All Forums | Pro Football

Minnesota at Green Bay (11/24/2013)

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 5191
Posts: 41
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2002
Posts: 61
Posted: #1

Away:  Minnesota [4-6 ATS]
Home:  Green Bay [5-5 ATS]

Game Time: 1:00 PM
Stadium: Lambeau Field

Recent Meetings:
10/27/13 - GB 44 vs. MIN 31

Team Leaders:

Minnesota:
Passing: Christian Ponder (1375)
Rushing: Adrian Peterson (851)
Receiving: Jerome Simpson (492)

Green Bay:
Passing: Aaron Rodgers (2218)
Rushing: Eddie Lacy (696)
Receiving: Jordy Nelson (889)

More:
Live Odds
In-Depth Matchup Information
Consensus Betting Information

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 883
Posted: #2
Expect Matt Flynn to make his debut. Also expect a Packers victory under Flynn. Once he's done here, some teams will reconsider him again.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 1827
Posted: #3

Pack -4.5 is a little shaky, but I just can't back the Vikings. I just can't bring myself to do it. I don't even think I could tease them in this game......

"Daaaaaable Check" or not - Pack minus whatever

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2013
Posts: 113
Posted: #4
GB covers
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 6659
Posted: #5
Quote Originally Posted by TheQuadYeah:

Pack -4.5 is a little shaky, but I just can't back the Vikings. I just can't bring myself to do it. I don't even think I could tease them in this game......

"Daaaaaable Check" or not - Pack minus whatever


Hmmmm....that is what I am wondering Quad. Is Minnesota even safe to tease here at +14? I remember last time I went against Flynn in GB when the Lions were in town. I got screwed pretty badly. He threw for like almost 600 yards, doing better than even Aaron Rodgers would have. Green Bay was dogs in that game though.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 376
Posted: #6
GB win and cover in this game 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 6659
Posted: #7
How can you guys confirm if Matt Flynn is playing or not? Covers mentions that "other guy"
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 6659
Posted: #8
Here is what I found on google-

""Yesterday, according to a report by Tom Silverstein at the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, McCarthy indicated that Scott Tolzien would start against the Minnesota Vikings on November 24th.""

Why in the Heck would they start Tolzien and  not Flynn? They said for "An element of surprise" so they can insert Flynn at the last moment. I think that's stupid. The Vikings could easily find the same info I just did. So what the heck is going on here? I don't understand why GB is only +2.5 on the BIG teaser cards here in vegas and Minnesota is +17.5. It all points to a GB win here, (They need to win to stay in the race) and I have to admit I have a gut feeling all along that Minnesota will be blown out here. I mean, Green Bay should win this by AT LEAST 7 pts but I need confirmation before I touch this one.

Will flynn be starting, and if not, what are the Vikings chances here of pulling the upset? Green Bay has NOT looked good since Rodgers absence.

Thanks guys for any info you can provide here
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 6659
Posted: #9
As much as I want to bet Green Bay here, I am going to have to say for now....THIS IS A FREAKIN NO PLAY!!

Green Bay has just been terrible. According to covers they havent lost 3 straight at home since 06 which was 7 years ago but I still don't think that's enough to pull the trigger here.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 775
Posted: #10
Cold and windy for this game, look for Peterson to fumble a couple times, Ponder too.....BIG GB play here!!!
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 775
Posted: #11
Tolzien is better than Flynn...its a no-brainer!!!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 6659
Posted: #12
Tolzien is so good then why did I read that he threw THREE Picks and  ZERO interceptions in his game at NY? 

And Flynn threw for almost 500 yards (better than A Rodgers) in his last GB game.

What is your logic? I haven't ever seen Tolzien play but I just read the stats. He doesn't sound good at all to me, getting blown out by a crap team like the Giants
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 710
Posted: #13
that's what nfl wants ...they gets.ill take the gb
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 5051
Posted: #14

GREEN BAY - 4

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 5051
Posted: #15

OVER 43.5    (Prime Play!)

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 6659
Posted: #16
NO PLAY, even though it seems like GB here I'd rather stay away. Forget this game everyone there's better plays out there this week.

Green Bay hasn't proved they can win without rodgers, and minnesota hasnt proved they can win on the road either.


 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 6659
Posted: #17
Vue, how the heck do you have only 2812 posts since 2008? I see you posting in these threads all the time! 

One time I posted over 700 messages in one day (No joke) and then they banned me from the message board. Ever since then I try to go easy and I still get people who complain about me.

Yeah I know I need to get a life. 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 6659
Posted: #18
The Quad is equally as shocking with only a lousy 1499 posts in over 3 years, and I see that mofo in these things like a virus.

LOL
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 6659
Posted: #19
Vue's post count = 2812 

2+8+1+2= 13

13 is the number of the illuminati

Quad= 1499

9+9=18

18= 6+6+6

What are you guys doin? 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 1827
Posted: #20
Quote Originally Posted by mgmprofits:

The Quad is equally as shocking with only a lousy 1499 posts in over 3 years, and I see that mofo in these things like a virus.

LOL

Ever heard of "Quality" over "Quantity"??

Just like this post you're reading right now = "Quality"

But I'd say, (and I'm rounding down - giving you the benefit of the doubt) 575 of your 600 posts are completely unnecessary. Just pure nonsense.....

To relate this to something you might know about (because, judging by your "all hours of the night" posts, and ranting and raving about nothing) - Cocaine, I would be the pure, unstepped on, 100% Coca - not even the synthetic stuff....

You, on the other hand, would be the baby laxative that the common street dealer puts in at the last minute to get an extra $10 out of some junkie - just pure filler with no "medicinal" benefits....

See, just like that, "Quality" over "Quantity"

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 6659
Posted: #21
Quote Originally Posted by TheQuadYeah:

Ever heard of "Quality" over "Quantity"??

Just like this post you're reading right now = "Quality"

But I'd say, (and I'm rounding down - giving you the benefit of the doubt) 575 of your 600 posts are completely unnecessary. Just pure nonsense.....

To relate this to something you might know about (because, judging by your "all hours of the night" posts, and ranting and raving about nothing) - Cocaine, I would be the pure, unstepped on, 100% Coca - not even the synthetic stuff....

You, on the other hand, would be the baby laxative that the common street dealer puts in at the last minute to get an extra $10 out of some junkie - just pure filler with no "medicinal" benefits....

See, just like that, "Quality" over "Quantity"


LMFAO!! That's the funniest s.hit I've read in a while! Thanks for this quality post. 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 6659
Posted: #22
And 99% of my posts are quality as well....they just go over most people's heads.  Sadly I guess, including yours.

Try to re-read all of my posts....Slowly....And Meditate on each one of them. And may God lead you to the truth.

Amen

lol
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 6659
Posted: #23
And remember it was me who defended your "Cuntler" write up. 

Everyone else was bashing you. I saw the value in the Bears ML, as I heard the "voice" tell me DA BEARS before I even read your post. 

You were like "You heard it here first" but really you were the 2nd place I heard it. So I put 2 and 2 together (or rather 1 and 1) and Boy...you wouldn't believe the underdog parlay I had.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2001
Posts: 1713
Posted: #24

This Week's Over / Under Math Plays:

Saints @ Falcons UNDER 52.5

Steelers @ Browns OVER 41.5

Buccaneers @ Lions OVER 48.5

Vikings @ Packers OVER 44

Jaguars @ Texans OVER 43.5

Chargers @ Chiefs UNDER 41

Bears @ Rams OVER 45

Colts @ Cardinals UNDER 45

Broncos @ Patriots OVER 55

Niners @ Redskins OVER 47

 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 577
Posted: #25
Green Bay -4.5
All Forums | Pro Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.