I think the Bears secondary could possibly get torched in this one. However, with the chillier weather expected, I don't see the New Orleans "DOME" Saints being as much of threat with the deep ball. The Bears lead the league in takeaways and I see the Bears winning this one and staying in the hunt for the division and wild card at worst. I think the Bears chances of winning out are much better than the Saints!
the bears should win a close one here, so not really feeling a play. the "dome" saints are 4-2 ats on grass this year, and 12-7 the last 3 years. something to keep in mind.
0
Quote Originally Posted by kmaster:
I think the Bears secondary could possibly get torched in this one. However, with the chillier weather expected, I don't see the New Orleans "DOME" Saints being as much of threat with the deep ball. The Bears lead the league in takeaways and I see the Bears winning this one and staying in the hunt for the division and wild card at worst. I think the Bears chances of winning out are much better than the Saints!
the bears should win a close one here, so not really feeling a play. the "dome" saints are 4-2 ats on grass this year, and 12-7 the last 3 years. something to keep in mind.
hmm - bears have played the over only 5 of 13 times this year, but 4 of their overs have been at home. factor in the prime-time trend and 2 not so great defenses, and im kinda liking the over now.
bears give up 21ppg - saints 25ppg.
bears are awful vs the pass, giving up 234 ypg, and stout vs the run at 91ypg - saints may be in pass mode all night - as long as the wind isnt a huge factor, i like the over here more i think about it.
~over 44.5~
0
hmm - bears have played the over only 5 of 13 times this year, but 4 of their overs have been at home. factor in the prime-time trend and 2 not so great defenses, and im kinda liking the over now.
bears give up 21ppg - saints 25ppg.
bears are awful vs the pass, giving up 234 ypg, and stout vs the run at 91ypg - saints may be in pass mode all night - as long as the wind isnt a huge factor, i like the over here more i think about it.
Over is my play , get it before it goes to 46'. 30 Degrees and little to no wind is football weather, dome team or not. The players had to have played outside once or twice in they're life, no?
0
Over is my play , get it before it goes to 46'. 30 Degrees and little to no wind is football weather, dome team or not. The players had to have played outside once or twice in they're life, no?
The Bears have covered their last four in December, and ten of their
last 12 in week 15. They are 0-4 ATS following a straight up win, and
1-6-1 ATS after allowing fewer than 15 points in the previous game.
New Orleans
has gone over in their last seven December games, in 10 of their last
12 games following a straight up win, and the over is 10-2-1 following
an ATS win.
This game is kinda hard to cap the side on. I think the weather could help the Bears cover but I dont understand why alot of people hear 20 degrees and think its automatically going to be 7-3? Remember the Giants and Pac in the NFC Champ game last year ? 24-21 I think ? 10 below zero. Just some info if you guys didnt see it . I hope it helps. BOL to all
0
The Bears have covered their last four in December, and ten of their
last 12 in week 15. They are 0-4 ATS following a straight up win, and
1-6-1 ATS after allowing fewer than 15 points in the previous game.
New Orleans
has gone over in their last seven December games, in 10 of their last
12 games following a straight up win, and the over is 10-2-1 following
an ATS win.
This game is kinda hard to cap the side on. I think the weather could help the Bears cover but I dont understand why alot of people hear 20 degrees and think its automatically going to be 7-3? Remember the Giants and Pac in the NFC Champ game last year ? 24-21 I think ? 10 below zero. Just some info if you guys didnt see it . I hope it helps. BOL to all
bvent - being a prime time game, this total will likely go up tomorrow. neither defense is very good, and if the weather is just *cold* - not going to affect the offenses. i bet this total floats to 46 by kickoff. anyone who likes the under, can likely wait for a better total.
0
bvent - being a prime time game, this total will likely go up tomorrow. neither defense is very good, and if the weather is just *cold* - not going to affect the offenses. i bet this total floats to 46 by kickoff. anyone who likes the under, can likely wait for a better total.
NO is 1-5 on the road, with the lone win coming against KC . Not enough balance to beat that bears D. Saints finding themselves in a bad spot with this spread, they're 0-3 away when dogged 0-3 pts . Chi will get after Bree's n he'll have a bad game. Matt Forte over 120 yds.
Bears -3 27-17 Easy
0
Lots of post! Probably already been said:
NO is 1-5 on the road, with the lone win coming against KC . Not enough balance to beat that bears D. Saints finding themselves in a bad spot with this spread, they're 0-3 away when dogged 0-3 pts . Chi will get after Bree's n he'll have a bad game. Matt Forte over 120 yds.
Bears win this one. Last time Brees was playin in the cold was at purdue, and he didn't like it. Weather cold and should be windy. Mixed temp. range throughout the day. Bears + D vs. NO rush is np. Bears + Sp.T vs. NO again np. Bears Forte is the real deal, I am not saying bush is not a prime timer, but I believe in the "FORT" more. Bears will tackle, NO will not. There will be points from desperation and to's add another + for the Bears.
The Bears for me -3. o/u to me is a coinflip
0
Bears win this one. Last time Brees was playin in the cold was at purdue, and he didn't like it. Weather cold and should be windy. Mixed temp. range throughout the day. Bears + D vs. NO rush is np. Bears + Sp.T vs. NO again np. Bears Forte is the real deal, I am not saying bush is not a prime timer, but I believe in the "FORT" more. Bears will tackle, NO will not. There will be points from desperation and to's add another + for the Bears.
first this is a thursday game...so let's throw out everything we know
about capping. road vs home record, weather,bears this...bears
that...etc. if bears are lock why only 3 points? sounds like everyone
and their grandmother will be taking the bears, except for insiders who
know the saints play the NFC North really tough..no REALLY TOUGH lets look at a common
opponent like the packers;
bears 3 packers 37 saints 51 packers 29
defence wins championships. this is not a championship game so saints are going to run up the scoreboard!
SAINTS 41 BEARS 19
gl
0
first this is a thursday game...so let's throw out everything we know
about capping. road vs home record, weather,bears this...bears
that...etc. if bears are lock why only 3 points? sounds like everyone
and their grandmother will be taking the bears, except for insiders who
know the saints play the NFC North really tough..no REALLY TOUGH lets look at a common
opponent like the packers;
bears 3 packers 37 saints 51 packers 29
defence wins championships. this is not a championship game so saints are going to run up the scoreboard!
Thursdays game have gone OVER in all of the games except for the Dallas vs Seattle game and maybe the Oakland vs SD game if you o/u line was 40.5(PUSH if it was at 41)
0
Thursdays game have gone OVER in all of the games except for the Dallas vs Seattle game and maybe the Oakland vs SD game if you o/u line was 40.5(PUSH if it was at 41)
As easy as this one looks and sounds with Bears having a better home record, saints road record not so hot, Bears defense and the weather all pointing in the direction of Bears + 3 and under 45. I took another look at their #s and this is what I saw. Although Saints away record is 1-5, they did not lose by much. For example: Denver 34 NO 32, TB 23 NO 20, with both games on grass, with pretty good run offense.
What this says to me is that, yes its cold, but not wet. Saints will come with their #1 ranked total yard offense and #1 ranked passing game againt's Bears #28th ranked pass defense, backed by good running roster, and just as good run defense. The mentality of " There is no fucken way that we are going without a good fight to keep are season going" might just be the key to winning this game. Remember the weather effects both teams. Saints is the better team at this time no matter where and when these two play. I like the Saints -3, leaning towards the Over because of the possibilities for interception being ran back for touchdowns. All quarterbacks throws INTs. Its just when.
PS: Please correct me if I am wrong about the games they played @TB and DEN being on grass.
0
As easy as this one looks and sounds with Bears having a better home record, saints road record not so hot, Bears defense and the weather all pointing in the direction of Bears + 3 and under 45. I took another look at their #s and this is what I saw. Although Saints away record is 1-5, they did not lose by much. For example: Denver 34 NO 32, TB 23 NO 20, with both games on grass, with pretty good run offense.
What this says to me is that, yes its cold, but not wet. Saints will come with their #1 ranked total yard offense and #1 ranked passing game againt's Bears #28th ranked pass defense, backed by good running roster, and just as good run defense. The mentality of " There is no fucken way that we are going without a good fight to keep are season going" might just be the key to winning this game. Remember the weather effects both teams. Saints is the better team at this time no matter where and when these two play. I like the Saints -3, leaning towards the Over because of the possibilities for interception being ran back for touchdowns. All quarterbacks throws INTs. Its just when.
PS: Please correct me if I am wrong about the games they played @TB and DEN being on grass.
pick of the week here fellows will slap350 on saint -3 and parlay it for 150 with the under. would like some insight as something else to two team parlay it up with i like it that muchi think the line will b going up up up in this one you never know with the totals but amthinking bears suck and cant do squat on offensei see it 27 to13( laening toward washington - wat cha all think tag yalls it6.5
ok final aswere after much toght and reasearch .first let me recant this as pick of week . like a couple of others beter. but the one is san diego -5 so as far as this one stil like the saints. seeing how im uo for the week 560 will start off here with250 saints -3 and a 100 parlaywith the over. feels gd i like saints one so much am adding another 2 teamer seams like money to me 150 parlay on san diego-k with saints plus three. now lets cash in
0
Quote Originally Posted by jmmychampion:
pick of the week here fellows will slap350 on saint -3 and parlay it for 150 with the under. would like some insight as something else to two team parlay it up with i like it that muchi think the line will b going up up up in this one you never know with the totals but amthinking bears suck and cant do squat on offensei see it 27 to13( laening toward washington - wat cha all think tag yalls it6.5
ok final aswere after much toght and reasearch .first let me recant this as pick of week . like a couple of others beter. but the one is san diego -5 so as far as this one stil like the saints. seeing how im uo for the week 560 will start off here with250 saints -3 and a 100 parlaywith the over. feels gd i like saints one so much am adding another 2 teamer seams like money to me 150 parlay on san diego-k with saints plus three. now lets cash in
Saints LT Jamaal Brown (ankle) has been ruled out for Thursday night's game against the Bears.
Zach Strief, who went to Northwestern and is used to the elements near
Soldier Field, will start for Brown. Brown hadn't been playing
particularly well, so it isn't a major concern for Drew Brees, Pierre
Thomas, or Reggie Bush. Dec. 10 - 3:27 pm et
0
Saints LT Jamaal Brown (ankle) has been ruled out for Thursday night's game against the Bears.
Zach Strief, who went to Northwestern and is used to the elements near
Soldier Field, will start for Brown. Brown hadn't been playing
particularly well, so it isn't a major concern for Drew Brees, Pierre
Thomas, or Reggie Bush. Dec. 10 - 3:27 pm et
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.