Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:
You don't get it and I'm not shocked.
You bring up the mutual site we sourced....my bold text speaks for itself in previous posts. It says, that Iraq had shown intent to maintain the ability and infrastructure to develop WMD's as soon as the attention was off of them.
You didn't call Kyle an idiot directly...but saying he isn't qualified to tell the difference between chlorine, simple green and biological chemicals is basically calling him an idiot with the back of your hand. YOU, ME and everyone in this forum but Da Rel are smart enough to tell the difference. Only there are a small handful of us in here with the integrity to tell the truth. You. clearly have an ax to grind and showed that you can't see things objectively based on the Zimmerman experience...I digress.
You reference things from my link but only give credence to information that YOU cherry picked while disregarding stuff that I quoted first....which can't be ignored....unless you have an ax to grind....I already digressed.....no sense in re-digressing.
I guess sense you don't have an active relationship with common sense you require everyone to have proper credentials to give credence to the obvious.
Do you need to have a plumber to tell you when your toilet is overflowing? Do you need to call the gas company to tell you that you have a gas leak?
Speaking of plumbers, do you ever get nervous when the plumber comes to your place while the wifey is home alone? Do you get flashbacks of Bill with Monica and a cigar?
Let's go ahead and ask others of it's an insult to say that Kyle is unqualified to determine what a biological weapon is. He's also unqualified to fix a helicopter, is that insulting him too? To say someone is unqualified to perform a task or determine something isn't an insult. Your logic is beyond terrible.
You claim I'm insulting Kyle because you know he isn't qualified to determine what's a biological weapon and what isn't. You claim you read the book, which chapter did he say he became a scientist qualified to determine what is and is not a biological or chemical weapon?
Actually, I like this game. Let's play it some more. I was in Afghanistan in 2005-2006. I saw a 55 gallon drum. I heard from someone I deem to be a credible source that it was chemicals intended for use in weapons. Boom, now Afghanistan has weapons of mass destruction....and I was told it came from Bowlslit's house. We should invade and kill everyone.
I'm starting to warm up to your logic Bowl, there might be something to it!
Most of your last few posts are regurgitating the same two paragraphs, the only two paragraphs, from your source that helps your stance. The rest are just ad hom attacks about reading comprehension, which is really ironic since the rest of your own source contradicts your position in this argument.
Anyways, this debate is getting kinda boring. I think it's time to move on unless you can provide something of substance other than those two paragraphs, which really aren't even that solid anyways, or some other war heroes that didn't even support Iraq either.
Especially if you aren't even going to address the pics of Melania.
Hot Forum Topics
