McFadden is doubtful. By far leading rusher and a big receiving threat for the Oak offense. Does not bode well for Raiders. And SD 7-1 ATS last 8 in Oakland. Chargers all day.
0
McFadden is doubtful. By far leading rusher and a big receiving threat for the Oak offense. Does not bode well for Raiders. And SD 7-1 ATS last 8 in Oakland. Chargers all day.
McFadden is doubtful. By far leading rusher and a big receiving threat for the Oak offense. Does not bode well for Raiders. And SD 7-1 ATS last 8 in Oakland. Chargers all day.
they won't miss a beat with bush. He was supposed to be the starter this year if he hadn't gotten hurt and mcfadden stepped in. I'm probably going with oakland here as they are a much better team than their 1-3 record gives them credit for and their pass defense will stunt the chargers strength in the passing game. the chargers will put up some good yards on the ground, sure, but honestly, the raiders are the best passing offense that the chargers have faced, (chiefs, jags, seahawks, cards) and with gradkowski making up for the bad numbers that campbell put up in the first two games, i expect their rank in the pass game to improve as gradkowski does more work under center. To complement the best arial challenge that SD has faced, the raiders are 6th in the league in rushing yards and only a few yards behind the chiefs in that category.
Also, the chargers special teams have been hideous, costing them games in week 1 and 3 where a total of 3 kicks were run back on them in those two road games.
anyways, that's what i got for now.
OAK +6
0
Quote Originally Posted by echelon1:
McFadden is doubtful. By far leading rusher and a big receiving threat for the Oak offense. Does not bode well for Raiders. And SD 7-1 ATS last 8 in Oakland. Chargers all day.
they won't miss a beat with bush. He was supposed to be the starter this year if he hadn't gotten hurt and mcfadden stepped in. I'm probably going with oakland here as they are a much better team than their 1-3 record gives them credit for and their pass defense will stunt the chargers strength in the passing game. the chargers will put up some good yards on the ground, sure, but honestly, the raiders are the best passing offense that the chargers have faced, (chiefs, jags, seahawks, cards) and with gradkowski making up for the bad numbers that campbell put up in the first two games, i expect their rank in the pass game to improve as gradkowski does more work under center. To complement the best arial challenge that SD has faced, the raiders are 6th in the league in rushing yards and only a few yards behind the chiefs in that category.
Also, the chargers special teams have been hideous, costing them games in week 1 and 3 where a total of 3 kicks were run back on them in those two road games.
Hey I usually try to steer clear of teasers and bet against the public but it hasn't been working at all lately. I was thinking about a 3T 10PT on the later games, what u think: ARZ +17, OAK +16.5, and PHI +13.5 or maybe just better off taking all 3 faves on a straight?? @ -120
Hey I usually try to steer clear of teasers and bet against the public but it hasn't been working at all lately. I was thinking about a 3T 10PT on the later games, what u think: ARZ +17, OAK +16.5, and PHI +13.5 or maybe just better off taking all 3 faves on a straight?? @ -120
Hey I usually try to steer clear of teasers and bet against the public but it hasn't been working at all lately. I was thinking about a 3T 10PT on the later games, what u think: ARZ +17, OAK +16.5, and PHI +13.5 or maybe just better off taking all 3 faves on a straight?? @ -120
E
STEVEN, IF I WAS TOTAKE A 3 TEAMER I WOULD PUT THE RAVENS N COLTS IN THERE FOR SURE.... I`LL LEAVE THE NEXT ONE UP TO YOU.
GL
0
Quote Originally Posted by StevenGA1011:
Hey I usually try to steer clear of teasers and bet against the public but it hasn't been working at all lately. I was thinking about a 3T 10PT on the later games, what u think: ARZ +17, OAK +16.5, and PHI +13.5 or maybe just better off taking all 3 faves on a straight?? @ -120
E
STEVEN, IF I WAS TOTAKE A 3 TEAMER I WOULD PUT THE RAVENS N COLTS IN THERE FOR SURE.... I`LL LEAVE THE NEXT ONE UP TO YOU.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
