All Forums | Pro Football

Cincinnati at Baltimore (09/07/2008)

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 2887
Posts: 36
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 80
Posted: #26
boys n girls DEFENSE wins games. Ravens
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 602
Posted: #27
Quote Originally Posted by W8LIFTER:

Cincinnati Bengals -2  Lock of the Day! LAY IT!!!

 

please stop saying lock, worst word in the history of betting sports, go ravens

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 5567
Posted: #28
W8...you should know better
 
Bengals -2
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 108
Posted: #29
dont worry guys its still a lock!....dont listen to this guy who thinks what we type has an effect on these games!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 5567
Posted: #30
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 25
Posted: #31
We all should have taken a look at the data on this one before pulling the trigger......80% of public on Bengals.....Thus we get what is currently being played out.....Ravens being up 7 and about to score again........It's all fixed.....If you don't believe me take a look at the Buffalo/Seattle score
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 5567
Posted: #32
Quote Originally Posted by Fish Naked:

W8...you should know better
 
Bengals -2
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 1560
Posted: #33
MOTHER  FAHKING BENGALS
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 1560
Posted: #34
i too wish people would take that "L" word out of their vocabulary when talking about sports betting.  i don't think saying or typing it has any effect on the game, but there is no such thing!!!
 
and to think that the games are fixed.....c'mon!  there's 100 guys out there making millions of dollars to play these games.  they are not fixed.  it's sports.  anyone can beat anyone on any given day. 
 
ie:  ravens and falcons today (both had the "L" word being tossed around in their threads) and the best example yet.....last year's super bowl winning giants over the patriots.  was that fixed?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 2628
Posted: #35
Was I the only player in this thread who was not on the Bengals? Damn I will just stop paying 169 a month for oddstracker, just log onto the game threads to see where the public suckers are betting.
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 1040
Posted: #36
Quote Originally Posted by stappy8:

We all should have taken a look at the data on this one before pulling the trigger......80% of public on Bengals.....Thus we get what is currently being played out.....Ravens being up 7 and about to score again........It's all fixed.....If you don't believe me take a look at the Buffalo/Seattle score

here would be my question... why would you have to look at the data to know the public would be on Cincy?  the public will always be on a (Palmer, Housh, Ocho) package over a (Flacco, Mason, ?) package... mostly, the QB matchup smelled of a public play... the public doesn't care that only one of these teams knows what defense is...

 

 

Kong... hello???  all over it man!

 

All Forums | Pro Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.