All Forums | Pro Football

Seattle at St. Louis (11/29/2009)

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 2450
Posts: 20
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2002
Posts: 61
Posted: #1

Away:  Seattle [3-7 ATS]
Home:  St. Louis [5-5 ATS]

Game Time: 1:00 PM
Stadium: Edward Jones Dome

Recent Meetings:
09/13/09 - STL 0 vs. SEA 28

Team Leaders:

Seattle:
Passing: Matt Hasselbeck (1853)
Rushing: Julius Jones (392)
Receiving: Nate Burleson (662)

St. Louis:
Passing: Marc Bulger (1469)
Rushing: Steven Jackson (1031)
Receiving: Donnie Avery (418)

More:
Live Odds
In-Depth Matchup Information
Consensus Betting Information

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 52
Posted: #2
Seattle looks good here.  StL is pretty horrible.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 5051
Posted: #3
       From what I understand, Marc Bulgar is out for this game, possibily the whole season. With a light lay of 3, against a pathetic Lambs team , Seattle will finally win and cover a game this year, by golly!! Will make a wager on the hawks, as this team IS NOT the Vikings!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 5485
Posted: #4
2 bad teams playing = OVER
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 131
Posted: #5
Vue28149--Be careful. The Seahawks are so bad. Either take the Rams who yes are 1-9, but Steve Spags has them playing with a positive mind set. Rams have been in every game last 4 weeks, even againist Saints/Cards/Vikes, and do you really feel strong laying points to the Rams in St Louis with a pathetic Seahawk running game, and lost coach of Jim Mora Jr? Don't wager on this game, but I don't care who's playing Qb for the Rams, they win the game out right. Rams 30 Hawks 24.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 6
Posted: #6

Rams win outright...agree on the over rockdog...bad teams seem to make each other offenses look unstoppable

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 403
Posted: #7
There's 3 reasons why you should take the Lambs in this one:

1. - This will be the Seahawks third road game in a row, while it's the Rams third home game in a row. I didn't even know that was allowed.

2. - While the Rams didn't win either of their last 2 games - which just happened to be against (arguably) the league's top 2 offenses, no less - they still played them pretty strong.

3. - Stephen Jackson should have a fantasy footballer's wet dream type of day against this weak D-Line

I think this is the best pick this week - Rams plus points?? SURE!!!
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 5491
Posted: #8
Rams +3
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 5051
Posted: #9
Quote Originally Posted by pointgivenpap:

Vue28149--Be careful. The Seahawks are so bad. Either take the Rams who yes are 1-9, but Steve Spags has them playing with a positive mind set. Rams have been in every game last 4 weeks, even againist Saints/Cards/Vikes, and do you really feel strong laying points to the Rams in St Louis with a pathetic Seahawk running game, and lost coach of Jim Mora Jr? Don't wager on this game, but I don't care who's playing Qb for the Rams, they win the game out right. Rams 30 Hawks 24.
Thanks pal- just might have to reconsider this bet. Both teams are shaky propositions !
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 984
Posted: #10

Seattle -3.5 : In the two games Boller has started this year, St. Louis has lost by a combined score of 73-10. The lambs were bad with Bulger, can you imagine how they'll be going down the stretch?  And tho the public is pounding the Hawks, i'll place the square bet to collect the rectangular money. Score: Seahawks 24-Rams 10 (2 units).

 

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 917
Posted: #11
Seattle is the best pick, the own the rams with 9 straight victories, they are much much better than any other team with similar records in the NFL, yeah they got blown out last week but I had Minny, Seahawks will win this game @ Rams like they always do.  Remember, if you think Seattle is so terrible, how many 3-7 teams, have wins of 28-0 (rams)  42-0 (Jax)

The thing here is if Seattle isn't so mismatched in the trenches they make plays.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 896
Posted: #12
I'd rather ply Baccarat before I put a wager on this game, but if I had to, I'd pick the over here.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 730
Posted: #13

Waiting for less juice or +4.5 line

St Louis +4

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 20644
Posted: #14

Third home game in a row for the Rams, maybe it's time they win one.

St Louis - 30                       Seattle - 28

Rams +3.5                     over 42

Seattle coming off BB losses playing a team with revenge on their mind. Might not be a good time for the Seahawks to be giving points.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 3328
Posted: #15
With the Colonel:
STL +4 and Over 42
GLTA
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 72
Posted: #16

Lets see, St. Louis has 15 injuries and Seattle has 8...think i'll take Seattle.

Seahawks -3 / under

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 222
Posted: #17
NOT TOUCHING IT !!!!!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 64
Posted: #18
I have a pretty sure lock this week too. Check out my analysis at pickonlywinners.com
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 6405
Posted: #19
Lambos  +4   
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 215
Posted: #20

Quote Originally Posted by Boludojones:

There's 3 reasons why you should take the Lambs in this one:

1. - This will be the Seahawks third road game in a row, while it's the Rams third home game in a row. I didn't even know that was allowed.

2. - While the Rams didn't win either of their last 2 games - which just happened to be against (arguably) the league's top 2 offenses, no less - they still played them pretty strong.

3. - Stephen Jackson should have a fantasy footballer's wet dream type of day against this weak D-Line

I think this is the best pick this week - Rams plus points?? SURE!!!

Exactly what I was thinking!

All Forums | Pro Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.