You
can argue, complain, B!T(#, scream, etc. etc. about the refs. However,
think about this there were bad calls all game long on both sides of
the ball. Plus, the defense of Seattle demolished A. Rodgers and
contained him from making big plays all game. Truly, everyone expected
before the game started that this would be a blowout win from G.Bay
that's why everyone played them to win and cover! So it doesn't matter
what anyone says! What should matter is the fact that G. Bay didn't play
well and is not the same dominant team that they used to be based
solely on the games they played this season! Plus this week alone was
underdog week! Next time everyone who jumped on G. Bay and rode A. Rods
nut sacks should follow the trend instead of following there heart and
how they feel about each team! Just FYI underdogs this week covered
13-16 games just in the NFL...
0
You
can argue, complain, B!T(#, scream, etc. etc. about the refs. However,
think about this there were bad calls all game long on both sides of
the ball. Plus, the defense of Seattle demolished A. Rodgers and
contained him from making big plays all game. Truly, everyone expected
before the game started that this would be a blowout win from G.Bay
that's why everyone played them to win and cover! So it doesn't matter
what anyone says! What should matter is the fact that G. Bay didn't play
well and is not the same dominant team that they used to be based
solely on the games they played this season! Plus this week alone was
underdog week! Next time everyone who jumped on G. Bay and rode A. Rods
nut sacks should follow the trend instead of following there heart and
how they feel about each team! Just FYI underdogs this week covered
13-16 games just in the NFL...
As much as I'd like to rip their hearts out, and until the Rams stop the excessive TO's (ongoing for several years now!), I am forced (because I need the money), take :
SEATTLE - 1
0
As much as I'd like to rip their hearts out, and until the Rams stop the excessive TO's (ongoing for several years now!), I am forced (because I need the money), take :
Vue, All B/S aside....I know you have made some great pics as I have seen them......some of them we agreed......but I will tell you this by looking at this line and the early movement.......Most will be on Seahawks after how good their defense looked with all of the sacks on Rogers......I only play 1-3 games a week and pound them for $550 to when 500.......I would play the Rams.
0
Vue, All B/S aside....I know you have made some great pics as I have seen them......some of them we agreed......but I will tell you this by looking at this line and the early movement.......Most will be on Seahawks after how good their defense looked with all of the sacks on Rogers......I only play 1-3 games a week and pound them for $550 to when 500.......I would play the Rams.
Sorry Vue, no way, no how, the Sea-Turds win this week..... Just can't happen after that fiasco on Monday Night - - I don't think Goodell would allow it at this point after all of the hoopla surrounding that game...........
Gimme the Lambs, at home, plus 1 for the - in the words of W8.............
LARGE!!!!!!!!!!!
0
Sorry Vue, no way, no how, the Sea-Turds win this week..... Just can't happen after that fiasco on Monday Night - - I don't think Goodell would allow it at this point after all of the hoopla surrounding that game...........
Gimme the Lambs, at home, plus 1 for the - in the words of W8.............
Look, the lambs have played lessor opponents than Seattle and still only average 19 points a game. They allow 26 points a game.
24-13 Seattle The refs wont be able to horsecollar seattle this week there are to many people eyeballing the situation. There are easier games to fix is what I am saying.
I see this as being alot like the Chicago game. Rams will have a tough time scoring against this tough defense.
0
Look, the lambs have played lessor opponents than Seattle and still only average 19 points a game. They allow 26 points a game.
24-13 Seattle The refs wont be able to horsecollar seattle this week there are to many people eyeballing the situation. There are easier games to fix is what I am saying.
I see this as being alot like the Chicago game. Rams will have a tough time scoring against this tough defense.
Dont forget how bad Seattle is away from home historically. Youre also acting like Seattle will move the ball easily, Russell Wilson has 400 passing yards through 3 games (should be 40 or so less). I think the play is Rams, will also tease to 8.5.
0
Dont forget how bad Seattle is away from home historically. Youre also acting like Seattle will move the ball easily, Russell Wilson has 400 passing yards through 3 games (should be 40 or so less). I think the play is Rams, will also tease to 8.5.
LINE WAS SETUP AS A NICE TRAP. TELL ME VEGAS DIDNT EXPECT/WANT HEAVY ACTION ON THE HAWKS AT -2.5!!.....LINE DIDNT MOVE CAUSE THE SHARPS DIDNT TAKE SEA EITHER....THE SAFEST PLAY IS GOING TO BE THE RAMS. ID WAIT AND GRAB THEM AT +3
0
LINE WAS SETUP AS A NICE TRAP. TELL ME VEGAS DIDNT EXPECT/WANT HEAVY ACTION ON THE HAWKS AT -2.5!!.....LINE DIDNT MOVE CAUSE THE SHARPS DIDNT TAKE SEA EITHER....THE SAFEST PLAY IS GOING TO BE THE RAMS. ID WAIT AND GRAB THEM AT +3
Dont forget how bad Seattle is away from home historically. Youre also acting like Seattle will move the ball easily, Russell Wilson has 400 passing yards through 3 games (should be 40 or so less). I think the play is Rams, will also tease to 8.5.
Right about Russel but consider he has played three very tough defenses. Who have the rams played? Lets see Washington-The weakest defense in the league it could be argued. Chicago- Got their asses handed to them against this tough defense. Detroit- A poor defense.
This looks alike like the Chicago game to me.
I'll pay the points on this and take the Hawks.
0
Quote Originally Posted by unchoop15:
Dont forget how bad Seattle is away from home historically. Youre also acting like Seattle will move the ball easily, Russell Wilson has 400 passing yards through 3 games (should be 40 or so less). I think the play is Rams, will also tease to 8.5.
Right about Russel but consider he has played three very tough defenses. Who have the rams played? Lets see Washington-The weakest defense in the league it could be argued. Chicago- Got their asses handed to them against this tough defense. Detroit- A poor defense.
I see a lot people are taking the Rams trying to be "sharps" just because it's a short line. Well let's see.. It's a division rivalry, the Rams are home, historically Seattle isn't a great road team, have a short week, are coming off a very emotional win and they rank last in the league in passing yards. When you factor in everything this line is about right. I see this game being a defensive battle. I just can't see the Rams moving the ball against this good of a D. Seattle as of now ranks 4th in the league in overall defense. We all saw how good they were this past Monday night vs the Packers. St. Louis has two of their starting offensive linemen out for the game and this spells disaster. Chris Clemons and Bruce Irvin should both have a field day, again. I'm not saying there's going to be 8 sacks again but i see there being around 4. The Rams look much improved compared to the past seasons with Jeff Fisher as head coach. They respect him and are gonna give it all they have each and every game. This game should be fairly close but in the end Seattle will walk away with the win.
Seattle -1
17-6 F
0
I see a lot people are taking the Rams trying to be "sharps" just because it's a short line. Well let's see.. It's a division rivalry, the Rams are home, historically Seattle isn't a great road team, have a short week, are coming off a very emotional win and they rank last in the league in passing yards. When you factor in everything this line is about right. I see this game being a defensive battle. I just can't see the Rams moving the ball against this good of a D. Seattle as of now ranks 4th in the league in overall defense. We all saw how good they were this past Monday night vs the Packers. St. Louis has two of their starting offensive linemen out for the game and this spells disaster. Chris Clemons and Bruce Irvin should both have a field day, again. I'm not saying there's going to be 8 sacks again but i see there being around 4. The Rams look much improved compared to the past seasons with Jeff Fisher as head coach. They respect him and are gonna give it all they have each and every game. This game should be fairly close but in the end Seattle will walk away with the win.
everything points to SEA but I wonder if they'll have a let down after stealing victory from GB. Karma is gonna bite them at sometime this year...could this be the week?
0
everything points to SEA but I wonder if they'll have a let down after stealing victory from GB. Karma is gonna bite them at sometime this year...could this be the week?
LINE WAS SETUP AS A NICE TRAP. TELL ME VEGAS DIDNT EXPECT/WANT HEAVY ACTION ON THE HAWKS AT -2.5!!.....LINE DIDNT MOVE CAUSE THE SHARPS DIDNT TAKE SEA EITHER....THE SAFEST PLAY IS GOING TO BE THE RAMS. ID WAIT AND GRAB THEM AT +3
Rams +3
0
Quote Originally Posted by PeteyRose:
LINE WAS SETUP AS A NICE TRAP. TELL ME VEGAS DIDNT EXPECT/WANT HEAVY ACTION ON THE HAWKS AT -2.5!!.....LINE DIDNT MOVE CAUSE THE SHARPS DIDNT TAKE SEA EITHER....THE SAFEST PLAY IS GOING TO BE THE RAMS. ID WAIT AND GRAB THEM AT +3
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.