Thank you for bringing up this valid point of why unions still need to exist in companies unlike Costco.
I would much rather work at non-union Costco than I would any of the major unionized grocery chains. I like money and non-union Costco pays much higher wages than any of those unionized chains. You are incorrect as usual. I brought up a valid point as to why not to work for the union.
0
[Quote: Originally Posted by djbrow]
Thank you for bringing up this valid point of why unions still need to exist in companies unlike Costco.
I would much rather work at non-union Costco than I would any of the major unionized grocery chains. I like money and non-union Costco pays much higher wages than any of those unionized chains. You are incorrect as usual. I brought up a valid point as to why not to work for the union.
Perhaps this one of the reason Costco has drawn the ire of Rush Limbeau, one of the shepherds of the right.
You seem to make an ASSumption that I somehow follow Flush Rimbaugh. Once again, you fail. I can't stand that corporate hack. I also understand that unions aren't always the answer.
As I pointed out before, take a look at Silicon Valley. No one starving in that area. No unions either. Educate yourself first and then come back when you can debate intelligently. Otherwise, I'm not having as much fun. I like fun.
0
[Quote: Originally Posted by djbrow]
Perhaps this one of the reason Costco has drawn the ire of Rush Limbeau, one of the shepherds of the right.
You seem to make an ASSumption that I somehow follow Flush Rimbaugh. Once again, you fail. I can't stand that corporate hack. I also understand that unions aren't always the answer.
As I pointed out before, take a look at Silicon Valley. No one starving in that area. No unions either. Educate yourself first and then come back when you can debate intelligently. Otherwise, I'm not having as much fun. I like fun.
Wow. 12 posts later and nothing in response to what I posted? You couldn't even do it in 12 posts?
All I said is you have a great reason why people not making Costco money might want to unionize. I realize that with a high school education, you may not always be able to articulate as well as others, but I think you made a great point. It was a compliment.
0
Wow. 12 posts later and nothing in response to what I posted? You couldn't even do it in 12 posts?
All I said is you have a great reason why people not making Costco money might want to unionize. I realize that with a high school education, you may not always be able to articulate as well as others, but I think you made a great point. It was a compliment.
Wow. 12 posts later and nothing in response to what I posted? You couldn't even do it in 12 posts?
All I said is you have a great reason why people not making Costco money might want to unionize. I realize that with a high school education, you may not always be able to articulate as well as others, but I think you made a great point. It was a compliment.
Go back and read what you wrote. That's not all you said.
That's my point, they are unionized and making less. Go look up the union wages for the unionized grocery chains. They are waaaaaaay below non-unionized Costco. No one deserves to be as stupid as you are.
I am gonna make this real simple for you.
Non-Union Costco = MORE
Unionized grocery chain = LESS
Got that simpleton???????????
I see you glossed over the non-union left leaning Silicon Valley though. Not surprised, I made you look silly on that as well.
0
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:
Wow. 12 posts later and nothing in response to what I posted? You couldn't even do it in 12 posts?
All I said is you have a great reason why people not making Costco money might want to unionize. I realize that with a high school education, you may not always be able to articulate as well as others, but I think you made a great point. It was a compliment.
Go back and read what you wrote. That's not all you said.
That's my point, they are unionized and making less. Go look up the union wages for the unionized grocery chains. They are waaaaaaay below non-unionized Costco. No one deserves to be as stupid as you are.
I am gonna make this real simple for you.
Non-Union Costco = MORE
Unionized grocery chain = LESS
Got that simpleton???????????
I see you glossed over the non-union left leaning Silicon Valley though. Not surprised, I made you look silly on that as well.
Aug 10, 2002 - No label on this hall$LINEBREAK$Nonunion construction workers used to cut ... because the Teamsters didn't use union construction workers.
This is one of my all time favorites. How bout explaining to us the benefit of being a union member in the above scenario? This is worthy of gold medal hypocrisy.
Aug 10, 2002 - No label on this hall$LINEBREAK$Nonunion construction workers used to cut ... because the Teamsters didn't use union construction workers.
This is one of my all time favorites. How bout explaining to us the benefit of being a union member in the above scenario? This is worthy of gold medal hypocrisy.
Its amazing how you still visit this website and waste your life away arguing with people on the internet...... good riddance, you really are worthless
Wall? Where are you? Why have you forsaken me?
0
Quote Originally Posted by Stiln:
Its amazing how you still visit this website and waste your life away arguing with people on the internet...... good riddance, you really are worthless
Go back and read what you wrote. That's not all you said.
That's my point, they are unionized and making less. Go look up the union wages for the unionized grocery chains. They are waaaaaaay below non-unionized Costco. No one deserves to be as stupid as you are.
I am gonna make this real simple for you.
Non-Union Costco = MORE
Unionized grocery chain = LESS
Got that simpleton???????????
I see you glossed over the non-union left leaning Silicon Valley though. Not surprised, I made you look silly on that as well.
Again, thank you for proving my point.
If I was a worker at Walmart, etc. and I wasn't making as much as someone at Costco or offered health benefits, I would want to unionize too.
You raised a great point.
0
Quote Originally Posted by bettingforfun:
Go back and read what you wrote. That's not all you said.
That's my point, they are unionized and making less. Go look up the union wages for the unionized grocery chains. They are waaaaaaay below non-unionized Costco. No one deserves to be as stupid as you are.
I am gonna make this real simple for you.
Non-Union Costco = MORE
Unionized grocery chain = LESS
Got that simpleton???????????
I see you glossed over the non-union left leaning Silicon Valley though. Not surprised, I made you look silly on that as well.
Again, thank you for proving my point.
If I was a worker at Walmart, etc. and I wasn't making as much as someone at Costco or offered health benefits, I would want to unionize too.
If I was a worker at Walmart, etc. and I wasn't making as much as someone at Costco or offered health benefits, I would want to unionize too.
You raised a great point.
Again, thank you for proving my point. You go ahead and work at Wal-Mart and try to get them to unionize and I will work for Costco and not worry about it.
0
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:
Again, thank you for proving my point.
If I was a worker at Walmart, etc. and I wasn't making as much as someone at Costco or offered health benefits, I would want to unionize too.
You raised a great point.
Again, thank you for proving my point. You go ahead and work at Wal-Mart and try to get them to unionize and I will work for Costco and not worry about it.
...............and yet once again doing the two-step around the Silicon Valley point. Heck I didn't even mention their abysmal hiring rate of minorities. How could this happen in such a left leaning industry?
0
...............and yet once again doing the two-step around the Silicon Valley point. Heck I didn't even mention their abysmal hiring rate of minorities. How could this happen in such a left leaning industry?
I can see that you were so hurt by the comment that you complained about it over a day later after numerous other responses in the thread.
I would like to see some equality. Have been very consistent with that line. You would never understand since it isn't people that think like you that are being oppressed.
Is that your apology?
0
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:
I can see that you were so hurt by the comment that you complained about it over a day later after numerous other responses in the thread.
I would like to see some equality. Have been very consistent with that line. You would never understand since it isn't people that think like you that are being oppressed.
Husband and wife working at non-union Costco puts them in the top 20% of households in the US. I am sure the bottom 80% would be ok with that income. As I said in my first post in the first sentence in this thread "shouldn't Costco be the perfect example of how to run a corporation", I believe still holds factually true.
You will also note that I didn't interject anything about right or left on the issue. (Ironically that came from a post later on). I was merely stating that Costco seemed to have it figured out without having to involve a union. Another fact.
In closing, unions can and do serve a purpose but my point has always been if more corporations thought like Costco they would be unnecessary.
Here's to hoping more corporations follow Costco's lead.
0
My work is done here as well.
Husband and wife working at non-union Costco puts them in the top 20% of households in the US. I am sure the bottom 80% would be ok with that income. As I said in my first post in the first sentence in this thread "shouldn't Costco be the perfect example of how to run a corporation", I believe still holds factually true.
You will also note that I didn't interject anything about right or left on the issue. (Ironically that came from a post later on). I was merely stating that Costco seemed to have it figured out without having to involve a union. Another fact.
In closing, unions can and do serve a purpose but my point has always been if more corporations thought like Costco they would be unnecessary.
Here's to hoping more corporations follow Costco's lead.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
