Packers Bounce Back. One Loss and everyone made it look Big. They needed a loss but to a team that had nothing to play for and that loss wasn't in their Division. Bears are out of the Playoffs. QB Jay didn't practice , WR out, it's going to be MURDER city. As Rivary as it is, Bears dominated the Packers all of 1980's when the Bears decoded Bart Starr and the Packers in a 67-7 loss. This GAME will be a shut Out at HOME and with Packers up by many points. Packer/Bears rivary at it's best!
0
Packers Bounce Back. One Loss and everyone made it look Big. They needed a loss but to a team that had nothing to play for and that loss wasn't in their Division. Bears are out of the Playoffs. QB Jay didn't practice , WR out, it's going to be MURDER city. As Rivary as it is, Bears dominated the Packers all of 1980's when the Bears decoded Bart Starr and the Packers in a 67-7 loss. This GAME will be a shut Out at HOME and with Packers up by many points. Packer/Bears rivary at it's best!
I think the under is a better play here. The Packers o line is hurt and not having Jennings has a bigger effect on the offense than most anticipated. Urlacher always brings the D for this game. 12 is too many in my opinion. (disclaimer - im from Milwaukee and huge Packer fan). This team (Pack) will not average 33 points right now.
0
I think the under is a better play here. The Packers o line is hurt and not having Jennings has a bigger effect on the offense than most anticipated. Urlacher always brings the D for this game. 12 is too many in my opinion. (disclaimer - im from Milwaukee and huge Packer fan). This team (Pack) will not average 33 points right now.
Yeah, I could see the Packers with a comfortable third quarter lead - and then Matt Flynn comes in and just starts killing the clock. 2 TD's might be enough for the Packers, but then again........
backdoor anyone??
Bears + over 2 TD's
0
Yeah, I could see the Packers with a comfortable third quarter lead - and then Matt Flynn comes in and just starts killing the clock. 2 TD's might be enough for the Packers, but then again........
bears ? really they have zero players left lost qb ,several w.r. running back as well . Going into gbay after that loss green bay will be relaxed and easily win by 21 and final 34-7. green bay and the under
0
bears ? really they have zero players left lost qb ,several w.r. running back as well . Going into gbay after that loss green bay will be relaxed and easily win by 21 and final 34-7. green bay and the under
Josh McClown is not the answer for the Bears.. Maybe a pick 6 or 2 for the Pack defense. Packers know they need to build momentum going into the playoffs.. Look for them to jump out to a big lead and then rest Rodgers and co.
GB 31 - Chi 13
Pack -11.5.
0
Packers will rebound in Lambeau.
I know they are hurt but still cover 11.5 pts.
Josh McClown is not the answer for the Bears.. Maybe a pick 6 or 2 for the Pack defense. Packers know they need to build momentum going into the playoffs.. Look for them to jump out to a big lead and then rest Rodgers and co.
I don't agree with the post about the Pack needing a loss. In opinion, no one "needs" a loss. The Pack just got outplayed in KC. That's it, no excuses. GB has not been nearly as impressive the last few weeks. Having said that, even with all their injuries, the Pack still have better atheletes than the Bears, the key to this game will be how well the Packers makeshift "O" line can match up with a Bears front line that is still one of the best in the league. I believe the under is the best play here
0
I don't agree with the post about the Pack needing a loss. In opinion, no one "needs" a loss. The Pack just got outplayed in KC. That's it, no excuses. GB has not been nearly as impressive the last few weeks. Having said that, even with all their injuries, the Pack still have better atheletes than the Bears, the key to this game will be how well the Packers makeshift "O" line can match up with a Bears front line that is still one of the best in the league. I believe the under is the best play here
Both teams have a lot of injured players but Chicago has a greater impact. They really miss Cutler. Ever since they lost Cutler, they haven't scored more than 20 points. Green Bay finally lost a game and took the pressure off for beating the Dolphins undefeated record.
The Packers should win straight up. As you can see the line dropped for 13 to 11 points. The last 8 games played went under and the most total points scored was only 40 points.
Under in my opinion is the best play.
0
Both teams have a lot of injured players but Chicago has a greater impact. They really miss Cutler. Ever since they lost Cutler, they haven't scored more than 20 points. Green Bay finally lost a game and took the pressure off for beating the Dolphins undefeated record.
The Packers should win straight up. As you can see the line dropped for 13 to 11 points. The last 8 games played went under and the most total points scored was only 40 points.
Not that it matters much but does GB have the easiest schedule of the year? Remember that come playoffs. Also does the titans have a fetish for 17 to 23 games lately.
0
Not that it matters much but does GB have the easiest schedule of the year? Remember that come playoffs. Also does the titans have a fetish for 17 to 23 games lately.
Packers need the win to clinch the No 1 seed. They want to get that done before heading to a fired up Detroit team. They will take care of business this week against Chicago and rest up next week. Packers cover easily! Look for the defense and special teams to do some scoring. Packers and the Over!
0
Packers need the win to clinch the No 1 seed. They want to get that done before heading to a fired up Detroit team. They will take care of business this week against Chicago and rest up next week. Packers cover easily! Look for the defense and special teams to do some scoring. Packers and the Over!
Let's see, matt forte out, marion barber out, jay cutler out. I can't possibly see the bears scoring more than 14 points in this game, mccown is going to be rattled in green bay and although the packers are hurting they are still far and away the better team and it's at home. Still i'm not crazy about either side of this game, more intrigued by the under just because i can't possibly see how the bears can score.
0
Let's see, matt forte out, marion barber out, jay cutler out. I can't possibly see the bears scoring more than 14 points in this game, mccown is going to be rattled in green bay and although the packers are hurting they are still far and away the better team and it's at home. Still i'm not crazy about either side of this game, more intrigued by the under just because i can't possibly see how the bears can score.
nighttime game, new Bears QB, weather is windy with a chance of snow/showers and a high of 36, Jennings, Clifton, and Bulaga out for the Packers.
But, the Packers need this win to assure homefield throughout - thanks a lot T-Suck of the Seaturds!!!!!!!!! You just couldn't hold on to that ball, kick the FG, and beat the 49ers by one point, could you!!!!!!!!!!!! NOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!! That would have made this decision soooooooooo much easier - and we wouldn't want that now, would we???????????
Anyways..........
I'm seeing the Packers with a comfortable 10-14 point lead, and then a lot of handoffs and a lot of clock killing, and maybe some Matt Flynn if the score is high enough and late enough in the game............
Or, if somehow the game is kept close due to the Bears "D" stepping their game up, I still see a lot of time killing - but on the Bears side - so, here's my "Christmas Day All Sports Tease" I'm doing because I'm a sadist at heart!
Pays +200
Good Luck All, and have a Merry Christmas!!!!!!!!!!!
Bears +20 = That should be enough to cover
Under 48.5 = hopefully the game plays out like I think it should
Bulls -0.5 = No Bynum + No Kobe = No Lakers
Clippers -1.5 = C'mon, all that talent, national T.V. exposure, it's opening day, and they're playing Golden State for God's sake!!!!
0
O.K. - here's what all of the factors mean to me:
nighttime game, new Bears QB, weather is windy with a chance of snow/showers and a high of 36, Jennings, Clifton, and Bulaga out for the Packers.
But, the Packers need this win to assure homefield throughout - thanks a lot T-Suck of the Seaturds!!!!!!!!! You just couldn't hold on to that ball, kick the FG, and beat the 49ers by one point, could you!!!!!!!!!!!! NOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!! That would have made this decision soooooooooo much easier - and we wouldn't want that now, would we???????????
Anyways..........
I'm seeing the Packers with a comfortable 10-14 point lead, and then a lot of handoffs and a lot of clock killing, and maybe some Matt Flynn if the score is high enough and late enough in the game............
Or, if somehow the game is kept close due to the Bears "D" stepping their game up, I still see a lot of time killing - but on the Bears side - so, here's my "Christmas Day All Sports Tease" I'm doing because I'm a sadist at heart!
Pays +200
Good Luck All, and have a Merry Christmas!!!!!!!!!!!
Bears +20 = That should be enough to cover
Under 48.5 = hopefully the game plays out like I think it should
Bulls -0.5 = No Bynum + No Kobe = No Lakers
Clippers -1.5 = C'mon, all that talent, national T.V. exposure, it's opening day, and they're playing Golden State for God's sake!!!!
My poor Bears...no way they cover! No QB, no Forte, no Knox, Hester hurt. These teams HATE each other....I cannot see the Pack letting up at any point in this game.
0
My poor Bears...no way they cover! No QB, no Forte, no Knox, Hester hurt. These teams HATE each other....I cannot see the Pack letting up at any point in this game.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
