St. Louis at Seattle (12/12/2011)

Woops it didnt put the other info on that quote reply. The guy said he was beeting seattle cause of what they did a few weeks ago and there wins vs nyg, philly.

Its all about the fans. Seattle have to play for the franchise. There is many city out there that wanted a football team. After Thanks giving, many team have to play for pride.

Under is a very safe bet and I do see a shut out.

BOLA  

Hope everyone is having a winning week as well, let's end it on a high note.

Seattle -9.5

GLA

[Quote: Originally Posted by Asomugha] Are you guys serious or wtf is this?

ARE YOU REALLY PLAYING SEATTLE SEAHAWKS WITH DOUBLE DIGITS!? ARE YOU SERIOUS!? PRIME PLAY?! WTF IS THIS!

Good luck to you... This is just stupid. Last year the line would be like + / - 4,5 favoring the rams, this year u have a + / - 9,5 line favoring the Seahawks, and no way Seahawks are that good.

Playing Seahawks -9,5 is just the stupidiest thing i've seen. That's close to the same spread u had in Packers - Raiders... Lmao...
[/Quote

Well we al saw the result of the Packer-Raider game. 

Did "Mr. Lock Lock Lock Lock" just tell me that I must lose a lot of money?? Are you F'n serious? You're the absolute F'n King Of Epic Fails!!! If my math is correct, I think I've gone something like 19-5 just fading your picks!!! You're the reason this emoticon =  was INVENTED, PAL!!!!!! And I'm sure everyone reading this will agree that next to that Gay-Ton idiot, you're the most annoying person in here!!!!!!

Anyways - that being said, I do think that 10 might be a little high, even against the Rams - backdoor covers, lucky special teams, Lynch gets injured, blah, blah, blah, we all know what can happen.....

So, here's what I've decided on - - pays +106 - -

Sea-Turds -6.5 & Over 36 - - I'm banking that the friggin' Lambs can score something.........

Oh, and Sandman - - good luck buddy

Seatttle gets the win Stl gets the cover dont be surprised STL wins outright sports handicapping is murphys law law of average what goes up must come down at the ened of the day its 50/50 thats why you play the odds the public took 10 out 14 against the spread sunday....this means the odds are stacked against the public odds say this is vegas's game tonight besides football is a game of streeaks and strides seattle streak is coming to a hault

Dragged by wifey to watch New Years Eve on the weekend. If I managed to sit through that (train-wreck) sober, I can sit through this game with some black & tan. 

as usual the ramsies will come out strong in the first quarter and start to faulter, only thing i see them doing is laying a terd on the 50 to remind everyone how bad they stink, been to a handfull of their games this year and its simpy dismill. look for jackson to conitinue to get his 3 yard dashes. unbelievable who ever is his play designs needs to hang it up.

only action i got on this game is a 4 teamer carrying from yesterday giants and the over and seahawks and the over. If i had to take a side it would be the seahawks.  good luck what ever side your on if its the seahawks and the over!

Nothing makes a Lousy O look better than a lousy D.... Seattle is scoring a lot their last 4 and I got The Rams Scoring 2 TD's

Spread seems high..  Not impressed with either team.  Both have looked decent in spots but nothing consistent.
Seems like everyone is high on Seattle for some reason.  I read someone say that it was a Vegas Gift?  Since when does Vegas give away money?
I think this is a classic monday night game where people think they can make up for all their losses, that it's a lock...  you know as well as I do that there are no locks, especially on monday.  I am going to be careful and make a small play.


I'm taking the points.

StL +9.5.


SEA 23 - StL 17.

GLA!!! 

I will take the seahawks and the over... been feeling that too. gamble gamble... 200 wins 520... hehe

why don't you go into that thread, and see who I took in that game, wiseguy........

and if it wasn't for the stinkin' Raiders, I would've had that teaser I posted in there too................

a lot of points so SEATTLE - 7 and lot of juiceeeeeeeeeee

 

maybe get a back door at h time

HEY VUE !!!! " BURY GIANTS PATHETIC SEASON" ???? ..... " WHAT A JOKE !!! IT'S YOUR MONEY PAL" ????   

Don't know why so many love the over. Seattle should dominate with the run, and that grinds the clock. I'm going with Seattle first half -6.5.  Then I can go to bed early, and avoid any back door cover in the second half. 

I suggest the people that think Seattle has absolutley no chance whatsoever of winning this game by 10 points or more arent being totally objective here,.. Yes, both teams bite the big one, however....3 of Seattle's last 4 wins have been by more than 10 points, they seem to be playing their best ball as of lately...Seatlle is 8-1 ats against the Rams the last 9, thats a pretty solid trend whether you like it or not.. Seattle has come up big in these spots "favored by 9 or more" over the past several years at home....i know there hasnt been many of them....   But your right, their are no "locks" in the NFL..St Louis could get lucky tonight and pull the upset....however unlikely

This one is for TheQuadYeah ( aka  assweasel) 

Sandman23...grow up man.  Your posts annoy the hell out of me with your LOCKs in all caps all the time. 

The Rams are bad they got beat 24-7 at home against this same Seahawk team now they go on the road in tough seattle. Seattle lays the hurting on them tonight. Seahawks 31-10. Bradford is rusty and will throw 3 picks, 2 for touchdowns.

Seahawks -11

and OVer 38

love  the over,peace out

LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK LOCK 

Over (1H) 19½

Then to bed early,,,,

BOLTALL

The last game, that Seattle won against the rams, was not Bradford...

SANDMAN