All Forums | Pro Football

Seattle at Denver (02/02/2014)

...

Participants:

Search

Posts: 409

fotosfromphilly

Prospect

Joined: Dec, 2010

Posts: 106

Posted: Feb. 2, 2014 - 12:19 PM ET #326

Public plays may be smaller than pros indeed, but during the Superbowl, the cumulative amount wagered by public is much greater...

0

easypics

Veteran

Joined: Jun, 2008

Posts: 2635

Posted: Feb. 2, 2014 - 12:23 PM ET #327

Are You Experienced ?

Have you ever been experienced ?

Underestimating Super Bowl experience , Road Pressure experience,

Media experience, Coach Experience ?

Who's Defense is flying under Radar ?

One that was tops last year,

One's who strength is stopping run more than pass.

Seattle's game plan ?

Beastin' it as long as possible . Reducing Kid Wilson

Big game, road inexperience faux pas via comeback mode =

INTS

Seattle's Speed n' Hyped up D can shut down Broncs down to 6 Halftime Pts.

Unfortunately for Seattle ,haltime show lasts 30 Min.

None better way Icing inexperienced team with momentum lead.

Who's THE best @ no Huddle , Audibles ?

Watch the best at work around Legion of Boom ?

Where was Road Boom on the road this year vs similar yet less formidable QB ?

Does anyone realize Saints averaged 18 pts on the road ?

Frisco's offense was well off TY ?

Zona ?

Carson Palmer ?

Seahawks 0 - 2 on the road TY vs Playoff teams...

One should check n' see when the last time Seattle beat an AFC ( out of division foe ) on the road ...

Bills don't count.

Seattle D got carved up on the road last year by Matty Ice's Falcoons Playoff Team . A team having a substantially less potent D than Denver . Broncs that fell victim to a Flacco Hail Mary .A Ravens team with defensive Boom of it's own that Manning outplayed . A ravens team who won it all .

Was that close for Denver.

Broncos soft white underbelly ?

Same as last year : Their secondary.

However , keep in mind Coach Fox ability and success engineering one sided Running Tebow QB attack .

Wilson's more talented but Seattle's offense is just as one dimensional.

For Seattle to win , they must ambush Fox's D via balanced Run and pass attack ,exploiting Broncs weak secondary.

Unfortunately for Seattle , that should result in a costly Wilson INT ,who has a long way to go understanding

BIG GAME pressure.

Something P. Manning understands, Lives and Breaths

in his sleep .

0

fotosfromphilly

Prospect

Joined: Dec, 2010

Posts: 106

Posted: Feb. 2, 2014 - 12:27 PM ET #328

As for Denver beating San Diego. This was San Diego's second straight playoff game on the road...and before that, they had a tough game against Kansas City (field goal game). Denver has been home...

Denver's defense is not as good as Seattle's offense...

0

easypics

Veteran

Joined: Jun, 2008

Posts: 2635

Posted: Feb. 2, 2014 - 12:34 PM ET #329

BRONCOS 20 SEATTLE 16

Seattle 10 - Denver 6

Halftime

GLUCK n' THANKS TO ALL , Especially those posting Intelligible,objective insight .

Difference between Winner$ n' Losers ,

Homers n' handjobs and baseless pics .

Insight that one may have overlooked.

0

easypics

Veteran

Joined: Jun, 2008

Posts: 2635

Posted: Feb. 2, 2014 - 12:37 PM ET #330

Quote Originally Posted by holtnt:

Some of you Covers members who have posted multiple write-ups touting Denver are extreme “Homers” or have a vested interest in a sportsbook somewhere; either way Seattle it is Ladies and Gentlemen! Put me down for Seattle ML (+113) for a Dime please. Thanks!

Hummmm ...Were'nt you a BIG time Frisco Homer in last year's SuperBowl ?

0

fotosfromphilly

Prospect

Joined: Dec, 2010

Posts: 106

Posted: Feb. 2, 2014 - 12:40 PM ET #331

Seattle's offense will not be one dimensional with Percy Harmin playing... What is so great about the Denver defense without Vaugh Miller?

0

mellowman7883

Rookie

Joined: Jun, 2010

Posts: 746

Posted: Feb. 2, 2014 - 12:41 PM ET #332

IT wouldnt surprise me at all to see Denver win by one point.

0

easypics

Veteran

Joined: Jun, 2008

Posts: 2635

Posted: Feb. 2, 2014 - 12:50 PM ET #333

Quote Originally Posted by holtnt:

Some of you Covers members who have posted multiple write-ups touting Denver are extreme “Homers” or have a vested interest in a sportsbook somewhere; either way Seattle it is Ladies and Gentlemen! Put me down for Seattle ML (+113) for a Dime please. Thanks!

Still reaching for carrot at stick's end ?

Suspicions gone astray once more Holtnt ?

Do however suspect you being suspiciously ignorant n' delusional.

How about picking winner$ over baseless theories?

GLuck

0

forkball

Rookie

Joined: Dec, 2009

Posts: 566

Posted: Feb. 2, 2014 - 12:55 PM ET #334

Not a Seattle homer sicsemper, but look at uncommon opponents in this tilt. Seattle had to play defending NFC champ SF 3 times this year, and could have won all three hadn't it been for a late breakaway run by Gore in SF. Then they dismantled the Saints as well as defeating the Panthers for a second consecutive year in their own back yard. Throw in the Cardinals this year who bolstered a top 5 defense minus a self induced fumble by Corbin setting up the game winner, and one could argue that Seattle should've swept em.

The Rams were no slouches either, just ask Indy... There's nine tough games right there and a 7-2 record against. If one analyzes Seattle's losses this year, one would see that they were literally seconds away from going 16-0. Throw in 2-0 in the playoffs and for laughs 4-0 in the preseason including a beat down of the Broncos 40-10 and it looks like 22-0 from one perspective eh?

Denver on the other hand was clearly the best AFC team, but their resume pales in comparison. The Pats were a mash unit all season, losing Talib in the first quarter of the AFC championship game which was the death blow as Manning exposed the backup repeatedly. If you look at Denver's tough opponents, SD, Indy and NE, Denver's record is 3-3. If you think KC is in the conversation ...5-3. Outside of that who did they play?

If we are talking battle tested, my money is on the table, in fact I booked Seattle 10-1 last February before the Harvin deal. Since then, I've hedged my bet, but would still go with the battle tested Seahawks hands down. GL.

0

easypics

Veteran

Joined: Jun, 2008

Posts: 2635

Posted: Feb. 2, 2014 - 12:55 PM ET #335

Anyone see a stray HH Dog ?

lol

0

roofdog03

Rookie

Joined: Sep, 2006

Posts: 710

Posted: Feb. 2, 2014 - 1:05 PM ET #336

my local has Denver -3,I cant wait to hammer on the hawks!!!!!!!!!!

0

easypics

Veteran

Joined: Jun, 2008

Posts: 2635

Posted: Feb. 2, 2014 - 1:09 PM ET #337

Quote Originally Posted by forkball:

Not a Seattle homer sicsemper, but look at uncommon opponents in this tilt. Seattle had to play defending NFC champ SF 3 times this year, and could have won all three hadn't it been for a late breakaway run by Gore in SF. Then they dismantled the Saints as well as defeating the Panthers for a second consecutive year in their own back yard. Throw in the Cardinals this year who bolstered a top 5 defense minus a self induced fumble by Corbin setting up the game winner, and one could argue that Seattle should've swept em.

The Rams were no slouches either, just ask Indy... There's nine tough games right there and a 7-2 record against. If one analyzes Seattle's losses this year, one would see that they were literally seconds away from going 16-0. Throw in 2-0 in the playoffs and for laughs 4-0 in the preseason including a beat down of the Broncos 40-10 and it looks like 22-0 from one perspective eh?

Denver on the other hand was clearly the best AFC team, but their resume pales in comparison. The Pats were a mash unit all season, losing Talib in the first quarter of the AFC championship game which was the death blow as Manning exposed the backup repeatedly. If you look at Denver's tough opponents, SD, Indy and NE, Denver's record is 3-3. If you think KC is in the conversation ...5-3. Outside of that who did they play?

If we are talking battle tested, my money is on the table, in fact I booked Seattle 10-1 last February before the Harvin deal. Since then, I've hedged my bet, but would still go with the battle tested Seahawks hands down. GL.

Based on Holtnt 's theories , We are guilty of 1 st degree Homerizing my friend.

?

Dare you bet on IF Factors,

Then Good Luck To you...

However all your comments neglect to mention Seattle's inexperience n' Sub Par play

ON THE ROAD

Barely beating Carolina on the road , first game of the year impresses ?

Try this for $ize :

Name the second toughest venue to play in the NFL ?

That would be KC...

In very few words, Denver has proven success in last 2 years where Seattle struggles :

WINNING ON THE ROAD under Adverse conditions.

That's indisputable.

GL

0

Quote Originally Posted by forkball:

Not a Seattle homer sicsemper, but look at uncommon opponents in this tilt. Seattle had to play defending NFC champ SF 3 times this year, and could have won all three hadn't it been for a late breakaway run by Gore in SF. Then they dismantled the Saints as well as defeating the Panthers for a second consecutive year in their own back yard. Throw in the Cardinals this year who bolstered a top 5 defense minus a self induced fumble by Corbin setting up the game winner, and one could argue that Seattle should've swept em.

The Rams were no slouches either, just ask Indy... There's nine tough games right there and a 7-2 record against. If one analyzes Seattle's losses this year, one would see that they were literally seconds away from going 16-0. Throw in 2-0 in the playoffs and for laughs 4-0 in the preseason including a beat down of the Broncos 40-10 and it looks like 22-0 from one perspective eh?

Denver on the other hand was clearly the best AFC team, but their resume pales in comparison. The Pats were a mash unit all season, losing Talib in the first quarter of the AFC championship game which was the death blow as Manning exposed the backup repeatedly. If you look at Denver's tough opponents, SD, Indy and NE, Denver's record is 3-3. If you think KC is in the conversation ...5-3. Outside of that who did they play?

If we are talking battle tested, my money is on the table, in fact I booked Seattle 10-1 last February before the Harvin deal. Since then, I've hedged my bet, but would still go with the battle tested Seahawks hands down. GL.

Based on Holtnt 's theories , We are guilty of 1 st degree Homerizing my friend.

?

Dare you bet on IF Factors,

Then Good Luck To you...

However all your comments neglect to mention Seattle's inexperience n' Sub Par play

ON THE ROAD

Barely beating Carolina on the road , first game of the year impresses ?

Try this for $ize :

Name the second toughest venue to play in the NFL ?

That would be KC...

In very few words, Denver has proven success in last 2 years where Seattle struggles :

WINNING ON THE ROAD under Adverse conditions.

That's indisputable.

GL

forkball

Rookie

Joined: Dec, 2009

Posts: 566

Posted: Feb. 2, 2014 - 1:10 PM ET #338

Quote Originally Posted by holtnt:

Some of you Covers members who have posted multiple write-ups touting Denver are extreme “Homers” or have a vested interest in a sportsbook somewhere; either way Seattle it is Ladies and Gentlemen! Put me down for Seattle ML (+113) for a Dime please. Thanks!

Regardless of sides always appreciate your write ups Holt. GL today!

Go Hawks!

0

RoonRoon

Prospect

Joined: Sep, 2013

Posts: 74

Posted: Feb. 2, 2014 - 1:11 PM ET #339

Quote Originally Posted by Louis_IV:

where are you seeing where the money is? No one tells you that. You may see 70% of people picking a side but not the dollar amounts. Line moves (unless they are being manipulated by the books) determine where the coin is, not % of public.

So 65%-70% of the people bet 10 bucks for Denver, while Seahawks bettors bet millions? More people bet one side it means more money 9 times out of 10 is on the side that has been bet up. The books are taking a risk because they will make money on the props. I know that the line moves based on the coin but the books have took a side clearly.

0

Mikeee369

Prospect

Joined: Oct, 2011

Posts: 23

Posted: Feb. 2, 2014 - 1:15 PM ET #340

Quote Originally Posted by roofdog03:

my local has Denver -3,I cant wait to hammer on the hawks!!!!!!!!!!

Dog I love your Avatar !!!

0

mellowman7883

Rookie

Joined: Jun, 2010

Posts: 746

Posted: Feb. 2, 2014 - 1:22 PM ET #341

Roon, If its 65% of the public on Denver and 35% on Seattle it doesnt take alot of bigger bets on Seattle to make the take even. Just saying. Another thing, the vig on this game is peanuts compared to the corporate money at stake.

0

mellowman7883

Rookie

Joined: Jun, 2010

Posts: 746

Posted: Feb. 2, 2014 - 1:23 PM ET #342

The squares have to win sometime, like Sammy says. He is right about that. What better way to keep the lemmings coming back for more next year.

0

forkball

Rookie

Joined: Dec, 2009

Posts: 566

Posted: Feb. 2, 2014 - 1:35 PM ET #343

Quote Originally Posted by easypics:

Based on Holtnt 's theories , We are guilty of 1 st degree Homerizing my friend.

?

Dare you bet on IF Factors,

Then Good Luck To you...

However all your comments neglect to mention Seattle's inexperience n' Sub Par play

ON THE ROAD

Barely beating Carolina on the road , first game of the year impresses ?

Try this for $ize :

Name the second toughest venue to play in the NFL ?

That would be KC...

In very few words, Denver has proven success in last 2 years where Seattle struggles :

WINNING ON THE ROAD under Adverse conditions.

That's indisputable.

GL

Beating the Chiefs at Arrowhead, weren't they 4-12 last year?

Both teams 6-2 on the road. No home field advantage for either, but I would cite the weather and type of field are home cooking for Seattle. Those don't sound like adverse conditions for Seattle do they?

0

easypics

Veteran

Joined: Jun, 2008

Posts: 2635

Posted: Feb. 2, 2014 - 1:53 PM ET #344

Good God Forkball...

Wasting time here. ..

Weather ?

Is it weather that makes a team consistently more inefficient on the road than home ?

Dare you believe Type of field or weather will have factor today?

Good God...

Any case, BL2U

0

easypics

Veteran

Joined: Jun, 2008

Posts: 2635

Posted: Feb. 2, 2014 - 2:08 PM ET #345

Tied to Sportsbook ?

I am thoroughly convinced ...Dumb does get Dumber.

Gee Golle Wiz Holtnt , if I post Grats Galore Posts can I too become a Cover's Captain ?

lol

You need :

Quit whinin' n' Cryin' Baseless suspicions and TRY posting winner$.

That's What it'$ all about .

0

MRDONTHOOKME

Prospect

Joined: Dec, 2013

Posts: 18

Posted: Feb. 2, 2014 - 2:26 PM ET #346

Las Vegas gave this one to us . When they released seattle minus 2.5 they were begging every idiot in the world to take denver,and it worked.I am not a crazy person who thinks nfl is fixed it isnt ,I am also not one of these guys that thinks I have enough intell to break down this game by x and o's ,I dont care who is injured, heck I dont care who is playing.THE LINESMAN DOES ALL THE WORK FOR ME .What is he trying to do ,who is he trying to get me to bet then go the opposite .My god are they greeddy denver mines 4 from the start would of got a ton of action on both sides ,thats not what the wanted .If you bet denver because of manning or your pathetic analysis of a football game your an idiot.Peyton will leave this game the way most of the greatest ever leave ,too late ,champions like him just can't walk away so before they leave you witness that they are human.They may win but i can get seattle plus 3.5 and its a gift i am positve it will come in .I will also do medium sized parley on seattle and over 46.5 . This would mean i am betting whith the house they dont have all those building from losing.

0

THESHOOTER

Veteran

Joined: Nov, 2005

Posts: 1892

Posted: Feb. 2, 2014 - 2:27 PM ET #347

RU$$EL WIL$ON + $KITTLE$ LYNCH + LEGION OF BOOM = VICTORY

0

THESHOOTER

Veteran

Joined: Nov, 2005

Posts: 1892

Posted: Feb. 2, 2014 - 2:27 PM ET #348

RU$$EL WIL$ON + $KITTLE$ LYNCH + LEGION OF BOOM = VICTORY

0

joegoraiders

Prospect

Joined: Sep, 2008

Posts: 14

Posted: Feb. 2, 2014 - 2:31 PM ET #349

Denver will win 33 - 26 Nobody Really Talks About Denvers Defense The Quiet Orange Crush.

0

TheQuadYeah

Banned

Joined: Nov, 2010

Posts: 1827

Posted: Feb. 2, 2014 - 2:31 PM ET #350

Quote Originally Posted by mellowman7883:

IT wouldnt surprise me at all to see Denver win by one point.

That's what I said way back on page 1......

If you're Seahawks +1.5, 2, 2.5, even 3 - you might get lucky. But Broncos M/L, that's the wager......

You'll see, you'll all see the "drama" unfold like a daytime afternoon soap opera.....

Quad out - going to a SB party. See y'all on the other side.....

GOOD LUCK ALL!!!!!!!!!

0

All Forums | Pro Football

About Us

Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials

Betting Guides

Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming

Sports Betting

US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps

Contests

Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools

The Covers community has

618,670

lifetime members worldwide

Join our community today

Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.

Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service

Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.

Seattle at Denver (02/02/2014)

Hot Forum Topics