How times change......I can remember when posting off topic in the politic forum was considered a mortal sin..
If we did tit for tat I think you would have been tossed years ago, so easy on the holier than thou garbage.
zelo is not adding great value with his rehash copy and paste crap as Covers is not a repost only website, if he would actually add more than conservative Obama bashing spam I think he would accomplish quite a bit more and avoid spam-in-return replies.
I'd take your party narrow minded approach vs his spam only threads for sure.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
How times change......I can remember when posting off topic in the politic forum was considered a mortal sin..
If we did tit for tat I think you would have been tossed years ago, so easy on the holier than thou garbage.
zelo is not adding great value with his rehash copy and paste crap as Covers is not a repost only website, if he would actually add more than conservative Obama bashing spam I think he would accomplish quite a bit more and avoid spam-in-return replies.
I'd take your party narrow minded approach vs his spam only threads for sure.
If we did tit for tat I think you would have been tossed years ago, so easy on the holier than thou garbage.
zelo is not adding great value with his rehash copy and paste crap as Covers is not a repost only website, if he would actually add more than conservative Obama bashing spam I think he would accomplish quite a bit more and avoid spam-in-return replies.
I'd take your party narrow minded approach vs his spam only threads for sure.
My narrow minded approach..ok
Can you tell me the last Republican Candidate for President you vote for ?
From what you have posted in this forum... we know it wasn't president Trump..you have said you didn't like Hillary or Obama (but never say a bad thing about them other than that ) I doubt if you voted for Mitt or McCain ..I'm sure you didn't vote for Bush 43 or his dad Bush 41....It wasn't Ron Reagan because you really loved Carter ...so who would that republican be.?
Tricky person ? Gen wight D.Eisenhower ?
0
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
If we did tit for tat I think you would have been tossed years ago, so easy on the holier than thou garbage.
zelo is not adding great value with his rehash copy and paste crap as Covers is not a repost only website, if he would actually add more than conservative Obama bashing spam I think he would accomplish quite a bit more and avoid spam-in-return replies.
I'd take your party narrow minded approach vs his spam only threads for sure.
My narrow minded approach..ok
Can you tell me the last Republican Candidate for President you vote for ?
From what you have posted in this forum... we know it wasn't president Trump..you have said you didn't like Hillary or Obama (but never say a bad thing about them other than that ) I doubt if you voted for Mitt or McCain ..I'm sure you didn't vote for Bush 43 or his dad Bush 41....It wasn't Ron Reagan because you really loved Carter ...so who would that republican be.?
Routine business here. For decades, US has been the largest arms dealer in the world. Before Trump, Obama administration has sold more weapons than any other administration since world war two.
0
Routine business here. For decades, US has been the largest arms dealer in the world. Before Trump, Obama administration has sold more weapons than any other administration since world war two.
That's right, you tick the names of all repubs as if it is your duty to vote down the party line irregardless of who it is or why...that is a person who votes to validate/support their personal political views. I am not that kind of voter, I vote for the person and their qualities not what party they belong to. People who blind party vote or reactively vote against some candidate when the alternative is equally bad or worse are not making things better and pave the way for awful guys like Trump getting elected.
To your point...Trump, Romney, Bush I and II were horrible, Reagan was awful but I was too young to know better and people were snowed by his schmaltzy personality and in fear due to misinformation from his staff.
I would vote for a solid candidate who best supported the interests of the common citizen...not the large biz like most you listed, not the military like most you listed. I do not agree with many fundamental principals your side rallies for but I would vote for any solid candidate on either side that is a deserving person. I do not see a deserving person on that list you made...
0
SS,
That's right, you tick the names of all repubs as if it is your duty to vote down the party line irregardless of who it is or why...that is a person who votes to validate/support their personal political views. I am not that kind of voter, I vote for the person and their qualities not what party they belong to. People who blind party vote or reactively vote against some candidate when the alternative is equally bad or worse are not making things better and pave the way for awful guys like Trump getting elected.
To your point...Trump, Romney, Bush I and II were horrible, Reagan was awful but I was too young to know better and people were snowed by his schmaltzy personality and in fear due to misinformation from his staff.
I would vote for a solid candidate who best supported the interests of the common citizen...not the large biz like most you listed, not the military like most you listed. I do not agree with many fundamental principals your side rallies for but I would vote for any solid candidate on either side that is a deserving person. I do not see a deserving person on that list you made...
I would vote for a solid candidate who best supported the interests of the common citizen...not the large biz like most you listed, not the military like most you listed. I do not agree with many fundamental principals your side rallies for but I would vote for any solid candidate on either side that is a deserving person. I do not see a deserving person on that list you made...
From what you just posted that would then make you a enthusiastic Bernie Sanders supporter...though I can't remember you ever touting him..
Regardless, it was Donald Trump who spoke to the ordinary American,,
to the people who were overworked, underpaid, unemployed, broke, and
rejected masses of people
who feel that the American dream eluded them..the commons citizens are the
one that elected President Trump..
0
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
I would vote for a solid candidate who best supported the interests of the common citizen...not the large biz like most you listed, not the military like most you listed. I do not agree with many fundamental principals your side rallies for but I would vote for any solid candidate on either side that is a deserving person. I do not see a deserving person on that list you made...
From what you just posted that would then make you a enthusiastic Bernie Sanders supporter...though I can't remember you ever touting him..
Regardless, it was Donald Trump who spoke to the ordinary American,,
to the people who were overworked, underpaid, unemployed, broke, and
rejected masses of people
who feel that the American dream eluded them..the commons citizens are the
one that elected President Trump..
This goes to show you the common citizen is a mindless zombie who will not research the candidates, Trump is not going to help the little guy and has not done so in the slightest. Trump has forwarded corporate interests and some extreme repubs views only to this point...and wait for the oncoming budget cuts, I promise you the little guy is going to get hammered all so we can give more breaks to big biz and build the military.
0
This goes to show you the common citizen is a mindless zombie who will not research the candidates, Trump is not going to help the little guy and has not done so in the slightest. Trump has forwarded corporate interests and some extreme repubs views only to this point...and wait for the oncoming budget cuts, I promise you the little guy is going to get hammered all so we can give more breaks to big biz and build the military.
From what you just posted that would then make you a enthusiastic Bernie Sanders supporter...though I can't remember you ever touting him..
Regardless, it was Donald Trump who spoke to the ordinary American,,
to the people who were overworked, underpaid, unemployed, broke, and
rejected masses of people
who feel that the American dream eluded them..the commons citizens are the
one that elected President Trump..
Out of curiosity when was the last time you voted for someone that wasn't a Republican?
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
From what you just posted that would then make you a enthusiastic Bernie Sanders supporter...though I can't remember you ever touting him..
Regardless, it was Donald Trump who spoke to the ordinary American,,
to the people who were overworked, underpaid, unemployed, broke, and
rejected masses of people
who feel that the American dream eluded them..the commons citizens are the
one that elected President Trump..
Out of curiosity when was the last time you voted for someone that wasn't a Republican?
If we did tit for tat I think you would have been tossed years ago, so easy on the holier than thou garbage.
zelo is not adding great value with his rehash copy and paste crap as Covers is not a repost only website, if he would actually add more than conservative Obama bashing spam I think he would accomplish quite a bit more and avoid spam-in-return replies.
I'd take your party narrow minded approach vs his spam only threads for sure.
The reason I don't reply is to give YOU a chance to Box me
0
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
If we did tit for tat I think you would have been tossed years ago, so easy on the holier than thou garbage.
zelo is not adding great value with his rehash copy and paste crap as Covers is not a repost only website, if he would actually add more than conservative Obama bashing spam I think he would accomplish quite a bit more and avoid spam-in-return replies.
I'd take your party narrow minded approach vs his spam only threads for sure.
The reason I don't reply is to give YOU a chance to Box me
Out of curiosity when was the last time you voted for someone that wasn't a Republican?
Bill Clinton
But that was before I learned about how large and influential the Clinton crime family actually was.
I didn't know anything about his drug running with Don Tyson. Or his pu$$y patrols with Arkansas Highway patrol. Or Cattlegate. Or multiple assassinations...I mean suicides. I didn't know he was going to fire FBI director one day before Vince Foster was murdered so there wouldn't be a proper, clean investigation.
I learned my lesson with that vote.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:
Out of curiosity when was the last time you voted for someone that wasn't a Republican?
Bill Clinton
But that was before I learned about how large and influential the Clinton crime family actually was.
I didn't know anything about his drug running with Don Tyson. Or his pu$$y patrols with Arkansas Highway patrol. Or Cattlegate. Or multiple assassinations...I mean suicides. I didn't know he was going to fire FBI director one day before Vince Foster was murdered so there wouldn't be a proper, clean investigation.
But that was before I learned about how large and influential the Clinton crime family actually was.
I didn't know anything about his drug running with Don Tyson. Or his pu$$y patrols with Arkansas Highway patrol. Or Cattlegate. Or multiple assassinations...I mean suicides. I didn't know he was going to fire FBI director one day before Vince Foster was murdered so there wouldn't be a proper, clean investigation.
I learned my lesson with that vote.
So now you cheer for a bigger crime family , correct?
0
Quote Originally Posted by wordsmyth:
Bill Clinton
But that was before I learned about how large and influential the Clinton crime family actually was.
I didn't know anything about his drug running with Don Tyson. Or his pu$$y patrols with Arkansas Highway patrol. Or Cattlegate. Or multiple assassinations...I mean suicides. I didn't know he was going to fire FBI director one day before Vince Foster was murdered so there wouldn't be a proper, clean investigation.
I learned my lesson with that vote.
So now you cheer for a bigger crime family , correct?
Seems like you folks on the "left" had a difficult time following the bouncing ball on Trump's trip. Let's summarize. He "threatened" NATO by not publicly announcing we would back others if attacked (a key tenet of NATO), and also made a big arms deal with Saudi Arabia.
What's the common theme here. He wants others to carry their own weight and start to fend for themselves..
There is nothing inconsistent about this theme. It follows his Nationalistic tendencies.
0
Seems like you folks on the "left" had a difficult time following the bouncing ball on Trump's trip. Let's summarize. He "threatened" NATO by not publicly announcing we would back others if attacked (a key tenet of NATO), and also made a big arms deal with Saudi Arabia.
What's the common theme here. He wants others to carry their own weight and start to fend for themselves..
There is nothing inconsistent about this theme. It follows his Nationalistic tendencies.
Yeah nothing like doing the bidding of our needy corporations to the enemy. I do consider the Saudis to be our enemies and they have an atrocious record of human rights abuses to women and others...Nothing like making a buck by arming our enemies by using taxpayer monies to visit and appease the Saudis...
Why have you been silent on Biden’s visit?
I thought he campaigned on ending our relations with the Saudis?
0
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
Yeah nothing like doing the bidding of our needy corporations to the enemy. I do consider the Saudis to be our enemies and they have an atrocious record of human rights abuses to women and others...Nothing like making a buck by arming our enemies by using taxpayer monies to visit and appease the Saudis...
Why have you been silent on Biden’s visit?
I thought he campaigned on ending our relations with the Saudis?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
