Yes my little wee lad. I sure am. I am holding the Seahawks personally responsible for my cash. The Packers have just enough injuries to make this game a close one. The edge goes to the home team with the better quarterback, the rain and the crowd.
How do you know it's gonna rain on Sunday?
Dude, it always rains in Seattle, didn't you... Hey, look out!
You alright man?
Help, help! My microphone is fried!
0
NO don't tell me that you're gonna do it again...
Yes my little wee lad. I sure am. I am holding the Seahawks personally responsible for my cash. The Packers have just enough injuries to make this game a close one. The edge goes to the home team with the better quarterback, the rain and the crowd.
How do you know it's gonna rain on Sunday?
Dude, it always rains in Seattle, didn't you... Hey, look out!
The idea of a lame duck coach seems to be turning out pretty bad for thr Gulls. Rodgers has to get this team back on track and start winning games. Pressure also on McCARTHY because of that Favre decision. Packers catching the Hawks coming off a sound beating.
0
Green Bay - 24 Seattle - 20
Packers +2.5 under 46
The idea of a lame duck coach seems to be turning out pretty bad for thr Gulls. Rodgers has to get this team back on track and start winning games. Pressure also on McCARTHY because of that Favre decision. Packers catching the Hawks coming off a sound beating.
Mr . Mannix, I can't be that predictable. Besides, you and I know that by gametime, the Packers will be favored anyway. I will always take the homedog that plays on a different surface than the away team. Seattle is too good of a team to go to 1-4. They have a great quarterback, and the receivers needed more than a week or two to get up to speed. I think they get it clicking in this game. i also like the over on this one too. Seattle is desperate and I expect an all out effort in front of the 12th man
0
Mr . Mannix, I can't be that predictable. Besides, you and I know that by gametime, the Packers will be favored anyway. I will always take the homedog that plays on a different surface than the away team. Seattle is too good of a team to go to 1-4. They have a great quarterback, and the receivers needed more than a week or two to get up to speed. I think they get it clicking in this game. i also like the over on this one too. Seattle is desperate and I expect an all out effort in front of the 12th man
Mr . Mannix, I can't be that predictable. Besides, you and I know that by gametime, the Packers will be favored anyway. I will always take the homedog that plays on a different surface than the away team. Seattle is too good of a team to go to 1-4. They have a great quarterback, and the receivers needed more than a week or two to get up to speed. I think they get it clicking in this game. i also like the over on this one too. Seattle is desperate and I expect an all out effort in front of the 12th man
Word 'em up Watch - I think the Packers injuries, especially on defense is the biggest factor - that and that they have ZERO depth. Their guys who have had to step in for the hurt have not gotten the job done and I don't expect them to. In fact, I think its going to be a long season in Cheeseland because of their lack of depth.
Seattle will run left, run left, run left, then...when they are in need of some good yardage, they'll run left behind Walter Jones and Wahle - No Clifton, KGB is a mess, and once again, the depth on the left side of their line is a joke - they will give up 30+ points. They might score 25+ but the Pack is going to lose in a shootout. The over is an easy play IMO.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Watch:
Mr . Mannix, I can't be that predictable. Besides, you and I know that by gametime, the Packers will be favored anyway. I will always take the homedog that plays on a different surface than the away team. Seattle is too good of a team to go to 1-4. They have a great quarterback, and the receivers needed more than a week or two to get up to speed. I think they get it clicking in this game. i also like the over on this one too. Seattle is desperate and I expect an all out effort in front of the 12th man
Word 'em up Watch - I think the Packers injuries, especially on defense is the biggest factor - that and that they have ZERO depth. Their guys who have had to step in for the hurt have not gotten the job done and I don't expect them to. In fact, I think its going to be a long season in Cheeseland because of their lack of depth.
Seattle will run left, run left, run left, then...when they are in need of some good yardage, they'll run left behind Walter Jones and Wahle - No Clifton, KGB is a mess, and once again, the depth on the left side of their line is a joke - they will give up 30+ points. They might score 25+ but the Pack is going to lose in a shootout. The over is an easy play IMO.
With Hasselback out, i am going to take the Seahawks anyway. Hell he cost me money last week anyway. Frye it is. I am staying with my pick of Seattle. I hope he never comes back. Let's go Seahawks!
0
With Hasselback out, i am going to take the Seahawks anyway. Hell he cost me money last week anyway. Frye it is. I am staying with my pick of Seattle. I hope he never comes back. Let's go Seahawks!
Was wondering what the line movement was for- Hasselbeck a no go.
Frye will want to make the most of the oppurtunity although he hasn't played in a while. But I think the coaching staff will probably just have him manage the game while trying to run the ball against the weakened GB defense. The under and SEA are my probable plays. GL
0
Was wondering what the line movement was for- Hasselbeck a no go.
Frye will want to make the most of the oppurtunity although he hasn't played in a while. But I think the coaching staff will probably just have him manage the game while trying to run the ball against the weakened GB defense. The under and SEA are my probable plays. GL
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.