Green Bay - 33 Jacksonville - 13
Packers -16 
Jax coming off su loss and getting more than 7 on the road indicates to me that they will mail this one in. Pack goes vanilla and wins this one by 20.
Green Bay - 
I would like to thank Vue for being a contrarian and providing us with a different viewpoint. I enjoy hearing opposing arguments in all the blogs on covers because regardless of who we are, we are always going to make mistakes. Its impossible to be right all the time.
Although, I am not really sure why Vue posts his or her picks without any real logical explanation behind them. I think everyone would benefit if Vue provided us with some tangible reasons as to the rationale for liking a certain side or total. From a handicapping perspective, I have a problem with your explanation of:
"I like the Jags, because everyone here says they have no chance."
That provides us with no intell or angles, nor does it suggest that we are overlooking some reason as to why the Jags wil cover. Are you just looking into some database? Whats your thought process here Vue?
Thank you so much for calling this toolbag out on his weak posts. He is by far one of the most annoying guys on this thread. Big Thank You also to MGMProfits for calling out this clone of all clones. Always be weary of a guy whose profile name ends in more than 4 random numbers and uses some hot chick as his profile pic. You can get better reasoning from a Magic 8-Ball.
Jags suck. And now without MJD or Gabbert, they will suck even more. Green Bay is a good team looking to keep ahead of Chicago for division race. This can easily be a boring one-sided affair ending 27-10.
Green Bay should easily cover.
Thank you so much for calling this toolbag out on his weak posts. He is by far one of the most annoying guys on this thread. Big Thank You also to MGMProfits for calling out this clone of all clones. Always be weary of a guy whose profile name ends in more than 4 random numbers and uses some hot chick as his profile pic. You can get better reasoning from a Magic 8-Ball.
Jags suck. And now without MJD or Gabbert, they will suck even more. Green Bay is a good team looking to keep ahead of Chicago for division race. This can easily be a boring one-sided affair ending 27-10.
Green Bay should easily cover.
Didn't they beat Houston by 18 at Houston when the Texans were undefeated? Unless they decide to keep Jville in the game to keep things interesting, you would have to think they should beat this team handily at Lambeau. But then again maybe the Pack is beginning to show chinks in the armor.....lol...Will McCarthy tinker with the line today?
Didn't they beat Houston by 18 at Houston when the Texans were undefeated? Unless they decide to keep Jville in the game to keep things interesting, you would have to think they should beat this team handily at Lambeau. But then again maybe the Pack is beginning to show chinks in the armor.....lol...Will McCarthy tinker with the line today?
Thank you so much for calling this toolbag out on his weak posts. He is by far one of the most annoying guys on this thread. Big Thank You also to MGMProfits for calling out this clone of all clones. Always be weary of a guy whose profile name ends in more than 4 random numbers and uses some hot chick as his profile pic. You can get better reasoning from a Magic 8-Ball.
Jags suck. And now without MJD or Gabbert, they will suck even more. Green Bay is a good team looking to keep ahead of Chicago for division race. This can easily be a boring one-sided affair ending 27-10.
Green Bay should easily cover.
agree weak posts ! thank yu for yur informative posts. go packerz !
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
