..Hillary or Trump..this helped perpetuate a narrative that third party supporters are just
undecideds who haven't yet come around to the correct line of thinking.
Ever wonder how they were able to dig up so many undecided voters ? Now we know ..
The second presidential debate attracted an average audience of 66.5
million viewers Sunday against formidable competition from NFL football.Sunday Night Football” contest between the Green Bay Packers and the New
York Giants on NBC, which averaged 16.6 million viewers. ( Giants lost ugly and got exposed by the Pack )
Nielsen data showed the audience was down 21% from the record-setting 84 million viewers who watched the 1st debate..
The audience for Sunday’s event ranks ninth among presidential debates since 1976...LATimes.
0
The second presidential debate attracted an average audience of 66.5
million viewers Sunday against formidable competition from NFL football.Sunday Night Football” contest between the Green Bay Packers and the New
York Giants on NBC, which averaged 16.6 million viewers. ( Giants lost ugly and got exposed by the Pack )
Nielsen data showed the audience was down 21% from the record-setting 84 million viewers who watched the 1st debate..
The audience for Sunday’s event ranks ninth among presidential debates since 1976...LATimes.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
