Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by Jmt908: Says the guy with 173 posts? But I'm not the one playing the square/sharpe game.
|
vanderdoss | 18 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Gary_Hobson: The thinking of a square right here folks Says the guy with 33 post. Usually if one uses the word "square" he is often a "square" himself. I like the play. Indy played as bad as they could have in 1H.
|
vanderdoss | 18 |
|
|
32 to 1 on this.
OSU wins West +103 Indiana wins East +120 Louisville wins Midwest -135 Michigan wins South +328 OSU seems a pretty safe bet, and I feel confident Louisville can get passed Duke and Indy can outlast the Canes, Mich is the hard one to hit. I love that squad and think they can upset KU and FLA, but it won't be easy. Thinking this is worth 200 to win over 6,000. Thoughts?
|
BlaineTheMono | 4 |
|
|
With you on Utah and Baylor, Charlotte. Good Luck! You won me a lot of money this football season. BTW, I grew up in Winston-Salem, right down the road.
|
CHARLOTTEsports | 11 |
|
|
Driskel over 1.5 tds and ints -145
|
angle2win | 4 |
|
|
Haven't seen too much attention paid to this total. I really like the Under. Mia looked awful last week, and yes ND's D is legit this year, but they remain a team that relies on the long ball. Mia should have the athletes to slow the UNC rushing attack and negate the 20+ yard runs the Heels have been getting all year, forcing longer, time-consuming drives.
Input?
|
BlaineTheMono | 1 |
|
|
Under?
|
Bling | 17 |
|
|
NICEly done, sir
|
LawsonJames | 142 |
|
|
6-1 is probably to win the pennant
|
BlaineTheMono | 13 |
|
|
With the extra wildcard, they would have to really regress to miss playoffs. Just hate that one-gm playoff. Since Trout arrived they have been one of the league's best. Thinking of going fairly big on this, so I appreciate the opinions.
|
BlaineTheMono | 13 |
|
|
Only 4 games back of Texas. 4 game lead on top WC spot. New WC rules really hurt, forcing LAA to most likely compete in the one-game playoff, but at 12-1, with that lineup and Weaver and Wilson on the mound, I'm loving this.
Thoughts?
|
BlaineTheMono | 13 |
|
|
Would love input from some of you expierened horse guys.
|
BlaineTheMono | 1 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by LebronsHairline: $330 is all in for you.. No offense but 7k would be all in for me.. Kansas is the safe play, but I like the Heels in a rout Look out.We got a badass here.
|
carysturtz | 9 |
|
|
There would be a lot more money won on this site if people stopped posting redundant, pointless rebuttals.
|
mikeyd065 | 18 |
|
|
Tough loss, Odds. But I meant what I said, you brought up some good points and I will be keeping an eye on your picks this tourney.
|
Crashdavis565 | 74 |
|
|
Oh and Quote Originally Posted by PokerProErik:
FAB MELO is OUT tomorrow. |
Crashdavis565 | 74 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by oddsbuster: Please don't take offense to any of my responses... 1.) This is without a doubt embedded into the head's of millions world wide (Including the betting market place). Surely you don't think Vegas would just hand over any portion of cash free of charge... 2.) Once again IMO you are completely following a guideline here that is also noted into the heads of millions... 3.) Please forgive me as I can assure you with 100% confidence the books are not kidding and yet they are 100% serious. If you like Syracuse that much taking them -4.5 is just one click away... 4.) Check that % closer to game time after public america awakes from a night of leisure and starts clicking the laying chalk button. It may not flip flop but I'd be willing to guess Syracuse will have no trouble reaching 45% or more at most sites. Also in the process watch the -4.5 most likely shrink before game time... Here's some things that I like to note on a game of this magnitude: Did you know that Syracuse is 8-2su & 7-3ats this season vs defenses that rank from 50-100 in the fg% allowed department. In that same category of opponents that rank from 1-50 the Orange are a perfect 7-0su but they have not gotten to that point without any trouble as they are actually money burning 2-5ats vs 1-50 ranked opponents in fg% allowed (Georgetown, Uconn x3, L-Ville x2 & USF). That's very interesting as Kansas State comes into this game ranked 45th nationally in the FG% allowed department. It should also be noted that of all those opponents played listed in the 1-50 rank of FG% allowed Kansas State has the highest ranked offense of any of them at 80th with 71.4ppg. Georgetown#147(68.4ppg), Uconn#139(68.7ppg), L-Ville#137(68.8ppg) & USF#325(59ppg) are all below that of Kansas States 71.4ppg. So you can call them mediocre but as far as conference SOS & RPI the B12 is right behind the Big East coming in at #3 in both categories. I'll take those points with Frank Martin coaching your so called "Mediocre team in a Mediocre conference" vs this over hyped Syracuse squad... Give me those +4.5 pts with confidence... Just saying, BOL!!! While I'm on Cuse, I must say that was great fucking post. Too many people just wanna rebuttal without reason or evidence. Post like this make people money. That said, I think you're overlooking the Melo/UNC-A factor. It's mentioned every time Cuse comes up, TV, radio, internet(excluding your post), everywhere. It seems everyone is calling for the 8-1 upset, everyone feels this should be closer to pick 'em. I see the majority of tomorrow morning's wagers on K-state. That doesn't mean they won't cover, it very well could be a close game, where 5 points would be crucial. My money will be on Cuse ML. The talent disparity between the two can't be disputed. On a neutral court I feel confident the one-seeded Cuse will advance to the second weekend.
|
Crashdavis565 | 74 |
|
|
I have been employing this strategy all week, and was absolutely on fire. Then I ran into Idaho and Fullerton yesterday, and lost the week's winnings on two bets. It's a dangerous game, friendo. That being said, I was trying to decide between UCSB and Nevada ML for a wager very similar to yours.
|
MikeMed | 7 |
|
|
Thanks, Newport.
Watching the Minn/Nwestern game yesterday, I thought how it'd be a good idea to bet the over on the winner vs Mich. I had totally forgotten about it until I saw this post. Followed you and won, albeit luckily. Thanks, and nice call on Baylor. Wish I tailed you there.
|
NEWPORT | 25 |
|
|
What are you on your period or something?
|
HOFCity | 6 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.