All Forums | Politics

Was Ronald Wilson Reagan (666) the Anti-Christ?

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 14667
Posts: 98
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 6368
Posted: #26
hey and what about this; D..I..C..K...H..E..A..D.......DOH!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 1101
Posted: #27
KOAJ, Thanks,for the addendum.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2005
Posts: 7450
Posted: #28
Quote Originally Posted by rufus1966:

Now rush and coulter are leading the charge.

This.


 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2003
Posts: 27850
Posted: #29
Quote Originally Posted by Henry-Lilly:


Uh oh... somebody is overly sensitive about their sexuality.  Didn't mean to expose you like that, but I just figured with you being a Barney Frank liberal that you were already out of the closet.  


I am not a liberal, just because I think you suck...  I am an independent...

You brought up the gay thing with your fantasies of washrooms, public parks, soliciting minors, conservative/closet-person patterns...https://www.badmouth.net/top-five-republican-gay-sex-scandals/

From the conservative party that "protest too much"

I never brought it up, just pointed out your display of your inner unconscious desires...  I do not bring up the gay thing, you did...  your issue, sorry to break the reality to you (read the thread)...

as an independent, I can tell that I am very comfortable with gay people, I just don't view their union as being a legitimate marriage...  does that make me a conservative then?

Bu what reality seems to show us is that Barney liberal seems to be solicited by Pink Elephants...

Q: How many Republican politicians can you fit in the closet?
A: Evidently, all of them.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 6580
Posted: #30
Quote Originally Posted by 5_for_Fighting:

Yes
H-U-S-S-E-I-N is 6 letters

dear God, your vote counts as much as mine

dl36 was also the same guy that thought America only had 49 states.

Maybe it's time you give this political thing up.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2003
Posts: 27850
Posted: #31
Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:

dl36 was also the same guy that thought America only had 49 states.

Maybe it's time you give this political thing up.



This is not political, if it was I would post it in the politics forum where it belongs...

where any political bull shit belongs
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 10502
Posted: #32
Quote Originally Posted by dl36:



I am not a liberal, just because I think you suck...  I am an independent...

You brought up the gay thing with your fantasies of washrooms, public parks, soliciting minors, conservative/closet-person patterns...https://www.badmouth.net/top-five-republican-gay-sex-scandals/

From the conservative party that "protest too much"

I never brought it up, just pointed out your display of your inner unconscious desires...  I do not bring up the gay thing, you did...  your issue, sorry to break the reality to you (read the thread)...

as an independent, I can tell that I am very comfortable with gay people, I just don't view their union as being a legitimate marriage...  does that make me a conservative then?

Bu what reality seems to show us is that Barney liberal seems to be solicited by Pink Elephants...

Q: How many Republican politicians can you fit in the closet?
A: Evidently, all of them.


Wow... why so defensive?  Are you that terrified of your homosexuality?  Big deal, so you are a dick licker, so are many of your other Obama supporters.  

 dick licker 36
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2003
Posts: 27850
Posted: #33
Quote Originally Posted by Henry-Lilly:


Wow... why so defensive?  Are you that terrified of your homosexuality?  Big deal, so you are a dick licker, so are many of your other Obama supporters.  

 dick licker 36


im not defensive, becasue there is no hidden agenda to defend...

If anything I am on the offensive pointing out that when you see an "obama whiner" you are basically seeing a conservative-closet-homosexual...

Your being terrified of your own homosexuality is what results in your world view...

Freudian psychoanalytic theory called it "reaction formation"...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reaction_formation

So people who are not against gays or support gays do not have issues because they have nothing to hide...

That is why the conservative anti-gay movement is simply a reaction to your closet-homosexual desires..

Im sorry that your homosexual fantasies get displayed on covers every time you bring up your gay shit on a ronald reagan thread...

in fact only a conservative closet case would do so (not all conservatives are closet cases)...

But you know when you are dealing with a closet case when he cant stop himself from bringing up his unconscious homosexual desires to lick dicks or have his dick licked (and you continue to do so in your closet/flaming fashion)...

You have been exposed... and your only retort is to try to call me gay, when you have shown once again that you have the issue...

I guess you are not as bad as APK who kept showing us that he had the mind of a child molester...

He was dangerous, your truck-stop and restroom fun does not hurt people (unless they are minors that some of you conservative-closet-person seems to fancy)

keep posting you are looking gayer and gayer every minute...
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 6681
Posted: #34
5_for_Fighting
RSI
View Space | Blog | Friends | Playbook |
Captain
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 6604
Location: Maine
#15
Posted: 7/8/2010 4:20:21 PM
QUOTE

Originally Posted by dl36:



Look at the letters

6 = Ronald
6 = Wilson
6 = Reagan

6 =  Barack
6 = Hussein
5 = Obama

it is 666, not 665...

trying to fit your round peg in a square hole just shows how desperate people are to make up things about Obama...

pretty pathetic if you ask me...

Yes
H-U-S-S-E-I-N is 6 letters

dear God, your vote counts as much as mine

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 5868
Posted: #35
I think the antichrist is supposed to rise in the middle east.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 13407
Posted: #36
Quote Originally Posted by KOAJ:



destruction started in 1913 with the Fed, then the income tax, then the 17th amendment. it really got cooking with the New Deal and then the Great Society, then medicare and medicaid, and Fannie and Freddie

war on drugs on reagan's head? foolish

alcohol was banned / prohobition - 1919 (Wilson)
Harrison Narcotics Tax - 1914 (Wilson)
Fed Bureau of Narcotics - 1930 (Hoover)
Marijuana Tax Act - 1937 (FDR)

Reagan centralized it in the 80s but Mr Clinton made the "Drug Czar" a cabinet level position

who taught that reagan started the War on Drugs?


No way you knew that off the top of your head
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 6681
Posted: #37
KOAJ is really sharp, I bet that it's mostly recall
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2006
Posts: 8001
Posted: #38
Quote Originally Posted by KOAJ:



destruction started in 1913 with the Fed, then the income tax, then the 17th amendment. it really got cooking with the New Deal and then the Great Society, then medicare and medicaid, and Fannie and Freddie

war on drugs on reagan's head? foolish

alcohol was banned / prohobition - 1919 (Wilson)
Harrison Narcotics Tax - 1914 (Wilson)
Fed Bureau of Narcotics - 1930 (Hoover)
Marijuana Tax Act - 1937 (FDR)
Reagan centralized it in the 80s but Mr Clinton made the "Drug Czar" a cabinet level position

who taught that reagan started the War on Drugs?


Well done.1913 was the beginning of the destruction with the Fed.

In our era, the President is just a pillar to conduct the speech and as an image.   Imagine a puppet with strings...those are all the recent presidents of the US. 


 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2003
Posts: 27850
Posted: #39
Looks like my stalker 5FF is still going bumping threads, and monitoring everything thing I post...

Some say it is typical "bob" trolling behavior...  I think he is upset about something...  I wonder what he is so upset/obsessed about?

Covers knows



 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 8480
Posted: #40
The great comedian paul mooney gave me this one george 6 walker 6 bush jr 6


Most people who disagree with the war on drugs forget that it was nixon who launched the US government’s war on drugs. Nixon started the fake war on drugs to illegally be able to target blacks and hispanics and create his republican ethnic cleansing movement/republican southern strategy and to stop the hippie movement against the vietnam war but it was reagan who made it popular and turned drugs into terrorism. Nixon riled up the fascist hate/fear machine and reagan made fascism popular. Reagan is the poster child. I wish hitler’s germany, the ethnic cleansing movement, the southern strategy, bull connor, harry j. anslinger, prohibition, nixon and reagan were discussed on tv 24 hours a day. That would be an eye opening channel. 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2005
Posts: 12241
Posted: #41
I couldn't find out for certain, but I found references to him having been an actor, a sportscaster and president of a increasingly irrelevent former super-power, but no reference to him having been the (or even an) antichrist.  I hope this helps. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 1581
Posted: #42

"war on drugs is baaad..."

war on drugs 80s campaign wasnt the beginning of usa destruction.

but double up is right. a complete sh*t storm began in the 80s with "just say no campaign" and that was all while on ronnys watch...

so many needless and extremely harsh laws enhanced and enforced ruining the usa. so much damn money wasted and counting...

some good documentaries out there on this topic..

reagan was a damn good speaker tho and funny 80s punchline...

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 7618
Posted: #43
Beyonce 7
Giselle   7
Knowles 7

7-7-7
JACKPOT = 7
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2010
Posts: 748
Posted: #44
If you don't like Republicans, fine. To make up shit like this is pretty weak.  You first would have to establish that the bible, Christ, and all involved are actually real.  That can't be done, so speculate your life away!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 3468
Posted: #45
Ronald Reagan used to club baby seals for fun....
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 6681
Posted: #46
40Down

||goodpost.gif' border=0>
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 6681
Posted: #47

Quote Originally Posted by MaineRoad:

I couldn't find out for certain, but I found references to him having been an actor, a sportscaster and president of a increasingly irrelevent former super-power, but no reference to him having been the (or even an) antichrist.  I hope this helps. 

 

I missed this post when I was on my mobile device



 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 30550
Posted: #48
it's the 666th anti-christ you have to worry about
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 6681
Posted: #49
||goodpost.gif' border=0> biscuit
That guy would REALLY be troble I imagine
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 6681
Posted: #50
* trouble
All Forums | Politics
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.