this quad guy is an idiot..if you could get the rams plua 7.5 and over 37 and only risk 100 to win over 200 everyone in there mother would be on that..id like to know what book offers that as a parlay because i want in.
defenses are banged up. rams have the worst rushing defense in the league. jacobs and bradshaw didnt do much last week so expect them to come out against a not so good rams defense and pound the ball up the middle. rams are also without one of their cornerbacks. if hakeem nicks is playin you better believe the giants will target him many times during the game. i just dont see the rams coming out on top or covering the spread tonight.
take the giants and or the over..teaser with the giants as a pick and over 37 would be a solid play.
Once again not saying teasing the over will not come in but gambling is about playing percrntages... that being said rams struggled to put up 13 last week, yes they ran for 153 yards but 70 of them came on 1 long TD run by the one guy they will not have tonight... so without it they got 90 yards running and 6 pts.. there is no goto guy in the red zone for the rams means field goals, that being said for the total to go over 51 you are saying that the giants ball control offense is gonna put up 30 and the rams will score 3 tds just to push chances very high!! now lets look at the over rams get 10-13 giants 24 nd your over is in trouble way more ways to loose IMO.. but once again just my opinion.. remeber 13 out of 15 games yesterday went under with a 6-7 pt teaser..
0
Quote Originally Posted by Rallytime316:
this quad guy is an idiot..if you could get the rams plua 7.5 and over 37 and only risk 100 to win over 200 everyone in there mother would be on that..id like to know what book offers that as a parlay because i want in.
defenses are banged up. rams have the worst rushing defense in the league. jacobs and bradshaw didnt do much last week so expect them to come out against a not so good rams defense and pound the ball up the middle. rams are also without one of their cornerbacks. if hakeem nicks is playin you better believe the giants will target him many times during the game. i just dont see the rams coming out on top or covering the spread tonight.
take the giants and or the over..teaser with the giants as a pick and over 37 would be a solid play.
Once again not saying teasing the over will not come in but gambling is about playing percrntages... that being said rams struggled to put up 13 last week, yes they ran for 153 yards but 70 of them came on 1 long TD run by the one guy they will not have tonight... so without it they got 90 yards running and 6 pts.. there is no goto guy in the red zone for the rams means field goals, that being said for the total to go over 51 you are saying that the giants ball control offense is gonna put up 30 and the rams will score 3 tds just to push chances very high!! now lets look at the over rams get 10-13 giants 24 nd your over is in trouble way more ways to loose IMO.. but once again just my opinion.. remeber 13 out of 15 games yesterday went under with a 6-7 pt teaser..
I think this is important because he will be asked to win this game....
1 of those was Denver and the other Arizona.... both with Steven Jackson playing....
Cadillac Williams? I'm not convinced......
Dome team outside traveling cross-country not enough?
How about the Giants home opener after a division loss?
I live in NY, (Jets Fan).... it's cold tonight..... not cold like January cold....but a little chilly out....
this is going to be a ball-control low-scoring affair..... I like the UNDER picks that have been mentioned despite the fact it is Monday Night Football.....
Eli Manning doesn't suck............... ok maybe he sucks a little...... but he does have several (im too lazy to look) 4000+ seasons.... he did throw 30+ Tds last year..... he also runs a great 2 minute offense....
The only question is can he play smart and not throw INTs.....
When he is "on" he's accurate... I expect him to have a decent game tonight.....
Giants have 2 really good running backs.... and 2 really good receivers.... they lost their possession receiver in Steve Smith but I'm expecting their new FA signing Brandon Stokely to have a few catches down the middle......
That could be bigger than people think....
If Eli is asked to manage the game and not come from behind, the Giants will win and cover....
I don't expect the Rams to score at will against the Giants defense..... their defensive line is very good, they are just really weak at LB....
I'm betting Gmen -6 (don't ask me why my book has it that low)
I like the UNDER as well..... so I'll reverse it.....
GL TO ALL!
0
2-6
That's Sam Bradford's record on the road....
I think this is important because he will be asked to win this game....
1 of those was Denver and the other Arizona.... both with Steven Jackson playing....
Cadillac Williams? I'm not convinced......
Dome team outside traveling cross-country not enough?
How about the Giants home opener after a division loss?
I live in NY, (Jets Fan).... it's cold tonight..... not cold like January cold....but a little chilly out....
this is going to be a ball-control low-scoring affair..... I like the UNDER picks that have been mentioned despite the fact it is Monday Night Football.....
Eli Manning doesn't suck............... ok maybe he sucks a little...... but he does have several (im too lazy to look) 4000+ seasons.... he did throw 30+ Tds last year..... he also runs a great 2 minute offense....
The only question is can he play smart and not throw INTs.....
When he is "on" he's accurate... I expect him to have a decent game tonight.....
Giants have 2 really good running backs.... and 2 really good receivers.... they lost their possession receiver in Steve Smith but I'm expecting their new FA signing Brandon Stokely to have a few catches down the middle......
That could be bigger than people think....
If Eli is asked to manage the game and not come from behind, the Giants will win and cover....
I don't expect the Rams to score at will against the Giants defense..... their defensive line is very good, they are just really weak at LB....
I'm betting Gmen -6 (don't ask me why my book has it that low)
I like the UNDER as well..... so I'll reverse it.....
It appears you don't know the difference between a PARLAY and a TEASER.
O.K. Mr Stickler - Just FYI - on www.betus.com a $100/7 point teaser - which would currently be Rams +14 and over 37.5 only nets you $76.92 - so............................................
0
Quote Originally Posted by pa_picks:
It appears you don't know the difference between a PARLAY and a TEASER.
O.K. Mr Stickler - Just FYI - on www.betus.com a $100/7 point teaser - which would currently be Rams +14 and over 37.5 only nets you $76.92 - so............................................
O.K. Mr Stickler - Just FYI - on www.betus.com a $100/7 point teaser - which would currently be Rams +14 and over 37.5 only nets you $76.92 - so............................................
Wow bro I hate to get involved but thats exactly what he said!! hes laying 130 to get 100 just like the rest of us!! which is less that you would hve to lay then to buy the hook tonight!! if you go 6.5 or 7.5 it will cost you 125-140 in juice so why not get 7 pts at the same juice insted of a half?? you really are not making ANY sense!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by TheQuadYeah:
O.K. Mr Stickler - Just FYI - on www.betus.com a $100/7 point teaser - which would currently be Rams +14 and over 37.5 only nets you $76.92 - so............................................
Wow bro I hate to get involved but thats exactly what he said!! hes laying 130 to get 100 just like the rest of us!! which is less that you would hve to lay then to buy the hook tonight!! if you go 6.5 or 7.5 it will cost you 125-140 in juice so why not get 7 pts at the same juice insted of a half?? you really are not making ANY sense!!
this quad guy is an idiot..if you could get the rams plua 7.5 and over 37 and only risk 100 to win over 200 everyone in there mother would be on that..id like to know what book offers that as a parlay because i want in.
defenses are banged up. rams have the worst rushing defense in the league. jacobs and bradshaw didnt do much last week so expect them to come out against a not so good rams defense and pound the ball up the middle. rams are also without one of their cornerbacks. if hakeem nicks is playin you better believe the giants will target him many times during the game. i just dont see the rams coming out on top or covering the spread tonight.
take the giants and or the over..teaser with the giants as a pick and over 37 would be a solid play.
Dude, REALLY??!?!?!?! Currently a $100.00 bet wins you $126.30 - therefore, you get $226.30 back if you win......... Just because simple math eludes some of you, don't hold the rest of the class up................This is the last I want to hear on this subject............
0
Quote Originally Posted by Rallytime316:
this quad guy is an idiot..if you could get the rams plua 7.5 and over 37 and only risk 100 to win over 200 everyone in there mother would be on that..id like to know what book offers that as a parlay because i want in.
defenses are banged up. rams have the worst rushing defense in the league. jacobs and bradshaw didnt do much last week so expect them to come out against a not so good rams defense and pound the ball up the middle. rams are also without one of their cornerbacks. if hakeem nicks is playin you better believe the giants will target him many times during the game. i just dont see the rams coming out on top or covering the spread tonight.
take the giants and or the over..teaser with the giants as a pick and over 37 would be a solid play.
Dude, REALLY??!?!?!?! Currently a $100.00 bet wins you $126.30 - therefore, you get $226.30 back if you win......... Just because simple math eludes some of you, don't hold the rest of the class up................This is the last I want to hear on this subject............
Wow bro I hate to get involved but thats exactly what he said!! hes laying 130 to get 100 just like the rest of us!! which is less that you would hve to lay then to buy the hook tonight!! if you go 6.5 or 7.5 it will cost you 125-140 in juice so why not get 7 pts at the same juice insted of a half?? you really are not making ANY sense!!
O.K., the wager payout is not the point. My point is, if you're parlaying, teasing, whatevering, even just 2 bets, why would you risk more than you can win? That's the whole point of a parlay, so you can make money - not lose it. You could still have the Rams at even +9 and over 37 - and still come out in the black..........Anyways, that's how I bet parlays, and that is my final outlook - good luck...........
0
Quote Originally Posted by bankjob:
Wow bro I hate to get involved but thats exactly what he said!! hes laying 130 to get 100 just like the rest of us!! which is less that you would hve to lay then to buy the hook tonight!! if you go 6.5 or 7.5 it will cost you 125-140 in juice so why not get 7 pts at the same juice insted of a half?? you really are not making ANY sense!!
O.K., the wager payout is not the point. My point is, if you're parlaying, teasing, whatevering, even just 2 bets, why would you risk more than you can win? That's the whole point of a parlay, so you can make money - not lose it. You could still have the Rams at even +9 and over 37 - and still come out in the black..........Anyways, that's how I bet parlays, and that is my final outlook - good luck...........
GIANTS +2.0 and OVER 34.5 on a 9 point tease. I do not think the Giants will lose tonight. How many they will win by...not sure, but I like my chances.
GLTA
0
GIANTS +2.0 and OVER 34.5 on a 9 point tease. I do not think the Giants will lose tonight. How many they will win by...not sure, but I like my chances.
O.K., the wager payout is not the point. My point is, if you're parlaying, teasing, whatevering, even just 2 bets, why would you risk more than you can win? That's the whole point of a parlay, so you can make money - not lose it. You could still have the Rams at even +9 and over 37 - and still come out in the black..........Anyways, that's how I bet parlays, and that is my final outlook - good luck...........
BRO I CAN'T EVEN COMMENT ON THAT YOU CANT TEACH STUPID AND I AM GETTING DUMBER AND DUMBER EVERY TIME YOU RESPOND SO PLEASE JUST LEAVE IT ALONE CAUSE YOU ARE LOOSING THE RESPECT OF THE ENTIRE BOARD....
0
Quote Originally Posted by TheQuadYeah:
O.K., the wager payout is not the point. My point is, if you're parlaying, teasing, whatevering, even just 2 bets, why would you risk more than you can win? That's the whole point of a parlay, so you can make money - not lose it. You could still have the Rams at even +9 and over 37 - and still come out in the black..........Anyways, that's how I bet parlays, and that is my final outlook - good luck...........
BRO I CAN'T EVEN COMMENT ON THAT YOU CANT TEACH STUPID AND I AM GETTING DUMBER AND DUMBER EVERY TIME YOU RESPOND SO PLEASE JUST LEAVE IT ALONE CAUSE YOU ARE LOOSING THE RESPECT OF THE ENTIRE BOARD....
Convinced on the GIANTS. Bought the hook down to 6.5. I love my teaser, but I have a feeling as the sun will rise tomorrow the GIANTS will truck the RAMS tonight.
GLTA
0
Convinced on the GIANTS. Bought the hook down to 6.5. I love my teaser, but I have a feeling as the sun will rise tomorrow the GIANTS will truck the RAMS tonight.
LMAO i happen to have a small play on Rams ML and over 44 (because I do like some of those parlay payouts, but its SMALL potatoes compared to the easy money I'll get on Rams+14/OV37).
Comical series of replies, thanks Quad. Don't ever let anyone tell ya you don't serve a useful purpose :D Best of Luck nonetheless, we are SORTA on the same side (except you've got some book that lets you do a half teaser/half parlay with convoluted payouts - is it just la la land maybe?)
0
LMAO i happen to have a small play on Rams ML and over 44 (because I do like some of those parlay payouts, but its SMALL potatoes compared to the easy money I'll get on Rams+14/OV37).
Comical series of replies, thanks Quad. Don't ever let anyone tell ya you don't serve a useful purpose :D Best of Luck nonetheless, we are SORTA on the same side (except you've got some book that lets you do a half teaser/half parlay with convoluted payouts - is it just la la land maybe?)
BRO I CAN'T EVEN COMMENT ON THAT YOU CANT TEACH STUPID AND I AM GETTING DUMBER AND DUMBER EVERY TIME YOU RESPOND SO PLEASE JUST LEAVE IT ALONE CAUSE YOU ARE LOOSING THE RESPECT OF THE ENTIRE BOARD....
O.K. - let's put it in perspective. Let's say you're craving a beer right now. Now, are you going to have an alcohol free, taste free, diet, 50 calorie, zero trans fats O'Douls?
Or..........
are you going to have an 8.5% ABV super tasty super rich India Pale Ale.......
I think you know the correct answer
So, take your "diet" teaser and stick it
You either go big or go home.............
0
Quote Originally Posted by bankjob:
BRO I CAN'T EVEN COMMENT ON THAT YOU CANT TEACH STUPID AND I AM GETTING DUMBER AND DUMBER EVERY TIME YOU RESPOND SO PLEASE JUST LEAVE IT ALONE CAUSE YOU ARE LOOSING THE RESPECT OF THE ENTIRE BOARD....
O.K. - let's put it in perspective. Let's say you're craving a beer right now. Now, are you going to have an alcohol free, taste free, diet, 50 calorie, zero trans fats O'Douls?
Or..........
are you going to have an 8.5% ABV super tasty super rich India Pale Ale.......
LMAO i happen to have a small play on Rams ML and over 44 (because I do like some of those parlay payouts, but its SMALL potatoes compared to the easy money I'll get on Rams+14/OV37).
Comical series of replies, thanks Quad. Don't ever let anyone tell ya you don't serve a useful purpose :D Best of Luck nonetheless, we are SORTA on the same side (except you've got some book that lets you do a half teaser/half parlay with convoluted payouts - is it just la la land maybe?)
0
Quote Originally Posted by FreeMoneyInc:
LMAO i happen to have a small play on Rams ML and over 44 (because I do like some of those parlay payouts, but its SMALL potatoes compared to the easy money I'll get on Rams+14/OV37).
Comical series of replies, thanks Quad. Don't ever let anyone tell ya you don't serve a useful purpose :D Best of Luck nonetheless, we are SORTA on the same side (except you've got some book that lets you do a half teaser/half parlay with convoluted payouts - is it just la la land maybe?)
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
