That's what happens when every Tom, Dick, and Harry nut- job can carry guns. It's not going to be the last incident. Violence begets more violence.
That's what happens when every Tom, Dick, and Harry nut- job can carry guns. It's not going to be the last incident. Violence begets more violence.
That's what happens when every Tom, Dick, and Harry nut- job can carry guns. It's not going to be the last incident. Violence begets more violence.
Phone call right before he was shot & killed....
www.abcnews.go.com/trayvon-martin-arrest-now-abc-reveals-cucial-phone/story?id=15959017
Seems clear that it was Zimmerman who created &/or provoked the entire incident which led to him gettin the shit kicked out himself & then killing an unarmed kid who belonged there & wasn't doing anything wrong in the 1st place -
Phone call right before he was shot & killed....
www.abcnews.go.com/trayvon-martin-arrest-now-abc-reveals-cucial-phone/story?id=15959017
Seems clear that it was Zimmerman who created &/or provoked the entire incident which led to him gettin the shit kicked out himself & then killing an unarmed kid who belonged there & wasn't doing anything wrong in the 1st place -
Trayvon was asked if the jewelry, which was mostly women’s rings and earrings, belonged to his family or a girlfriend.
“Martin replied it’s not mine. A friend gave it to me,” according to the report. Trayvon declined to name the friend.
================
Looks like the innocent teen was just another garden variety thug.
I'm shocked by this development.
Trayvon was asked if the jewelry, which was mostly women’s rings and earrings, belonged to his family or a girlfriend.
“Martin replied it’s not mine. A friend gave it to me,” according to the report. Trayvon declined to name the friend.
================
Looks like the innocent teen was just another garden variety thug.
I'm shocked by this development.
Oh, he had weed at school. Then he definately was a hoodlum who needed shootin. Ye-hawww.
Oh, he had weed at school. Then he definately was a hoodlum who needed shootin. Ye-hawww.
You fucked up righties amaze me. The Police told Zimmerman "don not follow him, we don't need you to do that". He chose to follow him and eventually shot him.
How does one defend this? I'm a lefty and all for gun ownership. I own dozens of guns. but I can't excuse a guy disobeying the Cops, and because of that, having to shoot someone. If he woulda left the kid alone when the police told him too..........?
You fucked up righties amaze me. The Police told Zimmerman "don not follow him, we don't need you to do that". He chose to follow him and eventually shot him.
How does one defend this? I'm a lefty and all for gun ownership. I own dozens of guns. but I can't excuse a guy disobeying the Cops, and because of that, having to shoot someone. If he woulda left the kid alone when the police told him too..........?
Oh, he had weed at school. Then he definately was a hoodlum who needed shootin. Ye-hawww.
Oh, he had weed at school. Then he definately was a hoodlum who needed shootin. Ye-hawww.
You fucked up righties amaze me. The Police told Zimmerman "don not follow him, we don't need you to do that". He chose to follow him and eventually shot him.
How does one defend this? I'm a lefty and all for gun ownership. I own dozens of guns. but I can't excuse a guy disobeying the Cops, and because of that, having to shoot someone. If he woulda left the kid alone when the police told him too..........?
Um, what you think happened (Zimmerman followed him and just shot him) is not what happened.
You are not that familiar with the statements and what the witnesses have said.
You should try and become more familiar.
You fucked up righties amaze me. The Police told Zimmerman "don not follow him, we don't need you to do that". He chose to follow him and eventually shot him.
How does one defend this? I'm a lefty and all for gun ownership. I own dozens of guns. but I can't excuse a guy disobeying the Cops, and because of that, having to shoot someone. If he woulda left the kid alone when the police told him too..........?
Um, what you think happened (Zimmerman followed him and just shot him) is not what happened.
You are not that familiar with the statements and what the witnesses have said.
You should try and become more familiar.
The Police told Zimmerman "don not follow him, we don't need you to do that". He chose to follow him
-----------------
Actually, a 9-11 dispatcher said that. Not "the police"
Additionally, Zimmerman said he was getting into his vehicle when he was attacked. So your assertion that he was "following" Martin after being told not to, is based on supposition and really has no evidence to support it.
But of course you goofy leftists just lie like there is no tomorrow in order to justify your silly political beliefs.
The Police told Zimmerman "don not follow him, we don't need you to do that". He chose to follow him
-----------------
Actually, a 9-11 dispatcher said that. Not "the police"
Additionally, Zimmerman said he was getting into his vehicle when he was attacked. So your assertion that he was "following" Martin after being told not to, is based on supposition and really has no evidence to support it.
But of course you goofy leftists just lie like there is no tomorrow in order to justify your silly political beliefs.
The Police told Zimmerman "don not follow him, we don't need you to do that". He chose to follow him
-----------------
Actually, a 9-11 dispatcher said that. Not "the police"
Additionally, Zimmerman said he was getting into his vehicle when he was attacked. So your assertion that he was "following" Martin after being told not to, is based on supposition and really has no evidence to support it.
But of course you goofy leftists just lie like there is no tomorrow in order to justify your silly political beliefs.
The Police told Zimmerman "don not follow him, we don't need you to do that". He chose to follow him
-----------------
Actually, a 9-11 dispatcher said that. Not "the police"
Additionally, Zimmerman said he was getting into his vehicle when he was attacked. So your assertion that he was "following" Martin after being told not to, is based on supposition and really has no evidence to support it.
But of course you goofy leftists just lie like there is no tomorrow in order to justify your silly political beliefs.
Trayvon was asked if the jewelry, which was mostly women’s rings and earrings, belonged to his family or a girlfriend.
“Martin replied it’s not mine. A friend gave it to me,” according to the report. Trayvon declined to name the friend.
================
Looks like the innocent teen was just another garden variety thug.
I'm shocked by this development.
How did they ask a dead kid what was in his backpack?
Trayvon was asked if the jewelry, which was mostly women’s rings and earrings, belonged to his family or a girlfriend.
“Martin replied it’s not mine. A friend gave it to me,” according to the report. Trayvon declined to name the friend.
================
Looks like the innocent teen was just another garden variety thug.
I'm shocked by this development.
How did they ask a dead kid what was in his backpack?
The Police told Zimmerman "don not follow him, we don't need you to do that". He chose to follow him
-----------------
Actually, a 9-11 dispatcher said that. Not "the police"
Additionally, Zimmerman said he was getting into his vehicle when he was attacked. So your assertion that he was "following" Martin after being told not to, is based on supposition and really has no evidence to support it.
But of course you goofy leftists just lie like there is no tomorrow in order to justify your silly political beliefs.
The Police told Zimmerman "don not follow him, we don't need you to do that". He chose to follow him
-----------------
Actually, a 9-11 dispatcher said that. Not "the police"
Additionally, Zimmerman said he was getting into his vehicle when he was attacked. So your assertion that he was "following" Martin after being told not to, is based on supposition and really has no evidence to support it.
But of course you goofy leftists just lie like there is no tomorrow in order to justify your silly political beliefs.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.