both teams suck. Oakland stunk it u against KC and Denver is just flat out awful. It's hard to bet on either side....yuck. I'm going with the Under 43.5. maybe both teams suckiness will cancel the other one out.
my gut instinct is to pick the underdog....but if I had to pick a side I would lean on Oakland -9. I'm assuming that Oak will get their crap together and want to redeem themselves after that Kc fiasco....LMAO. I cleaned up on the last oakland game betting BIGTIME on kc...just ask a certain oakland homer. U know who u are kid. I'm not going to call u out again on this thread. unless u want some more.
Happy betting
0
they should call this the TOILET BOWL
both teams suck. Oakland stunk it u against KC and Denver is just flat out awful. It's hard to bet on either side....yuck. I'm going with the Under 43.5. maybe both teams suckiness will cancel the other one out.
my gut instinct is to pick the underdog....but if I had to pick a side I would lean on Oakland -9. I'm assuming that Oak will get their crap together and want to redeem themselves after that Kc fiasco....LMAO. I cleaned up on the last oakland game betting BIGTIME on kc...just ask a certain oakland homer. U know who u are kid. I'm not going to call u out again on this thread. unless u want some more.
both teams suck. Oakland stunk it u against KC and Denver is just flat out awful. It's hard to bet on either side....yuck. I'm going with the Under 43.5. maybe both teams suckiness will cancel the other one out.
my gut instinct is to pick the underdog....but if I had to pick a side I would lean on Oakland -9. I'm assuming that Oak will get their crap together and want to redeem themselves after that Kc fiasco....LMAO. I cleaned up on the last oakland game betting BIGTIME on kc...just ask a certain oakland homer. U know who u are kid. I'm not going to call u out again on this thread. unless u want some more.
Happy betting
Hey Dumbass69,
Is your only claim to fame that one Oakland game? How about your locks Diego and the Over? Or better yet your cowgirls? Yea that's right I cleaned up on both of them funny how the bets you win are the one's you go big on and when you lose like the next three you don't bet. You're a clown I'm not saying NFL logic doesn't work I'm saying your logic is screwed the reason the Raiders looked like shit had more to do with there MVP Mcfadden getting hurt than it did with the QB situation. It completely changed the offense if Mcfadden had of played totally different outcome. You're a clown that says you have no problem fading your cowboys and then gives one of the worst capping of a game ever what's up with thatDDumbass69 no key injuries during that game just flawed logic? If Mcfadden plays and is healthy Raiders should have no problem with Tebow and the ponies. Gonna tease the Raiders down just because I really disvalue your opinion and your backing actually makes me think we might not cover.
0
Quote Originally Posted by dddevin69:
they should call this the TOILET BOWL
both teams suck. Oakland stunk it u against KC and Denver is just flat out awful. It's hard to bet on either side....yuck. I'm going with the Under 43.5. maybe both teams suckiness will cancel the other one out.
my gut instinct is to pick the underdog....but if I had to pick a side I would lean on Oakland -9. I'm assuming that Oak will get their crap together and want to redeem themselves after that Kc fiasco....LMAO. I cleaned up on the last oakland game betting BIGTIME on kc...just ask a certain oakland homer. U know who u are kid. I'm not going to call u out again on this thread. unless u want some more.
Happy betting
Hey Dumbass69,
Is your only claim to fame that one Oakland game? How about your locks Diego and the Over? Or better yet your cowgirls? Yea that's right I cleaned up on both of them funny how the bets you win are the one's you go big on and when you lose like the next three you don't bet. You're a clown I'm not saying NFL logic doesn't work I'm saying your logic is screwed the reason the Raiders looked like shit had more to do with there MVP Mcfadden getting hurt than it did with the QB situation. It completely changed the offense if Mcfadden had of played totally different outcome. You're a clown that says you have no problem fading your cowboys and then gives one of the worst capping of a game ever what's up with thatDDumbass69 no key injuries during that game just flawed logic? If Mcfadden plays and is healthy Raiders should have no problem with Tebow and the ponies. Gonna tease the Raiders down just because I really disvalue your opinion and your backing actually makes me think we might not cover.
Is your only claim to fame that one Oakland game? How about your locks Diego and the Over? Or better yet your cowgirls? Yea that's right I cleaned up on both of them funny how the bets you win are the one's you go big on and when you lose like the next three you don't bet. You're a clown I'm not saying NFL logic doesn't work I'm saying your logic is screwed the reason the Raiders looked like shit had more to do with there MVP Mcfadden getting hurt than it did with the QB situation. It completely changed the offense if Mcfadden had of played totally different outcome. You're a clown that says you have no problem fading your cowboys and then gives one of the worst capping of a game ever what's up with thatDDumbass69 no key injuries during that game just flawed logic? If Mcfadden plays and is healthy Raiders should have no problem with Tebow and the ponies. Gonna tease the Raiders down just because I really disvalue your opinion and your backing actually makes me think we might not cover.
that's cool. U know...for someone that claims to work in information tech (500K acct per your post) u seem to spend alot of time trying to fade me. I didn't even call u out speciffically, but u chose to expose yourself. I wonder if your employer knows how much freakin time u spend on gambling sites arguing back and forth with people. If I'm such a dumbass as u say...then what does that make u to banter back and forth? and in regards as to whether Mcfadden played or didn't play...that's a matter of COULDA WOULDA SHOUDLA.....
I seriously doubt that Mcfadden playing would have made alot of difference in that Kc v Oak game becuz guess what......Kyle (according to Skip Bayless of ESPN 1st take fame) shoulda been a Boller was starting with little chance that Carson Palmer would.. and to make matters worse they threw SIX ints combined. That's SIX!!!! even Barry Sanders in his prime would have a hard time helping anyone win if his qbs threw 3 ints let alone SIX. Yeah...I know...ur thinking ..."well we wouldn't have 6 ints if Mcfadden played....blah blah blah". Either way...it's a coulda woulda shoulda sitn.
Having said that...If ur truly believe in your oakland heart of hearts that Mcfadden would have made THATMUCH of a difference...then u should make a medium play for your hometeam against a bewildered Tim Tebow who is obviously having a hard time. Whether or not Tebow is the real deal is debateable, just watch ESPN 1st take for their analysis. But at the end of the day fading ur team just becuz we're both on the same side is pretty much...DUMB. Just like we're both on the same side on the KC v Miami game with us both picking KC. If we're both on a gambling site, arguing back and forth, and picking similair games which it appears that we are this week...then logically we really aren't that much different....are we?
think about it.......
0
Quote Originally Posted by 702_Capper:
Hey Dumbass69,
Is your only claim to fame that one Oakland game? How about your locks Diego and the Over? Or better yet your cowgirls? Yea that's right I cleaned up on both of them funny how the bets you win are the one's you go big on and when you lose like the next three you don't bet. You're a clown I'm not saying NFL logic doesn't work I'm saying your logic is screwed the reason the Raiders looked like shit had more to do with there MVP Mcfadden getting hurt than it did with the QB situation. It completely changed the offense if Mcfadden had of played totally different outcome. You're a clown that says you have no problem fading your cowboys and then gives one of the worst capping of a game ever what's up with thatDDumbass69 no key injuries during that game just flawed logic? If Mcfadden plays and is healthy Raiders should have no problem with Tebow and the ponies. Gonna tease the Raiders down just because I really disvalue your opinion and your backing actually makes me think we might not cover.
that's cool. U know...for someone that claims to work in information tech (500K acct per your post) u seem to spend alot of time trying to fade me. I didn't even call u out speciffically, but u chose to expose yourself. I wonder if your employer knows how much freakin time u spend on gambling sites arguing back and forth with people. If I'm such a dumbass as u say...then what does that make u to banter back and forth? and in regards as to whether Mcfadden played or didn't play...that's a matter of COULDA WOULDA SHOUDLA.....
I seriously doubt that Mcfadden playing would have made alot of difference in that Kc v Oak game becuz guess what......Kyle (according to Skip Bayless of ESPN 1st take fame) shoulda been a Boller was starting with little chance that Carson Palmer would.. and to make matters worse they threw SIX ints combined. That's SIX!!!! even Barry Sanders in his prime would have a hard time helping anyone win if his qbs threw 3 ints let alone SIX. Yeah...I know...ur thinking ..."well we wouldn't have 6 ints if Mcfadden played....blah blah blah". Either way...it's a coulda woulda shoulda sitn.
Having said that...If ur truly believe in your oakland heart of hearts that Mcfadden would have made THATMUCH of a difference...then u should make a medium play for your hometeam against a bewildered Tim Tebow who is obviously having a hard time. Whether or not Tebow is the real deal is debateable, just watch ESPN 1st take for their analysis. But at the end of the day fading ur team just becuz we're both on the same side is pretty much...DUMB. Just like we're both on the same side on the KC v Miami game with us both picking KC. If we're both on a gambling site, arguing back and forth, and picking similair games which it appears that we are this week...then logically we really aren't that much different....are we?
Raiders just signed T.J. Whozyourmama? Don't they already have enough super fast guys that can't hold onto the ball?
Carson Palmer too...... This team is turning into "Cincinnati Jr." Who's next? T.O.????????
.....and now McGahee might play this Sunday with a broken hand? I bet you Tebow touched him and healed him using his almighty divine powers..........
Here's a helpful capping hint for this game - the Raidahhs haven't beaten anyone this year by more than 10 points - and that includes the pre-season. So, take the Broncos -11, tease it with something else, and have a good day............
0
Raiders just signed T.J. Whozyourmama? Don't they already have enough super fast guys that can't hold onto the ball?
Carson Palmer too...... This team is turning into "Cincinnati Jr." Who's next? T.O.????????
.....and now McGahee might play this Sunday with a broken hand? I bet you Tebow touched him and healed him using his almighty divine powers..........
Here's a helpful capping hint for this game - the Raidahhs haven't beaten anyone this year by more than 10 points - and that includes the pre-season. So, take the Broncos -11, tease it with something else, and have a good day............
I'll be attending this game and will be watching from the suite. Ironically, I'm not betting on this game. Raiders are not in good shape and giving too many points to Tebow who could be hot or cold..god knows.. Just gonna enjoy the game and cheer for the Raiders and have a blast!
0
I'll be attending this game and will be watching from the suite. Ironically, I'm not betting on this game. Raiders are not in good shape and giving too many points to Tebow who could be hot or cold..god knows.. Just gonna enjoy the game and cheer for the Raiders and have a blast!
McFadden down, new qb and wr but they are going against Tebow, say no more. Oakland minus whatever on this one, Tebow is clueless and ineffective. Its only a matter of time before he disappears into the woodwork backing up a backup
0
McFadden down, new qb and wr but they are going against Tebow, say no more. Oakland minus whatever on this one, Tebow is clueless and ineffective. Its only a matter of time before he disappears into the woodwork backing up a backup
I love the Raiders this year- just not in this spot. Let's see- the reject from the Bungles team (Thank you, Mr Dalton) or the football god from Denver? I think Tebow actually earns a pay check this weekend. Hell even if the Broncos allow a million points, God will grant Tebow at least a "backdoor cover"!
DENVER + 9
0
I love the Raiders this year- just not in this spot. Let's see- the reject from the Bungles team (Thank you, Mr Dalton) or the football god from Denver? I think Tebow actually earns a pay check this weekend. Hell even if the Broncos allow a million points, God will grant Tebow at least a "backdoor cover"!
Without McFadden I dont see the raiders winning this game at all. Unless Carson has his shit totally together which I doubt. I also doubt he still has the longball. Broncos moneyline.
0
Without McFadden I dont see the raiders winning this game at all. Unless Carson has his shit totally together which I doubt. I also doubt he still has the longball. Broncos moneyline.
I like Denver here as well getting that many points, they might just win outright here. Raiders are banged up and this is Palmers first real start in how long ? His timing wont be there yet. Tebow can't be any worse than he already has been, granted he did win one game. If Denver doesn't fumble the ball and plays some better D then they should win.
Denver 20
Oakland 19
0
I like Denver here as well getting that many points, they might just win outright here. Raiders are banged up and this is Palmers first real start in how long ? His timing wont be there yet. Tebow can't be any worse than he already has been, granted he did win one game. If Denver doesn't fumble the ball and plays some better D then they should win.
McFadden down, new qb and wr but they are going against Tebow, say no more. Oakland minus whatever on this one, Tebow is clueless and ineffective. Its only a matter of time before he disappears into the woodwork backing up a backup
Amen to that!!!! Well the UNDER is falling like no tomorrow so I'm staying away. However, TEBOW in the BLACK HOLE??? Oakland's defense is gonna have a field day with this guy. a TD's a gift. I wonder if John Fox is gonna run that Florida QB draw plays again. To me, he's on the verge of losing this locker room if not already. .
Raiders -7
0
Quote Originally Posted by U-Z:
McFadden down, new qb and wr but they are going against Tebow, say no more. Oakland minus whatever on this one, Tebow is clueless and ineffective. Its only a matter of time before he disappears into the woodwork backing up a backup
Amen to that!!!! Well the UNDER is falling like no tomorrow so I'm staying away. However, TEBOW in the BLACK HOLE??? Oakland's defense is gonna have a field day with this guy. a TD's a gift. I wonder if John Fox is gonna run that Florida QB draw plays again. To me, he's on the verge of losing this locker room if not already. .
This one is hard to figure. Tebow is on a short chain this week. If he plays poorly in the first half, Kyle Orton takes over in the second half and will be out to prove something. Orton may be in as early as the second quarter. I tend to think Broncos cover the spread with Tebow not as quarterback.
0
This one is hard to figure. Tebow is on a short chain this week. If he plays poorly in the first half, Kyle Orton takes over in the second half and will be out to prove something. Orton may be in as early as the second quarter. I tend to think Broncos cover the spread with Tebow not as quarterback.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
I'm assuming that Oak will get their crap together and want to redeem themselves after that Kc fiasco....LMAO. I cleaned up on the last oakland game betting BIGTIME on kc...just ask a certain oakland homer. U know who u are kid. I'm not going to call u out again on this thread. unless u want some more.
DDumbass69 no key injuries during that game just flawed logic? If Mcfadden plays and is healthy Raiders should have no problem with Tebow and the ponies. Gonna tease the Raiders down just because I really disvalue your opinion and your backing actually makes me think we might not cover.
Just like we're both on the same side on the KC v Miami game with us both picking KC. If we're both on a gambling site, arguing back and forth, and picking similair games which it appears that we are this week...then logically we really aren't that much different....are we?
I love the Raiders this year- just not in this spot. Let's see- the reject from the Bungles team (Thank you, Mr Dalton) or the football god from Denver? I think Tebow actually earns a pay check this weekend. Hell even if the Broncos allow a million points, God will grant Tebow at least a "backdoor cover"!
Cant trust Tebow
Hot Forum Topics
