The FBI seeks to question the CIA whistle-blower (treasonous leaker )who filed a complaint over President Trump’s July 25 Ukraine call...
The New York Times has revealed the whistle-blower to be a CIA employee..who triggered impeachment proceedings against President Trump..and RealClearInvestigations has disclosed the name of the whistle blower as a 33-year-old Eric Ciaramella, a registered Democrat
held over from the Obama White House, previously worked with former Vice
President Joe Biden and former CIA Director John Brennan, a vocal
critic of Trump who helped initiate the Russia “collusion” investigation
of the Trump campaign during the 2016 election.
0
The FBI seeks to question the CIA whistle-blower (treasonous leaker )who filed a complaint over President Trump’s July 25 Ukraine call...
The New York Times has revealed the whistle-blower to be a CIA employee..who triggered impeachment proceedings against President Trump..and RealClearInvestigations has disclosed the name of the whistle blower as a 33-year-old Eric Ciaramella, a registered Democrat
held over from the Obama White House, previously worked with former Vice
President Joe Biden and former CIA Director John Brennan, a vocal
critic of Trump who helped initiate the Russia “collusion” investigation
of the Trump campaign during the 2016 election.
Yesterday.. Alexander Vindman told a House investigative committee Tuesday
that he provided a readout of the call to two individuals outside the White
House as part of his responsibility to coordinate U.S. government policy
with multiple agencies.
One was George Kent, a deputy assistant
secretary at the State Department, who testified last week, and the
other was an individual in the intelligence community, whom Vindman
declined to identify or name the official when pressed to do so..
So, the question is... if, Eric Ciaramella is the blower of the whistle....is he in fact a person with a need to know as Mr.Vindman claims? if he was ...was that information that he was told classified...If, it was,was it appropriate for him to actively colluded with House Democrats ?
0
Yesterday.. Alexander Vindman told a House investigative committee Tuesday
that he provided a readout of the call to two individuals outside the White
House as part of his responsibility to coordinate U.S. government policy
with multiple agencies.
One was George Kent, a deputy assistant
secretary at the State Department, who testified last week, and the
other was an individual in the intelligence community, whom Vindman
declined to identify or name the official when pressed to do so..
So, the question is... if, Eric Ciaramella is the blower of the whistle....is he in fact a person with a need to know as Mr.Vindman claims? if he was ...was that information that he was told classified...If, it was,was it appropriate for him to actively colluded with House Democrats ?
Today was another bad day for Democrats in Congress,,their key witness of the day Ambassador Gordon Sondland admited again that the only direct evidence he has on Trump ....is
Trump's own statement saying he wanted nothing from Ukraine ... "no quid
pro quo"............... the rest was more hearsay and presumptions with no evidence,that the President tried to connect the military aid to the investigations..
0
Today was another bad day for Democrats in Congress,,their key witness of the day Ambassador Gordon Sondland admited again that the only direct evidence he has on Trump ....is
Trump's own statement saying he wanted nothing from Ukraine ... "no quid
pro quo"............... the rest was more hearsay and presumptions with no evidence,that the President tried to connect the military aid to the investigations..
Yesterday.. Alexander Vindman told a House investigative committee Tuesday
that he provided a readout of the call to two individuals outside the White
House as part of his responsibility to coordinate U.S. government policy
with multiple agencies.
One was George Kent, a deputy assistant
secretary at the State Department, who testified last week, and the
other was an individual in the intelligence community, whom Vindman
declined to identify or name the official when pressed to do so..
So, the question is... if, Eric Ciaramella is the blower of the whistle....is he in fact a person with a need to know as Mr.Vindman claims? if he was ...was that information that he was told classified...If, it was,was it appropriate for him to actively colluded with House Democrats ?
The law protects the whistle blower.But then again trumpers don't care about laws. Besides there no need for the whistle blower as everything he said in his report has been confirmed by other witnesses. If you trumpers believe trump is so innocent then why is he blocking information from being released? Why has he put a gag order on witnesses that should be able to clear him? Better yet he was welcome to come testify himself. Why hasn't he shown up?
trumpers are not mad that the president broke the law they are mad that he got caught. bottom line
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
Yesterday.. Alexander Vindman told a House investigative committee Tuesday
that he provided a readout of the call to two individuals outside the White
House as part of his responsibility to coordinate U.S. government policy
with multiple agencies.
One was George Kent, a deputy assistant
secretary at the State Department, who testified last week, and the
other was an individual in the intelligence community, whom Vindman
declined to identify or name the official when pressed to do so..
So, the question is... if, Eric Ciaramella is the blower of the whistle....is he in fact a person with a need to know as Mr.Vindman claims? if he was ...was that information that he was told classified...If, it was,was it appropriate for him to actively colluded with House Democrats ?
The law protects the whistle blower.But then again trumpers don't care about laws. Besides there no need for the whistle blower as everything he said in his report has been confirmed by other witnesses. If you trumpers believe trump is so innocent then why is he blocking information from being released? Why has he put a gag order on witnesses that should be able to clear him? Better yet he was welcome to come testify himself. Why hasn't he shown up?
trumpers are not mad that the president broke the law they are mad that he got caught. bottom line
The law protects the whistle blower.But then again trumpers don't care about laws. Besides there no need for the whistle blower as everything he said in his report has been confirmed by other witnesses. If you trumpers believe trump is so innocent then why is he blocking information from being released? Why has he put a gag order on witnesses that should be able to clear him? Better yet he was welcome to come testify himself. Why hasn't he shown up?
trumpers are not mad that the president broke the law they are mad that he got caught. bottom line
You're hitting all the Nails directly on their heads.
Don't expect anything but deflection, lies , and insanity from Twittler's cult members ...
BEST OF HEALTH, HAPPINESS,WEALTH, BLESSINGS and LUCK TO ALL !!
1
Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:
The law protects the whistle blower.But then again trumpers don't care about laws. Besides there no need for the whistle blower as everything he said in his report has been confirmed by other witnesses. If you trumpers believe trump is so innocent then why is he blocking information from being released? Why has he put a gag order on witnesses that should be able to clear him? Better yet he was welcome to come testify himself. Why hasn't he shown up?
trumpers are not mad that the president broke the law they are mad that he got caught. bottom line
You're hitting all the Nails directly on their heads.
Don't expect anything but deflection, lies , and insanity from Twittler's cult members ...
I can't understand why anyone think that Dr.Hill's testimony would not be relevant,,just because she worked for the George Soros Open Society Institute for 6 years in the past and she had resigned before the July 25th phone call to President Zelensky...
Her testimony was 11 hours of things that were hearsay or her interpretation of things that happened,and the history of Ukraine and Russia.. However, not about what is the heart of the investigation and the reason for the impeachment hearing the July 25th phone call ..because she had officially left the White House in July, before the phone call in question..
0
I can't understand why anyone think that Dr.Hill's testimony would not be relevant,,just because she worked for the George Soros Open Society Institute for 6 years in the past and she had resigned before the July 25th phone call to President Zelensky...
Her testimony was 11 hours of things that were hearsay or her interpretation of things that happened,and the history of Ukraine and Russia.. However, not about what is the heart of the investigation and the reason for the impeachment hearing the July 25th phone call ..because she had officially left the White House in July, before the phone call in question..
President Donald Trump will not be required to release his tax returns to get on the state’s 2020 primary ballot.
The California Supreme Court ruled today to invalidate Senate Bill
27, which required that presidential candidates (aimed at Trump) release their tax
returns to get on the state ballot. The bill was signed by Gov. Gavin
Newsom in July.
The law violated a 1972 voter-approved amendment guaranteeing that all recognized candidates must be on the ballot.
President Trump has also asked the high court to block a subpoena from a New York prosecutor for his tax returns....
0
Maybe SDNY will fair better than California ....
President Donald Trump will not be required to release his tax returns to get on the state’s 2020 primary ballot.
The California Supreme Court ruled today to invalidate Senate Bill
27, which required that presidential candidates (aimed at Trump) release their tax
returns to get on the state ballot. The bill was signed by Gov. Gavin
Newsom in July.
The law violated a 1972 voter-approved amendment guaranteeing that all recognized candidates must be on the ballot.
President Trump has also asked the high court to block a subpoena from a New York prosecutor for his tax returns....
Short answer: Yes. In recent weeks Trump and his supporters have accused the author of the complaint of being a “deep-state operative.” However, both the inspector general for the intelligence community and the acting director of national intelligence have said the individual followed legal procedure. Contrary to Trump’s claims, the law does not require a whistleblower to present first-hand information, it only requires a reasonable belief of a violation, said David Colapinto, co-founder and general counsel for the National Whistleblower Center, an advocacy group.
The protocol is for an intelligence official to file a complaint with the inspector general who is expected to refer the matter to the director of national intelligence. In this case, the inspector general alerted the House Intelligence Committee, even though the acting DNI consulted the Department of Justice first.
0
Did Trump’s whistleblower follow protocol?
Short answer: Yes. In recent weeks Trump and his supporters have accused the author of the complaint of being a “deep-state operative.” However, both the inspector general for the intelligence community and the acting director of national intelligence have said the individual followed legal procedure. Contrary to Trump’s claims, the law does not require a whistleblower to present first-hand information, it only requires a reasonable belief of a violation, said David Colapinto, co-founder and general counsel for the National Whistleblower Center, an advocacy group.
The protocol is for an intelligence official to file a complaint with the inspector general who is expected to refer the matter to the director of national intelligence. In this case, the inspector general alerted the House Intelligence Committee, even though the acting DNI consulted the Department of Justice first.
He will be impeached but trumpers in the senate don't have the to convict him. Guilty as sin but trumpers don't care about the law. This will be the end of the GOP.
0
He will be impeached but trumpers in the senate don't have the to convict him. Guilty as sin but trumpers don't care about the law. This will be the end of the GOP.
He will be impeached but trumpers in the senate don't have the to convict him. Guilty as sin but trumpers don't care about the law. This will be the end of the GOP.
Are all of you guys rocking clown pics now like it's the thing to do? It was so much more gangsta when the people's champ and I were rocking Golden Girls. It was even more gangsta when we, along with Scal, were rocking old school wrestlers.
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
0
Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:
He will be impeached but trumpers in the senate don't have the to convict him. Guilty as sin but trumpers don't care about the law. This will be the end of the GOP.
Are all of you guys rocking clown pics now like it's the thing to do? It was so much more gangsta when the people's champ and I were rocking Golden Girls. It was even more gangsta when we, along with Scal, were rocking old school wrestlers.
He will be impeached but trumpers in the senate don't have the to convict him. Guilty as sin but trumpers don't care about the law. This will be the end of the GOP.
Wish my local would let me bet on this ....He stopped taking political action ....
BEST OF HEALTH, HAPPINESS,WEALTH, BLESSINGS and LUCK TO ALL !!
0
Quote Originally Posted by darkhorse12:
He will be impeached but trumpers in the senate don't have the to convict him. Guilty as sin but trumpers don't care about the law. This will be the end of the GOP.
Wish my local would let me bet on this ....He stopped taking political action ....
Are all of you guys rocking clown pics now like it's the thing to do? It was so much more gangsta when the people's champ and I were rocking Golden Girls. It was even more gangsta when we, along with Scal, were rocking old school wrestlers.
Wow ... Are you reading my mind ??? Ive been dowloading old WWF, and AWA pics for a few days ....
Had a Jimmy Suoerfly Snuka avatar back in 2010
BEST OF HEALTH, HAPPINESS,WEALTH, BLESSINGS and LUCK TO ALL !!
0
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
Are all of you guys rocking clown pics now like it's the thing to do? It was so much more gangsta when the people's champ and I were rocking Golden Girls. It was even more gangsta when we, along with Scal, were rocking old school wrestlers.
Wow ... Are you reading my mind ??? Ive been dowloading old WWF, and AWA pics for a few days ....
Are all of you guys rocking clown pics now like it's the thing to do? It was so much more gangsta when the people's champ and I were rocking Golden Girls. It was even more gangsta when we, along with Scal, were rocking old school wrestlers.
Wow ... Are you reading my mind ??? Ive been dowloading old WWF, and AWA pics for a few days ....Had a Jimmy Suoerfly Snuka avatar back in 2010
JYD, CoCo Beware are both great avatars.
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
0
Quote Originally Posted by DoubleUp4Life:
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
Are all of you guys rocking clown pics now like it's the thing to do? It was so much more gangsta when the people's champ and I were rocking Golden Girls. It was even more gangsta when we, along with Scal, were rocking old school wrestlers.
Wow ... Are you reading my mind ??? Ive been dowloading old WWF, and AWA pics for a few days ....Had a Jimmy Suoerfly Snuka avatar back in 2010
Shocking and stunning development. Fiona Hill just might have been a Leftist mole inside the Trump White House. Fiona Hill is a writer for an on line publication called, you guessed it! The Globalist! You can not make this up on your best day! Did she commit massive perjury in front of the next chiseled American hero to the right of George Washington at Mt Rushmore named Devin Nunes? Have we locked up Adam Schiff yet?
0
Shocking and stunning development. Fiona Hill just might have been a Leftist mole inside the Trump White House. Fiona Hill is a writer for an on line publication called, you guessed it! The Globalist! You can not make this up on your best day! Did she commit massive perjury in front of the next chiseled American hero to the right of George Washington at Mt Rushmore named Devin Nunes? Have we locked up Adam Schiff yet?
Shocking and stunning development. Fiona Hill just might have been a Leftist mole inside the Trump White House. Fiona Hill is a writer for an on line publication called, you guessed it! The Globalist! You can not make this up on your best day! Did she commit massive perjury in front of the next chiseled American hero to the right of George Washington at Mt Rushmore named Devin Nunes? Have we locked up Adam Schiff yet?
Nunes said Vienna was lovely
1
Quote Originally Posted by sundance:
Shocking and stunning development. Fiona Hill just might have been a Leftist mole inside the Trump White House. Fiona Hill is a writer for an on line publication called, you guessed it! The Globalist! You can not make this up on your best day! Did she commit massive perjury in front of the next chiseled American hero to the right of George Washington at Mt Rushmore named Devin Nunes? Have we locked up Adam Schiff yet?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.