coversn00b

Prospect

Posts: 174

Member Since: May 2017

Status: Offline

About me:

Signature:

Filter Posts by:

Entries	Thread Author	Posts	Activity
created a topic Hyeong Chung in Tennis =_^ gonna give it a go at a small line View Post \| View Thread	coversn00b	1	August 10, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
created a topic Alex z vs Kev A in Tennis Where do you think the value is here? Over? -2 1/2 games? View Post \| View Thread	coversn00b	1	August 06, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
created a topic Thiem -135 in Tennis Thiem should want this win because of this head to head alone being so lopsided, Kevin is past his prime although he's climbed back up in the rankings there have been inconsistencies. I believe Thiem will outhit him in plain out winners with a higher 1 serve percentage. huge value here. 10 units BOL View Post \| View Thread	coversn00b	1	August 03, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Delbonis + Mayer in Tennis Bol! everyone is fresh this week so hope they weren't hiding injuries or lost form! View Post \| View Thread	coversn00b	4	July 16, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Delbonis + Mayer in Tennis Add stefano napolitano View Post \| View Thread	coversn00b	4	July 16, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Delbonis + Mayer in Tennis Add Fernando Verdasco View Post \| View Thread	coversn00b	4	July 16, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
created a topic Delbonis + Mayer in Tennis Parlay View Post \| View Thread	coversn00b	4	July 16, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Roger Fed (large wager) in Tennis I agree. I'm not totally perfect but 75%hit rate in any sport although I like chalk is good, if you know when to pull the trigger. I made 2k from the over ao nadal and fed, 1k from nadal RG, and now 1k from Fed on Wimbledon. All of those were killer bets. The over was great for nadal, and fed, nadal demolished in his final, and fed comfortably won the first set with a still healthy cilic. I usually make my diff plays on parlays like delbonis+Mayer who are playing soon, usually three teamers or four give me decent odds. And I hit often. But I'm careful to remember this is excess money, not like I've seen others that are devastated when they lose. View Post \| View Thread	coversn00b	19	July 16, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Roger Fed (large wager) in Tennis spot on analysis pre-injury regardless. You're covering thanks to an injury and pride of him not retiring because otherwise he would have when he broke down in tears and said he would play on. You got lucky it's a final View Post \| View Thread	coversn00b	19	July 16, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Roger Fed (large wager) in Tennis I took the line before it hit three. Keep hating, you make me relevant. everything I posted was true. And the best money is the surest, I won while cilic was hurt in the last set. He actually had a chance to break fed and was playing at a high level, but I bet on Feds abilities, not his. So thanks for coming into my thread once again. 18/20. Two losses. That's a 90% hit rate. Have a good one! View Post \| View Thread	coversn00b	19	July 16, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Roger Fed (large wager) in Tennis He's crying. He had a mini panic attack. Those can be helpful if he isn't physically hurt I just don't see him losing. Like I posted, roger is 85-3 after the first set in Wimbledon. He's clinical as a front runner View Post \| View Thread	coversn00b	19	July 16, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Roger Fed (large wager) in Tennis well it said darn, but i wrote f*** yourself :). Game set and match for me. 2.8 to make 1k, graded winner. Good luck to the rest of you, and the ones smart enough to follow. View Post \| View Thread	coversn00b	19	July 16, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Roger Fed (large wager) in Tennis I have almost three thousand riding on this, go fuck yourself if you don't have anything to add. View Post \| View Thread	coversn00b	19	July 16, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Roger Fed (large wager) in Tennis Packers, private message him. My thread is about my bet. Unless you're going to hate on it further go flame out somewhere else. View Post \| View Thread	coversn00b	19	July 16, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Roger Fed (large wager) in Tennis Quote Originally Posted by PlowTheBook: Wagering on heavy favorites in the high 200's and beyond is just foolish. To me It's not "sharp" betting. Anyone can have an off day and there's no way I be wagering something like 900/300 on Fed tomorrow. I don't disagree, but gambling inherently carries a risk - you just skew the ratio. It might make sense to bet the house on a small -125 favorite and you lose anyway betting x amount of money, the same may be true of a large bet, but what matters is who gets paid out. Having said that, and having read Rogers stats in first sets in finals and Wimbledon esp, I'll happily lose my wager today. I'm +4400 roughly for a month now, took a hit from two wagers... I'll happily lose 2000 and try and make it back, if I didn't, I don't know why the fuck I would be wagering as a hobby. BOL either way! bombs away :) View Post \| View Thread	coversn00b	19	July 16, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Roger Fed (large wager) in Tennis Quote Originally Posted by WOLFofBELFORT: I'd listen to packersbackers everyone. He has a lot of losing experience. He's the clown that put 80% of his bankroll on a player like Laura Robson to win a match Then he ran away for a couple of years because he ran out of money and "hated" gambling. Now he's back A true clown.... Gives my reasoning some backing, so he isn't all the shit he talks himself up to be. I really don't care, I just can't stand someone pretending to be someone their not. And Laura R? Lmfao. Okay, well, that is just idk. no comment. Sorry he lost his bankroll tho, I don't care for bs but I hate to see people lose money even if I don't like them. But I'm surprised he bet so much on such a mediocre wta player when I've seen his hit rate be better with the atp tour. Yikes. View Post \| View Thread	coversn00b	19	July 16, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Roger Fed (large wager) in Tennis Line with my book with -285 for first set for those doing numbers, I wouldn't take the line anything higher than -340. It's been steadily rising as sharp bettors have been catching on. View Post \| View Thread	coversn00b	19	July 15, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Tenni$ @ction ($@t) 7/15!! in Tennis Ram should win View Post \| View Thread	finsterbaby	24	July 15, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
created a topic Roger Fed (large wager) in Tennis First set. His game is predicated on being a front runner, he's 85-3 when winning the first set at Wimbledon, and I don't believe even if it has to go there roger would want this to go to 5, which with 25+ aces cilic jus threw at avg 123 mph is nasty. I think roger will take the first set and if he doesn't I would fade cilic depending on how the second set goes. I'd give this wager a 9/10. I hope I don't lose this since I have every hater and their mother writing for them on here. View Post \| View Thread	coversn00b	19	July 15, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Venus And garbine in Tennis I'm not really worried what you believe. Lmao. I think the intelligent people picked up on the planet joke and I wasn't picking anyone. I haven't really made a single straight wager out of 19 that I've posted on here on women. sorry haters. Back to the cray cray cynicism drawing board. View Post \| View Thread	coversn00b	16	July 15, 2017 View Post \| View Thread

About Us

Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials

Betting Guides

Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming

Sports Betting

US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps

Contests

Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools

The Covers community has

618,670

lifetime members worldwide

Join our community today

Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.

Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service

Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.

Entries	Thread Author	Posts	Activity
created a topic Hyeong Chung in Tennis =_^ gonna give it a go at a small line View Post \| View Thread	coversn00b	1	August 10, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
created a topic Alex z vs Kev A in Tennis Where do you think the value is here? Over? -2 1/2 games? View Post \| View Thread	coversn00b	1	August 06, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
created a topic Thiem -135 in Tennis Thiem should want this win because of this head to head alone being so lopsided, Kevin is past his prime although he's climbed back up in the rankings there have been inconsistencies. I believe Thiem will outhit him in plain out winners with a higher 1 serve percentage. huge value here. 10 units BOL View Post \| View Thread	coversn00b	1	August 03, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Delbonis + Mayer in Tennis Bol! everyone is fresh this week so hope they weren't hiding injuries or lost form! View Post \| View Thread	coversn00b	4	July 16, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Delbonis + Mayer in Tennis Add stefano napolitano View Post \| View Thread	coversn00b	4	July 16, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Delbonis + Mayer in Tennis Add Fernando Verdasco View Post \| View Thread	coversn00b	4	July 16, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
created a topic Delbonis + Mayer in Tennis Parlay View Post \| View Thread	coversn00b	4	July 16, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Roger Fed (large wager) in Tennis I agree. I'm not totally perfect but 75%hit rate in any sport although I like chalk is good, if you know when to pull the trigger. I made 2k from the over ao nadal and fed, 1k from nadal RG, and now 1k from Fed on Wimbledon. All of those were killer bets. The over was great for nadal, and fed, nadal demolished in his final, and fed comfortably won the first set with a still healthy cilic. I usually make my diff plays on parlays like delbonis+Mayer who are playing soon, usually three teamers or four give me decent odds. And I hit often. But I'm careful to remember this is excess money, not like I've seen others that are devastated when they lose. View Post \| View Thread	coversn00b	19	July 16, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Roger Fed (large wager) in Tennis spot on analysis pre-injury regardless. You're covering thanks to an injury and pride of him not retiring because otherwise he would have when he broke down in tears and said he would play on. You got lucky it's a final View Post \| View Thread	coversn00b	19	July 16, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Roger Fed (large wager) in Tennis I took the line before it hit three. Keep hating, you make me relevant. everything I posted was true. And the best money is the surest, I won while cilic was hurt in the last set. He actually had a chance to break fed and was playing at a high level, but I bet on Feds abilities, not his. So thanks for coming into my thread once again. 18/20. Two losses. That's a 90% hit rate. Have a good one! View Post \| View Thread	coversn00b	19	July 16, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Roger Fed (large wager) in Tennis He's crying. He had a mini panic attack. Those can be helpful if he isn't physically hurt I just don't see him losing. Like I posted, roger is 85-3 after the first set in Wimbledon. He's clinical as a front runner View Post \| View Thread	coversn00b	19	July 16, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Roger Fed (large wager) in Tennis well it said darn, but i wrote f*** yourself :). Game set and match for me. 2.8 to make 1k, graded winner. Good luck to the rest of you, and the ones smart enough to follow. View Post \| View Thread	coversn00b	19	July 16, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Roger Fed (large wager) in Tennis I have almost three thousand riding on this, go fuck yourself if you don't have anything to add. View Post \| View Thread	coversn00b	19	July 16, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Roger Fed (large wager) in Tennis Packers, private message him. My thread is about my bet. Unless you're going to hate on it further go flame out somewhere else. View Post \| View Thread	coversn00b	19	July 16, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Roger Fed (large wager) in Tennis Quote Originally Posted by PlowTheBook: Wagering on heavy favorites in the high 200's and beyond is just foolish. To me It's not "sharp" betting. Anyone can have an off day and there's no way I be wagering something like 900/300 on Fed tomorrow. I don't disagree, but gambling inherently carries a risk - you just skew the ratio. It might make sense to bet the house on a small -125 favorite and you lose anyway betting x amount of money, the same may be true of a large bet, but what matters is who gets paid out. Having said that, and having read Rogers stats in first sets in finals and Wimbledon esp, I'll happily lose my wager today. I'm +4400 roughly for a month now, took a hit from two wagers... I'll happily lose 2000 and try and make it back, if I didn't, I don't know why the fuck I would be wagering as a hobby. BOL either way! bombs away :) View Post \| View Thread	coversn00b	19	July 16, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Roger Fed (large wager) in Tennis Quote Originally Posted by WOLFofBELFORT: I'd listen to packersbackers everyone. He has a lot of losing experience. He's the clown that put 80% of his bankroll on a player like Laura Robson to win a match Then he ran away for a couple of years because he ran out of money and "hated" gambling. Now he's back A true clown.... Gives my reasoning some backing, so he isn't all the shit he talks himself up to be. I really don't care, I just can't stand someone pretending to be someone their not. And Laura R? Lmfao. Okay, well, that is just idk. no comment. Sorry he lost his bankroll tho, I don't care for bs but I hate to see people lose money even if I don't like them. But I'm surprised he bet so much on such a mediocre wta player when I've seen his hit rate be better with the atp tour. Yikes. View Post \| View Thread	coversn00b	19	July 16, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Roger Fed (large wager) in Tennis Line with my book with -285 for first set for those doing numbers, I wouldn't take the line anything higher than -340. It's been steadily rising as sharp bettors have been catching on. View Post \| View Thread	coversn00b	19	July 15, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Tenni$ @ction ($@t) 7/15!! in Tennis Ram should win View Post \| View Thread	finsterbaby	24	July 15, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
created a topic Roger Fed (large wager) in Tennis First set. His game is predicated on being a front runner, he's 85-3 when winning the first set at Wimbledon, and I don't believe even if it has to go there roger would want this to go to 5, which with 25+ aces cilic jus threw at avg 123 mph is nasty. I think roger will take the first set and if he doesn't I would fade cilic depending on how the second set goes. I'd give this wager a 9/10. I hope I don't lose this since I have every hater and their mother writing for them on here. View Post \| View Thread	coversn00b	19	July 15, 2017 View Post \| View Thread
replied to Venus And garbine in Tennis I'm not really worried what you believe. Lmao. I think the intelligent people picked up on the planet joke and I wasn't picking anyone. I haven't really made a single straight wager out of 19 that I've posted on here on women. sorry haters. Back to the cray cray cynicism drawing board. View Post \| View Thread	coversn00b	16	July 15, 2017 View Post \| View Thread

coversn00b Follow Follow Unfollow

coversn00b