The rejection of the Trump candidacy is a final rejection of of any vestiges of austere border protection, trade protection and self interest deals, end of cultural protection measures by governments (including race, religion), and indeed the opposite is true, ACTIVE immigration incentives (visas, economic help, security, health are, education, jobs, etc).
The idea of protection of vales and culture, security from others is a sensitive one, and has to handled by a skilled politician, not easily carried out by a rogue celebrity and real estate mogul who disvalues political correctness. Trump's platform has solid tenets. Many believers who say "Finally!" Yet there is no derailing globalism and it will go unfettered now to an unknown, insecure and violent trajectory.
Trump's name and his brand recognition will come out of this sky high. Like the Kardashian's (perplexing their hold on the masses) who sell out any lipstick or new shoe within hours, the Trump brand will rebound in a YYyuge way. INTERNATIONALLY now, Trump hotels, clothes, food products and more will have a lengthy foothold with Ivanka, Donald Jr at the forefront.
America as a global PARTNER moves on, but as a nation and national identity, it loses the past, and becomes less of a unified nation and more of a loosely aligned coalition of interests. The new frontier is globalism. Can these coalitions solve problems? Slavery is more prevalent than ever by sheer numbers; poverty and inequality; religious zeal and terrorism from ISIS; disconnection within communities caused by multiculturalism, which becomes no culture at times.; the need for more law and order by militarized police; environmental destruction; corruption.
Even as President, Trump would've had to deal with international realities, a congress that would have to approve his wall and ban of Muslims, austere trade barriers etc. and globalism would still march forward during his tenure.
You would've had many gaffes and misstatements to talk about everyday, but with that you would've had more security with Trump, so the job loss, the immigration issues, ISIS killings, the trade deficits and your middle class wage will be blown up in front of us. Winners? Wall Street bankers, fund managers, the military industrial complex, the uber wealthy, refugees from cesspool nations, Islamist extremists everywhere...not you. Not me.
Told you so.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
The rejection of the Trump candidacy is a final rejection of of any vestiges of austere border protection, trade protection and self interest deals, end of cultural protection measures by governments (including race, religion), and indeed the opposite is true, ACTIVE immigration incentives (visas, economic help, security, health are, education, jobs, etc).
The idea of protection of vales and culture, security from others is a sensitive one, and has to handled by a skilled politician, not easily carried out by a rogue celebrity and real estate mogul who disvalues political correctness. Trump's platform has solid tenets. Many believers who say "Finally!" Yet there is no derailing globalism and it will go unfettered now to an unknown, insecure and violent trajectory.
Trump's name and his brand recognition will come out of this sky high. Like the Kardashian's (perplexing their hold on the masses) who sell out any lipstick or new shoe within hours, the Trump brand will rebound in a YYyuge way. INTERNATIONALLY now, Trump hotels, clothes, food products and more will have a lengthy foothold with Ivanka, Donald Jr at the forefront.
America as a global PARTNER moves on, but as a nation and national identity, it loses the past, and becomes less of a unified nation and more of a loosely aligned coalition of interests. The new frontier is globalism. Can these coalitions solve problems? Slavery is more prevalent than ever by sheer numbers; poverty and inequality; religious zeal and terrorism from ISIS; disconnection within communities caused by multiculturalism, which becomes no culture at times.; the need for more law and order by militarized police; environmental destruction; corruption.
Even as President, Trump would've had to deal with international realities, a congress that would have to approve his wall and ban of Muslims, austere trade barriers etc. and globalism would still march forward during his tenure.
You would've had many gaffes and misstatements to talk about everyday, but with that you would've had more security with Trump, so the job loss, the immigration issues, ISIS killings, the trade deficits and your middle class wage will be blown up in front of us. Winners? Wall Street bankers, fund managers, the military industrial complex, the uber wealthy, refugees from cesspool nations, Islamist extremists everywhere...not you. Not me.
The rejection of the Trump candidacy is a final rejection of of any vestiges of austere border protection, trade protection and self interest deals, end of cultural protection measures by governments (including race, religion), and indeed the opposite is true, ACTIVE immigration incentives (visas, economic help, security, health are, education, jobs, etc).
The idea of protection of vales and culture, security from others is a sensitive one, and has to handled by a skilled politician, not easily carried out by a rogue celebrity and real estate mogul who disvalues political correctness. Trump's platform has solid tenets. Many believers who say "Finally!" Yet there is no derailing globalism and it will go unfettered now to an unknown, insecure and violent trajectory.
Trump's name and his brand recognition will come out of this sky high. Like the Kardashian's (perplexing their hold on the masses) who sell out any lipstick or new shoe within hours, the Trump brand will rebound in a YYyuge way. INTERNATIONALLY now, Trump hotels, clothes, food products and more will have a lengthy foothold with Ivanka, Donald Jr at the forefront.
America as a global PARTNER moves on, but as a nation and national identity, it loses the past, and becomes less of a unified nation and more of a loosely aligned coalition of interests. The new frontier is globalism. Can these coalitions solve problems? Slavery is more prevalent than ever by sheer numbers; poverty and inequality; religious zeal and terrorism from ISIS; disconnection within communities caused by multiculturalism, which becomes no culture at times.; the need for more law and order by militarized police; environmental destruction; corruption.
Even as President, Trump would've had to deal with international realities, a congress that would have to approve his wall and ban of Muslims, austere trade barriers etc. and globalism would still march forward during his tenure.
You would've had many gaffes and misstatements to talk about everyday, but with that you would've had more security with Trump, so the job loss, the immigration issues, ISIS killings, the trade deficits and your middle class wage will be blown up in front of us. Winners? Wall Street bankers, fund managers, the military industrial complex, the uber wealthy, refugees from cesspool nations, Islamist extremists everywhere...not you. Not me.
Told you so.
What is his platform?
0
Quote Originally Posted by Relax_Dude:
The rejection of the Trump candidacy is a final rejection of of any vestiges of austere border protection, trade protection and self interest deals, end of cultural protection measures by governments (including race, religion), and indeed the opposite is true, ACTIVE immigration incentives (visas, economic help, security, health are, education, jobs, etc).
The idea of protection of vales and culture, security from others is a sensitive one, and has to handled by a skilled politician, not easily carried out by a rogue celebrity and real estate mogul who disvalues political correctness. Trump's platform has solid tenets. Many believers who say "Finally!" Yet there is no derailing globalism and it will go unfettered now to an unknown, insecure and violent trajectory.
Trump's name and his brand recognition will come out of this sky high. Like the Kardashian's (perplexing their hold on the masses) who sell out any lipstick or new shoe within hours, the Trump brand will rebound in a YYyuge way. INTERNATIONALLY now, Trump hotels, clothes, food products and more will have a lengthy foothold with Ivanka, Donald Jr at the forefront.
America as a global PARTNER moves on, but as a nation and national identity, it loses the past, and becomes less of a unified nation and more of a loosely aligned coalition of interests. The new frontier is globalism. Can these coalitions solve problems? Slavery is more prevalent than ever by sheer numbers; poverty and inequality; religious zeal and terrorism from ISIS; disconnection within communities caused by multiculturalism, which becomes no culture at times.; the need for more law and order by militarized police; environmental destruction; corruption.
Even as President, Trump would've had to deal with international realities, a congress that would have to approve his wall and ban of Muslims, austere trade barriers etc. and globalism would still march forward during his tenure.
You would've had many gaffes and misstatements to talk about everyday, but with that you would've had more security with Trump, so the job loss, the immigration issues, ISIS killings, the trade deficits and your middle class wage will be blown up in front of us. Winners? Wall Street bankers, fund managers, the military industrial complex, the uber wealthy, refugees from cesspool nations, Islamist extremists everywhere...not you. Not me.
America as a global PARTNER moves on, but as a nation and national identity, it loses the past, and becomes less of a unified nation and more of a loosely aligned coalition of interests. The new frontier is globalism. Can these coalitions solve problems? Slavery is more prevalent than ever by sheer numbers; poverty and inequality; religious zeal and terrorism from ISIS; disconnection within communities caused by multiculturalism, which becomes no culture at times.; the need for more law and order by militarized police; environmental destruction; corruption.
Even as President, Trump would've had to deal with international realities, a congress that would have to approve his wall and ban of Muslims, austere trade barriers etc. and globalism would still march forward during his tenure.
You would've had many gaffes and misstatements to talk about everyday, but with that you would've had more security with Trump, so the job loss, the immigration issues, ISIS killings, the trade deficits and your middle class wage will be blown up in front of us. Winners? Wall Street bankers, fund managers, the military industrial complex, the uber wealthy, refugees from cesspool nations, Islamist extremists everywhere...not you. Not me.
Told you so.
When you get caught up in extremism, you make inherent contradictions.
See you support someone like Trump and talk about the need for globalism for safety issues, yet you support a person whose views are the antithesis of globalism.
Perhaps if you actually thought the issues through rather than toe the Republican extremist line, you wouldn't get caught in such hypocrisy.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Relax_Dude:
America as a global PARTNER moves on, but as a nation and national identity, it loses the past, and becomes less of a unified nation and more of a loosely aligned coalition of interests. The new frontier is globalism. Can these coalitions solve problems? Slavery is more prevalent than ever by sheer numbers; poverty and inequality; religious zeal and terrorism from ISIS; disconnection within communities caused by multiculturalism, which becomes no culture at times.; the need for more law and order by militarized police; environmental destruction; corruption.
Even as President, Trump would've had to deal with international realities, a congress that would have to approve his wall and ban of Muslims, austere trade barriers etc. and globalism would still march forward during his tenure.
You would've had many gaffes and misstatements to talk about everyday, but with that you would've had more security with Trump, so the job loss, the immigration issues, ISIS killings, the trade deficits and your middle class wage will be blown up in front of us. Winners? Wall Street bankers, fund managers, the military industrial complex, the uber wealthy, refugees from cesspool nations, Islamist extremists everywhere...not you. Not me.
Told you so.
When you get caught up in extremism, you make inherent contradictions.
See you support someone like Trump and talk about the need for globalism for safety issues, yet you support a person whose views are the antithesis of globalism.
Perhaps if you actually thought the issues through rather than toe the Republican extremist line, you wouldn't get caught in such hypocrisy.
It's not a platform..........it's a plank. ..Trump is going to force Hillary to walk the plank..
this is a gambling site. I assume you still haven't put any money where your mouth is, right? Odds on your surefire trump win looking more positive for you daily. Why not bet instead of bloviating?
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
It's not a platform..........it's a plank. ..Trump is going to force Hillary to walk the plank..
this is a gambling site. I assume you still haven't put any money where your mouth is, right? Odds on your surefire trump win looking more positive for you daily. Why not bet instead of bloviating?
Only half correct....if there truly were common sense there would be no liberals. Only republicans and libertarians would exist.
Sure....... that would work out great. Keep the women in the kitchen and the foreigners in their own countries! Strap on your AR-15 and head out to your kids little league game! MURICA!!!!!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:
Only half correct....if there truly were common sense there would be no liberals. Only republicans and libertarians would exist.
Sure....... that would work out great. Keep the women in the kitchen and the foreigners in their own countries! Strap on your AR-15 and head out to your kids little league game! MURICA!!!!!!
That's a very good point and the only thing I agree with on trump but talk is cheap.
It actually is not a good point because it isn't true. Bowlslit is the biggest Trump cheerleader on this site.
Here are Trump's quotes on the war. Note the first:
Trump Timeline
Sept. 11, 2002: Howard Stern asks Trump if he supports invading Iraq. Trump answers hesitantly. “Yeah, I guess so. You know, I wish it was, I wish the first time it was done correctly.”
Jan. 28, 2003: Trump appears on Fox Business’ “Your World with Neil Cavuto,” on the night ofPresident Bush’s State of the Union address. Trump says he expects to hear “a lot of talk about Iraq and the problems,” and the economy. He urges Bush to make a decision on Iraq. “Either you attack or you don’t attack,” he says. But he offers no opinion on what Bush should do.
March 19, 2003: President George W. Bush announces in a televised address to the nation that the war with Iraq has started.
March 21, 2003: Neil Cavuto of Fox Business interviews Trump about the impact of the Iraq war on the stock market. Trump says the war “looks like a tremendous success from a military standpoint,” and he predicts the market will “go up like a rocket” after the war. But Cavuto does not ask Trump whether the U.S. should have gone to war with Iraq and Trump doesn’t offer an opinion.
0
Quote Originally Posted by lionblood:
That's a very good point and the only thing I agree with on trump but talk is cheap.
It actually is not a good point because it isn't true. Bowlslit is the biggest Trump cheerleader on this site.
Here are Trump's quotes on the war. Note the first:
Trump Timeline
Sept. 11, 2002: Howard Stern asks Trump if he supports invading Iraq. Trump answers hesitantly. “Yeah, I guess so. You know, I wish it was, I wish the first time it was done correctly.”
Jan. 28, 2003: Trump appears on Fox Business’ “Your World with Neil Cavuto,” on the night ofPresident Bush’s State of the Union address. Trump says he expects to hear “a lot of talk about Iraq and the problems,” and the economy. He urges Bush to make a decision on Iraq. “Either you attack or you don’t attack,” he says. But he offers no opinion on what Bush should do.
March 19, 2003: President George W. Bush announces in a televised address to the nation that the war with Iraq has started.
March 21, 2003: Neil Cavuto of Fox Business interviews Trump about the impact of the Iraq war on the stock market. Trump says the war “looks like a tremendous success from a military standpoint,” and he predicts the market will “go up like a rocket” after the war. But Cavuto does not ask Trump whether the U.S. should have gone to war with Iraq and Trump doesn’t offer an opinion.
France, Germany, Sweden etc wish that they did not have a Muslim invasion created to destroy Europe. Trump is right. No more Muslims coming to America till we have it figured out.
0
France, Germany, Sweden etc wish that they did not have a Muslim invasion created to destroy Europe. Trump is right. No more Muslims coming to America till we have it figured out.
France, Germany, Sweden etc wish that they did not have a Muslim invasion created to destroy Europe. Trump is right. No more Muslims coming to America till we have it figured out.
What do you know about European culture? When is the last time you were in France, Germany, or Sweden? Eating french fries or Swedish fish does not count.
0
Quote Originally Posted by sundance:
France, Germany, Sweden etc wish that they did not have a Muslim invasion created to destroy Europe. Trump is right. No more Muslims coming to America till we have it figured out.
What do you know about European culture? When is the last time you were in France, Germany, or Sweden? Eating french fries or Swedish fish does not count.
What do you know about European culture? When is the last time you were in France, Germany, or Sweden? Eating french fries or Swedish fish does not count.
Heard of Brexit?
0
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:
What do you know about European culture? When is the last time you were in France, Germany, or Sweden? Eating french fries or Swedish fish does not count.
this is a gambling site. I assume you still haven't put any money where your mouth is, right? Odds on your surefire trump win looking more positive for you daily. Why not bet instead of bloviating?
For a big time gambler Skippy,, you sure have a bad memory ..I told you before I don't bet on Presidential elections..but if I did,, I wouldn't go around making false claims about what odds I got on Hillary to win..now thats blowing hot air..
0
Quote Originally Posted by Skipster:
this is a gambling site. I assume you still haven't put any money where your mouth is, right? Odds on your surefire trump win looking more positive for you daily. Why not bet instead of bloviating?
For a big time gambler Skippy,, you sure have a bad memory ..I told you before I don't bet on Presidential elections..but if I did,, I wouldn't go around making false claims about what odds I got on Hillary to win..now thats blowing hot air..
For a big time gambler Skippy,, you sure have a bad memory ..I told you before I don't bet on Presidential elections..but if I did,, I wouldn't go around making false claims about what odds I got on Hillary to win..now thats blowing hot air..
you and trump a perfect combination. all talk.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
For a big time gambler Skippy,, you sure have a bad memory ..I told you before I don't bet on Presidential elections..but if I did,, I wouldn't go around making false claims about what odds I got on Hillary to win..now thats blowing hot air..
I was in Germany from 83-85 while stationed at Kleber Kaserne. I promise you German women did not have to worry about being raped, molested, possibly killed by Muslim immigrants.
0
I was in Germany from 83-85 while stationed at Kleber Kaserne. I promise you German women did not have to worry about being raped, molested, possibly killed by Muslim immigrants.
I was in Germany from 83-85 while stationed at Kleber Kaserne. I promise you German women did not have to worry about being raped, molested, possibly killed by Muslim immigrants.
Why ?
Is it because of their hairy arm pits?
0
Quote Originally Posted by sundance:
I was in Germany from 83-85 while stationed at Kleber Kaserne. I promise you German women did not have to worry about being raped, molested, possibly killed by Muslim immigrants.
i would say it is not a point worth arguing that if anyone is prosperous, it is Donald J Trump.
Lack of security = lack of prosperity
Under Hillary you will have:
1) ISIS spiking its calls for terrorism throughout cities in Europe and the US, and the US military unable to extend its influence in the region, nor willing to even call it "iradical islamic terrorism"
2) Immigrants pouring in the southern borders, and "visitors" ignoring their visas in record numbers and getting helped to do so
3) Violent crime and incarceration at record numbers under Obama, and will rise under the lack of law enforcement support, and the coddling of domestic terrorist organizations such as Black Lives (Only) Matter
4) More regime changing under Hillary--her favorite ideals for America are to meddle into other countries and topple those who don't toe the line (she despised JFK for not carrying out the CIA's recommendations to overthrow Castro when given 3 opportunities), and she does NOT care about the lives lost or the chaos that ensues.
5) Unstable middle class as Wall Street bankers use their puppet Hillary to keep the boot on their middle class necks--wages stay lowered in construction as illegals continue to dominate the industry; manufacturing goes to Mexico as people lose jobs and livelihoods.
0
"The first condition for prosperity is security."
--DJT
i would say it is not a point worth arguing that if anyone is prosperous, it is Donald J Trump.
Lack of security = lack of prosperity
Under Hillary you will have:
1) ISIS spiking its calls for terrorism throughout cities in Europe and the US, and the US military unable to extend its influence in the region, nor willing to even call it "iradical islamic terrorism"
2) Immigrants pouring in the southern borders, and "visitors" ignoring their visas in record numbers and getting helped to do so
3) Violent crime and incarceration at record numbers under Obama, and will rise under the lack of law enforcement support, and the coddling of domestic terrorist organizations such as Black Lives (Only) Matter
4) More regime changing under Hillary--her favorite ideals for America are to meddle into other countries and topple those who don't toe the line (she despised JFK for not carrying out the CIA's recommendations to overthrow Castro when given 3 opportunities), and she does NOT care about the lives lost or the chaos that ensues.
5) Unstable middle class as Wall Street bankers use their puppet Hillary to keep the boot on their middle class necks--wages stay lowered in construction as illegals continue to dominate the industry; manufacturing goes to Mexico as people lose jobs and livelihoods.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.