green bay linebackers will get to cutter and get him frustraded once he gets hit a few times he will be off his game like he has done in many games and then the picks will set in. even if rogers gets hit he seems to stay on track, i think he a little more consistent than cuttler. thinking green bay wins by at least 6 points
0
green bay linebackers will get to cutter and get him frustraded once he gets hit a few times he will be off his game like he has done in many games and then the picks will set in. even if rogers gets hit he seems to stay on track, i think he a little more consistent than cuttler. thinking green bay wins by at least 6 points
That write up is laughable. Packers are clearly the better team?
Okay then why was a must win game in Lambeau for the Pack so close? The Bears had nothing to play for then and would have won the game possibly if they had not run a vanilla offense all game.
This game comes down to one thing... Always fade Vue21849
Home Dogs win outright
Bears ML
THIS IS GREAT IT IS ONLY MONDAY AND THE VERBAL WARS HAVE ALREADY STARTEDI WILL HAVE A FULL WEEK OF ENTERTAINMENT
0
Quote Originally Posted by Joe6Pack:
That write up is laughable. Packers are clearly the better team?
Okay then why was a must win game in Lambeau for the Pack so close? The Bears had nothing to play for then and would have won the game possibly if they had not run a vanilla offense all game.
This game comes down to one thing... Always fade Vue21849
Home Dogs win outright
Bears ML
THIS IS GREAT IT IS ONLY MONDAY AND THE VERBAL WARS HAVE ALREADY STARTEDI WILL HAVE A FULL WEEK OF ENTERTAINMENT
That write up is laughable. Packers are clearly the better team?
Okay then why was a must win game in Lambeau for the Pack so close? The Bears had nothing to play for then and would have won the game possibly if they had not run a vanilla offense all game.
This game comes down to one thing... Always fade Vue21849
Home Dogs win outright
Bears ML
If you get a chance do yourself and favor and catch the nfl reply of that last matchup between the bears and pack. Im watching it now, all bears starters are still in with 5 min left in game. GB had at least 6 sacks on cutler. You can't tell me the bears weren't trying, they didn't want to see GB in the playoffs.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Joe6Pack:
That write up is laughable. Packers are clearly the better team?
Okay then why was a must win game in Lambeau for the Pack so close? The Bears had nothing to play for then and would have won the game possibly if they had not run a vanilla offense all game.
This game comes down to one thing... Always fade Vue21849
Home Dogs win outright
Bears ML
If you get a chance do yourself and favor and catch the nfl reply of that last matchup between the bears and pack. Im watching it now, all bears starters are still in with 5 min left in game. GB had at least 6 sacks on cutler. You can't tell me the bears weren't trying, they didn't want to see GB in the playoffs.
Hey JOE6, what in God's name are you talking about the way to win this game is to go against VUE... you must have had a rough weekend with the book. lol. Who caps like that??
As for the game I am leaning on the PACKERS. They are just playing unreal right now.
0
Hey JOE6, what in God's name are you talking about the way to win this game is to go against VUE... you must have had a rough weekend with the book. lol. Who caps like that??
As for the game I am leaning on the PACKERS. They are just playing unreal right now.
GB -3 (1unit) - all
the hype on the Rogers and Green Bay right now but truthfully not alot separating these two rival teams. If i can get the hook, i'll lay some on the home dog instead. SCORE: Packers 21-Bears18 UNDER 43.5
0
GB -3 (1unit) - all
the hype on the Rogers and Green Bay right now but truthfully not alot separating these two rival teams. If i can get the hook, i'll lay some on the home dog instead. SCORE: Packers 21-Bears18 UNDER 43.5
Packers are a much better team when they are playing with every ounce they have. As we've seen from their playoff performances against two teams many thought were superbowl bound. That defense is insane. And the offense can score on anyone. IMO, he Bears are the luckiest team around. Skate into the playoffs so to speak, and then draw Seattle. I'd say Pack throttles the Bears. Only one wildcard factor, the Bears play on a field worse than a farm pasture after a hurricane. What a joke. And I know they have it like that on purpose and built their team exactly for it. Too bad a few teams can overcome it...and the Packers are on eof those. So I see a slower, sloppy game here...but GB still wins by 7.
0
Packers are a much better team when they are playing with every ounce they have. As we've seen from their playoff performances against two teams many thought were superbowl bound. That defense is insane. And the offense can score on anyone. IMO, he Bears are the luckiest team around. Skate into the playoffs so to speak, and then draw Seattle. I'd say Pack throttles the Bears. Only one wildcard factor, the Bears play on a field worse than a farm pasture after a hurricane. What a joke. And I know they have it like that on purpose and built their team exactly for it. Too bad a few teams can overcome it...and the Packers are on eof those. So I see a slower, sloppy game here...but GB still wins by 7.
STFU Joe6Pack. Vue is a respected capper and does very well in the NFL & CFB. The reason I'm leaning towards Chicago this weekend because it's a divisional rivalry game and I believe it's going to be a lot closer than the betting public expect.
Take your dick out of his ass loser and let him do his own fighting. Track the guys picks and you'll see he is under 50%
0
Quote Originally Posted by CanadaCup:
STFU Joe6Pack. Vue is a respected capper and does very well in the NFL & CFB. The reason I'm leaning towards Chicago this weekend because it's a divisional rivalry game and I believe it's going to be a lot closer than the betting public expect.
Take your dick out of his ass loser and let him do his own fighting. Track the guys picks and you'll see he is under 50%
If you get a chance do yourself and favor and catch the nfl reply of that last matchup between the bears and pack. Im watching it now, all bears starters are still in with 5 min left in game. GB had at least 6 sacks on cutler. You can't tell me the bears weren't trying, they didn't want to see GB in the playoffs.
I have no need to re-watch the game to know the Bears did not run their full playbook that game. They talked about it all week before the game and then for a week after.
Lovie stated he played his starters bc he wanted them to stay in rhythm. While I disagree with this theory bc of possible injuries it explains why the starters played so late in the game.
The point is the Bears of course wanted to win the game but were never showing anything the Pack had not already seen.
While you re-watch the game check out the Bears hold the Pack, in a must win game at home, to 10 points total.
BEARS ML
0
Quote Originally Posted by dbol6683:
If you get a chance do yourself and favor and catch the nfl reply of that last matchup between the bears and pack. Im watching it now, all bears starters are still in with 5 min left in game. GB had at least 6 sacks on cutler. You can't tell me the bears weren't trying, they didn't want to see GB in the playoffs.
I have no need to re-watch the game to know the Bears did not run their full playbook that game. They talked about it all week before the game and then for a week after.
Lovie stated he played his starters bc he wanted them to stay in rhythm. While I disagree with this theory bc of possible injuries it explains why the starters played so late in the game.
The point is the Bears of course wanted to win the game but were never showing anything the Pack had not already seen.
While you re-watch the game check out the Bears hold the Pack, in a must win game at home, to 10 points total.
Striking similarity between the overhyped Falcons and Bears teams. I actually see the Falcons as the better team of the two. I still haven't been able to attach a label to this Bears team. The only constant i see w/ the bears is that Cutler will turn the ball over against even an average D (which Seattle was not). They clearly took advantage of a Seattle team that was due for a flat spot last week. Did you all not see that a roadtrip for Seattle spells disaster. The underlying factor in my backing of the Pack has been their defensive play. (See Baltimore 2000' and the Giants a few years ago). Add in a stud QB, and you've got the makings of a team that should actually give Blitzburg a good game in the Superbowl. Can we agree that Chicago is NOT battle tested thus far in the playoffs ?? Cutler had a great game, and I'm sure they're on an emotional high right now. Probably a high like the Seahawks were on coming into last week. They didn't start out slow, their defense was dominant, wow-----how could you bet against those Bears as underdogs at home ?? EASY. I don't care if the public is all over the Pack, and I really don't even care about the hook on that 3 !!
Gimmie the Pack minus the points, no matter where the line goes, and no matter how hard the public is pounding them !! Just sayin !! Have you folks not found that there are often "letdowns" after an outstanding performance. Yeah, the Pack had one as well, but they were less than a FG dog (ON THE ROAD), to say the writing wasn't on the wall would be an understatement .... And Chicago was 10 pt. faves at home, played perfect ball against a Seattle team that beat a saints team w/ no defense or running game (at home).
What part of the equasion are Bears backers missing. A HOT team, playing STELLAR defense, with an EXCEPTIONAL qb who doesn't panic..........And we all know they've played on this field before. The pack would have to be going against Pittsburg OR the Jets this week for me to even consider going the other way. Bears just aren't good enough. Please, Please, Please, Bears backers.......get that hook off that number so I can LOAD UP !!!!!!
Good luck w/ your plays......
0
Striking similarity between the overhyped Falcons and Bears teams. I actually see the Falcons as the better team of the two. I still haven't been able to attach a label to this Bears team. The only constant i see w/ the bears is that Cutler will turn the ball over against even an average D (which Seattle was not). They clearly took advantage of a Seattle team that was due for a flat spot last week. Did you all not see that a roadtrip for Seattle spells disaster. The underlying factor in my backing of the Pack has been their defensive play. (See Baltimore 2000' and the Giants a few years ago). Add in a stud QB, and you've got the makings of a team that should actually give Blitzburg a good game in the Superbowl. Can we agree that Chicago is NOT battle tested thus far in the playoffs ?? Cutler had a great game, and I'm sure they're on an emotional high right now. Probably a high like the Seahawks were on coming into last week. They didn't start out slow, their defense was dominant, wow-----how could you bet against those Bears as underdogs at home ?? EASY. I don't care if the public is all over the Pack, and I really don't even care about the hook on that 3 !!
Gimmie the Pack minus the points, no matter where the line goes, and no matter how hard the public is pounding them !! Just sayin !! Have you folks not found that there are often "letdowns" after an outstanding performance. Yeah, the Pack had one as well, but they were less than a FG dog (ON THE ROAD), to say the writing wasn't on the wall would be an understatement .... And Chicago was 10 pt. faves at home, played perfect ball against a Seattle team that beat a saints team w/ no defense or running game (at home).
What part of the equasion are Bears backers missing. A HOT team, playing STELLAR defense, with an EXCEPTIONAL qb who doesn't panic..........And we all know they've played on this field before. The pack would have to be going against Pittsburg OR the Jets this week for me to even consider going the other way. Bears just aren't good enough. Please, Please, Please, Bears backers.......get that hook off that number so I can LOAD UP !!!!!!
Lars1212 is correct about Capers there has been talk about this GB D they are very impressive in the play-offs. I really think when a line is 3 or less with a favorite that is a true fav you shouldnt take the dog and hope "they shock the world".
0
Lars1212 is correct about Capers there has been talk about this GB D they are very impressive in the play-offs. I really think when a line is 3 or less with a favorite that is a true fav you shouldnt take the dog and hope "they shock the world".
That write up is laughable. Packers are clearly the better team?
Okay then why was a must win game in Lambeau for the Pack so close? The Bears had nothing to play for then and would have won the game possibly if they had not run a vanilla offense all game.
This game comes down to one thing... Always fade Vue21849
Home Dogs win outright
Bears ML
All season long, you've got your rocks off bashing me. If you want to fade me- fine. BUT for the record : I'm currently # 1- in Irish Eyez's Playoff Pick em Pool @ 8-0, #11 in (King Kenny's) NFL 2010-11 with multiple winning weeks #"s 7,8,11,12,18,&19. Showing a profit of $17,450 on chump change bets on my SBG Global account, and currently ranked # 29 (out of 5,740 players) on the Covers playoff pool. So being a nice guy- please shut up & crawl back in your hole! Having said my piece, I wish everyone on these threads a profitable playoff season. Thank You!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Joe6Pack:
That write up is laughable. Packers are clearly the better team?
Okay then why was a must win game in Lambeau for the Pack so close? The Bears had nothing to play for then and would have won the game possibly if they had not run a vanilla offense all game.
This game comes down to one thing... Always fade Vue21849
Home Dogs win outright
Bears ML
All season long, you've got your rocks off bashing me. If you want to fade me- fine. BUT for the record : I'm currently # 1- in Irish Eyez's Playoff Pick em Pool @ 8-0, #11 in (King Kenny's) NFL 2010-11 with multiple winning weeks #"s 7,8,11,12,18,&19. Showing a profit of $17,450 on chump change bets on my SBG Global account, and currently ranked # 29 (out of 5,740 players) on the Covers playoff pool. So being a nice guy- please shut up & crawl back in your hole! Having said my piece, I wish everyone on these threads a profitable playoff season. Thank You!
please don't jump on my pick this week.... It's been profitable being on the opposite side as you.....
just kidding
GL!
Hey Bookie Breakah, so you can breathe easier, I think we're technically on the opposite side, but here's my bet -
Packers ML - HARD!!!!!!!!!!!! HARDER THAN I POUNDED MY WIFE LAST NIGHT!!!!!!!**
**O.K. - so I technically didn't pound my wife "hard" last night - soft-to-medium maybe, but still.........
Hey, I got Vue on my side, Breaka, you picked the Pack in the Superbowl (which isn't out of the question), and Cutler's still Cutler - the fact they're getting points at home should tell you that.....
Oh, and BTW, I went 2-2 last week because I had Seattle +11.5 - stupid Ravens and Patri-Nots should have won, though........
Good Luck everybody!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by BreakaBookie:
quasimodo....
please don't jump on my pick this week.... It's been profitable being on the opposite side as you.....
just kidding
GL!
Hey Bookie Breakah, so you can breathe easier, I think we're technically on the opposite side, but here's my bet -
Packers ML - HARD!!!!!!!!!!!! HARDER THAN I POUNDED MY WIFE LAST NIGHT!!!!!!!**
**O.K. - so I technically didn't pound my wife "hard" last night - soft-to-medium maybe, but still.........
Hey, I got Vue on my side, Breaka, you picked the Pack in the Superbowl (which isn't out of the question), and Cutler's still Cutler - the fact they're getting points at home should tell you that.....
Oh, and BTW, I went 2-2 last week because I had Seattle +11.5 - stupid Ravens and Patri-Nots should have won, though........
That write up is laughable. Packers are clearly the better team?
Okay then why was a must win game in Lambeau for the Pack so close? The Bears had nothing to play for then and would have won the game possibly if they had not run a vanilla offense all game.
This game comes down to one thing... Always fade Vue21849
Home Dogs win outright
Bears ML
So...................................... First of all, you're an idiot for saying fade Vue, second of all................
You were impressed by Cutler's 15 for 28 performance where he got sacked 3 times and fumbled once????? AGAINST THE SEA-TURDS???? AT HOME?!?!?!?!?!?! WHERE THEY SCORED 21 POINTS IN THE 4TH QUARTER?!?!??! Jesus - Hasselbeck had a better game than that...........
Clay & A.J. are going to feast on a Prime Cut Of Cutler this game - don't think so????????? Seattle's "D" was ranked 27th this year - Green Bay's #5 - do the math..........
I'm moneylining this game, because I'm betting it hard, but I don't think these 2 teams are in the same zone right now.......
CHEESE-HEADS MONEYLINE - HARD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LET'S REVIEW HISTORY - HAVE I EVER LOST A GAME WHEN I'VE SAID "HARD, HARDER THAN EVER"?!?!? NO - TAKE YOUR MORTGAGE OUT ON THIS ONE FOLKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Joe6Pack:
That write up is laughable. Packers are clearly the better team?
Okay then why was a must win game in Lambeau for the Pack so close? The Bears had nothing to play for then and would have won the game possibly if they had not run a vanilla offense all game.
This game comes down to one thing... Always fade Vue21849
Home Dogs win outright
Bears ML
So...................................... First of all, you're an idiot for saying fade Vue, second of all................
You were impressed by Cutler's 15 for 28 performance where he got sacked 3 times and fumbled once????? AGAINST THE SEA-TURDS???? AT HOME?!?!?!?!?!?! WHERE THEY SCORED 21 POINTS IN THE 4TH QUARTER?!?!??! Jesus - Hasselbeck had a better game than that...........
Clay & A.J. are going to feast on a Prime Cut Of Cutler this game - don't think so????????? Seattle's "D" was ranked 27th this year - Green Bay's #5 - do the math..........
I'm moneylining this game, because I'm betting it hard, but I don't think these 2 teams are in the same zone right now.......
CHEESE-HEADS MONEYLINE - HARD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LET'S REVIEW HISTORY - HAVE I EVER LOST A GAME WHEN I'VE SAID "HARD, HARDER THAN EVER"?!?!? NO - TAKE YOUR MORTGAGE OUT ON THIS ONE FOLKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
All season long, you've got your rocks off bashing me. If you want to fade me- fine. BUT for the record : I'm currently # 1- in Irish Eyez's Playoff Pick em Pool @ 8-0, #11 in (King Kenny's) NFL 2010-11 with multiple winning weeks #"s 7,8,11,12,18,&19. Showing a profit of $17,450 on chump change bets on my SBG Global account, and currently ranked # 29 (out of 5,740 players) on the Covers playoff pool. So being a nice guy- please shut up & crawl back in your hole! Having said my piece, I wish everyone on these threads a profitable playoff season. Thank You!
Vue, personally, you're better than this - don't let the haters get to you..............
0
Quote Originally Posted by vue21849:
All season long, you've got your rocks off bashing me. If you want to fade me- fine. BUT for the record : I'm currently # 1- in Irish Eyez's Playoff Pick em Pool @ 8-0, #11 in (King Kenny's) NFL 2010-11 with multiple winning weeks #"s 7,8,11,12,18,&19. Showing a profit of $17,450 on chump change bets on my SBG Global account, and currently ranked # 29 (out of 5,740 players) on the Covers playoff pool. So being a nice guy- please shut up & crawl back in your hole! Having said my piece, I wish everyone on these threads a profitable playoff season. Thank You!
Vue, personally, you're better than this - don't let the haters get to you..............
This is starting to shape up like that Jet/Patriot board last week.
The majority on the obvious. . .
Not only did Vegas hammer the public in that game, they also took the Super Bowl winner prop bet. Bet they cleared at least 100 million on that game.
Green Bay could win this game by a few scores. But only minus 3?
Recall Brady and the Pats with the ball and 8 minutes left in the game down two scores. I don't think you want to eat up the clock in that situation and that's exactily what they did. Patriot fans booed during the drive that resulted in 5 minutes off the clock and no points.
Last year it was the Vikes as the big money favorites over the Saints....
Business is business, GL
0
This is starting to shape up like that Jet/Patriot board last week.
The majority on the obvious. . .
Not only did Vegas hammer the public in that game, they also took the Super Bowl winner prop bet. Bet they cleared at least 100 million on that game.
Green Bay could win this game by a few scores. But only minus 3?
Recall Brady and the Pats with the ball and 8 minutes left in the game down two scores. I don't think you want to eat up the clock in that situation and that's exactily what they did. Patriot fans booed during the drive that resulted in 5 minutes off the clock and no points.
Last year it was the Vikes as the big money favorites over the Saints....
That write up is laughable. Packers are clearly the better team?
Okay then why was a must win game in Lambeau for the Pack so close? The Bears had nothing to play for then and would have won the game possibly if they had not run a vanilla offense all game.
This game comes down to one thing... Always fade Vue21849
Home Dogs win outright
Bears ML
Greatly respect Vue's opinion. This is just garbage talk.
I've never seen a crazed Bear from Belgium before.
This is a first.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Joe6Pack:
That write up is laughable. Packers are clearly the better team?
Okay then why was a must win game in Lambeau for the Pack so close? The Bears had nothing to play for then and would have won the game possibly if they had not run a vanilla offense all game.
This game comes down to one thing... Always fade Vue21849
Home Dogs win outright
Bears ML
Greatly respect Vue's opinion. This is just garbage talk.
I've never seen a crazed Bear from Belgium before.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
I WILL HAVE A FULL WEEK OF ENTERTAINMENT
??
and does very well in the NFL & CFB. The reason I'm leaning towards Chicago this weekend because it's a divisional rivalry game and I believe it's going to be a lot closer than the betting public expect. 
Hot Forum Topics
