How about we get a pool going for when Kim-Jong-Ding-Dong actually launches a nuclear warhead. Parameters will be that it could either strike somewhere like Guam, or be intercepted - he just has to launch it. You can go over or under your date, it'll be whoever's closest. Winner gets bragging rights and gets to say "I told you so", and possibly a Covers hat?
I'm going with Christmas - Monday, December 25th, 2017
Good Luck All!
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
How about we get a pool going for when Kim-Jong-Ding-Dong actually launches a nuclear warhead. Parameters will be that it could either strike somewhere like Guam, or be intercepted - he just has to launch it. You can go over or under your date, it'll be whoever's closest. Winner gets bragging rights and gets to say "I told you so", and possibly a Covers hat?
I'm going with Christmas - Monday, December 25th, 2017
i'll go with never. that guy, and the one before him, have been talking this nonsense for years. and now he has an equally unstable nutball on the other side he can trade threats with. i think we'll see more verbal sparring but that's about it.
it's a shame that government spends so much money and resources on unnecessary military bullshit while so many of the people suffer. of course, the people in government are doing great.
sucks that north korea does this too, but i'm not as concerned about them.
0
i'll go with never. that guy, and the one before him, have been talking this nonsense for years. and now he has an equally unstable nutball on the other side he can trade threats with. i think we'll see more verbal sparring but that's about it.
it's a shame that government spends so much money and resources on unnecessary military bullshit while so many of the people suffer. of course, the people in government are doing great.
sucks that north korea does this too, but i'm not as concerned about them.
i'll go with never. that guy, and the one before him, have been talking this nonsense for years. and now he has an equally unstable nutball on the other side he can trade threats with. i think we'll see more verbal sparring but that's about it.
it's a shame that government spends so much money and resources on unnecessary military bullshit while so many of the people suffer. of course, the people in government are doing great.
sucks that north korea does this too, but i'm not as concerned about them.
My thoughts exactly
Gotta go pee!
0
Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:
i'll go with never. that guy, and the one before him, have been talking this nonsense for years. and now he has an equally unstable nutball on the other side he can trade threats with. i think we'll see more verbal sparring but that's about it.
it's a shame that government spends so much money and resources on unnecessary military bullshit while so many of the people suffer. of course, the people in government are doing great.
sucks that north korea does this too, but i'm not as concerned about them.
i'll go with never. that guy, and the one before him, have been talking this nonsense for years. and now he has an equally unstable nutball on the other side he can trade threats with. i think we'll see more verbal sparring but that's about it.
it's a shame that government spends so much money and resources on unnecessary military bullshit while so many of the people suffer. of course, the people in government are doing great.
Surprised Trump didn't tell Blumenthal to vacation in NK....
sucks that north korea does this too, but i'm not as concerned about them.
0
Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:
i'll go with never. that guy, and the one before him, have been talking this nonsense for years. and now he has an equally unstable nutball on the other side he can trade threats with. i think we'll see more verbal sparring but that's about it.
it's a shame that government spends so much money and resources on unnecessary military bullshit while so many of the people suffer. of course, the people in government are doing great.
Surprised Trump didn't tell Blumenthal to vacation in NK....
sucks that north korea does this too, but i'm not as concerned about them.
One thing for sure we can thank Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton for having a nuclear North Korea... they couldn't have done it without them..
Clinton allowed Jimmy Carter to negotiated a sellout deal that gave North Korea two new reactors and $5 billion in aid in return for a promise.... to quit seeking nukes.
0
I will have to agree......never.
One thing for sure we can thank Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton for having a nuclear North Korea... they couldn't have done it without them..
Clinton allowed Jimmy Carter to negotiated a sellout deal that gave North Korea two new reactors and $5 billion in aid in return for a promise.... to quit seeking nukes.
Im going price is right style, december 26th 2017.
See, if it happens before, I win - reread the parameters. You screwed yourself on the before.....
And for all of you "never gonna happens", need I remind you we've got 2 small-d!cked egomaniacs in an old western style "fastest draw" shootout in the middle of a dusty street right next to the saloon and the tradin' post with the horse trough callin' each other out, but who blinks first, and when.....
"Get'cha popcorn ready!!!!!"
12/25/17 - "Dusk-ish" PST standard time.....
See you all in He11 after the rapture.....
Good Luck!
0
Quote Originally Posted by HockeyTeeth:
Im going price is right style, december 26th 2017.
See, if it happens before, I win - reread the parameters. You screwed yourself on the before.....
And for all of you "never gonna happens", need I remind you we've got 2 small-d!cked egomaniacs in an old western style "fastest draw" shootout in the middle of a dusty street right next to the saloon and the tradin' post with the horse trough callin' each other out, but who blinks first, and when.....
No need for North Korea launch a nuclear warhead to strike Guam.. According to Hank Johnson, Democrat,Representative Georgia 4th district .... the whole island
will become so overly populated that it will tip over...
0
No need for North Korea launch a nuclear warhead to strike Guam.. According to Hank Johnson, Democrat,Representative Georgia 4th district .... the whole island
will become so overly populated that it will tip over...
Ok gimme you get till xmas i get after, sounds good. I don't think kim jong-un is crazy enough to launch a missle at guam or anywhere for that matter. I dont think the nsa would let one off the launching pad.
Now if he did get one to launch, its over for n korea. Plain and simple. They have been a problem for years, like a gnat on the international scene. Yap yap yap, he may have yapped himself into a corner on this one. Well see.
0
Ok gimme you get till xmas i get after, sounds good. I don't think kim jong-un is crazy enough to launch a missle at guam or anywhere for that matter. I dont think the nsa would let one off the launching pad.
Now if he did get one to launch, its over for n korea. Plain and simple. They have been a problem for years, like a gnat on the international scene. Yap yap yap, he may have yapped himself into a corner on this one. Well see.
South Korean Army called the ROK Army would destroy North Korea. ROK is Republic of Korea. They are at the ready 24/7. Their readiness and toughness is never discussed.
0
South Korean Army called the ROK Army would destroy North Korea. ROK is Republic of Korea. They are at the ready 24/7. Their readiness and toughness is never discussed.
Ok gimme you get till xmas i get after, sounds good. I don't think kim jong-un is crazy enough to launch a missle at guam or anywhere for that matter. I dont think the nsa would let one off the launching pad.
Now if he did get one to launch, its over for n korea. Plain and simple. They have been a problem for years, like a gnat on the international scene. Yap yap yap, he may have yapped himself into a corner on this one. Well see.
The way things are going, Thanksgiving is looking better.....
0
Quote Originally Posted by HockeyTeeth:
Ok gimme you get till xmas i get after, sounds good. I don't think kim jong-un is crazy enough to launch a missle at guam or anywhere for that matter. I dont think the nsa would let one off the launching pad.
Now if he did get one to launch, its over for n korea. Plain and simple. They have been a problem for years, like a gnat on the international scene. Yap yap yap, he may have yapped himself into a corner on this one. Well see.
The way things are going, Thanksgiving is looking better.....
Slim/sundance....you can't be serious. Which side?
You don't really question this do you? If you do, please don't tell me.
In the United States House of Representatives...........
60.3% of 209 Democratic Representatives voted against President GWBush and the authorization for use of military force against Iraq Resolution of 2002....
In the United States Senate ..............
42% of Democratic senators (21 of 50) voted against President GWBush and the resolution...........
That's a total of 56.7% of the Democrats in Congress who voted against the President ...so which side will Democrats be on this time is a legitimate question.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Midnight1:
Slim/sundance....you can't be serious. Which side?
You don't really question this do you? If you do, please don't tell me.
In the United States House of Representatives...........
60.3% of 209 Democratic Representatives voted against President GWBush and the authorization for use of military force against Iraq Resolution of 2002....
In the United States Senate ..............
42% of Democratic senators (21 of 50) voted against President GWBush and the resolution...........
That's a total of 56.7% of the Democrats in Congress who voted against the President ...so which side will Democrats be on this time is a legitimate question.
If,, America goes to war with North Korea ....which side will the Democrats be on?
Not a democrat , but I think all Trump Supporters should be put on the front lines as possible cannon fodder ...Like our Country did to my ancestors during WW1/WW2/Nam etc
BEST OF HEALTH, HAPPINESS,WEALTH, BLESSINGS and LUCK TO ALL !!
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
Question of the day....
If,, America goes to war with North Korea ....which side will the Democrats be on?
Not a democrat , but I think all Trump Supporters should be put on the front lines as possible cannon fodder ...Like our Country did to my ancestors during WW1/WW2/Nam etc
In the United States House of Representatives...........
60.3% of 209 Democratic Representatives voted against President GWBush and the authorization for use of military force against Iraq Resolution of 2002....
In the United States Senate ..............
42% of Democratic senators (21 of 50) voted against President GWBush and the resolution...........
That's a total of 56.7% of the Democrats in Congress who voted against the President ...so which side will Democrats be on this time is a legitimate question.
that's an entirely different question. your first post asks, if there is a war, which side will be on.
your second post mentions that a bunch of democrats didn't want a war in the first place with iraq.
anyway, as to the first post, if we do have a war with north korea because their leader insults trump on twitter or whatever and a bunch of innocent people have to die as a result, i'd want us to win and then big government living fislcally liberal republicans to never hold office again, as a general rule.
as to your second post, i'd vote against any resolution of war against north korea because their leader is mean to us or likes to talk sh*t like a f*cking imbecile the same way our leader does.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
In the United States House of Representatives...........
60.3% of 209 Democratic Representatives voted against President GWBush and the authorization for use of military force against Iraq Resolution of 2002....
In the United States Senate ..............
42% of Democratic senators (21 of 50) voted against President GWBush and the resolution...........
That's a total of 56.7% of the Democrats in Congress who voted against the President ...so which side will Democrats be on this time is a legitimate question.
that's an entirely different question. your first post asks, if there is a war, which side will be on.
your second post mentions that a bunch of democrats didn't want a war in the first place with iraq.
anyway, as to the first post, if we do have a war with north korea because their leader insults trump on twitter or whatever and a bunch of innocent people have to die as a result, i'd want us to win and then big government living fislcally liberal republicans to never hold office again, as a general rule.
as to your second post, i'd vote against any resolution of war against north korea because their leader is mean to us or likes to talk sh*t like a f*cking imbecile the same way our leader does.
Not a democrat , but I think all Trump Supporters should be put on the front lines as possible cannon fodder ...Like our Country did to my ancestors during WW1/WW2/Nam etc
WW1/WW2/Nam .... all under Democrat Presidents....
0
Quote Originally Posted by DoubleUp4Life:
Not a democrat , but I think all Trump Supporters should be put on the front lines as possible cannon fodder ...Like our Country did to my ancestors during WW1/WW2/Nam etc
WW1/WW2/Nam .... all under Democrat Presidents....
My money is on NEVER. North Korea will push, kick and scream like they have done for years but they will never risk any maneuver which results in a counter strike by the U.S. or its allies. They will make sure none of those test missiles will ever come close or be mistaken for a first strike by North Korea and they know their big mouths alone will not start a war. This game has been played for over a half century and will continue until the NK leader's death. Kim Jong Un is simply inexperienced and didn't "earn" his way to the top so I'd expect him to continue with his mouth ... probably to please other hardline leadership within their political and military ranks.
0
My money is on NEVER. North Korea will push, kick and scream like they have done for years but they will never risk any maneuver which results in a counter strike by the U.S. or its allies. They will make sure none of those test missiles will ever come close or be mistaken for a first strike by North Korea and they know their big mouths alone will not start a war. This game has been played for over a half century and will continue until the NK leader's death. Kim Jong Un is simply inexperienced and didn't "earn" his way to the top so I'd expect him to continue with his mouth ... probably to please other hardline leadership within their political and military ranks.
that's an entirely different question. your first post asks, if there is a war, which side will be on.
your second post mentions that a bunch of democrats didn't want a war in the first place with iraq.
anyway, as to the first post, if we do have a war with north korea because their leader insults trump on twitter or whatever and a bunch of innocent people have to die as a result, i'd want us to win and then big government living fislcally liberal republicans to never hold office again, as a general rule.
as to your second post, i'd vote against any resolution of war against north korea because their leader is mean to us or likes to talk sh*t like a f*cking imbecile the same way our leader does.
0
Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:
that's an entirely different question. your first post asks, if there is a war, which side will be on.
your second post mentions that a bunch of democrats didn't want a war in the first place with iraq.
anyway, as to the first post, if we do have a war with north korea because their leader insults trump on twitter or whatever and a bunch of innocent people have to die as a result, i'd want us to win and then big government living fislcally liberal republicans to never hold office again, as a general rule.
as to your second post, i'd vote against any resolution of war against north korea because their leader is mean to us or likes to talk sh*t like a f*cking imbecile the same way our leader does.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
